SB / SA thread

[Banjomania]

Search Stephieg69 on SA, and you shall find! But again, I am not a paying member of SA--but I do know some of these SA girls by other mechanisms.

And gents--my inbox is overflowing like a creampied pussy, with requests for contact info for these UTR non-pro and semi-pro SA girls. PLEASE, PLEASE--be aware that I will ONLY share the personal contact info for these UTR SA girls with those I ALREADY KNOW WELL AND TRUST. Because if you are only a recent contributer to these forums, and if I don't know you, I'm just NOT going go put these girls OR MYSELF in jeopardy. Because these girls, unless contacted thru SA, would require a PERSONAL referral. And I'm NOT doing that unless I'm CERTAIN about your credentials.

Think about it. There are all kinds of problems with sharing info about girls that do not openly advertise themselves a hoes. There are all kinds of assholes and thugs out there--both with and without badges. So, I would need to know you WELL, in the sense of having have traded bareback girls with you privately for a LONG time, or else you need to be a PROLIFIC poster on here, going back YEARS. Not just a couple of recent posts. PLEASE understand: Its just to risky otherwise.

Amen, KoF!

[SteveInMa428]

Search Stephieg69 on SA, and you shall find! But again, I am not a paying member of SA--but I do know some of these SA girls by other mechanisms.

And gents--my inbox is overflowing like a creampied pussy, with requests for contact info for these UTR non-pro and semi-pro SA girls. PLEASE, PLEASE--be aware that I will ONLY share the personal contact info for these UTR SA girls with those I ALREADY KNOW WELL AND TRUST. Because if you are only a recent contributer to these forums, and if I don't know you, I'm just NOT going go put these girls OR MYSELF in jeopardy. Because these girls, unless contacted thru SA, would require a PERSONAL referral. And I'm NOT doing that unless I'm CERTAIN about your credentials.

Think about it. There are all kinds of problems with sharing info about girls that do not openly advertise themselves a hoes. There are all kinds of assholes and thugs out there--both with and without badges. So, I would need to know you WELL, in the sense of having have traded bareback girls with you privately for a LONG time, or else you need to be a PROLIFIC poster on here, going back YEARS. Not just a couple of recent posts. PLEASE understand: Its just to risky otherwise.

She's open to a gang bang if anyone is interested.

[KingOfFours]

Damn she looks good do have an ad or something. I can find her in.

Search Stephieg69 on SA, and you shall find! But again, I am not a paying member of SA--but I do know some of these SA girls by other mechanisms.

And gents--my inbox is overflowing like a creampied pussy, with requests for contact info for these UTR non-pro and semi-pro SA girls. PLEASE, PLEASE--be aware that I will ONLY share the personal contact info for these UTR SA girls with those I ALREADY KNOW WELL AND TRUST. Because if you are only a recent contributer to these forums, and if I don't know you, I'm just NOT going go put these girls OR MYSELF in jeopardy. Because these girls, unless contacted thru SA, would require a PERSONAL referral. And I'm NOT doing that unless I'm CERTAIN about your credentials.

Think about it. There are all kinds of problems with sharing info about girls that do not openly advertise themselves a hoes. There are all kinds of assholes and thugs out there--both with and without badges. So, I would need to know you WELL, in the sense of having have traded bareback girls with you privately for a LONG time, or else you need to be a PROLIFIC poster on here, going back YEARS. Not just a couple of recent posts. PLEASE understand: Its just to risky otherwise.

[ShadowFox198]

I got quite a few more pics when I inseminated her holes again recently. Here are some I can share.

Damn she looks good do have an ad or something. I can find her in.

[Sounds]

I can't figure out why. I uploaded again--try this:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Be...ew?usp=sharing

Worked this time.

Had worked in the past too when you first posted it, but not the other day.

[KingOfFours]

I can't figure out why. I uploaded again--try this:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Be...ew?usp=sharing

I got quite a few more pics when I inseminated her holes again recently. Here are some I can share.

[KingOfFours]

Doesn't work for me.

Tried with Tor and Chrome.

I can't figure out why. I uploaded again--try this:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Be...ew?usp=sharing

[Sounds]

I can open and view, no issues.

I use chrome on an Android.

Doesn't work for me.

Tried with Tor and Chrome.

[Drewonhere]

I have no clue why some of the google docs links come back with that message. The pic still comes up for me. I've had situations in the past where the link works for some but not others. I set the parameters so "anyone can view" so I don't know the cause of this but it might be the browser you are using? Can others please check and see if they can still view that particular picture and let us know?

I can open and view, no issues.

I use chrome on an Android.

[BSmith1116]

I have no clue why some of the google docs links come back with that message. The pic still comes up for me. I've had situations in the past where the link works for some but not others. I set the parameters so "anyone can view" so I don't know the cause of this but it might be the browser you are using? Can others please check and see if they can still view that particular picture and let us know?

I actually got the same message, as a heads up! Wasn't able to view.

[ILuvToMunch69]

I have no clue why some of the google docs links come back with that message. The pic still comes up for me. I've had situations in the past where the link works for some but not others. I set the parameters so "anyone can view" so I don't know the cause of this but it might be the browser you are using? Can others please check and see if they can still view that particular picture and let us know?

Not able to view from here on a Comcast network using Firefox.

[KingOfFours]

Google drive error says pic violates terms and conditions. Any chance you'd like to try to share it again please.

I have no clue why some of the google docs links come back with that message. The pic still comes up for me. I've had situations in the past where the link works for some but not others. I set the parameters so "anyone can view" so I don't know the cause of this but it might be the browser you are using? Can others please check and see if they can still view that particular picture and let us know?

[Stylish]

Former BP girl who used to post as Diamond in NH / MA. I would avoid her.

Any info on these ladies?

Seximama2018- her name is Mandy.

Kaylababy83- says she used to dance.

Tasty skyy- Tia.

They ended up hitting me up, so I know these are most likely high volume providers. Lmk! Thanks.

[StuSimple]

Any info on this one.

https://www.seeking.com/member/6c57d...2-2bd435a29d03

I've been talking to her on and off for a few months. She'll message for like a day and then stops. I'd be curious to know if you have any better luck. She didn't seem to want to talk on snap (which is what I use to verify the girls are real), so I eventually gave up on her.

[PatsFan1275]

Google drive error says pic violates terms and conditions. Any chance you'd like to try to share it again please.

I know her well. Face is mature, she's a MILF, but trim, some minor belly stretch marks, great legs, natural C cups which are nice with big brown areolae, a little droopy, but she dresses up nicely for professional bedroom success in high heels and nice lingerie. But on a 10 point scale of performance, she's a fucking 12! All holes open for deposit, and I've done some absolutely outrageous shit with her, not for the squeamish, that I've done with VERY few others that I won't even mention on here. I've several dozen pictures, including face pictures, and some of those pictures show the highly outrageous kinky shit I mentioned, that I will NEVER post publically. She's a passionte GFE and yet also, a raunchy-nasty PSE who loves ass to mouth and ass to cunnt, and other sublimely nasty shenanigans. Two or more cups were always available for me (into both ass and pussy) for a basically unlimited time frame for each visit. I won't discuss on here, the exact price I gave her publically. But I've been with her a couple hours each time, and probably could have stayed longer, but I had to leave because of my own pressing obligations afterwards--not hers. For a price less than most former backpage girls charge for just a half an hour these days.


Now--in return for one or more PHONE NUMBERS of some other SA girls on that site that you paying members have found (because I'm not a paying member of SA) who, like Steph, are CONFIRMED ultra-GFE, barebackin' HOs, and NOT Platinum Pussy "sugar babies", I will provide her phone number (which I have her permission to do), along with those outrageous pictures. But if and ONLY if I trust you! HEAVILY CONTRIBUTING SENIORS ONLY, PLEASE! Please note--I am interested ONLY in those ladies who have been CONFIRMED to fuck bareback first "date", and have an incall in, or close to Rhode Island, and are HOs, who are willing to get inseminated for a FAIR price on a pay-per-visit basis--I. E. , no "sugaring" bullshit.

Here is the ONLY picture of Steph that I will post publically.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L9H...ew?usp=sharing