Arrangement Reports

[ItsHowdyDoody]

Older 50+ in Chicago. 300. Safe. Need to get room too. Good attitude.

https://www.seeking.com/member/63506...e-c096643b738d

Thats pretty darn old. Have seen her a bunch of times on POF, to be had for free if anyone should ever so choose.

[Matts1975]

Anyone ever meet Marchewka? Have something set up. Will report back.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ebf54...5-9d51e9e99985

Was dreaming of her a month ago. Lives in lombard. Had a roomie. Polish. Divorced. Started as total GPS. KKK per month. Came down to 3 for initial meet. . Pm for details.

[Berserker06]

I think most of the images are reversed. I saw one girl on the train home from work who was reading messages on SA on her phone with a girlfriend one day, and I found her on there. Things like tattoos, piercings, etc. Were backwards on SA.

[Xg1423]

I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.

I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.

Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.

Get that sex.

SDX.

The girls that I have banged, only about 10% come up in google images. I think it is either SA doing something to the pictures or the girls maybe cropping part of the picture before uploading and google images does not recognize the partial pic. I hope someone has a better way to check these girls out before seeing them.

Stay safe out there.

[Skrause74]

Been in touch with this one. Might have a meet soon. Anyone have any interactions?

https://www.seeking.com/member/92c9c...5-09584cb625b3

[ChitwnGuy10]

Before Craigslist shut down I was taking to an early 40's woman who went by the code name Jennifer Wildmeadow based out of Woodstock. Nothing materialized, fast forward a couple months, I found her again on SA under the name Jen. So I started talking to her again and everything stayed consistent even the pictures she sent me. Does anyone have any experience with her? I love everything other than she only wants you to travel to her. Let me know if you have made contact and what you think.

Jen.

Mid 40's.

Blonde.

Asking for 200-300 per session very open minded.

I have spoken to her as well but not pulled the trigger. I would love to verify that she is legit. Has anyone seen her?

[FarFarAway]

I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.

I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.

Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.

Get that sex.

SDX.

That's not it at all. Google can't access the profiles on seeking.com, so that's why it doesn't have the photos in its search database. It used to be, for you newbies, that you had to go through a captcha to log on to seeking.com. Some might have found that annoying, I liked it b / c it was extra security. It seems to be removed now though. They change their procedures periodically, without announcement and explanation. If you have a SO, as I do, this is a reason to use seeking. No other site does this. I am also very circumspect about putting real pix of myself on the site, or sharing them w / girls by other means (text, kik, snap). I don't ever use any image that has been out on the web of me IRL, this is the way that we get exposed.

[SugarDaddyX]

I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.

I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.

Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.

Get that sex.

SDX.

[Skrause74]

Anyone ever meet Marchewka? Have something set up. Will report back.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ebf54...5-9d51e9e99985

[Matts1975]

Weird one this. Was willing to meet immediately. At midnight. Stays in far burbs. Seems to be high all the time. Passed.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ef4ac...4-9090e1e725fd

[Matts1975]

In oswego. Awful communicator. Radio silence for days. Erratic schedule. Worth the headache if one likes her type. See photos 300.

https://www.seeking.com/member/4a922...c-17632f52e3d8

[Matts1975]

To me, total GPS. Text only. Was expecting KKKK monthly. Yea right!

https://www.seeking.com/member/6e24e...4-d4a10aa6bada

[Matts1975]

Older 50+ in Chicago. 300. Safe. Need to get room too. Good attitude.

https://www.seeking.com/member/63506...e-c096643b738d

[DLover64]

So SA in Milwaukee is like shooting fish in a barrel. Racine too. I love it when the conversation goes like this:

Me: I'd love to see you $$ if backdoor is included.

Them:. No, sorry, I've never done that before.

Me: have a good one.

Them: I mean, if you threw in another $ I'd try it.

Me: no, I'd consider $0.5 if you let me CIA.

Them: OK let's do it.

Like, I'm a virgin, there's no way I'd ever do anal, unless it's either a perfect stranger offering me $0.5, sure sweet tits I go slow since I believe you.

[Member #6352]

She stopped responded after a certain time, we had a disagreement on when to meet. Called me up last minute but I couldn't oblige. Afterwards radio silent. Shame, I was really looking forward to meeting her too.

Howd she sound on phone? Anything seem fishy besides the radio silence? I feel like with SA girls sometimes its cause they flakey and othertimes cause they fake, always hard to figure out.