Thread: News and Media Reports
+
Add Report
Results 481 to 495 of 930
-
12-08-20 08:33 #450Senior Member

Posts: 502This is very true
I've had to check I'd several times. One girl I met turned 18 3 days prior to us meeting. I had an Asian girl so hot, but I wasn't sure about her age. I asked for I'd and she couldn't provide any and had lame excuses. I took her home and not the hotel. Got to be smart. The website should make females provide proof of age before joining. Always remember it's not worth the trouble. Think what the big head.
Originally Posted by FogHorn1
[View Original Post]
-
12-04-20 12:01 #449Senior Member

Posts: 618Be Careful
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ia-Conway.html
This is a couple weeks old now and some might know about it, but for those that don't pay attention to those "18-19" y / o who may not be legal. This guy was a scumbag of course, but the point is some of the younger ones on the site are actually under the legal limit.
-
08-24-20 21:14 #448Senior Member

Posts: 1481Probably a silly question but
If Kraft wins and survives the appeals in the state Supreme Court, will the other defendants cases automatically receive the same consideration? Or do they need to pursue the same legal avenues each separately? Also, what about the poor saps that plead out or no contest?
Originally Posted by RockSwithSalt
[View Original Post]
-
08-19-20 16:58 #447Senior Member

Posts: 143One small victory
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — A Florida appeals court ruled Wednesday that police violated the rights of New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft and others when they secretly video recorded them paying for massage parlor sex acts, barring the tapes' use at trial and dealing a potentially deadly blow to their prosecution.
The state 4th District Court of Appeal ruled Kraft's rights were violated under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
"The type of law enforcement surveillance utilized in these cases is extreme. While there will be situations which may warrant the use of the techniques at issue, the strict Fourth Amendment safeguards developed over the past few decades must be observed," the judges ruled.
"To permit otherwise would yield unbridled discretion to agents of law enforcement and the government, the antithesis of the constitutional liberty of people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures," the court added.
Prosecutors will likely appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court, but if it stands the misdemeanor charges brought against Kraft and other customers would have to be dropped for lack of evidence.
-
02-06-20 14:53 #446Senior Member

Posts: 1983Thanks for the article but, unfortunately, no new info there.
It's a long recital of things that have been discussed many times in the forum. Namely, that politicians and LE and organizations like Polaris Project have labeled pretty much everything as "trafficking" because it serves their various agendas. It points out that AMPs are easy targets and are disproportionately affected. I'm sure the author felt better after writing it but it doesn't change anything and doesn't really add much to the discussion. I was reading it in hopes of something new or interesting, but it wasn't there.
Originally Posted by Shinshi86
[View Original Post]
-
02-05-20 21:38 #445Senior Member

Posts: 560Very long, but interesting, article
https://reason.com/2020/02/02/massage-parlor-panic/
I posted this in the Baltimore forum, but I figured it's worth sharing here as well.
-
12-20-19 02:07 #444Senior Member

Posts: 560Their stupidity is our gain
Hopefully, it'll remain that way indefinitely.
Originally Posted by SlowBlo
[View Original Post]
-
12-19-19 18:32 #443Senior Member

Posts: 560Fosta
The article says supporters say "They note that no site has cropped up to replace Backpage" Excuse me? How stupid are these people? Or blind?
Originally Posted by OldManInVa
[View Original Post]
-
12-19-19 10:01 #442Senior Member

Posts: 117This link doesn't require a subscription to read the article.
https://theunionjournal.com/stamping...t-underground/
Originally Posted by OldManInVa
[View Original Post]
-
12-18-19 18:59 #441Senior Member

Posts: 105FOSTA Revisited
Maybe there is hope??
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/17/t...cking-law.html
-
12-18-19 01:39 #440Senior Member

Posts: 1291Point well taken
Sorry, I should have mentioned AMP's, or any type of MP for that matter, when suggesting use of a burner phone for the hobby. Your point is well taken.
Originally Posted by HappyGuy2
[View Original Post]
-
12-17-19 00:51 #439Banned Member

Posts: 392To expand one further
Tom did not include to use a burner for an AMP also.
Originally Posted by TomMcAn
[View Original Post]
I have had them trying to call or Text when it got slow, trying to drum up business.
Could be a domestic situation breaker!!
Play safe and paranoid.
HG2.
-
12-16-19 09:09 #438Senior Member

Posts: 148The one guy at the end
They all avoided the basic rules and warnings signs. Rule one don't talk about anything else once your there till your both naked and touching. The last one tried a cop check and she almost ran from it. LOL at that point he let the little head do the talking. I have bailed on a date because she started saying suspicious things. Also noticing on some of the news stories that the guy does a cop check but the girl never does. Wonder if law enforcement is finding UC who are willing to let a guy grope there breasts to lock in the bust.
Originally Posted by DirteeBoy
[View Original Post]
-
12-11-19 18:56 #437Senior Member

Posts: 124Operation Santa's Naughty List'
Check out these poor bastards, of course they made a few mistakes. Be careful out there boys!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4pa0szI9JU
-
12-04-19 13:41 #436Senior Member

Posts: 1291It's best to stay out of the headlines
I can't recall off the top of my head whether any mongers were prosecuted as a result of an agency bust, but considerably more than one career has been ruined through simple disclosure of clients' names. Don't forget the metropolitan area in which we live. One piece of JmSuttr's advice bears repeating: never disclose your real name, or other personal identifying information, to a provider or agency. It's frankly none of their business and they don't need it to arrange a meeting with you despite their pleas for screening or personal safety.
Originally Posted by Deranged
[View Original Post]
It's best to get a burner phone for use in contacting indies, crapshoots or agencies. This is especially true if, like me, one has to at least occasionally use a personal cell phone to conduct his employer's business. Tracing a burner phone isn't impossible, but it'll be a lot less fruitful if Uncle Leo has as little info as possible with which to work. He will probably move on to easier targets.








Reply With Quote





