"Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?

**Brandon97** · 06-08-20 15:24

Originally Posted by ErkTheOne [View Original Post]

SA just published a blog post on their site a couple weeks ago talking all about the realities of the aftermath of the COVID issue, and throughout it talked specifically about video dating and such. I wouldn't hold your breath on expecting them to spring right back to weeding out the online only crowd anytime soon. Ultimately, what do they care if it's still generating them revenue.

So I'm trying to ease back into meeting girls off Seeking, it's been awhile. Almost every girl I message replies she's online only. The worst thing is they often lead you along for a while without telling you they are online only. I have even told several I would be open to platonic meetings but I insist on meeting to see what they would say. They almost all say they are open to meet eventually but I have to send them money and have an online arrangement for some time to begin with. There are so many girls on there doing this, and not giving up and logging on daily for weeks, that some guys must really be sending them money without meeting. This is amazing to me. Another question is why don't they put in their ad that they are online only so I don't waste my time messaging back and forth with them until I learn the truth. My membership actually expires this week and I have went the entire month without finding anyone to meet. That site is becoming a waste of time and money.

**JaJunk** · 06-08-20 10:03

Originally Posted by Hal1957 [View Original Post]

I think that's a new area in the app. I don't remember seeing anything regarding the text area of their profiles in previous versions. Now, you can't read the text, but they tell you to go to the computer if you want to read it.

I used to be able to see the text for what they were looking for and their interests. I looked at the comments in Google Play and W8 Tech Limited is saying it's because "due to their updated privacy policy, Google removed certain content from being populated in our app. " That sounds like bullshit to me, as I don't think that's how it works. Anyway, then they should offer the APK for direct download.

**FarFarAway** · 06-07-20 17:47

Originally Posted by ErkTheOne [View Original Post]

SA just published a blog post on their site a couple weeks ago talking all about the realities of the aftermath of the COVID issue, and throughout it talked specifically about video dating and such. I wouldn't hold your breath on expecting them to spring right back to weeding out the online only crowd anytime soon. Ultimately, what do they care if it's still generating them revenue.

I wouldn't be too hurried to report girls. Believe it or not, I think that this could lead to your profile eventually getting booted. I have heard some complain about that here. You're just making more work for them, after all. They're balancing the $ they can make vs. Their risk. Now, if a girl were a flat-out hooker, or underage, that's another thing. Those are the sorts of girls who can draw the attention of LE, and they really want to avoid that. At times I have taken a 'live and let live' attitude to these non-SBs on the site. I'd definitely lean toward more reporting of bad actors than not, but still, there's no reason to screw yourself over just b / c you're trying to police someone else's site. It is such a pain to get banned, you really have to redo your whole sugar life. I posted about this recently in the Los Angeles sugar thread.

**BamBam** · 06-07-20 13:48

I see a number of profiles that appear in my search results. Including name and profile picture. But when I click on them, I get the "Profile Not Available" message. I can find profiles like this that are still on the site going back for years. Does anyone have any idea what causes this?

Thanks!

BAM.

**BookerTNelson** · 06-07-20 11:45

Originally Posted by JustLonely [View Original Post]

I was wondering about privacy concerns if a untrustworthy person records the video on their end for blackmail purposes.

It'll happen. Don't use it, it's that simple.

**JustLonely** · 06-06-20 15:40

I was wondering about privacy concerns if a untrustworthy person records the video on their end for blackmail purposes.

**Hal1957** · 06-05-20 09:45

I think that's a new area in the app. I don't remember seeing anything regarding the text area of their profiles in previous versions. Now, you can't read the text, but they tell you to go to the computer if you want to read it.

Originally Posted by JaJunk [View Original Post]

Anyone else getting this on their phone app? Did I miss an update or what is going on with this? Why would SA limit this to only being able to see it through the computer?

**FeelGoodMd** · 06-05-20 09:37

Originally Posted by Dimples572 [View Original Post]

She wants 450 ppm and will not budge on her price. No kissing, no oral, no anal and everything covered. No thank you.

https://www.seeking.com/member/00d57...e-816134d311d5

Thanks for the warning! She's attractive and has a nice, tight body, but her expectations are ridiculous to the point of being obscene.

As long as she doesn't find a sucker out there, she'll change her tune soon enough. Otherwise (in my best Soup Nazi voice): No sugar for you!

**Dimples572** · 06-04-20 22:21

She wants 450 ppm and will not budge on her price. No kissing, no oral, no anal and everything covered. No thank you.

https://www.seeking.com/member/00d57...e-816134d311d5

**JaJunk** · 06-04-20 11:39

Anyone else getting this on their phone app? Did I miss an update or what is going on with this? Why would SA limit this to only being able to see it through the computer?

**BookerTNelson** · 06-04-20 07:46

Originally Posted by Just757 [View Original Post]

With covid seeming to be "going away" or forgot about altogether, I feel that now is the time to go heavy on reporting the scammers which are the girls who "claim" they are not willing to meet in person and expect online only.

I think Seeking was being lenient during the pandemic but now that things are opening up, they will not take that approach. Just my opinion and observation.

Unfortunately, I believe that online only is here to stay.

**ErkTheOne** · 06-04-20 00:26

SA just published a blog post on their site a couple weeks ago talking all about the realities of the aftermath of the COVID issue, and throughout it talked specifically about video dating and such. I wouldn't hold your breath on expecting them to spring right back to weeding out the online only crowd anytime soon. Ultimately, what do they care if it's still generating them revenue.

Originally Posted by Just757 [View Original Post]

With covid seeming to be "going away" or forgot about altogether, I feel that now is the time to go heavy on reporting the scammers which are the girls who "claim" they are not willing to meet in person and expect online only.

I think Seeking was being lenient during the pandemic but now that things are opening up, they will not take that approach. Just my opinion and observation.

**Just757** · 06-03-20 21:43

With covid seeming to be "going away" or forgot about altogether, I feel that now is the time to go heavy on reporting the scammers which are the girls who "claim" they are not willing to meet in person and expect online only.

I think Seeking was being lenient during the pandemic but now that things are opening up, they will not take that approach. Just my opinion and observation.

**DickLongwood** · 06-03-20 12:54

Originally Posted by RavensFan2012 [View Original Post]

Yes she is LOL. The lamest attempt at a scam I have ever encountered. She just wanted me to pay her $9 Netflix bill and I could have my way with her. Even went so far as to set a date and time and gave me an address. I said great just send me a short vid of you saying my name and I'll send it over. Crickets.

Now is listed in D. C.