Rubrankings.com
Best Escorts
Live Escorts
Top Tier Escorts
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #1178

    Lolla

    https://www.seeking.com/member/f2745...e-22d9e9f55e75

    This one here for lollapalooza this weekend, she and her girlsfriend want to meet today, but I think she flake city.

  2. #1177

    Weekly deal

    https://www.seeking.com/member/d35ff...3-e7a804c3f0e5

    This one ask for weekly deal, told her if we get along good, I am okay with once a week, then she ghost, WTF.

  3. #1176

    Anyone

    https://www.seeking.com/member/05355...7-fc969e05d00d

    Chatting with this one, I don't think she is that hot but maybe her price is reasonable for BBFS cip deal, will see how it turn out. Anyone meet her.

  4. #1175
    Quote Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX  [View Original Post]
    This girl came up in my search since she lists herself as athletic. Looking at the photos I would grade her out as either "a few extra pounds" or "full / overweight", and these might be her most flattering photos from a year or two ago. There must be some disconnect between men and women on body type.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/09b63...9-cbfbd79e068d

    SDX.
    I would said full / overweight, however there are guys out there that like full / overweight women, so different strokes for different folks, I guess, just not for me.

  5. #1174

    Fishing on SA

    Quote Originally Posted by Navmd  [View Original Post]
    New poster long time lurker. Thought I'd give my take on SA. So far it's been good.

    Signed up for premium last week. Probably put in around 20 hours to date (setup, searching, messaging).

    Have sent 100 or so cold messages, basically any profile that caught my eye or has an oz of thought in it.

    Right now, getting about 30-40% response rate, 10-15% transition to conversation / digits.

    From those, I've 'selected' to hang with two of them this week, both beautiful and dtf, 19 and 23 yo. Going to book a hotel room this weekend and see how it goes. Hopefully, I keep both my kidneys.

    Keep you guys posted.
    Goodluck, man. But definitely do yourself a favor and have some sort of a backup if you already paid for the hotel. Most SA girls will flake. That's just life when fishing in the SA pool.

    I've had my fair share of flakes, and I'd hate for it to happen to you.

  6. #1173

    To be continued

    New poster long time lurker. Thought I'd give my take on SA. So far it's been good.

    Signed up for premium last week. Probably put in around 20 hours to date (setup, searching, messaging).

    Have sent 100 or so cold messages, basically any profile that caught my eye or has an oz of thought in it.

    Right now, getting about 30-40% response rate, 10-15% transition to conversation / digits.

    From those, I've 'selected' to hang with two of them this week, both beautiful and dtf, 19 and 23 yo. Going to book a hotel room this weekend and see how it goes. Hopefully, I keep both my kidneys.

    Keep you guys posted.

  7. #1172

    She did say athletic and curvy

    And she did say she does yoga and acrobatic. Besides she has pics so it's not like she is totally trying to pull a fast one on guys. I have seen a lot worse!

    Quote Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX  [View Original Post]
    This girl came up in my search since she lists herself as athletic. Looking at the photos I would grade her out as either "a few extra pounds" or "full / overweight", and these might be her most flattering photos from a year or two ago. There must be some disconnect between men and women on body type.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/09b63...9-cbfbd79e068d

    SDX.

  8. #1171

    Athletic?

    This girl came up in my search since she lists herself as athletic. Looking at the photos I would grade her out as either "a few extra pounds" or "full / overweight", and these might be her most flattering photos from a year or two ago. There must be some disconnect between men and women on body type.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/09b63...9-cbfbd79e068d

    SDX.

  9. #1170
    Quote Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX  [View Original Post]
    The lifestyle expectation field was just not working from either direction. Many guys would not even deal with the women in the higher lifestyle expectations, perceiving major GPS. The newer ladies to the website would think it was the norm for guys give them $10 k or $20 k per month for platonic dates. When that did not work out, they would give up on the site. It gave them false expectations of what an arrangement is.

    There are also new tags added. Here are some of them.

    Designer Clothes & Accessories: I'm looking for someone who can accomodate my designer style.

    Life of Leisure: I'm looking for someone who will support me in living a life of leisure.

    Tuition & School Support: I'm looking for someone who can pay for my tuition or help me with minor school related expenses.

    Fine Dining: I'm looking for someone who will take me out to amazing restaurants.

    Shows & Entertainment: I'm looking for someone who wants to see shows and live entertainment with me.
    LOL. I'm sure the young ones especially will have fun with those new tags. Of course now the tag library is pretty firmly biased towards what the girls can 'get' out of an arrangement vs what they'll offer. I won't miss the lifestyle expectations either, although it could sometimes help weed out the most irrational girls. The high ends of the old scale were ludicrously inflated, but it, along with the 'big fish' stories that go around on some message boards fed the fantasies of the young ladies. Can't blame them for being a little jaded when they're sold on images of evenings on a yacht with George Clooney and the offers they get are lunch hours in a Motel 6 with George Costanza!

  10. #1169

    Changes

    Quote Originally Posted by FafaFooey  [View Original Post]
    Some interesting changes on the site in the last 24 hours. A key word is now gone from the name of the site, the 'Lifestyle Expectation' field is gone from profiles, and several tags have been removed like 'Short Term' and 'Monthly Allowance'. Must have had some pretty detailed reviews with their lawyers and got the web developers busy quickly LOL. This doesn't change much, especially for those on both sides who have looked at the site for awhile, but it does up the risk of newer POTs viewing it as a 'vanilla' or 'platonic' dating site. Of course the pricing and recurring subscription requirement are still in place.
    The lifestyle expectation field was just not working from either direction. Many guys would not even deal with the women in the higher lifestyle expectations, perceiving major GPS. The newer ladies to the website would think it was the norm for guys give them $10 k or $20 k per month for platonic dates. When that did not work out, they would give up on the site. It gave them false expectations of what an arrangement is.

    There are also new tags added. Here are some of them.

    Designer Clothes & Accessories: I'm looking for someone who can accomodate my designer style.

    Life of Leisure: I'm looking for someone who will support me in living a life of leisure.

    Tuition & School Support: I'm looking for someone who can pay for my tuition or help me with minor school related expenses.

    Fine Dining: I'm looking for someone who will take me out to amazing restaurants.

    Shows & Entertainment: I'm looking for someone who wants to see shows and live entertainment with me.


    Get that sex.

    SDX

  11. #1168
    Quote Originally Posted by ChicagoGoer  [View Original Post]
    She dabbles in one of the agencies downtown.
    Any links to that agency?

  12. #1167

    Profile

    Quote Originally Posted by Kimbll83  [View Original Post]
    That's hard to believe every link from this forum is a girl who has blocked me though.
    Although it may be a slight hassle, you may want to create a new profile if you aren't premium. I've done this twice and had pretty solid success. Revisiting conversations fresh that may have fizzled out.

  13. #1166
    Quote Originally Posted by ArielDude28  [View Original Post]
    I was with her twice and she was fine at 300. She will jump in right after the first meet and would like someone who just like to fuck.

    She keeps changing her profile every now and then. This is the 2nd change. Good one if you like a slightly big girl. Everything covered including BJ.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/30606...9-3b54984160d8

    I think she is looking again. Looks fine and gets down to business right away. 250. I was with her thrice. I dropped as she was not providing the full experience. No BJ. Also had some concern with the smell her pu*.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/67dd7...4-9cc3328168a4
    The bottom SA profile said ave. Body type, is that ave fat or ave ave, I always concerns about face pic only, usually girls that have great body will show it off, girls with fat body will only have face pic.

  14. #1165

    Old profiles

    I was with her twice and she was fine at 300. She will jump in right after the first meet and would like someone who just like to fuck.

    She keeps changing her profile every now and then. This is the 2nd change. Good one if you like a slightly big girl. Everything covered including BJ.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/30606...9-3b54984160d8

    I think she is looking again. Looks fine and gets down to business right away. 250. I was with her thrice. I dropped as she was not providing the full experience. No BJ. Also had some concern with the smell her pu*.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/67dd7...4-9cc3328168a4

  15. #1164

    Yikes

    Thanks for the info on the 2nd one fellas. She def has the stink of crazy on her. Tho sadly that does mean she must be crazy in bed and now I kinda want to fuck her more. Thanks again.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
The Velvet Rooms
High Class Companions
Top Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Protected by Copyscape