Agency Girls Report REVIEWS OF GIRLS ONLY

**Random4** · 07-24-18 23:18

Originally Posted by ChiCity01 [View Original Post]

Valid points on every one of them.

The main reason why I replied to that thread is that the girls working for those agencies are actually NOT fresh "new talent".

SB is another form of escorting, think of it being a glamorized term used in the hobby. On top of that, the SB girls recruited by these agencies have sex with the owners which I find hilarious! The girls get paid full price, but later on the girl takes half when they work for them. LOL.

Owners shouldn't dip their pens in company ink. It will turn out bad.

The girls I had seen that were once with the agencies don't want all their money to be taken. Agencies take half. And for the most part, the girls do more work than the owners. And the girls that quit escorting don't want to fuck different men all the time. So that's why they went back to be a SB on Seeking Arrangements.

Sure, it's a convenience for SB and men to use agencies, but if SB due diligence in screening when they have time, they actually don't need agencies. If Seeking Arrangements has pointers on how to screen or offer screening services, well there is no need for agencies. If there were a website for sugar babies to be reviewed, hobbiest wouldn't need agencies.

From my "hobbyist perspective", new talent means someone I haven't already known about for a while (several months, whatever), seen churn through several different agencies (which some of them do), and doesn't have an inkling of being jaded yet. Someone doesn't have to wander into the world without having had much sex before to qualify as new talent in this scene.

I also don't really get a hobbyist vibe from what you wrote here. It almost sounds like you're a current or former escort, who isn't happy with the realities of the way the agency ecosystem works. A lot of what you bring up sounds extremely similar to what I've heard from some agency escorts near the end of their run or after they've switched agencies in search of greener pastures. I'm cool with escorts posting here, as it in some cases led to good discussion on TER, but if that's in fact the case be upfront about it. But maybe I'm wrong, and you're very in tune with the plights of the former escort SB crowd.

**Wolves432** · 07-24-18 22:21

First time with Victoria and it was a disaster. Overall this was one of my worst experiences and I was pretty shocked because she had good reviews. Almost as soon as I got into the room it seemed like she didn't want to be there and was just trying to get me out of there as fast as possible. After cleaning up I came out to her sitting on the bed texting not even really paying attention to me. I sat on the bed next to her and tried for a kiss, but it was very forced and it seemed like she didn't really like it as she keep pulling away. I will say that she is hot and while she is enhanced, it looks pretty good on her. After trying for a bit I eventually got a few lfk, but never dfk. She went down for a BBBJ which was good, but she stopped after a minute to ask if I liked it. I told her to continue and she did for another minute before asking if I was ready for the to start. I was confused as I wanted the BJ to continue, but it seemed like she was finished and didn't want to keep doing it. We did a few positions and it was okay, but her moans felt forced. After I finished I had to clean everything up as she just sat there looking at her phone. I tried for a second round because I still had half an hour left, but it wasn't going to happen. Overall it was a total waste of time and huge letdown. I won't be repeating anytime soon as I expect much better service for the price.

**Wolves432** · 07-24-18 22:06

Originally Posted by Beast42 [View Original Post]

Has anyone noticed a lack of reviews for EEC? Prior to the March2018 crash, I was a twice a month client and wrote reviews on each visit. Their website was up and running, and the booker was prompt and pleasant. I still get the Telegram message every couple days, but there is no info or price structure attached. A lot of the regulars were culled from the herd and the price of doing business increased significantly. The one day I was able to play they had no one working the airport. Needless to say, I haven't visited since March. Maybe it's just me, but the current EEC doesn't feel the same as the EEC I loved to visit prior to the crash. Anyone else have any thoughts on this topic?

I wanted to use them and I signed up on their website as required last week and still have not received any sort of confirmation. I texted them about signing up and they just said ok and nothing after that. Any help would be appreciated.

**WayWardsOn1** · 07-24-18 20:07

I used EEC today for the first time today. I have used the Angels many times.

From what I've been told, they have merged with The Angels but still have separate bookers.

It's a very confusing situation since some of the girls have different names at the two agencies.

PM me if you have questions.

Originally Posted by Beast42 [View Original Post]

Has anyone noticed a lack of reviews for EEC? Prior to the March2018 crash, I was a twice a month client and wrote reviews on each visit. Their website was up and running, and the booker was prompt and pleasant. I still get the Telegram message every couple days, but there is no info or price structure attached. A lot of the regulars were culled from the herd and the price of doing business increased significantly. The one day I was able to play they had no one working the airport. Needless to say, I haven't visited since March. Maybe it's just me, but the current EEC doesn't feel the same as the EEC I loved to visit prior to the crash. Anyone else have any thoughts on this topic?

**ITookUrJob** · 07-24-18 19:21

Originally Posted by Jefelici [View Original Post]

Saw her a few times about 6 years ago. Tiny and absolutely gorgeous Indian girl. Doesn't work often but check her if you get the chance.

Is the contact form on the website the best way to reach them? I will be traveling through Chicago so want to make sure I connect with them via the best medium. Also, any idea of their rates? Thank you.

**Vern2020** · 07-24-18 19:05

Originally Posted by Beast42 [View Original Post]

Has anyone noticed a lack of reviews for EEC? Prior to the March2018 crash, I was a twice a month client and wrote reviews on each visit. Their website was up and running, and the booker was prompt and pleasant. I still get the Telegram message every couple days, but there is no info or price structure attached. A lot of the regulars were culled from the herd and the price of doing business increased significantly. The one day I was able to play they had no one working the airport. Needless to say, I haven't visited since March. Maybe it's just me, but the current EEC doesn't feel the same as the EEC I loved to visit prior to the crash. Anyone else have any thoughts on this topic?

I've been a few times since the "change". I'd say about half the girls are 350 and half 400, so the pricing stabilized a bit. I've had an easy time booking and always had a good time with the girls (but a slight drop off in quality). Overall I've been happy. One of the girls told me they merged with Angellis.

**Audiboy** · 07-24-18 16:05

Deleted by Admin

You just can't help yourself can you?

A2

**Beast42** · 07-24-18 15:28

Has anyone noticed a lack of reviews for EEC? Prior to the March2018 crash, I was a twice a month client and wrote reviews on each visit. Their website was up and running, and the booker was prompt and pleasant. I still get the Telegram message every couple days, but there is no info or price structure attached. A lot of the regulars were culled from the herd and the price of doing business increased significantly. The one day I was able to play they had no one working the airport. Needless to say, I haven't visited since March. Maybe it's just me, but the current EEC doesn't feel the same as the EEC I loved to visit prior to the crash. Anyone else have any thoughts on this topic?

**HomerGuy** · 07-24-18 12:38

Originally Posted by SNeed12 [View Original Post]

They let her go? Too bad, she was one of the original crop of girls. Was never my favorite but I never had a terrible experience with her either.

She was there for almost three years, never a favorite with me either but I had two very decent sessions with her late last year and overall she's cuter and more attractive than most of the ones still there. She'll probably turn up at one of the other agencies, too young and inexperienced to go independent.

**SNeed12** · 07-24-18 08:33

Originally Posted by HomerGuy [View Original Post]

Hmm, curious that this review pops shortly after they let her go.

They let her go? Too bad, she was one of the original crop of girls. Was never my favorite but I never had a terrible experience with her either.

**ChiCity01** · 07-24-18 08:23

Originally Posted by OFCharlie [View Original Post]

I agree that if you can get the right SB, it will most likely be cheaper in the long run if you want to break it down by hourly rate, but I have to mostly disagree with your post for the following points.

1) you are assuming that every girl you contact on SA will reply to you. Wrong. If you are a 60 yr old guy, the odd of a 20 yr old hot girl replying to your message is very low. With an agency, it's a sure thing.

2) some of the girls will require coffee meets first. Time is money.

3) SA girls for most part have no reviews, so even if you manage to score one she might be a dud in bed. How is that saving money. At least with agency girls, you can get an idea of their service based on the reviews here.

4) not all agency girls want to be on SA. Just like girls are flakey, some guys are too. Some agency girls have told me that they don't have time to go on those coffee meets and do their own screenings. If SA is so great, then how do you explain that they got recruited by agencies. Why not just stay on SA?

5) how many 20 yr old can host? If you can't host yourself, then you have to factor in the room cost.

Valid points on every one of them.

The main reason why I replied to that thread is that the girls working for those agencies are actually NOT fresh "new talent".

SB is another form of escorting, think of it being a glamorized term used in the hobby. On top of that, the SB girls recruited by these agencies have sex with the owners which I find hilarious! The girls get paid full price, but later on the girl takes half when they work for them. LOL.

Owners shouldn't dip their pens in company ink. It will turn out bad.

The girls I had seen that were once with the agencies don't want all their money to be taken. Agencies take half. And for the most part, the girls do more work than the owners. And the girls that quit escorting don't want to fuck different men all the time. So that's why they went back to be a SB on Seeking Arrangements.

Sure, it's a convenience for SB and men to use agencies, but if SB due diligence in screening when they have time, they actually don't need agencies. If Seeking Arrangements has pointers on how to screen or offer screening services, well there is no need for agencies. If there were a website for sugar babies to be reviewed, hobbiest wouldn't need agencies.

**Goodtimechicago** · 07-24-18 02:37

Originally Posted by WallyMan [View Original Post]

https://youwannaseeme.org/home/ - pics not accurate but private incalls and cheap price. They have been around forever.

http://www.wetnwildescorts.com - good gals, YMMV but solid talent.

http://www.2kghub.com - I'm partial cause they are my go to agency. Private incalls, accurate pics, visiting gals. Most independents / first timers to chicago who they book for.

Saw her a few times about 6 years ago. Tiny and absolutely gorgeous Indian girl. Doesn't work often but check her if you get the chance.

**Jc2490** · 07-23-18 23:54

[Deleted by Admin]

Do you see where it says "Report Post?"

Care to guess what it's for?

A2

**WallyMan** · 07-23-18 20:33

Originally Posted by Gwynbleidd [View Original Post]

Hello everyone, I'm looking for agencies other than MCE. I've been nearly an exclusive client of theirs for quite a while and just about all the reviews here are spot on. But, I'm having an impossible time finding new agencies since I've been out the hobby for quite a bit. I'll appreciate any gestures in the right direction. Thanks.

https://youwannaseeme.org/home/ - pics not accurate but private incalls and cheap price. They have been around forever.

http://www.wetnwildescorts.com - good gals, YMMV but solid talent.

http://www.2kghub.com - I'm partial cause they are my go to agency. Private incalls, accurate pics, visiting gals. Most independents / first timers to chicago who they book for.

**OF Charlie** · 07-23-18 18:47

Originally Posted by ChiCity01 [View Original Post]

The reason how MCE, EEC, and Angeli recruits new talent is that these guys recruit their girls on SA. I've seen several girls pictures that were on SA, then all of sudden are on MCE, EEC, or Angelis website. Once they are with the agencies, the girls profiles on SA, are not active. That's how they get fresh "new talent" even though their not, as they fuck with the owners LOL.

I've also seen several girls from SA that have told me that they were recruited from these agencies. That's after the fact they are no longer working as escorts with these agencies.

Girls on SA are actually inexpensive. You can bang a SB for 2-4 hours on a hour of fucking using MCE, EEC, or Angelli. So, if you use these agencies that use girls on SA, well your paying a very high premium.

It should be the end of escort agencies since sugar baby websites provides a better bang for the buck. And there are way more girls on those websites who will do P4 P than using MCE, EEC or Angelis have to offer.

Why pay for a hour of fucking using those agencies, when you can get 2-4 hours of fucking on those sugar baby websites.

I agree that if you can get the right SB, it will most likely be cheaper in the long run if you want to break it down by hourly rate, but I have to mostly disagree with your post for the following points.

1) you are assuming that every girl you contact on SA will reply to you. Wrong. If you are a 60 yr old guy, the odd of a 20 yr old hot girl replying to your message is very low. With an agency, it's a sure thing.

2) some of the girls will require coffee meets first. Time is money.

3) SA girls for most part have no reviews, so even if you manage to score one she might be a dud in bed. How is that saving money. At least with agency girls, you can get an idea of their service based on the reviews here.

4) not all agency girls want to be on SA. Just like girls are flakey, some guys are too. Some agency girls have told me that they don't have time to go on those coffee meets and do their own screenings. If SA is so great, then how do you explain that they got recruited by agencies. Why not just stay on SA?

5) how many 20 yr old can host? If you can't host yourself, then you have to factor in the room cost.