Escort Reports

[LolHaha2]

http://springfield-ma.skipthegames.c...l/628796700365

http://springfield-ma.skipthegames.c...a/374876435088

Confirming legitimacy. A young hot spinner that responds quickly. Met her for a condom full service, she bounced and rode me so hard that I could not last long. She has a pretty face and nice attitude. Body is dry, rough, kitty is loose so there's been damage done. I would not recommend any bareback, use protection or bring your own. I would repeat as I had a good experience. Other mongers have listed a different experience so YMMV.

She definitely smokes so beware of smell. I noticed 1 hooded figure walking outside when I arrived and received the room number. Maybe its a coincidence or her handler? I was never confronted so I'd say it's safe & discreet. Doubt these girls are ever indie, nor is this the 1st time noticing eyeballers.

[Garthy]

Yes this is her. I posted her picture a couple posts back.

She is saying 60 for just head. I'm actually tempted to see if it's worth it. She looks like a skinny MILF type.

Someone on here has to have seen her?

She has a raspy voice and smells like an ashtray. Kind of looks like "Tan Mom," if you know the reference. Good oral skills and decent body for her age (which could be anything from 55-65, but a bit war-torn). Location is safe enough, but you have to not mind service on the couch in the entrance way.

[Pablo126]

I wonder if the sampling of mongers here is so radically different.

Along the same topic, what is everyone's take on eros? Girls are definitely pricey. I only very rarely find those girls on stg or even back when we had BP / CL. They appear to be more polished, healthy, attractive. But is it TGTBT? Worth the extra scratch?

[JustForthI]

The pics look familiar, but I can't quite place them. Some of the former BP girls have been posting on sites like AFF, so maybe I've seen them there?

Prices seem a bit TGTBT, which usually means either a scam (though those tend to have hotter pics), or you're going to get robbed by the handler.

If anyone tries one of them out, let us know!

I have seen Lexi Rose a few times. A rookie for sure. She is legit, very tiny, cute but her cooch is so tiny she can only handle cow girl for a short time. She also is difficult to get a hold of / schedule.

[Pablo126]

I wonder if the sampling of mongers here is so radically different.

Along the same lines of the conversation. What do you guys think about eros? The girls there definitely have priced themselves higher than stg or BP / CL etc. Are the girls worth it? More attractive / skilled? Fewer health issues? Or all the same, just priced higher?

[Is Thata Sw]

Yes this is her. I posted her picture a couple posts back.

She is saying 60 for just head. I'm actually tempted to see if it's worth it. She looks like a skinny MILF type.

Someone on here has to have seen her?

RU talking about Lynn in IO? Lynn / Bonnie was reviewed a while ago here. The monger said that the younger girls could learn a few things from her oral skills. I haven't seen her YMMV.

[LongTim]

http://springfield-ma.skipthegames.c...s/998230717464

http://springfield-ma.skipthegames.c...l/289912017165

Any info? These seem like new girls or are they new aliases?

Thank you in advance

The pics look familiar, but I can't quite place them. Some of the former BP girls have been posting on sites like AFF, so maybe I've seen them there?

Prices seem a bit TGTBT, which usually means either a scam (though those tend to have hotter pics), or you're going to get robbed by the handler.

If anyone tries one of them out, let us know!

[Piscesvt]

Weird. Everything feels fake from the rates to the writing to the pics, except the phone numbers are real, despite no hits on other sites.

http://springfield-ma.skipthegames.c...s/998230717464

http://springfield-ma.skipthegames.c...l/289912017165

Any info? These seem like new girls or are they new aliases?

Thank you in advance

[LolHaha2]

http://springfield-ma.skipthegames.c...s/998230717464

http://springfield-ma.skipthegames.c...l/289912017165

Any info? These seem like new girls or are they new aliases?

Thank you in advance

[TheGatekeeper]

I forgot the photo.

If things have not changed you will not be disappointed.

[Garthy]

Did you read were I said "part of this is our fault. " Did that say all of this is our fault? No. A lot of things played a role.

The guys on this forum make up such a small percentage of the men who see these woman. I think most of us on this forum would pay extra for better service if it was a available. But for every one of us there is 50 guys who just want to get wet and were happy to pay half or even a third of what the good ones where charging for the junkie ones. They drive the market not us. Your nuts to think that didn't this have an impact on the ones who charging higher prices for good services.

I know two girls who use to do this. One stop because she was sick of being offered pennies for her body and the other moved to a different part of the country where she could make money.

I wonder if the sampling of mongers here is so radically different.

Your nice looking women (hell, I know of what and whom you speak, I bet) are not taking the risks. I have known MANY lovely housewives who would do a couple of dates a month in their homes when hubby / bf / kids were away. That used to be easy to come by with BP (and yes there were screenings). I don't think cost was the issue. Yes, these women were hot as hell and the experience was safe and clean and relaxed.

But the expense wasn't the issue. (Actually, some of them were priced less than they were worth because there was no overhead and payment could often be augmented for household goods, etc.). Plus, once they knew YOU were safe, reliable and enjoyable, that had value in itself.

Most of my such contacts stopped because the RISK was too high. The condo association could turn them in, complain about cars in visitors spots, there were risks of arrest or of losing their kids. One was set up by LEO or some neighborhood watch program. An arrest in suburbia for prostitution is more life ruining than being busted for opiates (where you could plea that you have an addiction / disease and get into a program and a lesser sentence, etc). Plus, these women HAD lives. Real ones. Puritanism.

Risk vs rewards.

[LongTim]

I don't think "we" did any of the above. I think the opiate problem did much of it. But I won't digress into a long dissertation now.

Sex work has become more taboo. That has made it more illegal and more underground than ever. Stopping backpage did NOT help.

Look back at this forum about 5 years. Maybe a little longer, when there were absolutely stunning streetwalkers who could be had for a Jackson. Did "we" push them out too?

Gangs, drugs, politicians, a strange cultural shift toward fucked-up puritanism (and a few other things) have left a residuum of pretty nasty stuff for those who are seeking a quick and easy hook-up.

When there were safer, accessible mediums to advertise, a working woman could do okay. Now most of the sex trade in the area is gang-controlled.

"We" did not do that with price-gouging or being cheap. Drugs, gangs and politics did.

My opinion is that it comes down to a couple things:

As far as us longer-term guys on here go, who are willing to spend on quality, the problem is greed. I had several regulars that I spent generously on, weekly. Then, a few years ago, it seemed like the girls decided to get greedy and start robbing guys, even their regulars. I don't know if it was their own decision, or if they had handlers that I didn't know about that told them to do so. Either way, it seems idiotic to me. You have a stable source of income weekly, and you choose to rob that person? There goes that income. Either way, a few times of getting robbed / scammed, and you're no longer willing to be as generous.

As far as the quality of providers goes, I think the loss of CL is to blame to a big degree. The girls who are left out there have to go on sites like STG, which means posting their pics if they want to get any attention, and then it means getting inundated with 100 texts. No quality girl wants to do that. However, in the days of CL, a girl could just look for ads when she was in a moment of interest, and only reply to ones she wanted to, or post an add and get email replies within half an hour. It was much more friendly to the high quality, attractive, UTR ladies out there.

[Spider2112]

What's the deal with this one? I found her on stg. She is definitely legit. But she saying she only does BJ for 75 a visit. I got her down to 60. Can anyone report back that her BJ is worth this much?

Going by her picture I asked if we could do full-service. But she responded that she really does full service in only does BJ's. But if we hit it off full serve is possible.

I am a sucker for MILFs. Can anyone justify the expenditure?

RU talking about Lynn in IO? Lynn / Bonnie was reviewed a while ago here. The monger said that the younger girls could learn a few things from her oral skills. I haven't seen her YMMV.

[Is Thata Sw]

I forgot the photo.

What's the deal with this one? I found her on stg. She is definitely legit. But she saying she only does BJ for 75 a visit. I got her down to 60. Can anyone report back that her BJ is worth this much?

Going by her picture I asked if we could do full-service. But she responded that she really does full service in only does BJ's. But if we hit it off full serve is possible.

I am a sucker for MILFs. Can anyone justify the expenditure?

[SolBlind]

I don't think "we" did any of the above. I think the opiate problem did much of it. But I won't digress into a long dissertation now.

Sex work has become more taboo. That has made it more illegal and more underground than ever. Stopping backpage did NOT help.

Look back at this forum about 5 years. Maybe a little longer, when there were absolutely stunning streetwalkers who could be had for a Jackson. Did "we" push them out too?

Gangs, drugs, politicians, a strange cultural shift toward fucked-up puritanism (and a few other things) have left a residuum of pretty nasty stuff for those who are seeking a quick and easy hook-up.

When there were safer, accessible mediums to advertise, a working woman could do okay. Now most of the sex trade in the area is gang-controlled.

"We" did not do that with price-gouging or being cheap. Drugs, gangs and politics did.

Did you read were I said "part of this is our fault. " Did that say all of this is our fault? No. A lot of things played a role.

The guys on this forum make up such a small percentage of the men who see these woman. I think most of us on this forum would pay extra for better service if it was a available. But for every one of us there is 50 guys who just want to get wet and were happy to pay half or even a third of what the good ones where charging for the junkie ones. They drive the market not us. Your nuts to think that didn't this have an impact on the ones who charging higher prices for good services.

I know two girls who use to do this. One stop because she was sick of being offered pennies for her body and the other moved to a different part of the country where she could make money.