Sugar Baby / Sugar Daddy relationships

**JonesSoda911** · 10-21-19 15:42

Did anyone meet with Hanbear1996? I think we could exchange some info.

**WreckItRight** · 10-21-19 15:04

Originally Posted by TryinAgain2 [View Original Post]

Except that 7 out of those 8 are tire kickers or just expect to find a guy 5-10 years older than they are max that will buy them stuff and take them on luxury cruises so I stand by my experiences.

Always a few GPS but they usually come right down. Last two I talked to one started at 400 came down to 250, coming from bloomington. A former Sb told me 200 and she drives from muncie, new one I talked to literally said she has no amount just whatever I think she deserves. (admittedly that's rare) but it happened. I'm talking to one rn who hasnt brought up money yet. And we already went out on a date. Steak and shake LOL.

I think theres always some GPS because threes always idiot daddies with more $$ than good sense driving up the price. Lets face it some girls think it really is golden. No amount of A game, big bats and / or common sense will change their minds.

**Mr Popular** · 10-21-19 08:11

I spent the last month working like a dog, got about 30 numbers, met 5-6 and fucked maybe 2. Then last week, I called Tabby and Callie, set something up at their place and they drained me a couple times each with skills and activities most amateurs can't touch. I think I'll just stick to Insta creeping and top drawer escorts for a while.

Originally Posted by ZakkWylde [View Original Post]

Just stop sending them screenshots of others dudes posts lmao.

**Zakk Wylde** · 10-20-19 23:46

Originally Posted by TryinAgain2 [View Original Post]

Except that 7 out of those 8 are tire kickers or just expect to find a guy 5-10 years older than they are max that will buy them stuff and take them on luxury cruises so I stand by my experiences.

Just stop sending them screenshots of others dudes posts lmao.

**TryinAgain2** · 10-20-19 21:33

Originally Posted by WreckItRight [View Original Post]

According to SA and other sites there's an 8 to 1 ratio of babies to daddy's registered. Google search .......makes sense they join for free, message for free. Guys don't. That alone would be a huge offset of girls to guys.

Except that 7 out of those 8 are tire kickers or just expect to find a guy 5-10 years older than they are max that will buy them stuff and take them on luxury cruises so I stand by my experiences.

**WreckItRight** · 10-20-19 21:19

Originally Posted by TryinAgain2 [View Original Post]

There has been lots of complaining and reports of GPS and unrealistic requests for high allowances, spotty communications and ghosting. I believe it's due to the majority of guys wanting harems of girls at their disposals. There are already more guys wanting a SB than there are SB's. Always will be. But compound that by each guy, on average, trying to see 5-10 girls simultaneously in the name of "variety" and the exponential disparity works in the girls' favor. ................
Solution? Idk. But if most of us settled on one or two go-to girls instead of trying to see several every week, or 2-4 per DAY like the local, sick-ass pharmacist, maybe things would settle down instead of getting so out of hand. I've had better luck elsewhere than SA so I haven't paid for a membership in months. Haven't needed to. When I was, though, less than 1 in 10 messages sent resulted in a response. These numbers of sending out 20 messages a day each are hurting us collectively. But I also know, based on the guys reporting here about 3-4 different new girls they've seen every week, it probably won't change because they can't be happy with just one or two. It's a viscous, self-defeating cycle IMO.

Anyway, just ranting along. Back to your already scheduled programming.

According to SA and other sites there's an 8 to 1 ratio of babies to daddy's registered. Google search .......makes sense they join for free, message for free. Guys don't. That alone would be a huge offset of girls to guys.

**WreckItRight** · 10-20-19 21:15

Originally Posted by ZakkWylde [View Original Post]

My goal is 2-4 new girls a week. It's a grind but you only live once LOL.

You can't fault a man with goals! Hell yes! 2-3 new and one former 5 star one for nostalgia!

Originally Posted by ZakkWylde [View Original Post]

I think she got knocked up by a sugar daddy, let him pay her off for the same amount as 3 FS visits, got baby damaged, and now is jaded af and has become a medium volume provider who hates her job. Just what I've heard.

This made me laugh good one.

**Zakk Wylde** · 10-20-19 20:54

Originally Posted by TryinAgain2 [View Original Post]

There has been lots of complaining and reports of GPS and unrealistic requests for high allowances, spotty communications and ghosting. I believe it's due to the majority of guys wanting harems of girls at their disposals. There are already more guys wanting a SB than there are SB's. Always will be. But compound that by each guy, on average, trying to see 5-10 girls simultaneously in the name of "variety" and the exponential disparity works in the girls' favor. Each semi-hot girl gets 100's of messages per day from new guys and repeated tries. Even the disgusting, fat and ugly girls get more than they can handle, based on the reports. Their GPS skyrockets and their value on each guy plummets. Most girls would be happy with one daddy spoiling them a little, but they keep getting online to find a few hundred more thirsty guys and the grass seems greener. Now they're not as happy with a reasonable allowance because the odds seem in their favor and they think they can get more. They don't see that there are a hundred new girls getting on the site every week, but even if they did, they're still getting more and more requests because the same guys seeing 5-10 other girls are still contacting 10-20 additional girls every week or even day, increasing their perceived worth. They've already got one old dude paying them 200 per week or per meeting, why not see if a new guy will give them 250 or 300. Or 400. Or 500. We complain about the girls asking for these amounts, but it's supply and demand and by their perspective, they have the demand, as false as it might actually be.

Solution? Idk. But if most of us settled on one or two go-to girls instead of trying to see several every week, or 2-4 per DAY like the local, sick-ass pharmacist, maybe things would settle down instead of getting so out of hand. I've had better luck elsewhere than SA so I haven't paid for a membership in months. Haven't needed to. When I was, though, less than 1 in 10 messages sent resulted in a response. These numbers of sending out 20 messages a day each are hurting us collectively. But I also know, based on the guys reporting here about 3-4 different new girls they've seen every week, it probably won't change because they can't be happy with just one or two. It's a viscous, self-defeating cycle IMO.

Anyway, just ranting along. Back to your already scheduled programming.

My goal is 2-4 new girls a week. It's a grind but you only live once LOL.

**Zakk Wylde** · 10-20-19 20:44

Originally Posted by WreckItRight [View Original Post]

She's been on SA a while, stopped to have a baby. She used to be OneTrebledSb. Saw her last year a couple times before she got preggo. No issues. Was fun. I had a totally different experience. Maybe something changed who knows.

I think she got knocked up by a sugar daddy, let him pay her off for the same amount as 3 FS visits, got baby damaged, and now is jaded af and has become a medium volume provider who hates her job. Just what I've heard.

**WreckItRight** · 10-20-19 17:38

Originally Posted by HumpyDumpty [View Original Post]

I met with her last week as well and I should have posted sooner. I had similar experience and promised full GFE but delivered nothing. A min of CBJ and asked me to finish sooner and chatty most of the time. Agreed to spend 2-3 hours but after 30 min and one time said she is not in the mood and will deliver full GFE next time LOL. I don't think YMMV with this one. Best to avoid as there are several good ones out there.

She's been on SA a while, stopped to have a baby. She used to be OneTrebledSb. Saw her last year a couple times before she got preggo. No issues. Was fun. I had a totally different experience. Maybe something changed who knows.

**Slayter9** · 10-19-19 21:51

Had an initial meeting setup with this one. Communication was spotty. Earlier in the day before the meeting, she texts that she expects 200 upon first meeting. This was just a meeting for drinks. My attempts to clarify what she means are ignored as she goes dark. Then later, without addressing my question, she apologizes for running late. Wait, are we still on? No response and no shows when I'm in the area. Haven't heard from since. So, terrible communication and inflated initial meeting request. Good luck.

https://www.seeking.com/member/61e11...7-52c3e184bb88

**Fstrxtsy78** · 10-19-19 17:30

Originally Posted by MrPopular [View Original Post]

I can totally see your reviews being accurate, and won't dispute it, but I had a pretty good time with her a couple weeks ago. Decent apartment in Greenwood, she was friendly and flirty and not bad looking if you like baby damage, which I don't hold against her. There was a profusion of pot paraphernalia present. Good BBBJ, with a two hand twist and some ball licking, then we fucked hard for a while. When I came, she reached over to feel my balls as I dumped. Hot. She does some cheesy soft "porn" begging the camera for guys cum apparently, so she's an actress. But I've spent $100 on less active girls who did a lot less.

Appreciate the feedback, I realize what's going on, it will be corrected soon enough. She's a playa alright lmao.

**Mr Popular** · 10-19-19 16:07

I can totally see your reviews being accurate, and won't dispute it, but I had a pretty good time with her a couple weeks ago. Decent apartment in Greenwood, she was friendly and flirty and not bad looking if you like baby damage, which I don't hold against her. There was a profusion of pot paraphernalia present. Good BBBJ, with a two hand twist and some ball licking, then we fucked hard for a while. When I came, she reached over to feel my balls as I dumped. Hot. She does some cheesy soft "porn" begging the camera for guys cum apparently, so she's an actress. But I've spent $100 on less active girls who did a lot less.

Originally Posted by Fstrxtsy78 [View Original Post]

Best to avoid this one, don't think she is that interested in the "mutual benefits" aspect of a SD / SB relationship; very lopsided attention-wise and a taker; seems disgusted with the idea of giving a BJ, a time waster who will take whatever you throw her way $ wise and not return the favor. Basically a scammer, but YMMV as always.

https://www.seeking.com/member/0029d...9-d8a0c09aad84

**HumpyDumpty** · 10-19-19 14:41

I met with her last week as well and I should have posted sooner. I had similar experience and promised full GFE but delivered nothing. A min of CBJ and asked me to finish sooner and chatty most of the time. Agreed to spend 2-3 hours but after 30 min and one time said she is not in the mood and will deliver full GFE next time LOL. I don't think YMMV with this one. Best to avoid as there are several good ones out there.

Originally Posted by Fstrxtsy78 [View Original Post]

Best to avoid this one, don't think she is that interested in the "mutual benefits" aspect of a SD / SB relationship; very lopsided attention-wise and a taker; seems disgusted with the idea of giving a BJ, a time waster who will take whatever you throw her way $ wise and not return the favor. Basically a scammer, but YMMV as always.

https://www.seeking.com/member/0029d...9-d8a0c09aad84

**TryinAgain2** · 10-19-19 13:42

There has been lots of complaining and reports of GPS and unrealistic requests for high allowances, spotty communications and ghosting. I believe it's due to the majority of guys wanting harems of girls at their disposals. There are already more guys wanting a SB than there are SB's. Always will be. But compound that by each guy, on average, trying to see 5-10 girls simultaneously in the name of "variety" and the exponential disparity works in the girls' favor. Each semi-hot girl gets 100's of messages per day from new guys and repeated tries. Even the disgusting, fat and ugly girls get more than they can handle, based on the reports. Their GPS skyrockets and their value on each guy plummets. Most girls would be happy with one daddy spoiling them a little, but they keep getting online to find a few hundred more thirsty guys and the grass seems greener. Now they're not as happy with a reasonable allowance because the odds seem in their favor and they think they can get more. They don't see that there are a hundred new girls getting on the site every week, but even if they did, they're still getting more and more requests because the same guys seeing 5-10 other girls are still contacting 10-20 additional girls every week or even day, increasing their perceived worth. They've already got one old dude paying them 200 per week or per meeting, why not see if a new guy will give them 250 or 300. Or 400. Or 500. We complain about the girls asking for these amounts, but it's supply and demand and by their perspective, they have the demand, as false as it might actually be.

Solution? Idk. But if most of us settled on one or two go-to girls instead of trying to see several every week, or 2-4 per DAY like the local, sick-ass pharmacist, maybe things would settle down instead of getting so out of hand. I've had better luck elsewhere than SA so I haven't paid for a membership in months. Haven't needed to. When I was, though, less than 1 in 10 messages sent resulted in a response. These numbers of sending out 20 messages a day each are hurting us collectively. But I also know, based on the guys reporting here about 3-4 different new girls they've seen every week, it probably won't change because they can't be happy with just one or two. It's a viscous, self-defeating cycle IMO.

Anyway, just ranting along. Back to your already scheduled programming.