Rubrankings.com
Top Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
High Class Companions
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #8284
    Senior Member


    Posts: 2714
    Quote Originally Posted by Diver6390  [View Original Post]
    Yeah, I know all the hookers have the disclaimer that money exchanged is for time spent only. But sugar seem to have a different dimension to it. If you give your girlfriend an allowance, and sex is involved, isn't that technically the same? I know this is a fuzzy line, which is why I thought LE would stay away from the sugar bowl. If they are looking to bust a brothel or nab some human trafficker (because, let's face it, LE is more interested in making political headlines than actually making the world better), the hooker sites would be a bigger fish than the sugar bowl where you may nab one dude.
    However if they have a fake profile and you send a message saying do you want to meet and fuck for an a allowance that is solicitation, and you can be arrested.

    If you contact a SB and say lets grab dinner and drinks and no discussion of sex you're fine even if you offer $.

  2. #8283

    That's true, but.

    Quote Originally Posted by RawDogger  [View Original Post]
    It's very simple- agree to have sex for money. You don't seem to have a very good understanding about how these things work.
    Yeah, I know all the hookers have the disclaimer that money exchanged is for time spent only. But sugar seem to have a different dimension to it. If you give your girlfriend an allowance, and sex is involved, isn't that technically the same? I know this is a fuzzy line, which is why I thought LE would stay away from the sugar bowl. If they are looking to bust a brothel or nab some human trafficker (because, let's face it, LE is more interested in making political headlines than actually making the world better), the hooker sites would be a bigger fish than the sugar bowl where you may nab one dude.

  3. #8282
    Regular Member


    Posts: 14
    Maybe I am searching wrong, but I found nothing about these two. One is Piper, in Bellingham. The other is Kat, also in Bellingham. Piper has good reviews on TNA, and seems to be into everything I am interested in, but no info on BBFS. Kat, is obviously offering bb, it says so in her ad. I am just wondering if anyone has any previous experience with her.

    http://mt-vernon.skipthegames.com/fe...t/169373070800 Kat.

    http://mt-vernon.skipthegames.com/fe...e/731251502442 Piper.

    Thank for the help.

  4. #8281
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenCandles  [View Original Post]
    Anyone know what happened to her?

    The seductive angel website went down right around the time she went AWOL. All the other seductive angels are still posting through TNA but RileyStar's profile is scrubbed.
    Word on street is executive high roller type snagged her up in a sugar baby role.

  5. #8280
    Senior Member


    Posts: 594
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamper  [View Original Post]
    Good friend of mine. Not POC friendly if I recall. I will have to make sure that's still the case.

  6. #8279
    Quote Originally Posted by Chingados  [View Original Post]
    Do a search for Kori and you'll find some info.
    Thought I saw her. A search for Kori didn't show anything, Boards error then.

  7. #8278

    Kori

    Quote Originally Posted by Gamper  [View Original Post]
    Yes, that's Kori, who's been referenced on this board before. In short: she's real and does BBFS, but she's an anti-size queen, an enormous flake, and has a sleazy boyfriend.

  8. #8277

    Kori

    Do a search for Kori and you'll find some info.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gamper  [View Original Post]

  9. #8276

    RileyStar

    Anyone know what happened to her?

    The seductive angel website went down right around the time she went AWOL. All the other seductive angels are still posting through TNA but RileyStar's profile is scrubbed.

  10. #8275
    Quote Originally Posted by FlowIndigo  [View Original Post]
    Did you actually meet her? Seems obvious LE based on my previous post.
    Ya I'm going to take a pass right now thank you LOL.

  11. #8274

  12. #8273
    Quote Originally Posted by RedHot11  [View Original Post]
    Sent her a message on TNA and no response.
    Finally she responded looks like a genuine girl. I'll write a report later tomorrow evening after seeing her.

    Confirmed on text that rubber is optional. Sweet.

  13. #8272
    It's very simple- agree to have sex for money. You don't seem to have a very good understanding about how these things work.

    Quote Originally Posted by Diver6390  [View Original Post]
    Can someone knowledgeable give some details on how LE on SA could stick? I would think that Sugar kind of skirts the edges of LE's purview. Targeting the obvious escort boards make sense, but the sugar sites seem to be really broad.

  14. #8271

    Fiona

    Quote Originally Posted by NoMaam  [View Original Post]
    No link. She hasn't been around in years. I met her on the review board where she also went by Kaitlyn I think.
    Seems like she disappeared about 9 or 10 years ago. She'd be about 36 now. She would only be able to get off with Greek. I believe you are correct about her going by Kaitlyn later.

  15. #8270

    LE on SA?

    Quote Originally Posted by FlowIndigo  [View Original Post]
    Did you actually meet her? Seems obvious LE based on my previous post.
    Can someone knowledgeable give some details on how LE on SA could stick? I would think that Sugar kind of skirts the edges of LE's purview. Targeting the obvious escort boards make sense, but the sugar sites seem to be really broad.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
The Velvet Rooms
Top Tier Escorts
Best Escorts
Live Escorts

Protected by Copyscape