NoVA SugarBabies

**Mazvid** · 12-10-19 19:05

Originally Posted by KevinCalormis [View Original Post]

Nice bible verse in her profile: "The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. " Corinthians 6:13.

Something tells me we have a different definition of fun. Seriously I have no clue what some of these girls are thinking.

https://www.seeking.com/member/3e78d...5-700ced1bef7d

I want to read you did bffs and CIP with this one by next week.

**WillOckham** · 12-10-19 16:41

Originally Posted by Jsidd [View Original Post]

Some random person from the other side of the country starts messaging you like you're going to fly them out even though there is an abundance of women here. The most annoying is when they're msging from outside of the country.

Anyone seeing this happen? Seems like it comes it waves.

I have not joined SeegingArrangement because of the fixed cost, but I have used What'sYourPrice. Almost every morning I get two or three offers for meeting, and the requests come from foreign countries: Canada, the Philippines. Who in their right mind would fly to the Philippines for a first meeting?

I can only conclude that the website is generating these requests to maintain your attention.

**Jsidd** · 12-10-19 16:19

Some random person from the other side of the country starts messaging you like you're going to fly them out even though there is an abundance of women here. The most annoying is when they're msging from outside of the country.

Anyone seeing this happen? Seems like it comes it waves.

**John HandCock** · 12-10-19 15:23

Originally Posted by ChrisCarr [View Original Post]

Just a question, do any of you report obvious scammers? I do, and I report online-only and trans / cd's too. I think I've racked up 30 well-constructed reports and dozens more have been submitted without any evidence. In those cases I figure once a handful of users report a profile then the monkeys at seeking get around to checking said profile.

It is really pointless at the end of the day, but I'm banking on the idea that if I'm a user that is behaving responsibly that any revenge-reports f4 om girls will be looked at with credulity towards my efforts to make the site legitimate and safer for users.

Reporting is a waste of time, if any action is taken they have a new profile up before the old one is down. As far as trans / CDs if there is no interest then they fade from the site very fast. If you have the time to report do it here on the appropriate thread. When a girls profile or by line is online only or only selling pic, videos then the site is fully aware and should automatically reject her profile. If it plainly says that again waste of time contacting them but never fails some monger tries to talk them into meeting resulting in getting butt hurt when they get rejected.

**Sometimes123** · 12-10-19 14:52

Originally Posted by Sometimes123 [View Original Post]

Setup a meeting about a week in advance, seemed dtf. Meanwhile, she wanted to chat online via an app that allows recording. When I didn't go along, she went silent and blocked me.

Since the numbers were stripped on the forum and I can't provide link due to being blocked, her username starts with Jodie and ends with one one seven.

**Jsidd** · 12-10-19 14:27

Originally Posted by KevinCalormis [View Original Post]

Nice bible verse in her profile: "The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. " Corinthians 6:13.

Something tells me we have a different definition of fun. Seriously I have no clue what some of these girls are thinking.

https://www.seeking.com/member/3e78d...5-700ced1bef7d

Told her it was an interesting profile. Are you hoping to save us heathens from damnation.

**DWinthrop** · 12-10-19 13:33

Originally Posted by Madaboutmax [View Original Post]

I don't think SA considers online-only, trans / cd's as violations of their current policy.

I can't stand the trannies on seeking or any of the other dating sites. There are freak show services that cater to that, why do they need to intrude on normal sites where maybe 1% is looking for that. It's particularly annoying because I inevitably end up matching with a few of them since my technique is all about volume and speed of initial contacts. I don't bother to report, as some services like Bumble will actually ban you for that. But anytime I match with one and realize it I suggest we make a snuff film and then block them.

**DWinthrop** · 12-10-19 13:27

Nice bible verse in her profile: "The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. " Corinthians 6:13.

Something tells me we have a different definition of fun. Seriously I have no clue what some of these girls are thinking.

https://www.seeking.com/member/3e78d...5-700ced1bef7d

**Sometimes123** · 12-10-19 13:01

Setup a meeting about a week in advance, seemed dtf. Meanwhile, she wanted to chat online via an app that allows recording. When I didn't go along, she went silent and blocked me.

**ChrisCarr** · 12-10-19 10:03

Originally Posted by Madaboutmax [View Original Post]

I do report profiles for "reportable offenses", but SA's categories are escort / soliciting, underage, fake / scam, criminal activity, profile content, inappropriate conduct.

I don't think SA considers online-only, trans / cd's as violations of their current policy.

SA Policy states that online only relationships are not allowed. As for Cd / trans, the profile asks for sex not gender. A man in a dress is a man, I am not seeking a man, so the profile content is not appropriate.

**Jsidd** · 12-10-19 09:54

Originally Posted by Madaboutmax [View Original Post]

I do report profiles for "reportable offenses", but SA's categories are escort / soliciting, underage, fake / scam, criminal activity, profile content, inappropriate conduct.

I don't think SA considers online-only, trans / cd's as violations of their current policy.

if they're asking for money up front to prove you're legit etc.

If you scroll down to the 3rd from the bottom of the offense list, there is reason that says seeking online only relationship...that is if you use the app. On the website click on appropriate conduct and seeking online only relationship is there.

Sometimes when you push back on that they’ll block you first so you’re outta luck. That what happens with this one.

**Madaboutmax** · 12-10-19 09:48

Originally Posted by ChrisCarr [View Original Post]

Just a question, do any of you report obvious scammers? I do, and I report online-only and trans / cd's too. I think I've racked up 30 well-constructed reports and dozens more have been submitted without any evidence. In those cases I figure once a handful of users report a profile then the monkeys at seeking get around to checking said profile.

It is really pointless at the end of the day, but I'm banking on the idea that if I'm a user that is behaving responsibly that any revenge-reports f4 om girls will be looked at with credulity towards my efforts to make the site legitimate and safer for users.

I do report profiles for "reportable offenses", but SA's categories are escort / soliciting, underage, fake / scam, criminal activity, profile content, inappropriate conduct.

I don't think SA considers online-only, trans / cd's as violations of their current policy.

**ChrisCarr** · 12-10-19 09:10

Originally Posted by Jsidd [View Original Post]

So I messaged her, she finally responded with:

Hi there, I'm good. School in the US is expensive. So, I'm looking for a generous sugar daddy. If you are serious about meeting me, show me. Spoil me and I'll spoil you.

CashApp: $PrincessErica19.

https://www.seeking.com/member/14da7...4-eba453647bb9

Yeah, nope. Responded with. This is the work of scammers who take your money and run. Sorry, Bye. Profile is only a day old and some of the pics are not of the original profile pic.

Just a question, do any of you report obvious scammers? I do, and I report online-only and trans / cd's too. I think I've racked up 30 well-constructed reports and dozens more have been submitted without any evidence. In those cases I figure once a handful of users report a profile then the monkeys at seeking get around to checking said profile.

It is really pointless at the end of the day, but I'm banking on the idea that if I'm a user that is behaving responsibly that any revenge-reports f4 om girls will be looked at with credulity towards my efforts to make the site legitimate and safer for users.

**Jsidd** · 12-10-19 05:20

Originally Posted by AdcFellow [View Original Post]

Mackensie Park.

https://www.seeking.com/member/8eebc...7-d2ac96dc1afa

Agreed to $300 ppm. Did not show up for date. Just disappeared.

Jessika_94.

https://www.seeking.com/member/26180...7-a77e7a47fc54

Agreed to $300 ppm. Did not show up for date. Just disappeared.

301 KittyK.

https://www.seeking.com/member/82edc...4-a48564985ea5

DTF for $250.5'5, 120 lbs, 24 years old, obvious pro.

Chatted with 301 KittyK, pretty much the same thing. Have gone for the plunge yet.

**Jsidd** · 12-10-19 05:18

So I messaged her, she finally responded with:

Hi there, I'm good. School in the US is expensive. So, I'm looking for a generous sugar daddy. If you are serious about meeting me, show me. Spoil me and I'll spoil you.

CashApp: $PrincessErica19.

https://www.seeking.com/member/14da7...4-eba453647bb9

Yeah, nope. Responded with. This is the work of scammers who take your money and run. Sorry, Bye. Profile is only a day old and some of the pics are not of the original profile pic.