Seeking Arrangements

**Samuel05** · 04-04-19 09:07

Originally Posted by SwimSays [View Original Post]

Was the message sent through SA or from her directly? Either she's straight scamming or SA is trying to extract more $$$ out of your pocket. I'd NEVER give out any of that information, especially on a sugaring site.

It appears as though message was sent through or by SA. Said she was interested but wanted me verified with Optimum. Optimum's website displays SA logo. I attempt my own verifications and have uncovered ladies with as many as 10 felony cases, however, most are clean which is a comforting thought. There has been an uptick in hits from the site.

**WaveSeek** · 04-03-19 23:20

Originally Posted by Aardvarks [View Original Post]

F that. I've said this before on this forum. There's 10,000+ women and around 3,000 guys on SA In the Boston area. 3/1 ratio or higher. That means any BS requests (like show me a pic or verification or prepaying or anything you're not comfortable or the Bs platonic nonsense) you can hide them or block them and move on. I have a blurry underwater pic as my profile and some real pics that are private I only show the private ones to girls I'm attracted to who have already confirmed they can meet my needs from a scheduling standpoint. I show them pics and then hide them after a day. Move over to text or KIK ASAP and talk terms.

Every woman I've met on SA has been between 19-28 and I've had sex with all of them (except 1 and that was a really weird long story) on my terms at their places or a hotel. It can be done. You just have to have patience and a bullsh*t meter.

Sorry to be direct but entertaining their weird requests and quirky messages just encourages them. We have the upper hand here in terms of numbers, $, etc.

So well said, Aardvarks- Have experienced-- and agree with your data / numbers-- And yes-- it is really a matter of numbers-- Recently-- the numbers have exploded-- as compared to my first SA forays a few years ago: Life in SA-- was far more 'simple' and productive-- But-- the numbers are still there. Also-- have ventured in the same demographic-- with similar results-- Though my age range-- w success-- tends to be younger-- or older. Mid to late 20's-- iffy-- but younger 20's-- to the older range-- is well-- productive-- And damn-- the you 20's real life gals-- are open to so much. Ugh.

**JohnTies** · 04-03-19 16:51

BostonBossBabe. Read this profile and just spit my water out.

Really, what are these women thinking. Too funny.

If you have the balls talk to her, I would love to hear how it goes. LOL.

Just screams drama.

https://www.seeking.com/member/b1b53...1-3c1936ae68a0

**Aardvarks** · 04-03-19 14:20

Originally Posted by Samuel05 [View Original Post]

Got a request for private photos from??sweethoney? 37 yo writes as what might be interpretted to be classy and upscale. Anyway, send to her, hi-res but with dark glasses. She writes back blasting me about what am I trying to hide not showing my full face and so on. Immediately get blocked, no chance for explanation concerning discretion. Then, believe it or not, get another apparently auto-generated msg saying she's interested but wants me to get verified using Optimum, SA's in-house (service. Besides the expected questions, they ask for SSN. Don't think I'm ready for that. There is a definite connection between SA and Optimum. Not sure if she's an agent / employee or stipended. Anyone else encoutered similar?

F that. I've said this before on this forum. There's 10,000+ women and around 3,000 guys on SA In the Boston area. 3/1 ratio or higher. That means any BS requests (like show me a pic or verification or prepaying or anything you're not comfortable or the Bs platonic nonsense) you can hide them or block them and move on. I have a blurry underwater pic as my profile and some real pics that are private I only show the private ones to girls I'm attracted to who have already confirmed they can meet my needs from a scheduling standpoint. I show them pics and then hide them after a day. Move over to text or KIK ASAP and talk terms.

Every woman I've met on SA has been between 19-28 and I've had sex with all of them (except 1 and that was a really weird long story) on my terms at their places or a hotel. It can be done. You just have to have patience and a bullsh*t meter.

Sorry to be direct but entertaining their weird requests and quirky messages just encourages them. We have the upper hand here in terms of numbers, $, etc.

**SwimSays** · 04-03-19 13:43

Originally Posted by Samuel05 [View Original Post]

Got a request for private photos from??sweethoney? 37 yo writes as what might be interpretted to be classy and upscale. Anyway, send to her, hi-res but with dark glasses. She writes back blasting me about what am I trying to hide not showing my full face and so on. Immediately get blocked, no chance for explanation concerning discretion. Then, believe it or not, get another apparently auto-generated msg saying she's interested but wants me to get verified using Optimum, SA's in-house (service. Besides the expected questions, they ask for SSN. Don't think I'm ready for that. There is a definite connection between SA and Optimum. Not sure if she's an agent / employee or stipended. Anyone else encoutered similar?

Was the message sent through SA or from her directly? Either she's straight scamming or SA is trying to extract more $$$ out of your pocket. I'd NEVER give out any of that information, especially on a sugaring site.

**Samuel05** · 04-03-19 10:08

Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]

That crooked site, to which I would NEVER send money, makes you upload a public picture in order to complete "registration", even as a non-paying member. Just use a picture where your face and the surroundings can't be identified, if you want to stay UTR.

Got a request for private photos from??sweethoney? 37 yo writes as what might be interpretted to be classy and upscale. Anyway, send to her, hi-res but with dark glasses. She writes back blasting me about what am I trying to hide not showing my full face and so on. Immediately get blocked, no chance for explanation concerning discretion. Then, believe it or not, get another apparently auto-generated msg saying she's interested but wants me to get verified using Optimum, SA's in-house (service. Besides the expected questions, they ask for SSN. Don't think I'm ready for that. There is a definite connection between SA and Optimum. Not sure if she's an agent / employee or stipended. Anyone else encoutered similar?

**Spill** · 04-03-19 02:02

Originally Posted by Spike77 [View Original Post]

It is pretty easy for girls to create a profile and sit back and wait for the right guy to come to them. I am pretty sure they aren't paying to be on the site unlike the 90 bucks a month us guys pay. So from their perspective, why not? Getting spoiled and paid by some rich guy for their company sounds like a winning scenario to me. I hate to be the bearer of bad news but most women on here are here to get paid. And by paid meaning the easiest way possible. Most did not join because they want to have hot sex with men. I don't care how good looking or charming you think you are. That being said, I have my own crazy high standards on this site for the most part. I want a hot college type who loves sex and can come to a reasonable allowance. But it's the same scenario. I just need one girl to say yes. It is a lot of work. I've had so many time wasters, liars, catfishers, scam artists, thiefs, psychos, weirdos etc. What makes it all worth it? That one hot girl who you can trust, have a connection with, and crazy sex with for the long term. So despite all the work and pain I have put in it is all worth it to me. Furthermore, everyone has their price. I am sure if you have deep pockets you could convince some of these wanting platonic relationships. I think you will have a much more difficult time by merely going on your good looks and / or personality to get them in bed with you.

I very much agree with what Spike says here. We also have a very similar methodology. To answer JohnTies original question of "Has anyone bothered with those girls who put that in their profiles? I think that is the point of having that in the profile. They do not want us to bother them nor do we want to. I just hit "Hide profile" and move on.

I find it interesting that many times someone will post something negative about a lady on SA, for any number of reasons. I'll follow the link to SA and 9 times out of 10 I've already hidden her profile. There are all kinds of signs to read in a profile, both explicit and between the lines.

**Spike77** · 04-02-19 20:19

Originally Posted by JohnTies [View Original Post]

I am not a paying member right now but I do go on and look at prospects to when I do go back on.

And it is comical what some of these girls put in their profiles. Do they actually believe they will get money in a texting.

Emailing type of relationship?

I suspect they go on thinking like that and their dreams get dashed quickly of easy money after talking with some men on there.

Then many of them have platonic or not a hooker / prostitute / escort or no sex, etc, etc you get the picture.

I doubt if all of those women are not having sex, I am guessing they will try to pull it off by putting it on to see if any guys will fall for it.

I do or would not want to spend all that time talking or meeting to find out they really mean it or not.

Has anyone bothered with those girls who put that in their profiles?

Interested to hear some anecdotes.

It is pretty easy for girls to create a profile and sit back and wait for the right guy to come to them. I am pretty sure they aren't paying to be on the site unlike the 90 bucks a month us guys pay. So from their perspective, why not? Getting spoiled and paid by some rich guy for their company sounds like a winning scenario to me. I hate to be the bearer of bad news but most women on here are here to get paid. And by paid meaning the easiest way possible. Most did not join because they want to have hot sex with men. I don't care how good looking or charming you think you are. That being said, I have my own crazy high standards on this site for the most part. I want a hot college type who loves sex and can come to a reasonable allowance. But it's the same scenario. I just need one girl to say yes. It is a lot of work. I've had so many time wasters, liars, catfishers, scam artists, thiefs, psychos, weirdos etc. What makes it all worth it? That one hot girl who you can trust, have a connection with, and crazy sex with for the long term. So despite all the work and pain I have put in it is all worth it to me. Furthermore, everyone has their price. I am sure if you have deep pockets you could convince some of these wanting platonic relationships. I think you will have a much more difficult time by merely going on your good looks and / or personality to get them in bed with you.

**JohnTies** · 04-02-19 13:08

I am not a paying member right now but I do go on and look at prospects to when I do go back on.

And it is comical what some of these girls put in their profiles. Do they actually believe they will get money in a texting.

Emailing type of relationship?

I suspect they go on thinking like that and their dreams get dashed quickly of easy money after talking with some men on there.

Then many of them have platonic or not a hooker / prostitute / escort or no sex, etc, etc you get the picture.

I doubt if all of those women are not having sex, I am guessing they will try to pull it off by putting it on to see if any guys will fall for it.

I do or would not want to spend all that time talking or meeting to find out they really mean it or not.

Has anyone bothered with those girls who put that in their profiles?

Interested to hear some anecdotes.

**KingOfFours** · 04-02-19 10:11

Originally Posted by PaulRew [View Original Post]

About a week ago I deleted my profile, it seemed stale and I felt it was time to re-boot. That profile had no public pics but a few private pictures, never an issue. So yesterday I set up a new profile following the same picture template but it seems my new profile is stuck in limbo, SA wants me to upload a public pic to " complete my profile".

Any thoughts or suggestions?

That crooked site, to which I would NEVER send money, makes you upload a public picture in order to complete "registration", even as a non-paying member. Just use a picture where your face and the surroundings can't be identified, if you want to stay UTR.

**PaulRew** · 04-02-19 09:52

About a week ago I deleted my profile, it seemed stale and I felt it was time to re-boot. That profile had no public pics but a few private pictures, never an issue. So yesterday I set up a new profile following the same picture template but it seems my new profile is stuck in limbo, SA wants me to upload a public pic to " complete my profile".

Any thoughts or suggestions?

**Hobbyist420** · 03-31-19 14:01

"Seeking Arrangements says that the monthly allowance for Sugar Babies from their Sugar Daddy or Mommy is on average $3,000, which can pay off the average yearly tuition of $9,510 in mere months. ".

https://news3lv.com/news/local/unlv-...to-pay-tuition

After visibility like this, surprised it hasn't been shut down yet.

**Samuel05** · 03-31-19 10:07

Recent visit. Gained some flab since posted pics. Very talkative about family issues. Has a child not living with her. Negotiable $. BBJJ was nice. CFS into tight piece. Didn't turnout to be my type so couldn't reach a finish, but to her credit tried, not a quitter.

https://www.seeking.com/member/4cf5f...4-2edcdfbafd36

**Jack617** · 03-26-19 19:30

Looking to sell pics and vids, avoids discussion about actually meeting.

https://www.seeking.com/member/f075f...e-6109c116973d

NickyyBabyyy about 8 hours ago.

I just need to make a quick 5$ to be honest

NickyyBabyyy about 8 hours ago.

I send vids/pics

**PaulRew** · 03-25-19 19:03

Originally Posted by Banjomania [View Original Post]

Got a couple of replies from her, but no substance. Either extremely coy, or cautious.

Been texting with her, she then wants more pics and wants to tell me exactly what the pics should be (" not cropped and from a distance of. ") I lit her up, told her it will be the day hell freezes over when I let a withered SB pretender dictate the parameters of the pics I provide. And then blocked her. Oh, here is her private pic.