USA Adult Classified Advertiser: Reviews

[Willow1535]

This conversation should probably be taken to the Octagon, but I will add my two cents. I have been doing this for awhile and feel that I have something to add to this discussion. The quality of providers in this area has been trending downward for several years. This isn't a new phenomenon.

The lack of quality providers has changed my approach to the hobby. Up until 5 years ago, I had only engaged with escorts. My focus now is primarily seeing SBs. I do this for several reasons:

1) I tend to like younger women.

2) I prefer seeing someone who is potentially low volume.

3) I feel like I get more bang for my buck.

I do see escorts occasionally and typically will see EE's girls. In my opinion, he provides some of the best options in this area. I find the local talent to be scarce. You can look at the ads posted daily and I would say that 98 percent of the ladies posting would fall in the category of " I wouldn't fuck her with your dick". I am sorry, but it is true. A lot of the women that have positive reviews on here would fall under that category. I won't mention any names. Perhaps A2 can create a forum for this topic and we can have an open discussion there. It won't resolve the issue with quality, but we need to get to a point where we are open and honest with each other.

In regards to Sara TT. I saw her in the 2000's and again a few years ago. Without a doubt, she set the bar for excellence in this area. Another one who comes to mind was Phoebe7. Sara is a great provider, but she doesn't tick the boxes for me anymore. As I previously said, I like them young. Sara has to be in her late 40's. To each his own. In the end, we all have different tastes, budgets, wants, needs and experiences. Quality is a huge factor for me and until the situation changes locally, I will continue seeking the perfect SB, while using EE as an option, when needed.

Happy Mongering.

I saw her in 2009, when electronic cigarettes were not widely available. She came into my place in a cloud of smoke.

Which raises the question: 2009? Ten years ago? Seriously? So how old is she today? I know she was in her 30's, or close to it, in 2009, which means she's likely pushing 40 (or older) today. That's the age we should want their mothers to be, not the providers themselves.

Yes, I know: Any provider who isn't fat, gross, or ready to apply for an AARP card isn't a "good performer". That old chestnut.

Now, I would agree that Sara far surpasses the normal fare here. I didn't see any signs of drug use, or visible rolls of fat. That qualifies her as a perfect 10 in this venue. I would take Sara over Pretty Cameron (who literally sent me running in fear from the appointment site) any day of the week.

But however you look at it, none of the girls raved about here are MIss Universe material. So, no.

A few of them are "not bad". Sara was "not bad" in the first year of the Obama administration. Silk, RIP, a sweet person, was "not bad" for a time. But there, too, you were dealing with someone who was on the rough side.

Do any of you old-timers remember Climaxx Girls, circa 1999 or 2000? Every one of the girls I saw through that agency was a nine or a ten.

Check out Bianca Carlilse on Eros, or Serenity Snow. Those two are awesome, and they're almost certainly legit. So why are there 1,435 reviews of obese Cameron, and not one single review of Serenity Snow?

That was my original point: The widespread preference here seems to be for old, fat, rough and cheap. And I'm not the only one who feels that way, based on some of the previous remarks.

[DrDave39]

Todd-.

I agree that the overall quality has dropped over the last few years. Sadly that includes the quality of the touring ladies who visit (I've spoken ato a few who were excellent, and they shared that Cincinnati has a reputation for being cheap and too many girls had cancellations.) Look at national companies like XO Companions- super hoty girls every week in Columbus, but they no longer come down here. It doesn't help that another review site starting with "erotic" went dark- I'm just not willing to drop 4 or 5 $ on an EROS picture with zero reviews.

No Sarah isn't 20. But she still looks damn good and performs at a world class level. What is sad is that we seem to have lost virtually all the providers in the $$ range who were attractive and energetic. (Silk, Busty Redd, Ashleigh DD come to mind) Sigh.

Tgd.

[Todd Cincy]

+1. Uses a vape, zero smoke smell. Perfect skin and teeth. Tight, clean, and tasty. Always on time, hot lingerie, crazy hot skills and attitude. A safe playspace with sex swing, toys, mirrors. All at a very reasonable donation. Seen a few of the travelling $$$ to $$ providers who could match her- none better.

ToddCincy would probably find a way to diss Miss Universe if she were a provider.

The good dr.

I saw her in 2009, when electronic cigarettes were not widely available. She came into my place in a cloud of smoke.

Which raises the question: 2009? Ten years ago? Seriously? So how old is she today? I know she was in her 30's, or close to it, in 2009, which means she's likely pushing 40 (or older) today. That's the age we should want their mothers to be, not the providers themselves.

Yes, I know: Any provider who isn't fat, gross, or ready to apply for an AARP card isn't a "good performer". That old chestnut.

Now, I would agree that Sara far surpasses the normal fare here. I didn't see any signs of drug use, or visible rolls of fat. That qualifies her as a perfect 10 in this venue. I would take Sara over Pretty Cameron (who literally sent me running in fear from the appointment site) any day of the week.

But however you look at it, none of the girls raved about here are MIss Universe material. So, no.

A few of them are "not bad". Sara was "not bad" in the first year of the Obama administration. Silk, RIP, a sweet person, was "not bad" for a time. But there, too, you were dealing with someone who was on the rough side.

Do any of you old-timers remember Climaxx Girls, circa 1999 or 2000? Every one of the girls I saw through that agency was a nine or a ten.

Check out Bianca Carlilse on Eros, or Serenity Snow. Those two are awesome, and they're almost certainly legit. So why are there 1,435 reviews of obese Cameron, and not one single review of Serenity Snow?

That was my original point: The widespread preference here seems to be for old, fat, rough and cheap. And I'm not the only one who feels that way, based on some of the previous remarks.

[Blowme12]

+1. Uses a vape, zero smoke smell. Perfect skin and teeth. Tight, clean, and tasty. Always on time, hot lingerie, crazy hot skills and attitude. A safe playspace with sex swing, toys, mirrors. All at a very reasonable donation. Seen a few of the travelling $$$ to $$ providers who could match her- none better.

ToddCincy would probably find a way to diss Miss Universe if she were a provider.

The good dr.

Sara is without par in this city.

Along the way Todd Cincy has sang the praises of Kelly and Silk. Neither was close to Sara on their best day in my experience.

[DrDave39]

Better than the first (and it was good). Great communication, on time, clean and fresh. Remembered me and jumped right in. Fun talk during the break. She has plans to move a bit upscale- she is a bargain at the current rate.

The good dr.

[DrDave39]

I have seen Sara 6 times last year and I have never seen any smoking or anything to the effect also she has an amazing body and I found no rough area in any department, she is a very top notch provider.

+1. Uses a vape, zero smoke smell. Perfect skin and teeth. Tight, clean, and tasty. Always on time, hot lingerie, crazy hot skills and attitude. A safe playspace with sex swing, toys, mirrors. All at a very reasonable donation. Seen a few of the travelling $$$ to $$ providers who could match her- none better.

ToddCincy would probably find a way to diss Miss Universe if she were a provider.

The good dr.

[Mbgbe696]

A few addendums to your reviews:

Taylor Nikole was not bad back in her Delicious Dawn days, ten years ago. But even a good provider has a shelf life. Tom Brady probably won't be quarterbacking at sixty. Likewise, I recently saw some guy raving about Sara TongueTwister. I saw her in 2009, and she was rough and over the hill then. Also a heavy smoker. No thanks.

Steve of EE sometimes requires a bit of effort on the communications. But he's in a sensitive line of work, and he needs to preserve some barriers. He really is the best we have at the moment, IMO.

There are three reasons for the quality issues here:

1.) Many guys here seem to prioritize cheapness above all else. When you're only willing to spend $80, your choices are limited.

2.) Low monger self-esteem: A certain percentage of men on the forum (and I fear they've become the dominant portion) don't feel comfortable with hotter / younger women. This comes out in many comments, like the old saw that if a provider isn't fat, old or nasty, she must have "GPS". Translation: "I feel self-conscious around attractive women. ". (As I've noted, I'm in my 50s, and I have no qualms about demanding a hot 20-something.)

3.) Low quality drives out the good: I've talked to a number of higher-end providers over the years who have taken one look at the girls raved about here, and said "I don't want to be associated with that. " Likewise, men who don't want to content themselves with "Jenny Crack and Jenny Craig" often become frustrated and go elsewhere. (I've stayed away from the board for years at a time, even though I joined in 2009.).

Again, I acknowledge the importance of diversity. But when a majority of the women in any venue are either old, obese, or using, you have a problem. And we have a problem.

The solution is to demand better. Don't see the low-end girls. When presented with a bait-and-switch, walk away, and report it on the board.

That's what I did with Pretty Cameron. I walked away and said no thanks. I have benefitted from two other guys' candid reviews of Ellie, who I almost saw. I'm not going to deal with Jenny Crack or Jenny Craig. Period.

I have seen Sara 6 times last year and I have never seen any smoking or anything to the effect also she has an amazing body and I found no rough area in any department, she is a very top notch provider.

[Cincyjim]

I did a search and I couldn't pull anything up.

http://usaadultclassifieds.nl/classi...734&cityid=350

Thanks,

Happy Hunting!

Former dude.

[PjtIzzy11]

http://usaadultclassifieds.nl/classi...887&cityid=350

Any info would be appreciated.

[YogiBooboo]

I did a search and I couldn't pull anything up.

http://usaadultclassifieds.nl/classi...734&cityid=350

Thanks,

Happy Hunting!

Haven't seen her, but people have reported she is a TS.

[Gunman2013]

I did a search and I couldn't pull anything up.

http://usaadultclassifieds.nl/classi...734&cityid=350

Thanks,

Happy Hunting!

[MKimball]

Looking for info as well.

Not sure what is up. She and I had plans today. When I went to confirm, crickets.

[Red Running]

I spent some time with Kyla yesterday for the first time. After a communication problem the previous day she was responsive and everything was set up without hassle. Once I arrived she did a great job of warming me up, and the experience was fairly passionate and engaging. She did a great job and I may repeat.

[JLZ61]

I have also found him to be 99% responsive. He's not prone to long text chats but is pretty clear and consistent in his communications.

Our history goes back at least 4 years so I have some good data. While I haven't used EE for some time, if I were to connect with him again I feel pretty confident that things would go smoothly.

I never had a problem communicating with Steve. I text him and within a few minutes he replies. It doesn't always work out, but whenever it worked the person was always as described and all in all a pleasant experience. I have had no problem getting a reply in early afternnon.

[NKYmann]

I never had a problem communicating with Steve. I text him and within a few minutes he replies. It doesn't always work out, but whenever it worked the person was always as described and all in all a pleasant experience. I have had no problem getting a reply in early afternnon.

A few addendums to your reviews:

Taylor Nikole was not bad back in her Delicious Dawn days, ten years ago. But even a good provider has a shelf life. Tom Brady probably won't be quarterbacking at sixty. Likewise, I recently saw some guy raving about Sara TongueTwister. I saw her in 2009, and she was rough and over the hill then. Also a heavy smoker. No thanks.

Steve of EE sometimes requires a bit of effort on the communications. But he's in a sensitive line of work, and he needs to preserve some barriers. He really is the best we have at the moment, IMO.

There are three reasons for the quality issues here:

1.) Many guys here seem to prioritize cheapness above all else. When you're only willing to spend $80, your choices are limited.

2.) Low monger self-esteem: A certain percentage of men on the forum (and I fear they've become the dominant portion) don't feel comfortable with hotter / younger women. This comes out in many comments, like the old saw that if a provider isn't fat, old or nasty, she must have "GPS". Translation: "I feel self-conscious around attractive women. ". (As I've noted, I'm in my 50s, and I have no qualms about demanding a hot 20-something.)

3.) Low quality drives out the good: I've talked to a number of higher-end providers over the years who have taken one look at the girls raved about here, and said "I don't want to be associated with that. " Likewise, men who don't want to content themselves with "Jenny Crack and Jenny Craig" often become frustrated and go elsewhere. (I've stayed away from the board for years at a time, even though I joined in 2009.).

Again, I acknowledge the importance of diversity. But when a majority of the women in any venue are either old, obese, or using, you have a problem. And we have a problem.

The solution is to demand better. Don't see the low-end girls. When presented with a bait-and-switch, walk away, and report it on the board.

That's what I did with Pretty Cameron. I walked away and said no thanks. I have benefitted from two other guys' candid reviews of Ellie, who I almost saw. I'm not going to deal with Jenny Crack or Jenny Craig. Period.