Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 44,116 to 44,130 of 50235
-
06-10-19 04:35 #6120Senior Member

Posts: 168Pics are pretty accurate in my experience.
Originally Posted by Irresponsible
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-19 03:29 #6119Regular Member

Posts: 1New to town, how can I get to M?
Seems like we have positive reviews on M. I'm really into kgirls and want to know how can I contact the booker. Thanks!
-
06-10-19 03:12 #6118Senior Member

Posts: 844Chanel must be decently attractive if you've seen her that much. Sounds like maybe she's complacent with you, having seen her so many times. She might seem fresh from a new customer's view.
Originally Posted by TheAbc
[View Original Post]
I'm surprised she hasn't returned to the bay area yet.
-
06-10-19 03:07 #6117Senior Member

Posts: 844I just glanced at terb right now.
Originally Posted by Jodandayo
[View Original Post]
I see the girls that cost $200 USD or less, but their faces are all hidden. Not even partially obscured or blurred, which makes for a huge surprise when they open the door. I bet the reason they're that cheap is because of butterface.
Look at this funny shit that charges $300 CAD. I'd rather fuck my own hand with lotion. Even Lia looked better than this. Be happy that all of M's girls at least look better than this.
-
06-10-19 02:34 #6116Senior Member

Posts: 939Since M is on the topic again
Been seeing Chanel for a few months now and I think the sessions are getting stale. I noticed a change of her behavior (maybe to due to burnout) but she seems less enthusiastic and fun as the sessions before. She gets tried more easily and seems less responsive to do something, sort of going through the motions. Is this just me or anyone esle who has seen her lately get this too? I even took a break from seeing her for two weeks and it seems more or less not as good as before. I might replace her as my ATF with Lora or someone esle.
On another note, does anyone still see Namu? I don't think she gets much business nowadays. Still on the fence, but seems like her quality went down and I make it a bad habit of texting her when I'm horny. My dick says yes, but my brain says no. I thought about just hitting her for a quick session but with the amount of driving, I might as well do a full session with a better girl. I can't seem to find a good late night quick BBFS bootie call on a weekday.
-
06-10-19 02:16 #6115Senior Member

Posts: 844Nah man. You want 5's and 6's, you go to the Palace. That shit is one tier lower than M.
-
06-10-19 01:53 #6114Banned Member

Posts: 1333M Girls Appearance
The look thing is REALLY YMMV. I think Cona is an "8.5"; Megan is a "6", Chanel is "8" and Allie is a "8.5" and Heaven is a "8". I think Leah is definitely "5" and I am sure some guys disagree with me but as they say, different strokes for different folks. I think Leah was also a "5".
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-19 01:45 #6113Senior Member

Posts: 3480Couldn't have said it better especially about Lia who was one of the best fucks of my life ever and I've been around pretty long.
Originally Posted by HumblePie
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-19 01:39 #6112Senior Member

Posts: 44Hit or miss with SAG based on the girls I've seen in the past (none of them are available atm). Generally the pics have not been of the girls themselves but in a few cases they are fairly representative of their bodies (faces generally not as pretty).
Originally Posted by Irresponsible
[View Original Post]
Of the current lineup, Shannon's pics are reportedly real and I hear Taylor's pics are a good representation. Board has been pretty quiet about the rest of the girls AFAIK.
-
06-10-19 00:32 #6111Senior Member

Posts: 3502Sorry
If you like big tits, may as well try Shannon. I posted about Shannon, Taylor, Laura in LA County Asian thread. They are probably the top 3. Search for Erika here. Amber, Julie, Erika have too similar stats and I doubt are real pics. Do a reverse image search. Shannon is pics accurate. Taylor is using her real pics but you probably won't recognize her. Laura is attractive when I saw her awhile back but not her pics.
Originally Posted by Irresponsible
[View Original Post]
-
06-09-19 23:58 #6110Senior Member

Posts: 48Liked her and would repeat but def not her in the pics.
Originally Posted by Irresponsible
[View Original Post]
-
06-09-19 23:29 #6109Senior Member

Posts: 3502I agree
M girls may not be the best in looks but I wouldn't say 5-6 in looks. M has the best performers around IMHO. FOSTA changed things because I think non-BB guys stop coming. It's supply and demand and we get what we paid for.
I will be coming so fast when I see M has cute new young girl BB or not.
Originally Posted by JimThome
[View Original Post]
-
06-09-19 23:25 #6108Senior Member

Posts: 90A Little Better than MEH
M's girls are more like TER 7's and 8's. Recently she had one 6, Lia, but she was one of the best fucks I've had recently! Definitely a 9 in service so well worth it! Today's lineup of Megan, Cona, Lucia, and Chanel are all 7's and 8's IMHO.
Originally Posted by DHorn420
[View Original Post]
-
06-09-19 23:10 #6107Senior Member

Posts: 3502Thanks
Selena of KTE selfie pics are real and recent. She is even more beautiful when she smiles. Spinner body with enhanced tits. English is serviceable. I had a great time and would repeat for her tight pussy. I think she is only staying until next Sunday.
Originally Posted by WilshireBoy
[View Original Post]
-
06-09-19 21:30 #6106Senior Member

Posts: 7236LOL, a dude said that to Rebeccas booker that he spends thousands of $'s on kgirls. Why don't you answer my calls, don't want my $. Booker told him great go see someone else!
Originally Posted by HumblePie
[View Original Post]
Dude cried on the boards like little girl cause booker basically told get the f outa here!
Just becasue you got $ don't mean shit to some of the bookers.











Reply With Quote










