Arrangement Reports

[Roctiggers]

Wants 500 ppm. She is not that good looking.

https://www.seeking.com/member/cf4dd...7-d52e7ca638f8

[Bryzzo]

Anyone ever meet Marchewka? Have something set up. Will report back.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ebf54...5-9d51e9e99985

Wanted $700, I said nah.

[Matts1975]

I corresponded and talked with her months ago. With me at least she was quite b*why during negotiations The newly added full-face pic looks to be about two decades newer than a couple of the others.

Did you partake? If yes, please PM details. Thanks!

[SugarDaddyX]

I think the issue here is that a Google image search will not find an Instagram-hosted pic because you have to actively "follow" the person, after which you can see their pics. The same for a hashtage search. In other words, I don't think it concerns something SA is doing to the pics to prevent an image search.

Her Instagram was public, so no following was necessary to see any of her pictures. Several years ago, Google Image Search was very helpful, but that has not been the case more recently in my experience. Tonight, I just ran 100 images from about 25 different SA ladies through the tool via upload, and did not get a hit on a single one. Similarly, Facebook used to be a great resource for running phone numbers (I had 30-35% success), but Facebook seemed to change this feature a while back.

Get that sex.

SDX.

[Pau Ford]

Yeah, what others said.

Google can only index images that are publicly and openly on the internet. That's why your FB pics that are not set to public aren't crawled, but your FB profile pic is. Same with Twitter, if your tweets are protected they can't be indexed but your profile pic is public so that will show up. SA is not public so those don't get crawled. Not sure exactly why IG's that are public aren't fully captured. I've had hits and misses on public IG's, maybe just a function of Google Image Search not being as black and white as it is crawling regular text.

Between image search and Hiya reverse phone search I get at least something about 40-50% of the time. One nugget can lead to something else, to something else that eventually gets you a name or social media profile. Those IG scraper sites can turn up their IG name if you dig in enough. Don't forget to simply google their SA username, I've had that turn up hits elsewhere too.

No method is automatic or easy, it usually takes a multitude of resources as well as some elbow grease.

I think the issue here is that a Google image search will not find an Instagram-hosted pic because you have to actively "follow" the person, after which you can see their pics. The same for a hashtage search. In other words, I don't think it concerns something SA is doing to the pics to prevent an image search.

[OlderGuy1954]

Older 50+ in Chicago. 300. Safe. Need to get room too. Good attitude.

https://www.seeking.com/member/63506...e-c096643b738d

I corresponded and talked with her months ago. With me at least she was quite b*why during negotiations The newly added full-face pic looks to be about two decades newer than a couple of the others.

[OlderGuy1954]

I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.

I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.

Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.

Get that sex.

SDX.

I think the issue here is that a Google image search will not find an Instagram-hosted pic because you have to actively "follow" the person, after which you can see their pics. The same for a hashtage search. In other words, I don't think it concerns something SA is doing to the pics to prevent an image search.

[HungLowe]

Weird one this. Was willing to meet immediately. At midnight. Stays in far burbs. Seems to be high all the time. Passed.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ef4ac...4-9090e1e725fd

The back of her thighs has big pot tattoos on the back of both of them. Have to fly your freak flag high!! LOL.

[ItsHowdyDoody]

Older 50+ in Chicago. 300. Safe. Need to get room too. Good attitude.

https://www.seeking.com/member/63506...e-c096643b738d

Thats pretty darn old. Have seen her a bunch of times on POF, to be had for free if anyone should ever so choose.

[Matts1975]

Anyone ever meet Marchewka? Have something set up. Will report back.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ebf54...5-9d51e9e99985

Was dreaming of her a month ago. Lives in lombard. Had a roomie. Polish. Divorced. Started as total GPS. KKK per month. Came down to 3 for initial meet. . Pm for details.

[Berserker06]

I think most of the images are reversed. I saw one girl on the train home from work who was reading messages on SA on her phone with a girlfriend one day, and I found her on there. Things like tattoos, piercings, etc. Were backwards on SA.

[Xg1423]

I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.

I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.

Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.

Get that sex.

SDX.

The girls that I have banged, only about 10% come up in google images. I think it is either SA doing something to the pictures or the girls maybe cropping part of the picture before uploading and google images does not recognize the partial pic. I hope someone has a better way to check these girls out before seeing them.

Stay safe out there.

[Skrause74]

Been in touch with this one. Might have a meet soon. Anyone have any interactions?

https://www.seeking.com/member/92c9c...5-09584cb625b3

[ChitwnGuy10]

Before Craigslist shut down I was taking to an early 40's woman who went by the code name Jennifer Wildmeadow based out of Woodstock. Nothing materialized, fast forward a couple months, I found her again on SA under the name Jen. So I started talking to her again and everything stayed consistent even the pictures she sent me. Does anyone have any experience with her? I love everything other than she only wants you to travel to her. Let me know if you have made contact and what you think.

Jen.

Mid 40's.

Blonde.

Asking for 200-300 per session very open minded.

I have spoken to her as well but not pulled the trigger. I would love to verify that she is legit. Has anyone seen her?

[FarFarAway]

I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.

I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.

Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.

Get that sex.

SDX.

That's not it at all. Google can't access the profiles on seeking.com, so that's why it doesn't have the photos in its search database. It used to be, for you newbies, that you had to go through a captcha to log on to seeking.com. Some might have found that annoying, I liked it b / c it was extra security. It seems to be removed now though. They change their procedures periodically, without announcement and explanation. If you have a SO, as I do, this is a reason to use seeking. No other site does this. I am also very circumspect about putting real pix of myself on the site, or sharing them w / girls by other means (text, kik, snap). I don't ever use any image that has been out on the web of me IRL, this is the way that we get exposed.