Agency Girls Report REVIEWS OF GIRLS ONLY

**Roarson 1281** · 08-02-18 00:25

Anyone seen her?

**Bsuh69** · 08-01-18 20:21

Just saw summer at MCE and other reports were spot on. She was a solid 10 and not a Backpage 10, but legit 10. Bbj and multiple shots on goal from any position I felt like. She's super laid back, friendly. Others have said she's not GFE, I'm not sure as that's not my thing so I wasn't trying to kiss.

**Goodtimechicago** · 08-01-18 19:35

This may just be post coital bliss, but does anyone else think Autumn looks like a young Tori Black? It's been bugging me ever since the session ended on who she reminded me of, but I think I finally figured it out. (I know I may come across as an agency schill, but we clicked really well). Feel free to PM for details, but other reviews on her here are very accurate. Not as overtly sexual as Kylie or Megan, but damn, the chemistry was amazing.

**LaCoyote** · 08-01-18 15:35

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was pointless, unproductive drama. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

**ChiCity01** · 08-01-18 15:00

With all the lackluster reviews on girls from EEC, MCE, and Angeli just go on a sugar baby website and take a gamble. For the most part it's going to be great. And don't forget those girls on SA are not pros. Money worth spent if BCD happens and they girl does everything you want, well almost everything.

**Cranial** · 08-01-18 13:35

I used Angelli's for years. Some of their original girls were spectacular (Alana, Alaina, Anastasia). There's little doubt that their talent pool is not as deep as it used to be (or at least not as consistent). I recently saw Samantha (a new girl for them) and she was stunning and pleasing (although seconds were not available), and Lia was nice as well (but a bit business like). Other recent forays have been less than spectacular (Aiden, Cindy, Akita) both in looks and performance. I get updates every day from them on Telegram, which is great, but I have been a bit gun shy of late because of recent subpar performance and the chatter on here about the EEC merger. So, has anyone seen Iris, Cameron or Magnolia from Angelli (if they're EEC girls, I have no clue as to their EEC name).

**ChicagoKid5** · 08-01-18 12:13

Anyone see sasha from EEC? Looking to meet someone today and MCE isn't running any promos. Thanks.

**Lukkylou** · 08-01-18 11:55

Originally Posted by Miramir [View Original Post]

Completely agree. Same experience and also no BBBJ. Will not repeat.

Put Sophie in that category too. Cute as a button. Classic All-American face and smile, but the belly and tits have some serious baby damage. Legs look great too, but she's very passive and her bbj needs some work. Cute enough that I was able to shoot twice though. And she's super cool. But not worth the money.

LL.

**Miramir** · 08-01-18 00:24

Originally Posted by Flipper12 [View Original Post]

I saw her when EEC was the regular EEC maybe a year ago. She is probably late twenties and has a kid. She has a loose, saggy belly that you can't see from the pics (which are at least a year old). She had the belly when I last saw her. Titties are soft but a bit droopy.

No DFK, mostly just LFK but otherwise BBBJ and FS in multiple positions was offered.

I paid $350 and it was not worth it for me and I wouldn't repeat.

Completely agree. Same experience and also no BBBJ. Will not repeat.

**Beast42** · 07-31-18 22:26

Originally Posted by EricLex [View Original Post]

I used to frequent the agency a lot, and I had nothing but amazing experiences. I, however, now find myself wanting to book someone but feel like ever since the alleged merge between them and Angellis, the agency has lost its credibility. When I say credibility, I mean its ability to produce the same high-caliber talent. Does anyone else feel this way? I've yet to book with them, and I honestly haven't really felt like there has been any incentive to.

Your thoughts, gents?

Same Same. I had visited EEC about 12 times between Dec2017 and April2018. Had a great time 11 of 12 visits and the girl that didn't perform was fired after my feedback. Found out later that she had move over to Angellis and just today she appeared on the EECs Telegram feed. I advise you to stay away from Cecilia. Please save your money and use that towards a provider with verified feedback. I have not booked with them since the crash and the handful of interactions I've had with the booker have been awkward and rushed. The previous booker had personality and seemed to value you as a customer. I don't get that same feeling now. Also, without a direct inquiry and lack of functional website I have no idea what the price will be and I'd be hard pressed to donate above 350. The new EEC is not the EEC from earlier this year. I miss that EEC.

**Flipper12** · 07-31-18 20:14

Originally Posted by HalfChi [View Original Post]

Thanks, I've been seeing her on the telegrams and thought about seeing her. Guess I won't now.

Anyone have any info on Taylor? She's the only other one I see looks hot and haven't seen yet. I've seen a handful and always been happy so far.

I saw her when EEC was the regular EEC maybe a year ago. She is probably late twenties and has a kid. She has a loose, saggy belly that you can't see from the pics (which are at least a year old). She had the belly when I last saw her. Titties are soft but a bit droopy.

No DFK, mostly just LFK but otherwise BBBJ and FS in multiple positions was offered.

I paid $350 and it was not worth it for me and I wouldn't repeat.

**Eric Lex** · 07-31-18 19:20

Originally Posted by Ufeelmylove143 [View Original Post]

Taylor is great in attitude. But she has a little baby belly now, pics are a little old. If that does not bother you then I would visit her!

I used to frequent the agency a lot, and I had nothing but amazing experiences. I, however, now find myself wanting to book someone but feel like ever since the alleged merge between them and Angellis, the agency has lost its credibility. When I say credibility, I mean its ability to produce the same high-caliber talent. Does anyone else feel this way? I've yet to book with them, and I honestly haven't really felt like there has been any incentive to.

Your thoughts, gents?

**Ufeelmylove143** · 07-31-18 18:52

Originally Posted by HalfChi [View Original Post]

Thanks, I've been seeing her on the telegrams and thought about seeing her. Guess I won't now.

Anyone have any info on Taylor? She's the only other one I see looks hot and haven't seen yet. I've seen a handful and always been happy so far.

Taylor is great in attitude. But she has a little baby belly now, pics are a little old. If that does not bother you then I would visit her!

**ChicagoKid5** · 07-31-18 17:05

Originally Posted by Beast42 [View Original Post]

Did you communicate that information with the Booker? Normally they will try to do something and make it right. Also, they will never know about her unless you give them feedback and they are normally pretty quick to let go of the low performers.

I also seen paisley and had the same experience she was a cool girl but would not shitup and she's not agressive at all. I told her I like aggressive girls and she said she will never be aggressive during these dates. Definitely not worth the price of admission. The booker suggested I book her and that she would be worth it. Ya definitely not. There a few girls I want to see like Sasha, aubrey, cindy, akita, ariel, but theres no reviews and I can't afford to waste my time and money with experiences like that.

**Bsuh69** · 07-31-18 14:19

Originally Posted by JasonJe [View Original Post]

I've had a pretty consistently good experience with 2 kg. These are the girls you meet at a dive bar, have a fun convo with and then take home for some wild fun.

They're not intimidatingly hot but they're down to earth.

This is my go-to when I just want to have great sex without the awkwardness.

What was the screening process like? I love the look of the girls they have.