Thread: Bullshit that has Nothing to do With Pussy
+
Add Report
Results 2,206 to 2,214 of 2214
-
08-10-18 01:01 #9Senior Member

Posts: 1715It's simple math. Take a $400 girl, with 50% cut as example. That is $200 per hour. To make $100K a year, she needs to see 500 guys (assuming all are 1 hour appt). That is like 10 guys a week. Top performers easily see more than that. All this math is not counting any tips guys might give them. And let's not forget this is all tax free money. How many 20 yr old girls can make $100K a year without opening their legs?
Originally Posted by HomerGuy
[View Original Post]
While I feel very bad that they have to do this to pay for college, at the same time nobody is putting a gun to their heads.
As for your comment on the timer, I actually don't have an issue with that. Isn't that better than being shorted on time? Just read the posts on this site. How many guys complain about not getting the full time that they paid for? We all know about the timer going in. And mce is not the only agency to use timer. As I said in the other post, the solution is simple. Don't use agencies if you don't like them. It's really that simple.
Finally, this is econ 101. Basic supply and demand. Agencies exist because there is demand out there.
-
08-10-18 00:38 #8Senior Member

Posts: 70One of the other girls told me she got fired for causing drama with a client.
Originally Posted by HomerGuy
[View Original Post]
That's what I'm looking for, at these rates -- I want the kind of service a regular business will give me.Sounds more like a corporate mentality than an escort agency.
-
08-09-18 21:05 #7Banned Member

Posts: 21Its not just that
They make them pay for the room too.
Originally Posted by ChiCity01
[View Original Post]
Not all agencies are like that. But for this reason and for the post saying how the girls are terrified of the bosses and the timer is why I won't use some agencies around here. I get it doesn't bug some of you, and rock on.
It's why I had to stop using Angelli's when it was Kelly's. A couple girls told me they were leaving cause the owner was rough and kept threatening to get more 'inventory' if they didn't keep us coming back.
It's a boner killer for me.
-
08-09-18 14:43 #6Senior Member

Posts: 180I'm with you, Charlie, on all your points. These young girls could never make the kind of money they do going solo because they lack the savvy, ambition and resources for screening, etc. Not that there weren't young solo young hot hoofers in the Good Olde Days, but since the tightened restrictions in the name of trafficking, screening has become a much bigger deal than it ever was, it's less possible to go it alone for these young ones. It's just that agencies McDonald's-like efficiency takes its toll by depriving the hobby of some of the spontaneity and fun. These gals are scared stiff of MCE bosses and except for some of their top money makers, need to live up to assembly line standards or risk getting canned. Even their most popular gals jump when their cell phone timers go off at EXACTLY the one hour mark. Some fun ain't it?
Originally Posted by OFCharlie
[View Original Post]
-
08-09-18 14:18 #5Banned Member

Posts: 38Agencies
Yet MCE takes 50% of their cut. LOL.
Originally Posted by OFCharlie
[View Original Post]
The girls do all the physical work yet the booker nor the owner spreads their legs.
It may be a standard for the industry but it should be more in my opinion.
-
08-09-18 13:12 #4Senior Member

Posts: 1715Well, there are many reasons why young girls work for an agency. For one, how many 19 yr old girls have a credit card. Even if they do, most hotels won't let a 19 yr old check in. Also, most of the agency girls are in college, just trying to have less student loans when they graduate. They don't have the time to do the screening.
Originally Posted by HomerGuy
[View Original Post]
Personally, I prefer to deal with an agency like mce. As I posted before, there were times where I would shoot them a text and an hour later I would be knocking on the hotel door to see one of their girls.
-
08-09-18 12:33 #3Senior Member

Posts: 180I got my information from a recent session with one of their gals who didn't go into detail, only that Olivia and a few others were fired. As for saying the agencies have a corporate mentality, it was only an observation, not a criticism. If there were as many independent hot young hoofers in the area as there are working for local agencies I'd love it because there'd be fewer restrictions on time, etc. Just one guy's opinion.
Originally Posted by OFCharlie
[View Original Post]
-
08-09-18 11:04 #2Senior Member

Posts: 1715Where are you getting your intel from? How do you know they were fired and not quit?
Originally Posted by HomerGuy
[View Original Post]
If you don't like their business model, do not use them then. I see nothing wrong with them getting rid of under performers. I pay top $ and I want good performers.
-
08-14-17 00:43 #1Administrator

Posts: 5266Bullshit that has Nothing to do With Pussy
Thread Starter.













Reply With Quote




