Bullshit that has Nothing to do With Pussy

[Fun69]

They make them pay for the room too.

Not all agencies are like that. But for this reason and for the post saying how the girls are terrified of the bosses and the timer is why I won't use some agencies around here. I get it doesn't bug some of you, and rock on.

It's why I had to stop using Angelli's when it was Kelly's. A couple girls told me they were leaving cause the owner was rough and kept threatening to get more 'inventory' if they didn't keep us coming back.

It's a boner killer for me.

I am certain that just like the company I work for, there is more back end work that we don't know or see to deliver a product or service. We say 50% split is unfair but in a regular business, the companies always make more than 60% of the profits. I also know that two girls have told me that they get higher cut than the agency. And finally, multiple girls have told me that the Agency pays for the rooms.

I am new to Chicago agencies and I started using that agency more than the other one based on how good you all spoke of them. I find it confusing how we all know that their strictness is for our benefits but want to rant. Please show me a perfect agency and I will give them my money.

[OF Charlie]

They make them pay for the room too.

Not all agencies are like that. But for this reason and for the post saying how the girls are terrified of the bosses and the timer is why I won't use some agencies around here. I get it doesn't bug some of you, and rock on.

It's why I had to stop using Angelli's when it was Kelly's. A couple girls told me they were leaving cause the owner was rough and kept threatening to get more 'inventory' if they didn't keep us coming back.

It's a boner killer for me.

This is good discussion. An agency is really no different than any business. If workers are not happy, then they leave. If customers are not happy, then they will stop using their service. An agency just like any business will either have to adopt/change or it will go out of business.

This kind of open discussion is good as I am sure all agencies monitor this site. Constructive feedbacks are good for everyone.

[OF Charlie]

I'm with you, Charlie, on all your points. These young girls could never make the kind of money they do going solo because they lack the savvy, ambition and resources for screening, etc. Not that there weren't young solo young hot hoofers in the Good Olde Days, but since the tightened restrictions in the name of trafficking, screening has become a much bigger deal than it ever was, it's less possible to go it alone for these young ones. It's just that agencies McDonald's-like efficiency takes its toll by depriving the hobby of some of the spontaneity and fun. These gals are scared stiff of MCE bosses and except for some of their top money makers, need to live up to assembly line standards or risk getting canned. Even their most popular gals jump when their cell phone timers go off at EXACTLY the one hour mark. Some fun ain't it?

It's simple math. Take a $400 girl, with 50% cut as example. That is $200 per hour. To make $100K a year, she needs to see 500 guys (assuming all are 1 hour appt). That is like 10 guys a week. Top performers easily see more than that. All this math is not counting any tips guys might give them. And let's not forget this is all tax free money. How many 20 yr old girls can make $100K a year without opening their legs?

While I feel very bad that they have to do this to pay for college, at the same time nobody is putting a gun to their heads.

As for your comment on the timer, I actually don't have an issue with that. Isn't that better than being shorted on time? Just read the posts on this site. How many guys complain about not getting the full time that they paid for? We all know about the timer going in. And mce is not the only agency to use timer. As I said in the other post, the solution is simple. Don't use agencies if you don't like them. It's really that simple.

Finally, this is econ 101. Basic supply and demand. Agencies exist because there is demand out there.

[SNeed12]

It seems they've fired a bunch of their gals lately, starting with Olivia.

One of the other girls told me she got fired for causing drama with a client.

Sounds more like a corporate mentality than an escort agency.

That's what I'm looking for, at these rates -- I want the kind of service a regular business will give me.

[WallyMan]

Yet MCE takes 50% of their cut. LOL.

The girls do all the physical work yet the booker nor the owner spreads their legs.

It may be a standard for the industry but it should be more in my opinion.

They make them pay for the room too.

Not all agencies are like that. But for this reason and for the post saying how the girls are terrified of the bosses and the timer is why I won't use some agencies around here. I get it doesn't bug some of you, and rock on.

It's why I had to stop using Angelli's when it was Kelly's. A couple girls told me they were leaving cause the owner was rough and kept threatening to get more 'inventory' if they didn't keep us coming back.

It's a boner killer for me.

[HomerGuy]

Well, there are many reasons why young girls work for an agency. For one, how many 19 yr old girls have a credit card. Even if they do, most hotels won't let a 19 yr old check in. Also, most of the agency girls are in college, just trying to have less student loans when they graduate. They don't have the time to do the screening.

Personally, I prefer to deal with an agency like mce. As I posted before, there were times where I would shoot them a text and an hour later I would be knocking on the hotel door to see one of their girls.

I'm with you, Charlie, on all your points. These young girls could never make the kind of money they do going solo because they lack the savvy, ambition and resources for screening, etc. Not that there weren't young solo young hot hoofers in the Good Olde Days, but since the tightened restrictions in the name of trafficking, screening has become a much bigger deal than it ever was, it's less possible to go it alone for these young ones. It's just that agencies McDonald's-like efficiency takes its toll by depriving the hobby of some of the spontaneity and fun. These gals are scared stiff of MCE bosses and except for some of their top money makers, need to live up to assembly line standards or risk getting canned. Even their most popular gals jump when their cell phone timers go off at EXACTLY the one hour mark. Some fun ain't it?

[ChiCity01]

Well, there are many reasons why young girls work for an agency. For one, how many 19 yr old girls have a credit card. Even if they do, most hotels won't let a 19 yr old check in. Also, most of the agency girls are in college, just trying to have less student loans when they graduate. They don't have the time to do the screening.

Personally, I prefer to deal with an agency like mce. As I posted before, there were times where I would shoot them a text and an hour later I would be knocking on the hotel door to see one of their girls.

Yet MCE takes 50% of their cut. LOL.

The girls do all the physical work yet the booker nor the owner spreads their legs.

It may be a standard for the industry but it should be more in my opinion.

[OF Charlie]

I got my information from a recent session with one of their gals who didn't go into detail, only that Olivia and a few others were fired. As for saying the agencies have a corporate mentality, it was only an observation, not a criticism. If there were as many independent hot young hoofers in the area as there are working for local agencies I'd love it because there'd be fewer restrictions on time, etc. Just one guy's opinion.

Well, there are many reasons why young girls work for an agency. For one, how many 19 yr old girls have a credit card. Even if they do, most hotels won't let a 19 yr old check in. Also, most of the agency girls are in college, just trying to have less student loans when they graduate. They don't have the time to do the screening.

Personally, I prefer to deal with an agency like mce. As I posted before, there were times where I would shoot them a text and an hour later I would be knocking on the hotel door to see one of their girls.

[HomerGuy]

Where are you getting your intel from? How do you know they were fired and not quit?

If you don't like their business model, do not use them then. I see nothing wrong with them getting rid of under performers. I pay top $ and I want good performers.

I got my information from a recent session with one of their gals who didn't go into detail, only that Olivia and a few others were fired. As for saying the agencies have a corporate mentality, it was only an observation, not a criticism. If there were as many independent hot young hoofers in the area as there are working for local agencies I'd love it because there'd be fewer restrictions on time, etc. Just one guy's opinion.

[OF Charlie]

It seems they've fired a bunch of their gals lately, starting with Olivia. Sounds like they're only going with the real money makers. Sounds more like a corporate mentality than an escort agency.

Where are you getting your intel from? How do you know they were fired and not quit?

If you don't like their business model, do not use them then. I see nothing wrong with them getting rid of under performers. I pay top $ and I want good performers.

[Admin2]

Thread Starter.