The Massholes

[Cperry123]

Well. Maybe. But only if I don't have to kiss her! And absolutely no DATY! I charge extra for that! Are you going to book her for me, LOL?!

You're awesome King of Fours! I think there is a new term you created, GDS- Golden Dick Syndrome. Not to be confused with PDS- Platinum Dick Syndrome. Because after all it is Warren! ROTFLMFAO!

[KingOfFours]

Well. Maybe. But only if I don't have to kiss her! And absolutely no DATY! I charge extra for that! Are you going to book her for me, LOL?!

And also, she'd have to wear her tribal feathered headband!

[KingOfFours]

Yes, you would! If she paid you enough of course you would! And you'd go GFE too, nice attitude-and-all! LOL Come on, KoF would you agree to $1,000 for 1 hour of nonstop BB fucking of Liz Warren + GFE?

Well. Maybe. But only if I don't have to kiss her! And absolutely no DATY! I charge extra for that! Are you going to book her for me, LOL?!

[Nrlmus]

Yes, Deb, these self righteous politicians ARE the problem. And I would not fuck Pocahontas Warren if SHE paid ME!

Yes, you would! If she paid you enough of course you would! And you'd go GFE too, nice attitude-and-all! LOL Come on, KoF would you agree to $1,000 for 1 hour of nonstop BB fucking of Liz Warren + GFE?

[KingOfFours]

Yes, Deb, these self righteous politicians ARE the problem. And I would not fuck Pocahontas Warren if SHE paid ME!

Because no guy in their right mind would WANT to fuck them! They are total idiots! I found a link that states that most clients of escorts are violent men. Well where is this coming from? I bet the woman who wrote this article didn't interview sex workers! 99 % of the clients I see are very kind actually. I mean there's the 1 % like the guy who tried to force handcuffs on me, the few guys who slammed my head down their cocks after I told them not to. No one has tried to rape me, assault me or traumatize me. Actually the guys I see are the ones who are nervous! Most are married men and don't have a violent bone in their bodies! All they want is a hot, discrete encounter. What's wrong with that? In this article it states that it doesn't matter if it's a consensual act or not, that all sex work is trafficking! Oh yes, she says the money we make is the trafficker! LOL. Anyway politicians in other countries where prostitution is legal seem to have their heads screwed on straight. I can understand if an underage girl or woman is being forced into prostitution against their will, that is trafficking, although I think that most men if they found out that there was trafficking going on would report it to the police, anonymously, considering most of you have wives, girlfriends and daughters and wouldn't want to see a woman suffer this way. I think the whole human trafficking hysteria is insulting to me and every sex worker I know. I wish these politicians and human trafficking organizations would listen to us and find out how we feel about sex work. , but they really don't care how we feel or they would have asked us already.

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/do...10.1086/695670

While I am loath to give people like this our site as a stage I offer in rebuttle

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/ne...e-human-rights

A2

[Deb4512]

Because no guy in their right mind would WANT to fuck them! They are total idiots! I found a link that states that most clients of escorts are violent men. Well where is this coming from? I bet the woman who wrote this article didn't interview sex workers! 99 % of the clients I see are very kind actually. I mean there's the 1 % like the guy who tried to force handcuffs on me, the few guys who slammed my head down their cocks after I told them not to. No one has tried to rape me, assault me or traumatize me. Actually the guys I see are the ones who are nervous! Most are married men and don't have a violent bone in their bodies! All they want is a hot, discrete encounter. What's wrong with that? In this article it states that it doesn't matter if it's a consensual act or not, that all sex work is trafficking! Oh yes, she says the money we make is the trafficker! LOL. Anyway politicians in other countries where prostitution is legal seem to have their heads screwed on straight. I can understand if an underage girl or woman is being forced into prostitution against their will, that is trafficking, although I think that most men if they found out that there was trafficking going on would report it to the police, anonymously, considering most of you have wives, girlfriends and daughters and wouldn't want to see a woman suffer this way. I think the whole human trafficking hysteria is insulting to me and every sex worker I know. I wish these politicians and human trafficking organizations would listen to us and find out how we feel about sex work. , but they really don't care how we feel or they would have asked us already.

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/do...10.1086/695670

While I am loath to give people like this our site as a stage I offer in rebuttle

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/ne...e-human-rights

A2

[KingOfFours]

You are almost 100% correct on ALL of this, Nrimus. Almost. You got just one thing wrong. Everything ELSE you said about Pocahontas is absolutey spot on correct. But when you said, " Liz Warren is smart enough woman to know better", I need to disagree. Elizabeth Warren is not smart enough to know ANYTHING. Pocahontas is as dumb as a stone!!

It's fascinating how most liberal, pro-women rights type of senator in the country is trying to:

1. increase women's dependency on the third parties because now escorts would have to trust somebody with their money and ask third parties to open and hold bank accounts for them if they still want to keep their money in the bank. Or keep cash at home which is "dan-ge-rous"!

2. increase their risk, as many who'd otherwise work from hotel / home now would be forced to hit the streets.

3. let alone the whole feminist mantra about women deciding for themselves on what to do with their bodies.

I think the real reason for all of this has actually nothing to do with human trafficking because Liz Warren is smart enough woman to know better and she went to college so she heard or maybe even knew some girlfriends who made their way through school escorting. They even have some Harvard students doing it (back in the day I used to know one). I think for the likes of Liz Warren it's all strictly personal.

I'm sure that many of us talked to providers about who most of their clients are. I'm yet to find a provider who said that it's NOT married men. 80% of their clients are married men. Married women kinda know that and so it's nothing more then jealousy / anger / envy/ vindictive action of the women who on some level somehow feel themselves inadequate in certain departments. Similar to most of #MeToo movement (She fucked him and now she's a star, and it turns out that I fucked him for nothing! Kill!) It's different in focus but similar in nature. I'm sure that if you press Liz to explain why she's doing it at some point you'd get her to exclaim: "But this is just disgusting! Dirty, spreading decease" and the like. The staff that married suburban women try to convince themselves with in regards to prostitution. Prostitution is their boogie man. Comes from societal conditioning. Liz Warren as a married woman is susceptible to all of those insecurities no less then another.

The funniest thing is that while they may feel it on the strictly intuitive level but they still are afraid to let themselves to admit that their action is largely counterproductive in the relation to themselves. That in most instances the fact that their husbands have chance to visit escorts actually preserves their marriages and their way of life. In many instances if their husbands lose that chance those women would find themselves alone in no time!

Be as it may I think these are the main reason for all these FOSTA/SESTA which bring us no fiesta LOL. It's personal insecurities of suburban wives masquerading itself as a concern for human trafficking victims.

While Rubio as always is just trying to position himself for the future with those women and kiss some ass. Unfortunately mongers and escorts are not as numerous, and I suspect have tendency to vote on issues unrelated to prostitution anyway.

[Nrlmus]

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...ushpmg00000003

Yes but it's great that huffpo is taking up the cause. I think ultimately Fosta/Sesta could end up ushering in legal sex work in the USA.

It's hard to recognize both "my body my choice" and "but you can't sell pussy." Either you have agency over your body or you do not, there is no middle ground on that.

A2

It's fascinating how most liberal, pro-women rights type of senator in the country is trying to:

1. increase women's dependency on the third parties because now escorts would have to trust somebody with their money and ask third parties to open and hold bank accounts for them if they still want to keep their money in the bank. Or keep cash at home which is "dan-ge-rous"!

2. increase their risk, as many who'd otherwise work from hotel / home now would be forced to hit the streets.

3. let alone the whole feminist mantra about women deciding for themselves on what to do with their bodies.

I think the real reason for all of this has actually nothing to do with human trafficking because Liz Warren is smart enough woman to know better and she went to college so she heard or maybe even knew some girlfriends who made their way through school escorting. They even have some Harvard students doing it (back in the day I used to know one). I think for the likes of Liz Warren it's all strictly personal.

I'm sure that many of us talked to providers about who most of their clients are. I'm yet to find a provider who said that it's NOT married men. 80% of their clients are married men. Married women kinda know that and so it's nothing more then jealousy / anger / envy/ vindictive action of the women who on some level somehow feel themselves inadequate in certain departments. Similar to most of #MeToo movement (She fucked him and now she's a star, and it turns out that I fucked him for nothing! Kill!) It's different in focus but similar in nature. I'm sure that if you press Liz to explain why she's doing it at some point you'd get her to exclaim: "But this is just disgusting! Dirty, spreading decease" and the like. The staff that married suburban women try to convince themselves with in regards to prostitution. Prostitution is their boogie man. Comes from societal conditioning. Liz Warren as a married woman is susceptible to all of those insecurities no less then another.

The funniest thing is that while they may feel it on the strictly intuitive level but they still are afraid to let themselves to admit that their action is largely counterproductive in the relation to themselves. That in most instances the fact that their husbands have chance to visit escorts actually preserves their marriages and their way of life. In many instances if their husbands lose that chance those women would find themselves alone in no time!

Be as it may I think these are the main reason for all these FOSTA/SESTA which bring us no fiesta LOL. It's personal insecurities of suburban wives masquerading itself as a concern for human trafficking victims.

While Rubio as always is just trying to position himself for the future with those women and kiss some ass. Unfortunately mongers and escorts are not as numerous, and I suspect have tendency to vote on issues unrelated to prostitution anyway.

[Deb4512]

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...ushpmg00000003

Yes but it's great that huffpo is taking up the cause. I think ultimately Fosta/Sesta could end up ushering in legal sex work in the USA.

It's hard to recognize both "my body my choice" and "but you can't sell pussy." Either you have agency over your body or you do not, there is no middle ground on that.

A2

[Dayman1]

So how does she look and is she worth 100?

[Nrlmus]

Ha!. FOSTA, Trump and all you goody-two-shoes who want to wreck my fun and other mongers who play by the rules, eat a sack of dicks!. USASG mongers on!

USASG, fucking A! A2 for president!

[MeatMan]

Ha!. FOSTA, Trump and all you goody-two-shoes who want to wreck my fun and other mongers who play by the rules, eat a sack of dicks!. USASG mongers on!

[MeatMan]

I actually think that the closest you can get to getting an idea of what MLK would've thought or did if he was still alive today is to listen to Andy Young's commentary. Andy was MLK's best friend. He might've not been as dynamic of a speaker as MLK was but the two basically thought very similarly. And-eh, it's good for Andy that Andy is not involved much into things nowadays. Because if he would've been involved, who's to say that the fate of poor John Conyers wouldn't have befallen Andy Young too, and MLK too for that matter. Those who fight hard usually party hard too, and never end up being told by their doctors about low-levels of testosterone in their bodies.

Not to go off the reel, MLK's heart was in the right place, but the man was naive. He felt integration was the solution, but it has been the lasting problem. The reason why the KKK and other racists rose up was that black communities were becoming too powerful and wealthy (Tulsa, Oklahoma had a Wall St in the 1920's) They became terrorists to bomb and stifle our growth further. When we integrated, suddenly our people wanted to go to system THEY CONTROLLED. Wanted to shop at businesses THEY OWNED. Wanted to play sports with their untalented people THEY OWNED. My ancestors sought validation from them as a means to define their equality in this country. It was the wrong idea because we were better. We had empires and royalty that rivaled any civilization on the planet. Anyway, I'm done with this subject.

[Grogrin]

Yes, very deep and introspective. Thanks for giving me something to think about.

I actually think that the closest you can get to getting an idea of what MLK would've thought or did if he was still alive today is to listen to Andy Young's commentary. Andy was MLK's best friend. He might've not been as dynamic of a speaker as MLK was but the two basically thought very similarly. And-eh, it's good for Andy that Andy is not involved much into things nowadays. Because if he would've been involved, who's to say that the fate of poor John Conyers wouldn't have befallen Andy Young too, and MLK too for that matter. Those who fight hard usually party hard too, and never end up being told by their doctors about low-levels of testosterone in their bodies.

[Nrlmus]

First, where I live, I was told all white people are inherently racist, and somehow that's the norm. If MLK were alive today, he would have been outraged at this notion, because its bullshit. He would also be offended by BLM especially their violent protests. This is NOT what he advocated. He would be horrified to see what the left does to a Trump supporter. He would likely have some issues with Voter I'd laws, not the principle, but the execution. He would likely say they need to be easier to get, not that they shouldn't be required. MLK, was for equality, nothing more. Not for rioting if a police officer has to shoot an armed criminal. Not for rioting because a gay Jew was invited to speak at a college. Not for reparations, equality. If he could come back today, and see the nation and of the black community, in general, knowing that Democrats had overwhelming control most of the time. I'm sure he would be asking Democrats "What in the ever-loving-fuck are you guys doing?

I actually think that the closest you can get to getting an idea of what MLK would've thought or did if he was still alive today is to listen to Andy Young's commentary. Andy was MLK's best friend. He might've not been as dynamic of a speaker as MLK was but the two basically thought very similarly. And-eh, it's good for Andy that Andy is not involved much into things nowadays. Because if he would've been involved, who's to say that the fate of poor John Conyers wouldn't have befallen Andy Young too, and MLK too for that matter. Those who fight hard usually party hard too, and never end up being told by their doctors about low-levels of testosterone in their bodies.