Escort Reports

[TimBow52]

This one is interesting, so I played detective. Here are the clues:

1. The photos appear unique for the 3 image matching services I use, so doesn't appear fake.

2. She claims to be 25.

3. She is implying we know her "same, sweet face" even though we can't really see it.

4. She says she is using a new number (it's a VOIP number so no names available).

5. 125 lbs, natural boobs, shaved, 5'4" to 5'7".

6. Body, poses and outfits seem to be consistent with a well-known provider.

My guess is this is Jewls based on what I see in my database. Can anyone that has seen her a number of times confirm?

Nope, these are old photos of Rachel Racks an escort used to post in Columbia. LOL. Same girl and Jewls does not have boobs this good.

[SCWildRide]

My guess is this is Jewls based on what I see in my database. Can anyone that has seen her a number of times confirm?

That isn't Jewlz in the pics. The last couple adds she put up was maybe last year and no names were listed. She is smart and very careful when she does advertise. If you have only seen her one time, trust me you will know it when you see her. Once is all it takes and then your hooked. She set the bar high for the rest of them. My only problem was keeping up with her. She does provide a great cardio work out though.

[HappyHoundDog]

This one is interesting, so I played detective. Here are the clues:


My guess is this is Jewls based on what I see in my database. Can anyone that has seen her a number of times confirm?

O. T. I can't say for sure who this is, but I can say for sure that its not Jewls!

Need to do some more research.

HH.

[DCrist0527]

I can't be sure. I've seen her multiple times but it's been a while. If I had to guess, based on the photos, I would say no, that's not her. But again, it's been about a year.

Also, she had a voip number in the past that was 864. Obviously, that changes very easily. But another piece of the puzzle.

This one is interesting, so I played detective. Here are the clues:

1. The photos appear unique for the 3 image matching services I use, so doesn't appear fake.

2. She claims to be 25.

3. She is implying we know her "same, sweet face" even though we can't really see it.

4. She says she is using a new number (it's a VOIP number so no names available).

5. 125 lbs, natural boobs, shaved, 5'4" to 5'7".

6. Body, poses and outfits seem to be consistent with a well-known provider.

My guess is this is Jewls based on what I see in my database. Can anyone that has seen her a number of times confirm?

[David3131]

This one is interesting, so I played detective. Here are the clues:

1. The photos appear unique for the 3 image matching services I use, so doesn't appear fake.

2. She claims to be 25.

3. She is implying we know her "same, sweet face" even though we can't really see it.

4. She says she is using a new number (it's a VOIP number so no names available).

5. 125 lbs, natural boobs, shaved, 5'4" to 5'7".

6. Body, poses and outfits seem to be consistent with a well-known provider.

My guess is this is Jewls based on what I see in my database. Can anyone that has seen her a number of times confirm?

Not sure who she is, but that is a smoking hot body. If anyone sees her please report or PM me the deets.

[Shrink645]

I don't think it's Jewls. Looks more like Naudia to.

[Member #6253]

Good morning GVL members. Lurker from AVL here. This one is posting on AVL STG but location in post is Greenville, Spartanburg, Anderson. Do any of your fine fellows have any Intel?

http://asheville.skipthegames.com/fe...a/440938018575

[OldTiger]

Anyone with intel on this one advertising on skipthegames today?

http://greenville.skipthegames.com/f...d/884194198673

This one is interesting, so I played detective. Here are the clues:

1. The photos appear unique for the 3 image matching services I use, so doesn't appear fake.

2. She claims to be 25.

3. She is implying we know her "same, sweet face" even though we can't really see it.

4. She says she is using a new number (it's a VOIP number so no names available).

5. 125 lbs, natural boobs, shaved, 5'4" to 5'7".

6. Body, poses and outfits seem to be consistent with a well-known provider.

My guess is this is Jewls based on what I see in my database. Can anyone that has seen her a number of times confirm?

[Zauriel]

Your point is well taken and there is absolutely no need to apologize for or regret posting a positive review as your first post. My issue is documented in my posts.

Sorry I gave a good review for my first post. I wasnt aware of this site before visiting Naudia but that doesn't change anything I wrote. I had a great experience with her and I'll def see her again. Do you have an issue with her to share?

[NcBrian]

Anyone with intel on this one advertising on skipthegames today?

http://greenville.skipthegames.com/f...d/884194198673

Was wondering the same. Report back if you take a chance.

[NcBrian]

There's no doubt in my mind she's real. That's not my issue. What I do have issue with is some bad reviews, followed by a few glowing reviews by different people with their first post. That's rare for a single review. But multiple very positive reviews for the same girl? In a short period of time? I'm not lumping your validation in with those!

I find those 1-post reviews HIGHLY questionable and that alone crosses her off my list.

I wouldn't cross her off your list. I've seen a few girls while I've been in town and she is by far the hottest, especially for the $.

[NcBrian]

So it's just a coincidence your first and only post is about Naudia. Like someone else did. While you are out of town.

Not buying it. And since there are these curious reviews, clearly she's having trouble with anyone buying it.

But hey, if you had luck, you might want to bargain a bit more. Sounds like she may need the business.

I'm working in town for a week. She was hot and I will def see her again.

[NcBrian]

Yes I am mad. That this is just another layer of BS we have to wade through. The 3rd or 4th, etc glowing review of her written by a newb is not believable. You got a discount for writing a good review of her then. You are essentially a paid endorser. A commercial spokesman. Your review is not valid.

Sorry I gave a good review for my first post. I wasnt aware of this site before visiting Naudia but that doesn't change anything I wrote. I had a great experience with her and I'll def see her again. Do you have an issue with her to share?

[DCrist0527]

Good points and I've already said too much on the topic. And I'll admit to making the fuss. LOL.

That said, I do think there is a danger in letting it stand. If it was one instance, I let it slide, because clearly, I have no proof. But I also think many of us put stock into multiple confirmations. Also, if we don't call it out, we're likely to see it more often. Perhaps it's a losing battle, and admittedly, it's a mountain out of a molehill. And I do value the opinions of those that have seen her. I'll get off my soap box. Thanks for helping me keep it in perspective.

I would suggest that the reaction rather than the viewpoint is the issue. I think it is reasonable to be hesitant about first-time reviews. I also think that making a fuss over said reviews (not saying you did) is equally unproductive. If you question a review, you can easily disregard it. Said review's mere existence isn't really that big of a deal. You just use it as information and evaluate its merit accordingly.

[Guitarwizard]

I would suggest that the reaction rather than the viewpoint is the issue. I think it is reasonable to be hesitant about first-time reviews. I also think that making a fuss over said reviews (not saying you did) is equally unproductive. If you question a review, you can easily disregard it. Said review's mere existence isn't really that big of a deal. You just use it as information and evaluate its merit accordingly.

There's no doubt in my mind she's real. That's not my issue. What I do have issue with is some bad reviews, followed by a few glowing reviews by different people with their first post. That's rare for a single review. But multiple very positive reviews for the same girl? In a short period of time? I'm not lumping your validation in with those!

I find those 1-post reviews HIGHLY questionable and that alone crosses her off my list.