Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 5,356 to 5,370 of 5988
-
05-05-20 04:05 #633Senior Member

Posts: 51As Boner said, could be she needs more money, she did mention its been real slow because of rona, but at the same time I didn't get the vibe she was desperate for the money either, pretty care free attitude imo. Maybe bookers were getting pressured a lot and think it would be good for biz?
I even tried in the beginning, when she was putting the cover on and I said why? But my conversation with her (all in Korean) she was saying no way. She also went on about a client who got blacklisted for trying to be slick and trying to pull a fast one on her by slipping the cover off while distracting her. She was pretty adamant about not being a "no condom girl" . LOL.
Man some of the stories these girls tell me about clients crack me up.
Dmg was $$60 for the hr, but they up sell for 2 pops for another 40.
Originally Posted by SlickAzn5
[View Original Post]
-
05-04-20 22:02 #632Senior Member

Posts: 273Sorry, which booker is this in OC? Not seeing Leah on the LA site.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
05-04-20 19:56 #631Senior Member

Posts: 3570Leah
I guess she needs more money now or somebody convinced her to upsell. It happens. Leah has an amazing non-fat spinner body. I held her small waist like I was masturbating with a flesh light. Great time. I never choose extra option with any girl. The other reviewer was legit and correct that she would not be easy BB before the upsell.
Text booker for BBFS price if anyone is interested.
Originally Posted by SlickAzn5
[View Original Post]
-
05-04-20 19:46 #630Senior Member

Posts: 38Even Booker said BBFS
If this is the same Leah we are talking about (one of lovelykgirls in Anaheim), that is weird.
I didn't take it up at the time but even the booker told me she's BBFS.
Originally Posted by SlickAzn5
[View Original Post]
-
05-04-20 18:37 #629Senior Member

Posts: 30They adveritsed Leah as BBFS, what happened? Can you provide dmg / more deets?
Originally Posted by MisterBox
[View Original Post]
-
05-02-20 22:20 #628Senior Member

Posts: 7236They want contact info for free and don't want to do the dirty work!
Originally Posted by Cancnb
[View Original Post]
-
05-02-20 15:47 #627Senior Member

Posts: 29Tip on contact info
A tip that has worked for me over the years.
Go to TER and if the girl you want to see has a review, a lot of times the review will have the web address, phone number which can lead to the other girls offered by same agency.
At least that can get you talking to the booker.
-
05-01-20 22:59 #626Senior Member

Posts: 51Same as Top Girls I'm assuming as I saw Leah yesterday. Only difference is the LA girls as they have Kei and Ravi. Not Sohee.
Originally Posted by MangoMuncher
[View Original Post]
Pain in the ass to get to the room, elevator busted, had to go all the way around to the other side.
But as far as review goes, Leah is definitely a pleaser.
Slim and small, super clean and decent looks.
Great kisser, not much English, and performance was excellent.
Performance 9.
Looks 7. 5.
Strictly no BBFS.
Would repeat.
-
05-01-20 22:25 #625Senior Member

Posts: 51Same as Top Girls I'm assuming as I saw Leah yesterday. Only difference is the LA girls as they have Kei and Ravi. Not Sohee.
Originally Posted by MangoMuncher
[View Original Post]
Pain in the ass to get to the room, elevator busted, had to go all the way around to the other side.
But as far as review goes, Leah is definitely a pleaser.
Slim and small, super clean and decent looks.
Great kisser, not much English, and performance was excellent.
Performance 9.
Looks 7. 5.
Strictly no BBFS.
Would repeat.
-
05-01-20 22:21 #624Regular Member

Posts: 12Answering my own question I did end up seeing Choco that day.
Originally Posted by RandomString30
[View Original Post]
I vaguely recall someones review of her being kinda harsh IMO. She wasn't drop dead gorgeous like her pictures make her out to be, but I thought her pictures were representative, I recognized her face by her pics so it wasn't like some of the kgirls where the pictures are so exaggerated you have to study them to be sure. She had a little extra weight around her belly but she wasn't fat or unfit. Overall had an enjoyable time, casual kinda feel to it.
-
05-01-20 20:03 #623Banned Member

Posts: 1333I got the same message. I recall seeing Velvet and she is not that attractive in person and she is hard NO on BBFS.
Originally Posted by Jmrz4
[View Original Post]
-
05-01-20 15:29 #622Senior Member

Posts: 67Princess Garden back in business
Just got a text from the booker. She said they're back and running. She recommended Grace who offers BBFS. Might give her a shot and will report back if I do. Enjoy!
-
05-01-20 13:46 #621Regular Member

Posts: 6Also interested to know
Would also really appreciate the number of this agency too. Looks like there's some promising talent.
Originally Posted by Mintzpo
[View Original Post]
-
04-30-20 20:50 #620Senior Member

Posts: 273Sohee at Kakao
Hi guys,
Could someone DM the below bookers number? Also, has anyone tried Sohee? Looking to book with her next week. I always return the favor.
https://www.kakao-girls.com/
TIA!
-
04-28-20 10:54 #619Senior Member

Posts: 778Anyone in this hobby should realize that most pics are fake and that if they look TGTBT, esp. If they look like a hot model, then it's a 99.9% chance that the pics are fake. Doing google image searches take a few seconds to check. Choco's pics were pretty obvious that they were fake: https://www.instagram.com/helenwoooo/?hl=en.
Originally Posted by KGirlAddict
[View Original Post]
I don't trust other hobbyist's reviews either, as many will claim that the pics are "representative" or maybe a little old or she's "put on a few pounds". These are claims even if the pics are clearly of some Asian model found on a google image search.








Reply With Quote



