News and Media Reports

**Monger Bro** · 04-30-19 14:39

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8884726.html

They need to pass that law in the States as well.

A2

**NYTrader731** · 04-30-19 11:26

Originally Posted by Lehmonade [View Original Post]

Pretty sure boundaries of comfort is flexible in this one. Money talks louder than their comfort.

Had a girl told me she dont do anal AT ALL! Then perks her ass up when the benjamin starts peaking through the wallet. Uncomfortable indeed.

Has anyone just been a sugar daddy so they could have someone 20-30 years younger to talk to. These newscasters can't be idiots, I hope.

**RobertJdn** · 04-30-19 09:08

So, it's still working it's way through committee in the Florida house but seems to have support, a minimum 5 days in the county jail for solicitation. It started out as a 30 day minimum for soliciting a victim of human trafficking but they stripped that part out and pared down the mandatory time to ten days and now five.

**Lehmonade** · 04-28-19 23:02

Originally Posted by MosinNagant [View Original Post]

https://www.wftv.com/news/9-investig...tish/943137086

I love how frequently they deny that sex takes place.

Pretty sure boundaries of comfort is flexible in this one. Money talks louder than their comfort.

Had a girl told me she dont do anal AT ALL! Then perks her ass up when the benjamin starts peaking through the wallet. Uncomfortable indeed.

**Mosin Nagant** · 04-26-19 07:07

https://www.wftv.com/news/9-investig...tish/943137086

I love how frequently they deny that sex takes place.

**Jokester1** · 04-24-19 07:21

Originally Posted by TrollingObt [View Original Post]

They didn't have to establish "compulsory prostitution". As much as we dislike it, prostitution is a crime. They made 4 traffic stops where guys admitted to paying for happy endings. They did dumpster dives and pulled out evidence of happy endings. They had a health inspector saying that women were living out of the massage parlors which was enough to trigger an investigation. Women were arriving with suitcases, being shuttled from parlor to parlor in expensive cars and in some cases not stepping foot out of the parlor for weeks.

Of course they live in the parlors--they aren't here to spend money on apartments, they are here to make as much money as they possibly can in as short a time as possible. Not only do they not want to spend money on apartments, they don't have income they want the IRS to know about or that they have proof of to qualify to rent a decent apartment. Other incidental reasons for living in the massage spas: They are generally on duty from 9 or 10 am To 11:00 pm Time to get to and from an apartment would cut into sleep time and getting ready for work time in the morning. They don't want to buy a car (the vast majority use cash only for everything they need, and they certainly couldn't qualify for a car loan when they don't want their income known) and the cost of a cab or Uber twice a day would impact their main goal: Make and save as much money as possible in as short a time as possible. Setting up, qualifying for, and paying for utilities, WiFi, furniture. There's more reasons--but these seem to be the major ones based on what I've learned from the ladies.

**NewGuy01** · 04-23-19 19:51

I thought this needed to be shared.

https://www.foxnews.com/health/texas...hea-rash-hands

Be safe.

**TrollingObt** · 04-21-19 04:40

Originally Posted by Rebrobate218 [View Original Post]

You can't say that. The authorities had these women under watch for more than four months. After all that time they could not establish compulsory prostitution? They then set up cameras to capture the "massage".

If it walks like a duck and quacks it is most likely a duck. If it appears to be a publicity stunt then most likely it is. They recorded more than 200 guys and girls going through the spa so they could get their publicity. The men and women (female customers) who were recorded did not deserve this. The spa workers who were charged with felonies through a trick in the law did not deserve this. There are things you do not do.

The Police Chief in Houston said the exact same thing. "We did not find evidence of drug dealing but that doesn't mean it was not taking place. " His cops raided a home on a fictious investigation and killed the home owners. One home owner wounded a cop and three other cops were wounded by friendly fire. Ultimately, it was discovered the cops lied to the judge to get the no-knock warrant.

You cannot say just because there is not evidence that does not mean it is not happening. Also, they got abou8 t 200 guys getting HJs. They did not get a "trafficker" or a "gangster. ".

They didn't have to establish "compulsory prostitution". As much as we dislike it, prostitution is a crime. They made 4 traffic stops where guys admitted to paying for happy endings. They did dumpster dives and pulled out evidence of happy endings. They had a health inspector saying that women were living out of the massage parlors which was enough to trigger an investigation. Women were arriving with suitcases, being shuttled from parlor to parlor in expensive cars and in some cases not stepping foot out of the parlor for weeks.

**Rebrobate218** · 04-20-19 22:32

Originally Posted by TrollingObt [View Original Post]

Just because the evidence didn't pan out, doesn't mean they didn't have a legitimate case to believe it existed. I never thought that they'd get a conviction on him, but they did have a reasonable belief that trafficking was taking place based on the stake outs that occurred. That's a far cry from false pretense.

The human trafficking was only one part of the case, everyone with half a brain knows what happens in those types of massage parlors. Proving it is a whole different story.

You can't say that. The authorities had these women under watch for more than four months. After all that time they could not establish compulsory prostitution? They then set up cameras to capture the "massage".

If it walks like a duck and quacks it is most likely a duck. If it appears to be a publicity stunt then most likely it is. They recorded more than 200 guys and girls going through the spa so they could get their publicity. The men and women (female customers) who were recorded did not deserve this. The spa workers who were charged with felonies through a trick in the law did not deserve this. There are things you do not do.

The Police Chief in Houston said the exact same thing. "We did not find evidence of drug dealing but that doesn't mean it was not taking place. " His cops raided a home on a fictious investigation and killed the home owners. One home owner wounded a cop and three other cops were wounded by friendly fire. Ultimately, it was discovered the cops lied to the judge to get the no-knock warrant.

You cannot say just because there is not evidence that does not mean it is not happening. Also, they got abou8 t 200 guys getting HJs. They did not get a "trafficker" or a "gangster. ".

**Camera3** · 04-20-19 07:14

Originally Posted by NightAudit [View Original Post]

https://decriminalizesexwork.net/archives/5967

Wishful thinking but then again.

"LGBTQIA+" -- holy shit, they keep adding letters and now a symbol? I had to look this up. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex (I had to look that up to know what it was), asexuallity and the " is in case someone feels left out, I guess. I find it interesting the hardcore old guard that has a place on Mills calls themselves "LGBT" only. Hmmmmmmmmmm.

Great find. I can't wait to see how this hits channel 9.

C3.

**NightAudit** · 04-19-19 13:51

https://decriminalizesexwork.net/archives/5967

Wishful thinking but then again.

**TrollingObt** · 04-13-19 17:03

Originally Posted by MilkyWay [View Original Post]

I made a prediction about the prosecutors running into an issue with seeking evidence under false pretense. It looks like its about to happen:

https://deadspin.com/prosecutor-ther...-th-1834008710

https://www.businessinsider.com/robe...ficking-2019-4

https://sports.yahoo.com/robert-kraf...181714308.html

Just because the evidence didn't pan out, doesn't mean they didn't have a legitimate case to believe it existed. I never thought that they'd get a conviction on him, but they did have a reasonable belief that trafficking was taking place based on the stake outs that occurred. That's a far cry from false pretense.

The human trafficking was only one part of the case, everyone with half a brain knows what happens in those types of massage parlors. Proving it is a whole different story.

**Milky Way** · 04-13-19 16:48

Originally Posted by MilkyWay [View Original Post]

I think unintended effect because Kraft has the means to pick their case apart. Watchout for seeking evidence under false pretense. They got a judge to sign off on the surveillance based on a sex traffic victim. What deal was offered for cooperation? All this assumes Kraft is willing to put up a fight.

I made a prediction about the prosecutors running into an issue with seeking evidence under false pretense. It looks like its about to happen:

https://deadspin.com/prosecutor-ther...-th-1834008710

https://www.businessinsider.com/robe...ficking-2019-4

https://sports.yahoo.com/robert-kraf...181714308.html