Rubrankings.com
rubmaps
The hottest girls are here
The Velvet Rooms
Live Escorts
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Meet Sugar Babies
Top Escorts
The hottest girls are here
The Velvet Rooms
Live Escorts
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Meet Sugar Babies
Top Escorts
The hottest girls are here
The Velvet Rooms
Live Escorts
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Meet Sugar Babies
Top Escorts

Thread: Arrangement Reports

+ Add Report
Page 989 of 1138 FirstFirst ... 489 889 939 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1039 1089 ... LastLast
Results 14,821 to 14,835 of 17057
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #2237

    Instagram and Google Image Search

    Quote Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX  [View Original Post]
    I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.

    I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.

    Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.

    Get that sex.

    SDX.
    I think the issue here is that a Google image search will not find an Instagram-hosted pic because you have to actively "follow" the person, after which you can see their pics. The same for a hashtage search. In other words, I don't think it concerns something SA is doing to the pics to prevent an image search.

  2. #2236

    I love the thighs!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Matts1975  [View Original Post]
    Weird one this. Was willing to meet immediately. At midnight. Stays in far burbs. Seems to be high all the time. Passed.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/ef4ac...4-9090e1e725fd
    The back of her thighs has big pot tattoos on the back of both of them. Have to fly your freak flag high!! LOL.

  3. #2235

    50

    Quote Originally Posted by Matts1975  [View Original Post]
    Older 50+ in Chicago. 300. Safe. Need to get room too. Good attitude.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/63506...e-c096643b738d
    Thats pretty darn old. Have seen her a bunch of times on POF, to be had for free if anyone should ever so choose.

  4. #2234

    Marchewka

    Quote Originally Posted by Skrause74  [View Original Post]
    Anyone ever meet Marchewka? Have something set up. Will report back.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/ebf54...5-9d51e9e99985
    Was dreaming of her a month ago. Lives in lombard. Had a roomie. Polish. Divorced. Started as total GPS. KKK per month. Came down to 3 for initial meet. . Pm for details.

  5. #2233

    Image search

    I think most of the images are reversed. I saw one girl on the train home from work who was reading messages on SA on her phone with a girlfriend one day, and I found her on there. Things like tattoos, piercings, etc. Were backwards on SA.

  6. #2232

    Totally agree

    Quote Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX  [View Original Post]
    I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.

    I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.

    Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.

    Get that sex.

    SDX.
    The girls that I have banged, only about 10% come up in google images. I think it is either SA doing something to the pictures or the girls maybe cropping part of the picture before uploading and google images does not recognize the partial pic. I hope someone has a better way to check these girls out before seeing them.

    Stay safe out there.

  7. #2231

    Belldandy616

    Been in touch with this one. Might have a meet soon. Anyone have any interactions?

    https://www.seeking.com/member/92c9c...5-09584cb625b3

  8. #2230
    Quote Originally Posted by DaneCummings  [View Original Post]
    Before Craigslist shut down I was taking to an early 40's woman who went by the code name Jennifer Wildmeadow based out of Woodstock. Nothing materialized, fast forward a couple months, I found her again on SA under the name Jen. So I started talking to her again and everything stayed consistent even the pictures she sent me. Does anyone have any experience with her? I love everything other than she only wants you to travel to her. Let me know if you have made contact and what you think.

    Jen.

    Mid 40's.

    Blonde.

    Asking for 200-300 per session very open minded.
    I have spoken to her as well but not pulled the trigger. I would love to verify that she is legit. Has anyone seen her?

  9. #2229
    Quote Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX  [View Original Post]
    I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.

    I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.

    Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.

    Get that sex.

    SDX.
    That's not it at all. Google can't access the profiles on seeking.com, so that's why it doesn't have the photos in its search database. It used to be, for you newbies, that you had to go through a captcha to log on to seeking.com. Some might have found that annoying, I liked it b / c it was extra security. It seems to be removed now though. They change their procedures periodically, without announcement and explanation. If you have a SO, as I do, this is a reason to use seeking. No other site does this. I am also very circumspect about putting real pix of myself on the site, or sharing them w / girls by other means (text, kik, snap). I don't ever use any image that has been out on the web of me IRL, this is the way that we get exposed.

  10. #2228

    Image Search

    I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.

    I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.

    Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.

    Get that sex.

    SDX.

  11. #2227

    Marchewka.

    Anyone ever meet Marchewka? Have something set up. Will report back.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/ebf54...5-9d51e9e99985

  12. #2226

    Sugarbabies4200.

    Weird one this. Was willing to meet immediately. At midnight. Stays in far burbs. Seems to be high all the time. Passed.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/ef4ac...4-9090e1e725fd

  13. #2225

    Kitten.

    In oswego. Awful communicator. Radio silence for days. Erratic schedule. Worth the headache if one likes her type. See photos 300.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/4a922...c-17632f52e3d8

  14. #2224

    Lola.

    To me, total GPS. Text only. Was expecting KKKK monthly. Yea right!

    https://www.seeking.com/member/6e24e...4-d4a10aa6bada

  15. #2223

    Jo l.

    Older 50+ in Chicago. 300. Safe. Need to get room too. Good attitude.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/63506...e-c096643b738d

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Top Tier Escorts
Best Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts
Best Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts
Best Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
High Class Companions

Protected by Copyscape