Thread: Arrangement Reports
+
Add Report
Results 14,596 to 14,610 of 16834
-
12-07-18 00:16 #2239Senior Member

Posts: 165Instagram and Google Image Search
I think the issue here is that a Google image search will not find an Instagram-hosted pic because you have to actively "follow" the person, after which you can see their pics. The same for a hashtage search. In other words, I don't think it concerns something SA is doing to the pics to prevent an image search.
Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-18 21:26 #2238Senior Member

Posts: 47I love the thighs!!
The back of her thighs has big pot tattoos on the back of both of them. Have to fly your freak flag high!! LOL.
Originally Posted by Matts1975
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-18 20:31 #2237Banned Member

Posts: 18550
Thats pretty darn old. Have seen her a bunch of times on POF, to be had for free if anyone should ever so choose.
Originally Posted by Matts1975
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-18 19:47 #2236Senior Member

Posts: 61Marchewka
Was dreaming of her a month ago. Lives in lombard. Had a roomie. Polish. Divorced. Started as total GPS. KKK per month. Came down to 3 for initial meet. . Pm for details.
Originally Posted by Skrause74
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-18 17:38 #2235Senior Member

Posts: 56Image search
I think most of the images are reversed. I saw one girl on the train home from work who was reading messages on SA on her phone with a girlfriend one day, and I found her on there. Things like tattoos, piercings, etc. Were backwards on SA.
-
12-06-18 16:48 #2234Banned Member

Posts: 54Totally agree
The girls that I have banged, only about 10% come up in google images. I think it is either SA doing something to the pictures or the girls maybe cropping part of the picture before uploading and google images does not recognize the partial pic. I hope someone has a better way to check these girls out before seeing them.
Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX
[View Original Post]
Stay safe out there.
-
12-06-18 16:46 #2233Regular Member

Posts: 6Belldandy616
Been in touch with this one. Might have a meet soon. Anyone have any interactions?
https://www.seeking.com/member/92c9c...5-09584cb625b3
-
12-06-18 15:44 #2232Senior Member

Posts: 57I have spoken to her as well but not pulled the trigger. I would love to verify that she is legit. Has anyone seen her?
Originally Posted by DaneCummings
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-18 15:13 #2231Senior Member

Posts: 3254That's not it at all. Google can't access the profiles on seeking.com, so that's why it doesn't have the photos in its search database. It used to be, for you newbies, that you had to go through a captcha to log on to seeking.com. Some might have found that annoying, I liked it b / c it was extra security. It seems to be removed now though. They change their procedures periodically, without announcement and explanation. If you have a SO, as I do, this is a reason to use seeking. No other site does this. I am also very circumspect about putting real pix of myself on the site, or sharing them w / girls by other means (text, kik, snap). I don't ever use any image that has been out on the web of me IRL, this is the way that we get exposed.
Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX
[View Original Post]
-
12-06-18 15:07 #2230Senior Member

Posts: 165Image Search
I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.
I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.
Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.
Get that sex.
SDX.
-
12-06-18 14:58 #2229Regular Member

Posts: 6Marchewka.
Anyone ever meet Marchewka? Have something set up. Will report back.
https://www.seeking.com/member/ebf54...5-9d51e9e99985
-
12-06-18 14:29 #2228Senior Member

Posts: 61Sugarbabies4200.
Weird one this. Was willing to meet immediately. At midnight. Stays in far burbs. Seems to be high all the time. Passed.
https://www.seeking.com/member/ef4ac...4-9090e1e725fd
-
12-06-18 14:22 #2227Senior Member

Posts: 61Kitten.
In oswego. Awful communicator. Radio silence for days. Erratic schedule. Worth the headache if one likes her type. See photos 300.
https://www.seeking.com/member/4a922...c-17632f52e3d8
-
12-06-18 14:19 #2226Senior Member

Posts: 61Lola.
To me, total GPS. Text only. Was expecting KKKK monthly. Yea right!
https://www.seeking.com/member/6e24e...4-d4a10aa6bada
-
12-06-18 14:14 #2225Senior Member

Posts: 61Jo l.
Older 50+ in Chicago. 300. Safe. Need to get room too. Good attitude.
https://www.seeking.com/member/63506...e-c096643b738d







Reply With Quote



