News and Media Reports

[Alpheus]

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/i...205759273.html

[Ronny770]

But does showing 40 year women mean nothing happened? You wanted them to show the kids faces, which if there are some, they wouldn't do?

There were no kids involved. Dunwoody just amping the situation as much as possible.

[DRickGiver5]

A lot of families destroyed. The cops should be penalized for not knowing what is the law e. G. 3 months no pay etc. The cops can just go on but the broken families cannot. This is not fair. (I know life isn't fair!) They should also be taught what is meant by sex trafficking or sex slavery with minors. I saw in the news about arrest being made for sex slavery to minors but the pictures of the arrests show 40 yr old women. Sex trafficking and forced sex to minors are really nasty but don't do it for publicity or increase police budgets. I think somebody is playing with statistics to justify their motives. Better still, make prostitution legal and control it properly.

But does showing 40 year women mean nothing happened? You wanted them to show the kids faces, which if there are some, they wouldn't do?

[Acaryu]

That's big news! Score one for the Constitution.

Unfortunately, you can bet the state legislature is going to introduce legislation making these types of surveillance activities easier in the next session. All they have to do is use the term "human trafficking" no matter how bullshit it is and it'll pass with 98% of the vote.

A lot of families destroyed. The cops should be penalized for not knowing what is the law e. G. 3 months no pay etc. The cops can just go on but the broken families cannot. This is not fair. (I know life isn't fair!) They should also be taught what is meant by sex trafficking or sex slavery with minors. I saw in the news about arrest being made for sex slavery to minors but the pictures of the arrests show 40 yr old women. Sex trafficking and forced sex to minors are really nasty but don't do it for publicity or increase police budgets. I think somebody is playing with statistics to justify their motives. Better still, make prostitution legal and control it properly.

[Seraphim]

That's big news! Score one for the Constitution.

Unfortunately, you can bet the state legislature is going to introduce legislation making these types of surveillance activities easier in the next session. All they have to do is use the term "human trafficking" no matter how bullshit it is and it'll pass with 98% of the vote.

It's good however, does it really matter at his point? I mean most people probably already plead to lesser charges. So only the ones who lawyered up made out. Even if all the cases were dismissed, LEO still got what it wanted--the agencies gone, people's faces in the paper, and most of the business out of their area. I don't think they have to make a law to get what they want. I wonder if some of the old agencies will resurface? Would be nice.

[YeOldHornDawg]

Judge suppressed sex videos, case can be dismissed.

https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/...ce=gwinnett_fb

That's big news! Score one for the Constitution.

Unfortunately, you can bet the state legislature is going to introduce legislation making these types of surveillance activities easier in the next session. All they have to do is use the term "human trafficking" no matter how bullshit it is and it'll pass with 98% of the vote.

[Killakill]

Damn, that's (was) Terrachi Spa in Gainesville, which was the only surviving KAMP out of the original 5 KAMPs. I've been trying to fuck the mamasan (on the right) for years but she always rebuked me. She looked much better in person than in the photo. Wonder if she'd suck my dick if I posted bail. LOL.

That'll be one helluva BJ for 4 K LOL!

[Ronny770]

Judge suppressed sex videos, case can be dismissed.

https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/...ce=gwinnett_fb

[Niteluvr]

https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/...ce=gwinnett_fb

Damn, that's (was) Terrachi Spa in Gainesville, which was the only surviving KAMP out of the original 5 KAMPs. I've been trying to fuck the mamasan (on the right) for years but she always rebuked me. She looked much better in person than in the photo. Wonder if she'd suck my dick if I posted bail. LOL.

[Ronny770]

https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/...ce=gwinnett_fb

[HobbyMan51]

Providing commentary on an individual situation situation is much better than generalizing about a 'community' and a possible 'clash'.

For those who didn't catch this.

Society=white culture.

Community=black culture.

Clash=race war.

Dude is absolutely nuts. I bet the pm he sent night was lit as fuk.

Quite perceptive, if somewhat narrow, interpretation, NewDude. I will pm you soon and clarify some things for you. Thank you.

[NewDude]

He is wrong because a person was murdered and he doesn't give a shit. Apparently you don't either. I also get from your comments that you are from the same "community" as the Parrot and so revel in your fantasy that society doesn't understand you. Poor baby! Get this straight, pal: I have had life experiences across the spectrum, including yours, and I get it, got it? What you are saying gives your community a pass on everything wrong just because you prefer to play the "victim" card. Hey, society doesn't care about me so I don't care about society or its foundations. Kind of gives you the right to do or say anything you want without any responsibility, right? Well, I ain't buying it and fortunately millions of others in the country ain't buying it either. If you don't care about the same things that the rest of society cares about, I. E. The glue or fabric that holds societies together, then we can clearly see why things are the way they are in our country today. Your attitude is even more appalling than the Parrot's and if there is a whole community out there that thinks the way that you do then that entire community is dead wrong. Fortunately I don't believe that to be the case but if it is we are going to have a clash down the road. Maybe you and others like you want that and if so we'll just see how that all turns out. Bottom line: you are wrong and your attitude is repulsive and reprehensible.

Providing commentary on an individual situation situation is much better than generalizing about a 'community' and a possible 'clash'.

For those who didn't catch this.

Society=white culture.

Community=black culture.

Clash=race war.

Dude is absolutely nuts. I bet the pm he sent night was lit as fuk.

[Admin2]

I remember the post that started this all. At the end of the post he asks if there are any positive news stories anyone can share. This is the behavior of someone not interested in discussion? He shared his opinion and encouraged the board to provide news stories with different angles. Is it clairvoyance or pretentiousness that makes you state with such confidence that what someone posts are not their opinions and that they're not trying to have a discussion? It is very ironic seeing as a lot of the work you do here is stopping discussions from happening. I also find it a bit disingenuous because (regardless of what anyone else's intentions were) I was very clearly trying to have a discussion and you deleted my comments as well, all while posts with opposing views were allowed to remain. It would appear that if any comments are made that elicit a high level of emotional response, and depending on the angle of the post, it is branded as trolling SIMPLY BC it invokes visceral reactions.

Remember this, you changed the nature of our discourse right here "Is it clairvoyance or pretentiousness that makes you state with such confidence that what someone posts are not their opinions and that they're not trying to have a discussion?" If you want to insult me, you should do it on a fight thread not a thread for discussing news stories.

It is neither clairvoyance nor pretentiousness. It is based on my having knowledge that you do not. This was not the first, nor the second but the fifth or sixth time he tried to inflame the forum with a post of that EXACT nature. I deleted the others and I'm sorry but I missed this one.

Now the question you might want to ask yourself is this. When you could have just asked me why I'm so certain instead of offering me a choice between an impossibility or an insult what was your purpose with the insult? Are you so enamored with your new bromance that you have lost the ability to reason? You are also implying that I deleted YOUR posts when instead I deleted a conversation thread that was becoming increasingly antagonistic on a thread that is supposed to be about news stories, not whether or not dead hookers deserved to die.

If it is your intention to continue to offer insults I would suggest you move it to the fight thread. I will ignore you to be sure, but they still need to be on a fight thread.

[EastRendezvous]

I agree, there are many people on this forum that have different opinions and they are encouraged to participate in whatever discussion they like. This guy isn't doing that, this guy is a troll, he's not trying to have a discussion, his posts aren't his opinions, his posts are designed to inflame the forum. Engaging him just encourages him. He's been banned under a multitude of user names.

I remember the post that started this all. At the end of the post he asks if there are any positive news stories anyone can share. This is the behavior of someone not interested in discussion? He shared his opinion and encouraged the board to provide news stories with different angles. Is it clairvoyance or pretentiousness that makes you state with such confidence that what someone posts are not their opinions and that they're not trying to have a discussion? It is very ironic seeing as a lot of the work you do here is stopping discussions from happening. I also find it a bit disingenuous because (regardless of what anyone else's intentions were) I was very clearly trying to have a discussion and you deleted my comments as well, all while posts with opposing views were allowed to remain. It would appear that if any comments are made that elicit a high level of emotional response, and depending on the angle of the post, it is branded as trolling SIMPLY BC it invokes visceral reactions.

[Admin2]

If somebody don't agree with you, your comment to fit their agenda or views they call you the person a troll.

Except for it not being true. There are loads of people across the forum that disagree with me. I don't call them trolls. I call trolls trolls.