Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 12,181 to 12,195 of 13327
-
07-18-18 11:07 #1147Regular Member

Posts: 20Mystery Girl?
O. T. I can't say for sure who this is, but I can say for sure that its not Jewls!
Originally Posted by OldTiger
[View Original Post]
Need to do some more research.
HH.
-
07-18-18 10:52 #1146Senior Member

Posts: 260I can't be sure. I've seen her multiple times but it's been a while. If I had to guess, based on the photos, I would say no, that's not her. But again, it's been about a year.
Also, she had a voip number in the past that was 864. Obviously, that changes very easily. But another piece of the puzzle.
Originally Posted by OldTiger
[View Original Post]
-
07-18-18 10:12 #1145Senior Member

Posts: 610Mystery girl
Not sure who she is, but that is a smoking hot body. If anyone sees her please report or PM me the deets.
Originally Posted by OldTiger
[View Original Post]
-
07-18-18 09:10 #1144Senior Member

Posts: 30Not Jewls IMHO.
I don't think it's Jewls. Looks more like Naudia to.
-
07-18-18 08:20 #1143Senior Member

Posts: 975Asheville lurker
Good morning GVL members. Lurker from AVL here. This one is posting on AVL STG but location in post is Greenville, Spartanburg, Anderson. Do any of your fine fellows have any Intel?
http://asheville.skipthegames.com/fe...a/440938018575
-
07-18-18 07:13 #1142Senior Member

Posts: 650Mystery girl
This one is interesting, so I played detective. Here are the clues:
Originally Posted by DayTimeFun
[View Original Post]
1. The photos appear unique for the 3 image matching services I use, so doesn't appear fake.
2. She claims to be 25.
3. She is implying we know her "same, sweet face" even though we can't really see it.
4. She says she is using a new number (it's a VOIP number so no names available).
5. 125 lbs, natural boobs, shaved, 5'4" to 5'7".
6. Body, poses and outfits seem to be consistent with a well-known provider.
My guess is this is Jewls based on what I see in my database. Can anyone that has seen her a number of times confirm?
-
07-18-18 06:37 #1141Senior Member

Posts: 1206Your point is well taken and there is absolutely no need to apologize for or regret posting a positive review as your first post. My issue is documented in my posts.
Originally Posted by NcBrian
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-18 23:06 #1140Regular Member

Posts: 6Was wondering the same. Report back if you take a chance.
Originally Posted by DayTimeFun
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-18 19:26 #1139Regular Member

Posts: 6I wouldn't cross her off your list. I've seen a few girls while I've been in town and she is by far the hottest, especially for the $.
Originally Posted by DCrist0527
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-18 18:45 #1138Regular Member

Posts: 6I'm working in town for a week. She was hot and I will def see her again.
Originally Posted by DCrist0527
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-18 18:42 #1137Regular Member

Posts: 6Sorry I gave a good review for my first post. I wasnt aware of this site before visiting Naudia but that doesn't change anything I wrote. I had a great experience with her and I'll def see her again. Do you have an issue with her to share?
Originally Posted by Zauriel
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-18 17:49 #1136Senior Member

Posts: 260Good points and I've already said too much on the topic. And I'll admit to making the fuss. LOL.
That said, I do think there is a danger in letting it stand. If it was one instance, I let it slide, because clearly, I have no proof. But I also think many of us put stock into multiple confirmations. Also, if we don't call it out, we're likely to see it more often. Perhaps it's a losing battle, and admittedly, it's a mountain out of a molehill. And I do value the opinions of those that have seen her. I'll get off my soap box. Thanks for helping me keep it in perspective.
Originally Posted by Guitarwizard
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-18 16:33 #1135Senior Member

Posts: 149Both Views Are Fair Points
I would suggest that the reaction rather than the viewpoint is the issue. I think it is reasonable to be hesitant about first-time reviews. I also think that making a fuss over said reviews (not saying you did) is equally unproductive. If you question a review, you can easily disregard it. Said review's mere existence isn't really that big of a deal. You just use it as information and evaluate its merit accordingly.
Originally Posted by DCrist0527
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-18 13:22 #1134Senior Member

Posts: 260Fair point, and it is a tough spot.
As I said in my other post: if a provider has mutiple glowing reviews by posters that have exactly one post, well, I judge that to be highly suspicious and I'd avise others to do so as well. In all likelihood, the provider or handler is creating these bogus reviews. Or persuading others through a "discount" to provide a positive review.
We all have our first post and first review. But how many providers have multiple first-post reviews?
Originally Posted by RetsOfydna
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-18 13:17 #1133Senior Member

Posts: 260There's no doubt in my mind she's real. That's not my issue. What I do have issue with is some bad reviews, followed by a few glowing reviews by different people with their first post. That's rare for a single review. But multiple very positive reviews for the same girl? In a short period of time? I'm not lumping your validation in with those!
I find those 1-post reviews HIGHLY questionable and that alone crosses her off my list.
Originally Posted by Sarito1
[View Original Post]









Reply With Quote





