Rants, Raves and Opinions AKA "The Octagon"

[Cheech1]

There is no relationship between advertising and credibility, except perhaps the more something is advertised the less likely it is to be what its touted to be, LOL. I wouldn't mind purchasing a subscription to the site, but 20 a month would be more than I think I would pay, 5 or maybe 10 a month. It all adds up. The ads on this site don't bother me at all. My only concern would be that the site would become like cable TV, you have to pay to get it but then all the non-premium channels are full of adds anyway, so in essence we are paying to watch the adds. It sucks. I don't think Jackson would do it, but greed eventually wins and so, sooner or later, even if this were a pay site, there would be adds.

Cheech.

[Hooter12]

Not crazy about the "Secret Benefits" pop up that starts every time I log in. But I will say as a side note, while all the girls they show are great, the one posing sideways wearing the denim with the open denim shirt is absolutely the shit. What that girl doesn't have she doesn't need. I don't know where they found her but boy if she was a provider I'd be broke in no time.

I'm curious, would you rather pay 20 bucks a month or close a pop under once a day?

A2

I was talking about the girl not the annoyance of the pop up. Now that you ask though, probably the 20 bucks. Would give the site more credibility. However was talking about the model.

I don't see the connection between advertising and credibility. Unless you mean that the existence of paid subscriptions would do that. I tend to agree with that viewpoint.

A2

[Cincyfunguy]

I am just following the thread and agree that this conversation should probably be in the octagon, but my post would be out of context over there. It appears that most of these responses (to the MVD212 and FunLuver posts) are being aimed at MVD212, when, as it appeared to me after reading the thread several times over, the opposing comments were about the original post by FunLuver, not MVD? I'm not a science nut or a history geek, but just because a bunch of crazed serial killers had some sort of sexual dysfunction, does not necessarily, in any way, equate to everyone with a sexual dysfunction being a serial killer, LOL. If that were the case, without AMPs, 90% of guys over 60 would be widowed, single, and / or in prison, LOL.

(Inside comments were meant to be tongue in cheek and primarily intended for 104.7 FM, B&T followers only) thank you for you consideration to this matter.

I'm just sayin.

[CrissyLynn2015]

I can't believe I got to write this whole thing again LOL. For some reason it didn't go thru last time [Deleted by Admin]

I was the reason, don't tell guys not to post shit. If they think your apartment is in a sketchy place then they need to post that. If it is and it's costing you money then you need to fix that.

Telling then that it's not your fault who is walking around doesn't mean you aren't responsible for where you decide to run your business. If there are sketchy people walking around it's probably going to cost you business until you fix that.

A2

[DaytonSteve]

No, not everyone. Just that it's a possibility. I specifically did not generalize.

The point is that the first dude was right about AMPs, just let us get off, and the world is a better place.

That I agree with, It should be legal, period!

[BuxKA]

Keep the pop ups please. I will say the jiggly ass one was my favorite.

I use Firefox with the Popup blocker ultimate ad on and it stops it every time.

[BigJay69]

Not crazy about the "Secret Benefits" pop up that starts every time I log in. But I will say as a side note, while all the girls they show are great, the one posing sideways wearing the denim with the open denim shirt is absolutely the shit. What that girl doesn't have she doesn't need. I don't know where they found her but boy if she was a provider I'd be broke in no time.

I'm curious, would you rather pay 20 bucks a month or close a pop under once a day?

A2

Keep the pop ups please. I will say the jiggly ass one was my favorite.

[Hooter12]

Not crazy about the "Secret Benefits" pop up that starts every time I log in. But I will say as a side note, while all the girls they show are great, the one posing sideways wearing the denim with the open denim shirt is absolutely the shit. What that girl doesn't have she doesn't need. I don't know where they found her but boy if she was a provider I'd be broke in no time.

I'm curious, would you rather pay 20 bucks a month or close a pop under once a day?

A2

[BengalMan]

I am over 60 picture and I can still kill cereal, particularly Raisin Bran. But eating cereal definitely makes my ED dysfunction worse. Or maybe I'm confused.

Switch to Trix!

[MollyDaniels]

Come on guys.

Correlation does not imply causation.

If that were the case, wouldn't Cincy have been filled with serial killers whenever they banned all strip clubs in Cincy?

[MVD212]

Sorry, but that's not science. That's just batshit crazy talk.

Its science because it's a theory that has been researched and proven many times. You knowing nothing about serial killers doesn't make it untrue.

[MVD212]

While true that a lot of serial killers have some sort of sexual motivation, you are trying to imply that everyone with a sexual dysfunction or a lack of sex will turn into a serial killer which is quite silly.

No, not everyone. Just that it's a possibility. I specifically did not generalize.

The point is that the first dude was right about AMPs, just let us get off, and the world is a better place.

[BillBut52]

I am just following the thread and agree that this conversation should probably be in the octagon, but my post would be out of context over there. It appears that most of these responses (to the MVD212 and FunLuver posts) are being aimed at MVD212, when, as it appeared to me after reading the thread several times over, the opposing comments were about the original post by FunLuver, not MVD? I'm not a science nut or a history geek, but just because a bunch of crazed serial killers had some sort of sexual dysfunction, does not necessarily, in any way, equate to everyone with a sexual dysfunction being a serial killer, LOL. If that were the case, without AMPs, 90% of guys over 60 would be widowed, single, and / or in prison, LOL.

(Inside comments were meant to be tongue in cheek and primarily intended for 104.7 FM, B&T followers only) thank you for you consideration to this matter.

I am over 60 picture and I can still kill cereal, particularly Raisin Bran. But eating cereal definitely makes my ED dysfunction worse. Or maybe I'm confused.

[Pictraders69]

Have you been watching Lifetime again?

(A2, please move / mod if out of place -- I realize this probably belongs in the Octagon.).

I am just following the thread and agree that this conversation should probably be in the octagon, but my post would be out of context over there. It appears that most of these responses (to the MVD212 and FunLuver posts) are being aimed at MVD212, when, as it appeared to me after reading the thread several times over, the opposing comments were about the original post by FunLuver, not MVD? I'm not a science nut or a history geek, but just because a bunch of crazed serial killers had some sort of sexual dysfunction, does not necessarily, in any way, equate to everyone with a sexual dysfunction being a serial killer, LOL. If that were the case, without AMPs, 90% of guys over 60 would be widowed, single, and / or in prison, LOL.

(Inside comments were meant to be tongue in cheek and primarily intended for 104.7 FM, B&T followers only) thank you for you consideration to this matter.

[DaytonSteve]

If you can't normally bust a nut with a woman, one of the eventualities is to kill them. Most serial killers are sexual in the root of their motives. Simple science.

While true that a lot of serial killers have some sort of sexual motivation, you are trying to imply that everyone with a sexual dysfunction or a lack of sex will turn into a serial killer which is quite silly.