Escort Reports

[JoyRide88]

I saw a brief mention here the previous month about.

"Ask ashley" a new agency with some girls from an old agency.

Has anyone tried them?

Any info.

[Beast42]

Cecilia from EEC has so-so reviews (read the review, not just the score) while Celine from AA has glowing reviews. They are the same person. Go to their website and see for yourself. I have my screenshots saved to preserve the observation.

This is a fact check post, no opinion involved. PSA for those who enjoyed this girl during her EEC days.

Also, there is a interesting new addition to ECE (European Companion Entertainment). I'll just leave it at that.

Actually Cecelia, formerly from EEC, is now Cecelia A, not Celine A. Celine A is asian and is also PSE. Cecelia is Panamanian and isn't even GFE. The TER reviews for Celine A should not be confused with the 2 reviews for Cecelia.

[IrishOne9611]

Anyone know who at NG is hosting on Cumberland?

[CoolPatrick]

Cecilia from EEC has so-so reviews (read the review, not just the score) while Celine from AA has glowing reviews. They are the same person. Go to their website and see for yourself. I have my screenshots saved to preserve the observation.

This is a fact check post, no opinion involved. PSA for those who enjoyed this girl during her EEC days.

Also, there is a interesting new addition to ECE (European Companion Entertainment). I'll just leave it at that.

[Jadedone]

I have had good and bad experiences with all types of girls as well as agencies. One thing that girls have always told me is how they appreciate that I am well groomed, in decent but not athletic shape, clean freshly showered, breath fresh as well. I can tell you one thing, if you are nasty then its not likely that a hot girl can bear you for so long. And on a day where she might be worn out she just might not have enough energy left to deal with a nasty guy.

...

Well said. And most decent providers will be more than happy for you to use their shower before and after the session.

[Riina]

I have had good and bad experiences with all types of girls as well as agencies. One thing that girls have always told me is how they appreciate that I am well groomed, in decent but not athletic shape, clean freshly showered, breath fresh as well. I can tell you one thing, if you are nasty then its not likely that a hot girl can bear you for so long. And on a day where she might be worn out she just might not have enough energy left to deal with a nasty guy.

I could not tell you how many times I've asked a provider about a bad review and was told the guy was a fat slob bastard. Their's a lot of detail that goes into finding the edge that brings me to levels of eroticism most mongers will never reach. It's starts every morning by scanning the forums for new and young girls likely to be sensitive and excited to suck a grown man's dick for money. I'm almost fifty, being well groomed is very important. I only monger early afternoon. Their's so much more, but I'm sure you get it.

[ChicagoPlayer]

[Racial Epithet(s) Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited in accordance with the Forum's Zero Tolerance policy regarding reports containing racial epithets.

Please be advised that Forum Members who succeed in having three or more of their reports deleted for personal attacks, racial epithets or other derogatory comments, will be banned under the Forum's Serial Antagonist Policy.

Guess you gotta make a new shill account now.

A2

[LatinPoker]

I've been out of the hobby for a while and have had a craving for Asian, wondering if anyone has dreamt with anyone from Pam's selection recently? Any recommendations would be appreciated.

[LedZep79]

I completely agree with about the blacklisting issue Cool Patrick. My personal experience involves XO Companions. I had used them to see a really nice Russian girl, Lily, and left a good review on the OThER site. A few months later, they had a girl named Elli that had me out the door in less than 30 minutes and was less than GFE. I called to complaint and received no redress for the terrible service. I left a review and the very next day, I was told to either delete the review or that I wouldn't be allowed to use their services again. A year later, I'm still blacklisted for writing an honest review.

After Explicit Chicago's owner got busted in October and early November (at the latest), which you can find some posts about that here, a fake review about Dakota Green popped up later in November. She was here in Summer for one trip, that was it, never see EC's ad on backpage about her again. And yet, someone claimed that he contacted EC (in jail?) to set up a date with Dakota. So, would you consider it NOT fake?

If you had your reviews (TER or USASG or otherwise) being plagiarized by others, then would you be convinced that there are fake reviews out there? Sure, the experience may be consistent, but these contributes to value / experience inflation. I don't really mind about this, not even if it is used by agencies as a marketing tactic. But I don't like the fact that some agencies or indys would blacklist or even blackemail you if you don't give high-enough score or praise them enough. The blackmailing is real, one b-list ex-porn address, who frequent Chicago when she was active in escorting, has done the blackmail stuff; and another ex-address who frequent TER regional boards makes a mission to call that girl out whenever the girl rebrand herself. The drama is pretty reality-tv.

As for blacklisting, I personally never ran into the situation. I heard of some complaints, but not bothered enough to conduct investigative journalism.

[TonyYes23]

I met with Taylor from EEC recently. She's not always in Chicago; they move her around. But had a really solid experience. Once you are verified, hookup is pretty standard and simple. At the room, very attractive, shorter All-American girl with natural beauty and banging natural body.

Ask for shower first. Not a problem. Afterward, we really clicked almost immediately. A bit of casual but playful pillow talk before we began to LFK to DFK and then into the good stuff. Taylor made plenty of comments to turn me on, simple compliments to keep my confidence high. I started DATY, really responded well. Got me going. Then her turn to do the same, GFE, before we got into real action.

She really enjoys, according to her, laying face down doggy.

Anyway, it was truly something, would recommend and will repeat.

[Flipper12]

I'll probably have a good time but from reading previous posts these past months, I might also have a bad one.

This has pretty much been my experience and at this point I've come to accept it.

Even if a lady has great reviews, you could have a horrible time. I recently saw a provider that was rated 9-9 on TER. She looked great but there was just no real chemistry and I was out of there in about a half hour with my dick in my hands. Couldn't believe I had flushed $300 down the toilet.

On the other hand, I saw a girl that could have been my ATF, it was so good. The next week she was let go from the agency for poor performance when other mongers complained about her. I couldn't believe it. She was a 10-10 in my book and I couldn't wait to repeat. I couldn't believe what an unbelievable deal I had at $325.

It's like going to the casino to play poker. You could hit some big hands, get paid off and have the best time of your life. Or you could just get bad hands all night and lose all your money.

I usually try to stay around the $300 donation. I think of it as paying $600 for a good time because usually one time will be great and one time will be OK. So on average I'm paying $600 for the chance at an excellent experience.

Unless you're willing to stick with someone you've seen before it's always a risk of an OK time versus a great time. The thrill of having a great time with a hot young girl I've never seen before is enough for me to risk the shitty experiences where I'm lighting my money on fire.

[CoolPatrick]

I don't understand why people are convinced there's a bunch of fake or paid reviews floating around. Yes some agencies give discounts for a subsequent appointment if you post a review. Angellis says on their site they give a $100 discount for reviews which I can verify they honor. CEC / MCE used to occasionally give $50 discounts for reviews, but they haven't done so at all in the past 3 or 4 months (now they just discount $30 if you prebook early in the week, or $30 off across the board for the day occasionally). I haven't used EEC yet so I can't comment there. I have never seen anyone explicitly or implicitly say that the reviews must be positive or of a certain score. I post reviews on the other site, and sometimes the discount is the incentive I need to just sit down and write the review instead of putting it off and forgetting. I don't like the YMMV lottery with unreviewed or little reviewed talent, so for me more reviews = better expectations and confidence = better choices made and a more enjoyable time.

For the most part, my experiences have fallen very much in line with what's been written in others reviews. So if there are fake reviews out there, they don't appear to be misstating things or overstating on looks or experiences. On the other site almost anytime anyone brings up one of the Chicago agencies, the thread gets derailed into accusations of people being shills, paid off, or rumors about xyz. I started reading this site and eventually signed up specifically because there was productive discussions and info sharing happening here, not just mostly ISO, non-subtly-disguised-ads, and accusations abound.

After Explicit Chicago's owner got busted in October and early November (at the latest), which you can find some posts about that here, a fake review about Dakota Green popped up later in November. She was here in Summer for one trip, that was it, never see EC's ad on backpage about her again. And yet, someone claimed that he contacted EC (in jail?) to set up a date with Dakota. So, would you consider it NOT fake?

If you had your reviews (TER or USASG or otherwise) being plagiarized by others, then would you be convinced that there are fake reviews out there? Sure, the experience may be consistent, but these contributes to value / experience inflation. I don't really mind about this, not even if it is used by agencies as a marketing tactic. But I don't like the fact that some agencies or indys would blacklist or even blackemail you if you don't give high-enough score or praise them enough. The blackmailing is real, one b-list ex-porn address, who frequent Chicago when she was active in escorting, has done the blackmail stuff; and another ex-address who frequent TER regional boards makes a mission to call that girl out whenever the girl rebrand herself. The drama is pretty reality-tv.

As for blacklisting, I personally never ran into the situation. I heard of some complaints, but not bothered enough to conduct investigative journalism.

[Random4]

I don't understand why people are convinced there's a bunch of fake or paid reviews floating around. Yes some agencies give discounts for a subsequent appointment if you post a review. Angellis says on their site they give a $100 discount for reviews which I can verify they honor. CEC / MCE used to occasionally give $50 discounts for reviews, but they haven't done so at all in the past 3 or 4 months (now they just discount $30 if you prebook early in the week, or $30 off across the board for the day occasionally). I haven't used EEC yet so I can't comment there. I have never seen anyone explicitly or implicitly say that the reviews must be positive or of a certain score. I post reviews on the other site, and sometimes the discount is the incentive I need to just sit down and write the review instead of putting it off and forgetting. I don't like the YMMV lottery with unreviewed or little reviewed talent, so for me more reviews = better expectations and confidence = better choices made and a more enjoyable time.

For the most part, my experiences have fallen very much in line with what's been written in others reviews. So if there are fake reviews out there, they don't appear to be misstating things or overstating on looks or experiences. On the other site almost anytime anyone brings up one of the Chicago agencies, the thread gets derailed into accusations of people being shills, paid off, or rumors about xyz. I started reading this site and eventually signed up specifically because there was productive discussions and info sharing happening here, not just mostly ISO, non-subtly-disguised-ads, and accusations abound.

[CoolPatrick]

I'll probably have a good time but from reading previous posts these past months, I might also have a bad one. I rather see someone with many reviews (although some are fake but at least I have a general idea) than some with one or two. Sure some of you get discounts when you have a bad time, but do they offer that to everyone or only if you're a repeat client? There was a post earlier mentioning a guy was shorted half an hour and no response from agency. I don't want to take the risk. And then that email trash talking other agencies? For someone that hasnt been with the agency, it sounds like they're bragging and unprofessional.

I try to contribute when I can. I don't write reviews much because I don't hobby that much and I only see video friendly providers (pretty slim in Chicago). I write reviews on ter or ecc so I didn't think copying / pasting here would be necessary.

Everyone has his preference. I wouldn't ask you to TOFTT with EEC if you have concerns about YMMV risks. Just like I'm concerned about the ill-defined and confusing usage of PSE by some agencies, which increases the YMMV risk that I'd take in general. But when girls moves from one agency to another, then my assessment would change depending on how ATF she is to me.

But to be fair, all EEC reports should help you make decision and you should be fine trying greta and taylor and a few others with consistent reviews on TER.

To clarify for others, you mean TER and ECCIE. The latter is not popular in Chicago or Midwest. ECCIE is different from EEC.

As for copy / paste, that's your preference. I tend to upload my review to TER and then trim down a lot or write something brief at here because I've seen some would copy / paste the reports from USASG to TER to cheat and earn the free memberships. Do what you'd like regarding cross posting.

[FirstTimer7]

FT7 seems okay with his posts and the PM with me, there was some good intel, but you are right that he didn't review much. I would encourage FT7 to report a bit more and hope for more contribution especially reviews. Senior status and post count can all be relative, readers just have to read some past posts to make their own judgment. I just think it's too early to call FT7 out, he is not a senior with hundreds of the same sort of posts, not yet.

As to EEC reviews, seems like this forum has more folks appreciating their work, particularly given their pricing strategy. All reviews about Greta are consistent but people can imitate and post fakes. No way we can stop that on any review sites. Also, Angelis and MCE / CEC are winning their battles over TER. And you can find Angelis listed yet another EEC alum this week. For whatever reasons, the competition between these three agencies with the young hot American girls bullpen is real.

A bit of support to EEC to help keep the pricing in check is good for Chicago market.

I'll probably have a good time but from reading previous posts these past months, I might also have a bad one. I rather see someone with many reviews (although some are fake but at least I have a general idea) than some with one or two. Sure some of you get discounts when you have a bad time, but do they offer that to everyone or only if you're a repeat client? There was a post earlier mentioning a guy was shorted half an hour and no response from agency. I don't want to take the risk. And then that email trash talking other agencies? For someone that hasnt been with the agency, it sounds like they're bragging and unprofessional.

I try to contribute when I can. I don't write reviews much because I don't hobby that much and I only see video friendly providers (pretty slim in Chicago). I write reviews on ter or ecc so I didn't think copying / pasting here would be necessary.