Escort Reports

[StymieChula]

Not trying to be that guy, but out of sheer curiosity I've read through some of the indictment that FDLE wrote to nab Jada / Rachel and her babydaddy on the RICO charges because I'm a paranoid nerd. During their investigation they did identify and question some mongers who dated her while her phone was being tapped. I Read it as if they were going to use them as witnesses at trial too. I would imagine there is a lot of threats going on behind the scenes if they don't cooperate, too.

Little Annie will sell her own mother to save her ass. If you had any visits with her and spoke of anything to hang yourself and it benefits her to take you down she will.

I am sure they don't have to squeez her to hard to get her to turn on her lawyer friend if she didn't already cause you know that's what this is all about.

[UrinalPube]

I would highly rethink picking her up or being around her. A warrant was just issued for her by BCSO a few days ago. Don't want to get busted for harboring.

Damn. Thanks for the heads-up. Was going to try to meet up with her soon. Bummer, she's one of my go-tos. Maybe I'll have to give Honey another go. Anyone know if she's got anything pending? LOL.

[UrinalPube]

Any chance you have a link to an article that discusses the "2 mongers in Orlando"? I'm hardpressed to think LE would go after mongers based on nothing other than what is in the phone of a provider, text messages alone seems likely awfully lean evidence to arrest or convict someone, just too many holes for a half decent defense attorney to exploit at trial. Specific to my discussion with Kimmy, or any provider, I'm using a burner phone and it couldn't be traced to me anyway. Just to be clear, I'm not looking to start an argument, I'm just curious about the "2 mongers" you're talking about.

Not trying to be that guy, but out of sheer curiosity I've read through some of the indictment that FDLE wrote to nab Jada / Rachel and her babydaddy on the RICO charges because I'm a paranoid nerd. During their investigation they did identify and question some mongers who dated her while her phone was being tapped. I Read it as if they were going to use them as witnesses at trial too. I would imagine there is a lot of threats going on behind the scenes if they don't cooperate, too.

[TheLibertarian]

Having read all the recent reports, I would like to off, for what it's worth, my reflection. We are on this site for various reasons, but, I suppose, ultimately, we want to have fun and enjoy ourselves. When service is bad or non existent, as in no show or "crickets", that should be reported to advise other mongers and perhaps even give a "wake-up call" to the provider. When service is good, that, too, should be reported to encourage the provider and to let other mongers that a good time was had by all. However, nit-picking and derogatory comments due to personal issues, have no place in this forum. This is not the place for people to grind their own axe on their own issues. Whether a provider is big or small, short or tall, fat or thin, has a gut or is just skin on bone is really a matter for each individual monger. We all have our own preferences and that is why this site is important to us. It helps inform our decisions as to how we will find enjoyment. Other sites out there include images of providers, although sometimes they are not accurate, these help inform our decisions too. I have seen a lot of comments lately that seem to be based on personal bias and disagreements with providers. I don't believe that this site is the appropriate venue to deal with personal issues. I just felt the need to express myself on these issues, thanks for hearing me.

Very well put. At the same time, we should put down things they may be negatives to others, but possibly in a way that doesn't sound like we are ripping them. These are beautiful ladies that make us happy.

Feet are an example. While not a big deal for me, extremely important to others. Instead of saying she has nasty feet, describe in more detail. Say that she did not put new nail Polish on and her feet were rough, as if she did not use lotion on them. If feet were important, then you would not call. This would allow someone the choice, and prevent a bad experience. So IMHO, it's not bad to put down negatives, just use fact. Don't make it sound like you are just bitching.

[JayJayTwo]

I don't believe she is LE but whennshe gets busted her phone is evidence and the explicit language is all the evidence needed. 2 mongers in Orlando just fell victim to this. Enough of a reason to stay away. Or get her to change her style.

Any chance you have a link to an article that discusses the "2 mongers in Orlando"? I'm hardpressed to think LE would go after mongers based on nothing other than what is in the phone of a provider, text messages alone seems likely awfully lean evidence to arrest or convict someone, just too many holes for a half decent defense attorney to exploit at trial. Specific to my discussion with Kimmy, or any provider, I'm using a burner phone and it couldn't be traced to me anyway. Just to be clear, I'm not looking to start an argument, I'm just curious about the "2 mongers" you're talking about.

[Tattoedbadboy]

I don't disagree, but it didn't concern me with Kimmy. In our discussions, she mentioned GFE, greek, BB and one or two other such activities. Here, I wasn't worried about it as she's been reviewed enough times where I was comfortable that she's a legit provider and not LE. One of the many reasons I use this forum regularly!

I don't believe she is LE but whennshe gets busted her phone is evidence and the explicit language is all the evidence needed. 2 mongers in Orlando just fell victim to this. Enough of a reason to stay away. Or get her to change her style.

[JayJayTwo]

Kimmy is very explicit in her texts she sends. She really needs to wipe her phone conversations and watch her language when she texts new friends. She is to forward and to many red flags.

I don't disagree, but it didn't concern me with Kimmy. In our discussions, she mentioned GFE, greek, BB and one or two other such activities. Here, I wasn't worried about it as she's been reviewed enough times where I was comfortable that she's a legit provider and not LE. One of the many reasons I use this forum regularly!

[MalteseFalcone]

Having read all the recent reports, I would like to off, for what it's worth, my reflection. We are on this site for various reasons, but, I suppose, ultimately, we want to have fun and enjoy ourselves. When service is bad or non existent, as in no show or "crickets", that should be reported to advise other mongers and perhaps even give a "wake-up call" to the provider. When service is good, that, too, should be reported to encourage the provider and to let other mongers that a good time was had by all. However, nit-picking and derogatory comments due to personal issues, have no place in this forum. This is not the place for people to grind their own axe on their own issues. Whether a provider is big or small, short or tall, fat or thin, has a gut or is just skin on bone is really a matter for each individual monger. We all have our own preferences and that is why this site is important to us. It helps inform our decisions as to how we will find enjoyment. Other sites out there include images of providers, although sometimes they are not accurate, these help inform our decisions too. I have seen a lot of comments lately that seem to be based on personal bias and disagreements with providers. I don't believe that this site is the appropriate venue to deal with personal issues. I just felt the need to express myself on these issues, thanks for hearing me.

[DJMiles]

I have no idea whether she's pregnant. She did have a bit of a bump when I saw her about a month ago. But given that she offers BBFS to every monger, it's not a stretch to imagine it could be true. Hopefully there won't be any requests for paternity tests any time soon.

Kimmy is new to the scene, or at least here anyway. I liked her pictures and she had received several positive reviews so I thought I'd set up a meeting. It took a few attempts, nothing too bad, maybe got it coordinated on the third or fourth attempt. When I was able to set something up, it was just a few hours later in the same day. In advance of the agreed upon time, I headed in her general direction, sent her a text and got the address for her incall, a hotel on US1 at the north end of Cocoa. I arrived on time and another text or two had me at her room. Kimmy greeted me at the door with a silk robe hanging loosely and a lacey bra pushing up some really nice cleavage! She's definitely the girl in the pics, though they may be a little dated. She ushered me in and I was naked and in the bed within a minute or two, definitely ready to go! Kimmy joined me, though she kept the robe on initially, and started in on a really nice BBBJ, definitely had the blood flowing! Once she had me ready to go, on went the cover. We went through a couple positions and I finished in the bag. Some small talk while Kimmy helped me clean up and I was out the door.

A few things worth noting. I've never met Kimmy before so I don't know how she is when she's "normal" but, to me, she seemed a little spacey. Nothing egregious, she wasn't passing out or anything, but she just seemed a bit out of it. As has been mentioned at least once before, she's got a dog in the room. The dog was well behaved and not a problem. However, it's a pretty good sized dog and, if that's a issue, you need to keep it in mind. Lastly, once she took off the robe, I noticed her belly. I could be wrong, but I think she's pregnant. Not too far along, maybe a couple months, but she definitely had a gut and it appeared to me to be pregnancy, not fat or a belly from earlier pregnancies. While some guys may be turned on by that, I wasn't thrilled by it. By that time though, I was naked, in bed and with a full erection, kinda late to get up and leave!

Anybody know if I'm right about the pregnancy? I'm fine with the dog and I can deal with spacey, if that's how she normally is. If she is pregnant, I'd probably wait awhile before seeing her again.

http://space-coast.skipthegames.com/...r/455363604816

[Ryuut]

IF you look at her photos in the STG ad, you can see her gut in the full nude shot. She still looks great and I love the dark nips.

Could def be a post premiers baby bump, that happens. I would never call that a gut, indicating a fupa of sorts. I'm checking her out soon so I'll see first hand and report.

[RedNose1]

No offense meant, but I don't know how you could not "see or notice" that she had a bit of a gut. You didn't mention in your review, did she remove all of her clothing? As I mentioned in my review, she kept her robe on until it was all but required to come off and I was left with the impression that the action was intentional. While terms like "spinner" and "BBW" may be a bit subjective, hard to miss the gut. Again, I don't want to overstate it, she is certainly NOT fat, BBW or whatever, she just had a small, but noticeable, gut. I'd love to hear feedback from anyone else that has seen Kimmy recently. Who knows, maybe she was celebrating Thanksgiving in September and over-indulged! Any other mongers visit with her recently and have any input on this one?

IF you look at her photos in the STG ad, you can see her gut in the full nude shot. She still looks great and I love the dark nips.

[JayJayTwo]

A few things worth noting. I've never met Kimmy before so I don't know how she is when she's "normal" but, to me, she seemed a little spacey. Nothing egregious, she wasn't passing out or anything, but she just seemed a bit out of it. As has been mentioned at least once before, she's got a dog in the room. The dog was well behaved and not a problem. However, it's a pretty good sized dog and, if that's a issue, you need to keep it in mind. Lastly, once she took off the robe, I noticed her belly. I could be wrong, but I think she's pregnant. Not too far along, maybe a couple months, but she definitely had a gut and it appeared to me to be pregnancy, not fat or a belly from earlier pregnancies. While some guys may be turned on by that, I wasn't thrilled by it. By that time though, I was naked, in bed and with a full erection, kinda late to get up and leave!

Anybody know if I'm right about the pregnancy? I'm fine with the dog and I can deal with spacey, if that's how she normally is. If she is pregnant, I'd probably wait awhile before seeing her again.

http://space-coast.skipthegames.com/...r/455363604816

Recently had the joy of meeting up with kimmy. She does look like her pictures but I don't think they fully do her justice. I only went for the qv but left very satisfied. She never mentioned time nor tried to rush me. As for the other report of her being prego or having a gut, I didn't really see or notice. I didn't think she was pregnant.

No offense meant, but I don't know how you could not "see or notice" that she had a bit of a gut. You didn't mention in your review, did she remove all of her clothing? As I mentioned in my review, she kept her robe on until it was all but required to come off and I was left with the impression that the action was intentional. While terms like "spinner" and "BBW" may be a bit subjective, hard to miss the gut. Again, I don't want to overstate it, she is certainly NOT fat, BBW or whatever, she just had a small, but noticeable, gut. I'd love to hear feedback from anyone else that has seen Kimmy recently. Who knows, maybe she was celebrating Thanksgiving in September and over-indulged! Any other mongers visit with her recently and have any input on this one?

[Tattoedbadboy]

Kimmy is very explicit in her texts she sends. She really needs to wipe her phone conversations and watch her language when she texts new friends. She is to forward and to many red flags.

[Shelbygt5]

Recently had the joy of meeting up with kimmy. She does look like her pictures but I don't think they fully do her justice. I only went for the qv but left very satisfied. She never mentioned time nor tried to rush me. As for the other report of her being prego or having a gut, I didn't really see or notice. I didn't think she was pregnant. As got the dog, she is very friendly and laid on the couch the whole time. I feel kimmy was well worth the donation and pleasant to be around. I will agree tho she seemed a little out of it, not dozing off or incoherent but just a bit delayed, may have been first date jitters. Over all I will repeat she is a Jem in brevard. As all ways YMMV.

http://cocoa-beach.skipthegames.com/...r/866275171589

[TheLibertarian]

Has anyone seen Jewels with the 999-number recently?

Messages were short and sweet, but always prompt. She will not discuss anything but price in texts. I made the mistake of asking her if greek was included in the hour, and it went silent. I used a different number to contact her.

I set up a QV, since this was the first time seeing her. The hour price of $. 7 for an hour told me something was up. I saw the 37 age and decided to bite.

Communication was easy and prompt. The address is a home. I show up a few minutes late because I had a hard time seeing the house numbers. I show up and its a nice clean house, she is in limited clothing. She is thin, and=but not sickly. She ks no where near the 37 she advertises, If I had to guess, I would say at least in her 50's. While I would not hot on her in a bar, she was not what I would classify as unattractive, just not my type.

We get undressed and she starts a pretty good head game, she puts her business right next to my face, but nit close enough to suggest she was wanting me to take a taste. We then get on to fiull service. She lets me know we have to hurry because I was late. She also mentioned she hated to rush, and felt she was sincere.

I saw no warning signs. She provided a good service and was very professional. I probably won't repeat, only because not my type. May use her for a back up though. If you like mature woman that are willing to please, you will really like her.