Thread: The Rat Trap
+
Add Report
Results 2,476 to 2,490 of 10982
-
05-11-19 18:19 #8507Senior Member

Posts: 851Keep it up and no one will give any good info. After 14 years of being on this board I weep for the new guys coming in with the current crop of reviewers with the constant non reviews and increasing white knights / pimps. Stanktuna has a good ring to it LOL.
Originally Posted by SevenYearMitch
[View Original Post]
-
05-11-19 18:11 #8506Senior Member

Posts: 851Different strokes for different folks. As you say.
Originally Posted by PanteraPotzee
[View Original Post]
-
05-11-19 14:40 #8505Banned Member

Posts: 356Good Advice!
HarryPlopper, 7 YrM gave you some great advice here.
Originally Posted by SevenYearMitch
[View Original Post]
You definitely want to stay away from "StankTuna". But don't take my word for it, here's someone who knows all about StankTuna: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=DYPFEtCfpOw.
But don't despair, here's a gal that has NO screening, and let's you do absolutely ANYTHING you want to her: https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.p...h59b95e6de5bc9.
-
05-11-19 09:29 #8504Banned Member

Posts: 49Bahaha
He complained about Avalon's rates & m1 screening process. Hmm. And if I remember correctly he had an issue with Sophia. Did you ever think your constant ranting on here about the ladies made good providers sour on you Mr. Plopper?
Originally Posted by SevenYearMitch
[View Original Post]
Sabrina is a great provider it is one of the good references that Michelle take but let's face it it's not that hard to get in with her I could see why as stringent as Michele is she would want more. I personally have never seen Michelle so I cannot speak on her skill looks or anything like that. But she has gotten consistent good reviews for years and if her screening process it's too much for you then keep it moving to somebody else. I'm quick to put a negative review off if a girl earns it but I'm not going to come on here and slam a girl I don't know for her screening process. That is her business.
As far as Avalon goes I saw her about three years ago before she disappeared. Her screening process was fairly strict to her rates were high but it was all worth. She was smoking hot and gave me one of those dreams that I replay over and over again to this day. If her rates are too high then just keep it moving to somebody that you can afford. She was not a clock watcher then was almost John for anything that I ask that was reasonable. And she's a gorgeous woman.
If you go to the massage thread and check if my post about 88 and Missy you will see I'm not pro provider I'm very pro monger. But at the same time you get what you give you're not going to get decent chicks if you're on this forum complaining about ones you haven't even seen for their screening or rates.
I can't say for sure but I'm leaning towards the same rationale that the guys on here that constantly complain aren't very good clients. I know the girls on here that constantly complain aren't very good providers. It's most likely the same rationale.
This is not a slam anybody it's just a different viewpoint that somebody you should look at maybe next time they go to book an appointment. Different strokes for different folks.
PP.
-
05-11-19 08:23 #8503Senior Member

Posts: 935LOL, you didn't answer my simple question. Instead you chose to whine about being afraid of white knights. Can't say I'm too surprised. The obvious answer (in addition to being a hypocrite) is that you must think you're special. Personally, I always have multiple girls in my rotation which is why I have no trouble getting great references to fuck whoever I want. You should consider doing the same. My other piece of free advice for you is to change your name. Can you really fault a provider for not wanting to see a guy named "HarryPlopper"? Would you want to see a provider named "StankTuna"? LOL
Originally Posted by HarryPlopper
[View Original Post]
SYM.
-
05-11-19 07:31 #8502Senior Member

Posts: 851M1 and Scarlett / Liza Lust who was on Eros
I have an appt with Scarlett still, we will see if she shows next week. I am guessing no since her add on EROS is gone and she seemed to be a flake. Details are your friend man, so is comprehension.
M1 just told me that "sorry I need more than Sabrina T to see you " and I have no more recent references that she would "accept". I am not alone in my dislike for M1's screening tactics and I have PMs from other members that are afraid of the white knights scolding them for a negative review.
I guess I will wear your defined "hypocrite" badge with honor. Have fun with M1 ,she seems to use you as an advertising arm. Nothing wrong with that if that is your "girl" but I am very honest in my experiences and I hope the majority of the mongers her are as well.
Harry P.
Originally Posted by SevenYearMitch
[View Original Post]
-
05-11-19 06:14 #8501Senior Member

Posts: 935LOL, you're not a pariah but you are a hypocrite. You complain that M1 L won't see you because you won't / can't give her a reference but then you yourself won't see Scarlett because you don't trust BradFlorida as a reference / reviewer. Why is it okay for you as a monger to insist on a reference but not okay for a provider to do the same?
Originally Posted by HarryPlopper
[View Original Post]
SYM.
-
05-10-19 17:09 #8500Banned Member

Posts: 49You are correct
Its totally not just FB but I think they are the biggest culprit. Same exact thing with me, I left my girlfriend at the time use my lap top to buy yellow high heels online. For almost 2 months I got nothing but ads for yellow high heels on everything internet related. Guys at the office chuckled when I was setting up a powerpoint and the ads kept popping up. It was funny, jokes in I didn't know they made them in your size, red is more your color. LOL,
Originally Posted by Lehmonade
[View Original Post]
It is a catch22, of course the average joe like you and I hate to have our privacy invaded it save lives. I just hope the future generations realize that everything doesn't have to be on social media unlike most of the current one.
PP.
-
05-10-19 16:21 #8499Banned Member

Posts: 356Beard Man
Hey Doll, thanks for the compliments, but please don't give away all my secrets!
Originally Posted by PurrFecttSwags
[View Original Post]
Stay cool, Doll, stay cool!
-
05-10-19 16:16 #8498Banned Member

Posts: 356National Championships?
National Championships? Really?
Originally Posted by PurrFecttSwags
[View Original Post]
Alabama only won 1 of the last 3, and got trounced this last year by 28 points (4 TDs)!
-
05-10-19 16:09 #8497Banned Member

Posts: 356She has a brain
The old Swags was messed up on booze, pills and / or needles, hence all the incomprehensible dribble in the past.
Originally Posted by DingALing
[View Original Post]
Now that she has left all that behind, it's easier to see that the gal does have a brain!
And no one else currently has access to her account. She would not voluntarily allow it.
-
05-10-19 16:04 #8496Banned Member

Posts: 356Gone Away
Funny that your handle, "Poaching", would make this comment because she has actually escaped by poaching off of well-to-do relatives.
Originally Posted by Poaching
[View Original Post]
-
05-10-19 13:15 #8495Senior Member

Posts: 548Pin Point Location and MAC address
Data mining is a huge venue for agencies who work for and sell our identity and data. Literally everything you search for gets sent out. I remember one time looking up some cars for one night out of curiosity, and for 3 straight weeks everything I looked at (facebook, youtube, other media platforms) contained ads for cars of all types, including insurance. I was royally fucked when I impulsively clicked into a youtube ad video for one car that led to the next, and the next. Sure it helps to provide info to consumers in a free market, but if you're just an avid window-shopper like me you're brain fucked by just showing a little of interest.
Originally Posted by PanteraPotzee
[View Original Post]
I don't know much but I know it's not just facebook. It's every web platforms and us leaving our online footprints. It goes without saying though. Although we're putting EVERYONE's privacy in jeopardy to account for maybe about 10-25% of the population doing what they're not supposed to, this is however necessary to convict minor to hard criminals and place some on radars for other serious shit (terrorism, child porn, etc.). Just sucks.
-
05-09-19 02:13 #8494Banned Member

Posts: 49Facebook
Is a big no no. All big brother. I don't even have the app or check it from any phone. It will connect you to anyone and everyone you have in your contact or you have called or texts. It doesn't matter of your accounts are fake it still has the location and what device and who it belongs to. I don't even understand why people use it anymore. There are other social media outlets that are not quite as monitored and put your information together like Facebook. And remember what it was like about 15 to 20 years ago before social media how we used to call people we knew or sent them letters. We do not have to rely on the new technological ways that impede on our privacy but we choose to. And I say this stuff now because technology it's too much for me to understand or I'm scared of it I'm a 33 year old man not some old fuddy-duddy it's just not worth it.
Originally Posted by Lehmonade
[View Original Post]
I'm not just saying in the hobby world but my life in general. Other than the hobby I'm a pillar to society I don't break any laws I got nothing to hide it's just an invasion of my privacy something that I don't like. We have lost sight of what this country was built upon just to get some likes on Instagram.
PP.
-
05-06-19 19:13 #8493Senior Member

Posts: 1062Not quite
No I'm definitely my own person. Never met you or anyone else on this board other than providers. I just like to throw some jabs at the 85% when I can.
Originally Posted by PurrFecttSwags
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote




