Arrangement Reports

[Pal5600]

She replied to me, Asking if I am looking for online?? Which I am not. May be it is just for me. Don't know.

Yeah that's odd, she said that looking for going on date for fun, whatever that mean? Like how would she go on a date if she only want online, go figure.

[PkMongers]

https://www.seeking.com/member/a92b7...d-9059dfebb396

Had anyone hook up with this one, I try but she never respond.

She replied to me, Asking if I am looking for online?? Which I am not. May be it is just for me. Don't know.

[Creative Eros]

Charlee.

https://www.seeking.com/member/abcc0...4-b9e1966bfbb7

Her profile pic with those huge tits is what originally drew me into communicating with her. She's certainly no model, somewhat more on the average looking side. So when we got to discussing price and she told me 1500, I started laughing. My reply to her was that I was glad I was not drinking something when she quoted that price. 1500. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. At that price of course I took her up on it. I couldn't resist. (kidding).

[Al Melrose]

I don't know if it's me, but I haven't had any success what so ever with seeking. I am willing to pay 3,000 bucks to have sex with an attractive sugar baby I am also able to fly to other states to do so, but all the sugar babies ignore me. Guys, I need your guidance, or maybe I am just too ugly for sugar babies if there is such a saying. And I don't mean to inflate prices with this high cash offer, but I am desperate.

Send me the 3 K, I guarantee I'll find you a girl.

[Cycologist]

I don't know if it's me, but I haven't had any success what so ever with seeking. I am willing to pay 3,000 bucks to have sex with an attractive sugar baby I am also able to fly to other states to do so, but all the sugar babies ignore me. Guys, I need your guidance, or maybe I am just too ugly for sugar babies if there is such a saying. And I don't mean to inflate prices with this high cash offer, but I am desperate.

No, you just need to go troll some other site, I should have caught this bullshit in moderation. Apologies to the board for missing it.

A2

[Pal5600]

https://www.seeking.com/member/a92b7...d-9059dfebb396

Had anyone hook up with this one, I try but she never respond.

[Chicago41]

Talking with these 3. Anyone sample?

I talked with beachbhabie a bit a couple months ago and she ghosted me. Seemed flaky.

[Yardy00]

She's moderately new, that should change soon.

One of the underrated aspects of SA is seeing how hilariously out of touch the new girls are. If you read through the new accounts so many of them seem to have no idea of their competition on the site. Girls I wouldn't give 100 to are signing up with attitudes like they are SA's saving grace and about to change the game, with headlines like "believe it or not I'm real" or "chicago's best finally here". Then you read the bio and some BS about "not willing to meet but can possibly send some lucky daddy some cute photos if the price is right". I always get a kick out of these, especially when I check back in 2 weeks and their profiles / attitudes are completely different since they finally get the idea that 1) there are much better looking women than them on the site and 2) we have the internet and don't pay for photos.

So many of the new profiles have the online only tag LOL.

[Pal5600]

Talking with these 3. Anyone sample?

https://www.seeking.com/member/0bbe5...6-455f0dfa866c

https://www.seeking.com/member/0fb32...b-297c739c7da0

https://www.seeking.com/member/8f8ff...4-dcad95d31e7e

Messaged but no word back yet.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ac5ac...5-8d8c3d05d3a8

https://www.seeking.com/member/7e686...d-6a7d85cef414

https://www.seeking.com/member/4ba0c...a-cec9b1bf73bb

1) beautiful_blonde14 she just want bullshit online only.

2) emily410 platonic friendship bullshit or just with me.

3) lexxxxxxxxxxxx never respond to me.

And the other not really my cup of tea.

[Pal5600]

https://www.seeking.com/member/98a56...3-55393f8bcab6

This one likely be fake, but anyone chat with her.

[ChiNorthside]

Talking with these 3. Anyone sample?

https://www.seeking.com/member/0bbe5...6-455f0dfa866c

https://www.seeking.com/member/0fb32...b-297c739c7da0

https://www.seeking.com/member/8f8ff...4-dcad95d31e7e

Messaged but no word back yet.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ac5ac...5-8d8c3d05d3a8

https://www.seeking.com/member/7e686...d-6a7d85cef414

https://www.seeking.com/member/4ba0c...a-cec9b1bf73bb

[OlderGuy1954]

Ok, I'll give them a couple days. I now suspect they may have picked up on me using a VPN (spammers regularly use VPNs too).

Sorry for the off topic, back to your regularly scheduled programming!

I turned on my VPN mid-session and that triggered something at SA. No problems with VPNs and SA in general, but a rapidly changing IP address makes them think you're a problem. Customer service had it back in a day or so.

[FafaFooey]

Based on my admittedly limited experience way more than 1% of the gals on SA are not what they claim to be. That's not to say they're LE. I haven't encountered that. But, scammers of all varieties, yes. Druggies, yes. No relation in real life to the photos, yes. Scary criminal history, yes. Plenty of gals will do a meet and greet over coffee, or drink, or dinner. Its a way to screen them, and better to hold off discussing details of an arrangement once you are in person and have a safer feeling.

Agree. I think whatever the risks are on SA a simple public M&G mitigates most of them. If there are LE on SA then skipping on the 'meet right now' girls pretty much elminates them. Of course anything that's imaginable is possible, but its very, very unlikely most LE jurisdictions are going to commit the resources to enagage in a drawn out process to nab a guy or girl for what's in most places a misdemeanor. And many of the scammers, druggies, etc. That bring down the level of the site also won't want to put in the time to go through with that step, always pushing to get on to the paid stages (or demanding to be paid for simple M&Gs!

[Chicago41]

Twice in the last six weeks. I write cust service and within about 36 hrs its reactivated. They never give a reason other than its a computer Algorithm.

The last time I told them that I expected to be refunded for the day and a half and they added three days to my account.

Ok, I'll give them a couple days. I now suspect they may have picked up on me using a VPN (spammers regularly use VPNs too).

Sorry for the off topic, back to your regularly scheduled programming!

[Randolph]

Nothing more from my point of view. I had an account there until July, deleted it, decided to make a new one a couple days ago. I log in last night and suddenly it shows a screen saying I'm suspended and I get an e-mail saying the same. Send a message to customer support, no response. Tried to log in this morning and it says my account has been deleted. And just yesterday, I paid for the membership upgrade, too. Real nice.

Twice in the last six weeks. I write cust service and within about 36 hrs its reactivated. They never give a reason other than its a computer Algorithm.

The last time I told them that I expected to be refunded for the day and a half and they added three days to my account.