Thread: Stupid Shit in NoVa
+
Add Report
Results 451 to 465 of 640
-
08-19-20 11:00 #190Administrator

Posts: 5119I still don't believe it
Chicks can feel immediately when a guy isn't wearing a condom. Like right away. If it was a deal he would have spoken of her struggling, he didn't, he characterized it as something he "got away with" until it was over. That's not how it works. So no, I still don't believe it actually happened. I still believe it was a bullshit story that was made up to get the sewing circles panties in a bunch.
Originally Posted by Mdubya
[View Original Post]
However: Stealthing is considered sexual assault in Virginia, if it actually happened she has options.
Generally I remove the post, put a note on the account to review the posts closely in the future. We used to ban accounts but that doesn't really do anything because they just start a new one. What works is when they don't get a payoff for the behavior. Sometimes the mods miss things, we wish it didn't happen but it does, that's why there is a report post button. Just use it, I remove the post, he doesn't get any attention and he finds some political forum where the trolling is better. This is in no way me saying that stealthing is ok, the forum's position on it has been consistent for years. We are all about mutual consent and always have been. I'm not saying stealthing is ok, I'm saying the story was bullshit.
Originally Posted by SlowBlo
[View Original Post]
I'm moving all this follow up to the stupid shit thread.
-
08-19-20 01:05 #189Senior Member

Posts: 380Personal Observation
From what I've seen, the support for sex workers is sort of spread out when it comes to the left, spreading from moderate to uber-liberal. There are those that are moderate liberals and who consider themselves feminists who believe that decriminalization or legalization for sex workers is the best option. Either way, their general tone seems to be that of general acceptance.
However, it seems like it's the uber-liberals, the type that loves to blame everything on everyone and how every bad thing is a result of either capitalism or straight white male hegemony, that believes that ALL sex workers are "victims. " Best example of this is when the deputy police chief of Seattle PD was addressing the Seattle City Council, which are socialist uber-liberal morons, and they couldn't believe that he said that women chose to be sex workers. One of their responses was that he was mansplaining prostitution, even though he's just quoting sex workers and speaking on what he's seen from talking with sex workers. Apparently, to uber-liberals, prostitution is a result of *gasp* capitalism and straight white male hegemony.
https://mynorthwest.com/1541126/seat...c-garth-green/
Honestly, you'll even find moderate conservatives who will support decriminalization and / or legalization. Hell, alt-right pastors are constantly getting busted for fucking prostitutes so even they secretly would support it too.
-
08-18-20 17:51 #188Senior Member

Posts: 203No
She's a crapshoot girl so her calls are handled by her handler. I'm sure her handler has it. But I'm sure he wasn't dumb enough to use his real phone number.
Originally Posted by SlowBlo
[View Original Post]
-
08-18-20 17:10 #187Senior Member

Posts: 560Number
Did she save his number or texts?
Originally Posted by Mdubya
[View Original Post]
-
08-18-20 17:06 #186Senior Member

Posts: 560Report post
If we report the post do you block him? Just wondering. Or do we get a girl to set him up and we all meet him some where LOL.
Originally Posted by Tomk2323
[View Original Post]
-
08-18-20 15:02 #185Senior Member

Posts: 203Confirmed
I confirmed with the girl he did this to. She said it was true. She said he was a young white male. She's very worried about her health now. She was actually mortified and went back home because of this incident. So all the hate he is getting is well deserved.
Originally Posted by Admin2
[View Original Post]
-
08-17-20 07:52 #184Senior Member

Posts: 269Take a trip to Germany
The redlight districts are in every city / town. Government sanctions mongering. You don't have to go looking for it. No wondering what's on the other side of the door (fat ugly chick or uncle LE) It's literally dancing in the windows for you to choose from. This is literally as LIBERAL as a country can get with this sort of thing. For some reason we've been conditioned to hate this.
Originally Posted by BunkerBuster
[View Original Post]
-
08-16-20 22:06 #183Senior Member

Posts: 281Doesn't work that way, though
I don't think that generalization is accurate as there as those that argue legalization and subsequent regulation would drastically decrease human trafficking. To say that, generally, conservatives are against legalization would be more accurate.
Originally Posted by BunkerBuster
[View Original Post]
-
08-16-20 21:09 #182Senior Member

Posts: 269Umm incorrect
Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris and others are all open to decriminalizing prostitution. Most of your far left are for decriminalization of things like this. It's your moderate Dems that try to meet Repulicans half way. Criminalization it has always been more of a Conservative talking point.
Originally Posted by BunkerBuster
[View Original Post]
-
08-16-20 18:30 #181Senior Member

Posts: 2686Doesn't work that way, though
The general liberal view is now that all prostitution is trafficking, and all women are victims.
Originally Posted by MadeYoulLook29
[View Original Post]
-
08-16-20 13:45 #180Senior Member

Posts: 269Actually
"Liberal" judges would be more open to legalizing things such as weed and prostitution. It's conservatives that want to keep things the same. When you think extremely liberal think Germany where prostitution is legal and weed usage. Maybe since we are all fellow mongers we should vote liberal seeing how its in our best interest. Dodging LE is annoying as hell.
Originally Posted by SlowBlo
[View Original Post]
-
08-16-20 12:23 #179Administrator

Posts: 5119Fyi
Use of the word liberal (or conservative) in a critical manner means it's got to be on the stupid shit thread. This post isn't so bad, not great either it wasn't the liberals that wrote, passed, and signed Fosta / Sesta, but it will kick off never ending commentary about the idiotic red / blue divide.
Originally Posted by SlowBlo
[View Original Post]
A2.
-
08-16-20 03:47 #178Senior Member

Posts: 560With respect, that's NOT why people are pissed at cops these days. I mean sure, people who get busted for soliciting won't think highly of cops--or enjoy their time around them. But there's a whole plethora of other (bigger) issues that people have with the profession lately. Though I won't dive into specifics right now as this really isn't the thread to discuss in length.
Originally Posted by SlowBlo
[View Original Post]
Bottom line: cops have always been on the lookout to bust providers & johns, that's nothing new. All you can do is keep your head on a swivel aaaaaaaannnnnnnd (https://youtu.be/uqo5RYOp4nQ).
-
08-15-20 17:07 #177Senior Member

Posts: 560Hotels
Good thoughts! I'm not worried about the Hotels as much as LEO and election year politicians. LEO can go on Listcrawler and see probably 20 or more women all advertising that they're in Springfield by the mall. They go to a Liberal Judge and get permission to setup stings and go after us or the women. I've seen it happen when I lived in Henrico county. LEO would contact the women and setup a date. Then ask the Hotel permission to go to the rooms to bust the women. A girl I was on my way to meet got busted that way. Luckily I was late. The Hotel actually gave LEO a key to all the rooms and they arrested all the women in the Motel that were working. Sounds illegal but the judges went along with it. They also went after the massage parlors. They sent in unmarried officers and after the HJ was done they would walk out and the police waiting outside would bust the place. In Henrico, the judges went along with it. Even if you fight it and get off, those of us who are married, are screwed. (no pun intended) That's what all the Defund Police and rioting is about. IMHO.
Originally Posted by Utwogood
[View Original Post]
-
08-12-20 08:20 #176Senior Member

Posts: 448I agree they are sex workers and get paid for having sex.
To me, hookers are professionals, know they are a hooker, quickly get down to business by defining a time place amount activities and length of visit. They treat it like a job that some may enjoy and some don't. They set boundaries to keep things professional and don't let emotional play a role. They have multiple partners, sometimes in the same day and must practice safe sex due to the number of sexual partners.
A true amateur SB doesn't want to admit to themselves that they are being paid for sex. They lie to themselves that they just have a rich boyfriend that treats them well. They like to be wined and dined and shown off. They treat a Sugar Relationahip much more like normal dating with boundaries and compensation. It a high risk high reward venture, but the rewards are significant. To have a true 9 out of 10 beautiful bartender spend an entire weekend with me at my home, maybe have 6 rounds of bareback sex for the price of a moderately priced escort can be had.
If your definition of a Hooker is a woman who accepts money for sex then yes they are Hookers. Most understand Hooker to be a more derogatory term and treat them as such.
Originally Posted by SlowBlo
[View Original Post]









Reply With Quote


