Bareback Beauties. OC style

**AngelFreak** · 07-15-18 19:36

Originally Posted by NoClue02 [View Original Post]

Dang, she's not that bad. Kinda below the kaamp standard a bit but isn't as bad. I would say she's 6. 5 out of 10. Maybe she's mid 30's (maybe my standard isn't that high LOL). Her service made up what's she's lack in. I been to a few kaamp in oc, most of the girls aren't great either.

Prefer thai agency, always have cute young ones but too bad they're gone. Anyone with information please share.

Same experience with Fiona. Not the best looking but decent body. She is Short! Probably not even 5'.

The booker says Dia has "similar service" - Can anyone confirm?

**NoClue02** · 07-11-18 13:56

Originally Posted by SpikeBites [View Original Post]

Now that you mention it, you are right that most thai agencies are gone. They used to be my go to a few years ago. Wonder what happened.

There was a big bust on thai agencies not too long ago. Not sure if the one in scp was one of them or not, but they no longer post. I did saw couple girls posted under diff agencies up in SGV area for a short period of time afterward but now is all gone.

**Mr Dph** · 07-11-18 13:26

Originally Posted by SpikeBites [View Original Post]

Now that you mention it, you are right that most thai agencies are gone. They used to be my go to a few years ago. Wonder what happened.

The story was all over the internet.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/l...526-story.html

**SpikeBites** · 07-11-18 02:42

Originally Posted by NoClue02 [View Original Post]

Dang, she's not that bad. Kinda below the kaamp standard a bit but isn't as bad. I would say she's 6. 5 out of 10. Maybe she's mid 30's (maybe my standard isn't that high LOL). Her service made up what's she's lack in. I been to a few kaamp in oc, most of the girls aren't great either.

Prefer thai agency, always have cute young ones but too bad they're gone. Anyone with information please share.

Now that you mention it, you are right that most thai agencies are gone. They used to be my go to a few years ago. Wonder what happened.

**NoClue02** · 07-11-18 02:41

Originally Posted by VeryInterest [View Original Post]

Saw fiona. BBFS cip msog 260. No issues but she's prob early 40's and the face isn't that easy on the eyes.

Dang, she's not that bad. Kinda below the kaamp standard a bit but isn't as bad. I would say she's 6. 5 out of 10. Maybe she's mid 30's (maybe my standard isn't that high LOL). Her service made up what's she's lack in. I been to a few kaamp in oc, most of the girls aren't great either.

Prefer thai agency, always have cute young ones but too bad they're gone. Anyone with information please share.

**SpikeBites** · 07-10-18 19:22

Originally Posted by VeryInterest [View Original Post]

Saw fiona. BBFS cip msog 260. No issues but she's prob early 40's and the face isn't that easy on the eyes.

Early 40's wow. Usually girls at this AAMP have been 30 or younger, from my experience at least.

**Cjg1988** · 07-10-18 19:21

Originally Posted by JimMSmith [View Original Post]

This booker has been in this business for a long time and I think he is just tired of all the questions he gets. I think his attitude is all the information is on the website. I think he doesn't want to have any dialogue going which I don't blame him.

What website are we talking about? Idk any Booker / Agency websites in the OC area.

**Jim M Smith** · 07-10-18 12:56

Originally Posted by OcAmper [View Original Post]

I don't think he was being coy, I bet that was an honest answer. He probably has never seen the girl in person. These girls hop around from house to house. They show up, the girl leaving rotation lets the new girl on rotation into the house and girl leaving rotation leaves.

The booker is totally hands off, and never see's the girl.

Not all work this way, but the majority of the ones I've been to sure seem to work this way.

This booker has been in this business for a long time and I think he is just tired of all the questions he gets. I think his attitude is all the information is on the website. I think he doesn't want to have any dialogue going which I don't blame him.

**VeryInterest** · 07-10-18 12:51

Saw fiona. BBFS cip msog 260. No issues but she's prob early 40's and the face isn't that easy on the eyes.

**Oc Amper** · 07-10-18 12:09

Originally Posted by Jack926 [View Original Post]

Basic question such as: "How close does she resemble the photos?" The answer of: "I have not seen the girl and I don't know" is a bizarre answer.

I don't think he was being coy, I bet that was an honest answer. He probably has never seen the girl in person. These girls hop around from house to house. They show up, the girl leaving rotation lets the new girl on rotation into the house and girl leaving rotation leaves.

The booker is totally hands off, and never see's the girl.

Not all work this way, but the majority of the ones I've been to sure seem to work this way.

**NoClue02** · 07-10-18 03:29

Originally Posted by Wanpo [View Original Post]

I've frequented this agency multiple times and they have almost always used accurate pictures, so I don't think that's the case here.

Kaamp used to post very close to real pictures, at least the agencies in LA that I had visited in the past. In OC, not many kaamps are posting real or even close. Not ugly by any means, but majority is about 6-7 out of 10 where 10 is the best. I've been to several agencies in the past, I find the cheaper Chinese does post real pictures. Not sure what had changed, but not many agencies post real pictures anymore.

As far as Fiona from kcupid, I finally visited her. Like many others review, she is easy for BBFS, just say no to condom and she is down to whatever you want. Had to used google translate to communicate with her. She isn't bad looking, but def not the girl in the picture. Kinda cute when she is laying down. Fake boobs as you can see the scar underneath, but damn nice though. Easy going lady, quick massage in the shower before leaving.

**Jack926** · 07-10-18 02:55

Originally Posted by Jack926 [View Original Post]

Fake photos all the way-The booker is coy on answering Questions: Not worth the hassle.

Originally Posted by RoyEmbd99 [View Original Post]

I know they have used 'representative' pics a few times; but I would say 95% of the time are accurate (with some photoshop of course). Tim is a stand up guy and runs a smoth operation. Top choice when in OC.

As for BBFS, a few have done it, but I do not see any current selection of those. Of course=YMMV.

I am not saying that all the girls at that agency have fake photos; some actually do use real photos and some don't. From what I gathered, those that do not use their real photos from portfolio, the depicted photos are different than the girls.

And yes, it is true that the owner is good and careful but sometimes he should answer the basic questions rather than being so coy about it. Basic question such as: "How close does she resemble the photos?" The answer of: "I have not seen the girl and I don't know" is a bizarre answer.

**JasonVee** · 07-10-18 02:29

Originally Posted by RoyEmbd99 [View Original Post]

I know they have used 'representative' pics a few times; but I would say 95% of the time are accurate (with some photoshop of course). Tim is a stand up guy and runs a smoth operation. Top choice when in OC.

As for BBFS, a few have done it, but I do not see any current selection of those. Of course=YMMV.

I agree. Only ones using fake photos are the low end Chinese agencies with really old women charging $100/ her, afaik.