Escort Reports

**CoolPatrick** · 06-09-17 11:59

Originally Posted by Lee2718 [View Original Post]

Awhile back I had a really negative experience with Jne Smth from Dallas. I know that she's pretty universally acclaimed, and I'm admittedly suspicious, myself, when there are only a few rogue bad reviews for an experienced provider. I suppose I'm posting more for other new friends of hers, in case they start getting similar bad vibes. I'd recommend bailing ship in that case. Even she has off-days, turns out.

I'm not a frequent flyer by any means in this game, but I was surprised how sour what I thought would be a low-risk meeting became.

I'm not looking to defame her publicly (sounds like others have had really excellent experiences with her), so I'm happy to share more or answer questions over PM (for anyone who's on the fence, or hasn't met her before).

I had a great time with her, but I always consider any encounter as YMMV. You are entitled to your opinion, and nothing wrong to share your frustration. As long as your language is respectful (at least not name calling, right?) and factual, others would want to know how it happened and how we can avoid. That's what I'd like to know since I do plan to see her again.

**Lee2718** · 06-08-17 21:02

Awhile back I had a really negative experience with Jne Smth from Dallas. I know that she's pretty universally acclaimed, and I'm admittedly suspicious, myself, when there are only a few rogue bad reviews for an experienced provider. I suppose I'm posting more for other new friends of hers, in case they start getting similar bad vibes. I'd recommend bailing ship in that case. Even she has off-days, turns out.

I'm not a frequent flyer by any means in this game, but I was surprised how sour what I thought would be a low-risk meeting became.

I'm not looking to defame her publicly (sounds like others have had really excellent experiences with her), so I'm happy to share more or answer questions over PM (for anyone who's on the fence, or hasn't met her before).

**OF Charlie** · 06-06-17 22:49

Originally Posted by OFCharlie [View Original Post]

I got the same email. EEC is gone now. Website is down.

Below is the link to the new agency. From what I can tell, most if not all the 262 girls are with CEM now. I got a text that I am good to book since I was previously verified.

https://chicagoescortmodels.net/

It looks like some of the girls that went to CEM are back to the 262 agency, but their rates are not 262 anymore. Very confusing on what is going on.

https://262escortschicago.com/

**Rackster** · 06-06-17 18:57

Originally Posted by Maxamillion101 [View Original Post]

I have 2 friends that are smooooking hot. They want to have a foursome and we are looking for another guy but its not cheap. About $1 K. I know it's a lot, but they are smoking hot. Message me if interested. This is for today. They would want to see a picture too. Sorry guys, I know not ideal, but I thought I would at least offer!

For 1 k I wouldn't share 2 girls. Are you going to pay 1 k too?

I might consider if these girls allowed creampie and let me fuck them all night.

**CoolPatrick** · 06-06-17 14:22

https://www.preferred411.com/P255576 Anastasia Rose.

https://twitter.com/anastasiaroseXX

TER: 301373. 6/21-6/30.

Check her out on pornhub and her twitter, she is probably a real sex addict and pretty much willing to do anything in front of camera as an adult actress, and her reviews seem to indicate she would do just the same without camera. $650/ hr, $50 off if you have 10 more okays from P411.

MILF Veronica Avluv is in town 6/7-6/11 $1,200/hr
Seasoned Lauren Phillips is in town 6/22-6/25 also $1,200/hr.

So, in hindsight, $650 for AR should be a crazy fun experience.

**Maxamillion101** · 06-06-17 13:29

I have 2 friends that are smooooking hot. They want to have a foursome and we are looking for another guy but its not cheap. About $1 K. I know it's a lot, but they are smoking hot. Message me if interested. This is for today. They would want to see a picture too. Sorry guys, I know not ideal, but I thought I would at least offer!

**Tornacl** · 06-04-17 17:03

The mind is starting to go, LOL.

I mentioned the photo shoot because the next morning I woke up with the seven I have been with for 30+ years. Most of her make up had been sweated off in the hot tub and the playroom. Her hair was a mess, had raccoon eyes and she could have passed for home less.

The point is these very professional shots are rarely an accurate indication of looks. I have seen both sides. Buyer beware.

**Ron M** · 06-04-17 11:14

Originally Posted by HOB2015 [View Original Post]

I stay far from the agencies and stick with the indys.

Me too. There's less hassle and very little screening if any.

**HOB2015** · 06-04-17 08:16

Get what you pay for there. Made a mistake one time going and wanted to leave as soon as I walked in. Didn't want a bad rap stayed for ok massage, the girl rushed and complained and incall was dirty. I stay far from the agencies and stick with the indys on p411 or Eros.

Originally Posted by Tornacl [View Original Post]

I saw her about five years ago at that agency. She was a solid civve six at the time. If you were out with her and ran into your buddies they would probably say, "not bad, nice rack. " Good value at the time, wouldn't consider a rerun at her western burbs.

I have noticed as well her moving back fourth with them and the double rate when she hosts. Her current photos show what hair, lighting, make up and photo shop can do for a woman.

My wife did a "sexy" photo shoot at a Lifestyle resort, Desire, in Mexico. She was in hair and make up for an hour and a half before we started. These photo shoots gets as explicit as you like. When I looked at the final product all I could say is, " wow I got to bang a super model!

They weren't that hard to set up with six years ago. RS2 K made them happy. It was a little freaky that one of their in-calls is only a half mile from where I live. On the other hand a nice easy walk.

.

**Toe Knee** · 06-03-17 11:01

[Deleted by Admin]

Seriously?

**Tornacl** · 06-03-17 10:22

I saw her about five years ago at that agency. She was a solid civve six at the time. If you were out with her and ran into your buddies they would probably say, "not bad, nice rack. " Good value at the time, wouldn't consider a rerun at her western burbs.

I have noticed as well her moving back fourth with them and the double rate when she hosts. Her current photos show what hair, lighting, make up and photo shop can do for a woman.

My wife did a "sexy" photo shoot at a Lifestyle resort, Desire, in Mexico. She was in hair and make up for an hour and a half before we started. These photo shoots gets as explicit as you like. When I looked at the final product all I could say is, " wow I got to bang a super model!

They weren't that hard to set up with six years ago. RS2 K made them happy. It was a little freaky that one of their in-calls is only a half mile from where I live. On the other hand a nice easy walk.

Originally Posted by CoolPatrick [View Original Post]

Most importantly, the only thing that matter is if the agency works well with you and if you enjoyed the girls. Sounds like they work out well for you.

I have no problem with the location and the price of youwannaseeme. I never say their girls are ugly because that's not me. I believe to one of his own. The girl that I consider unattractive can be somebody's hot-as-well wet dream, and vice versa. But given the location and price, it is common sense that the girls will not earn much per client after the agency takes their cut. So, they may have to work more to earn their targeted daily earning, so the chance of they having a bad mood or being exhausted are higher. Ultimately, their price may likely reflect their market of interest. If you know you are young and hot and love to eat body fluid, why would you NOT capitalize your natural good and charge clients for more?

There is one girl from youwannaseeme that I want to see couple years ago. I noticed she has been on/off with them and has gone solo and then be back with them multiple times. She charges almost doubled while operating in the west burbs. She got many reviews under multiple alias. Service score are decent but the appearance score are ups and downs. The disappointing reviews all pointed to guys' expectation of her age and appearance in relation to price. I'd bang this MILF if youwannaseeme let me through, but it's okay not to see her once I gather more intel about her, after all, I have a long list of girls I'd like to see already.

One thing for sure though is their description of girls is mostly off-base. The reality would be at least a bit older, height and weight are certainly off and the info was listed to just give us a rough idea. The blurred and small resolution of images was set up NOT to give us a clear view for privacy concerns (or concealing the not-so-attractive parts). So I DO NOT take those info literally nor seriously and hence I do not have high expectation. Being fair is crucial to me in this hobby.

Obviously, they have enough volume to sustain their operation at a prime location under the radar for a long time, which explains their 'verification' procedure. I just don't see the appeals of going through theirs for an affordable thrill. I rather spend $ and use the easier P411 route to hook up with those young and open Dallas girls (or other indys) for all the stuff I like to do with a girl.

**CoolPatrick** · 05-31-17 10:52

Originally Posted by ReadyFreddie [View Original Post]

Well, I have to respond only because I've been there and you guys are telling me the girls I see are ugly. I have seen 4 girls so far. The hottest one (Sophie) I scored an 8. I would see her again in a heartbeat, and the price is good. I don't see what problem you can have with the location (Gold Coast). I thought two of the others I saw were attractive, and I would score them a 7. I certainly would not call them ugly by any stretch. The other girl I saw I did not consider that attractive, but she was enthusiastic.

While they are not models, they are girl next door types mostly (based on my small sampling). I am sure there may be some dogs, but the price and service was good enough for me.

Most importantly, the only thing that matter is if the agency works well with you and if you enjoyed the girls. Sounds like they work out well for you.

I have no problem with the location and the price of youwannaseeme. I never say their girls are ugly because that's not me. I believe to one of his own. The girl that I consider unattractive can be somebody's hot-as-well wet dream, and vice versa. But given the location and price, it is common sense that the girls will not earn much per client after the agency takes their cut. So, they may have to work more to earn their targeted daily earning, so the chance of they having a bad mood or being exhausted are higher. Ultimately, their price may likely reflect their market of interest. If you know you are young and hot and love to eat body fluid, why would you NOT capitalize your natural good and charge clients for more?

There is one girl from youwannaseeme that I want to see couple years ago. I noticed she has been on/off with them and has gone solo and then be back with them multiple times. She charges almost doubled while operating in the west burbs. She got many reviews under multiple alias. Service score are decent but the appearance score are ups and downs. The disappointing reviews all pointed to guys' expectation of her age and appearance in relation to price. I'd bang this MILF if youwannaseeme let me through, but it's okay not to see her once I gather more intel about her, after all, I have a long list of girls I'd like to see already.

One thing for sure though is their description of girls is mostly off-base. The reality would be at least a bit older, height and weight are certainly off and the info was listed to just give us a rough idea. The blurred and small resolution of images was set up NOT to give us a clear view for privacy concerns (or concealing the not-so-attractive parts). So I DO NOT take those info literally nor seriously and hence I do not have high expectation. Being fair is crucial to me in this hobby.

Obviously, they have enough volume to sustain their operation at a prime location under the radar for a long time, which explains their 'verification' procedure. I just don't see the appeals of going through theirs for an affordable thrill. I rather spend $ and use the easier P411 route to hook up with those young and open Dallas girls (or other indys) for all the stuff I like to do with a girl.

**Ready Freddie** · 05-25-17 18:17

Originally Posted by CoolPatrick [View Original Post]

I would not have high expectation of appearance given their price range and where they operate. Which is also why I'm not a fan of their verification, If I need to tell everything about me to be able to see a girl, the girl will have to be like the legendary porn stars on my bucket list.

Well, I have to respond only because I've been there and you guys are telling me the girls I see are ugly. I have seen 4 girls so far. The hottest one (Sophie) I scored an 8. I would see her again in a heartbeat, and the price is good. I don't see what problem you can have with the location (Gold Coast). I thought two of the others I saw were attractive, and I would score them a 7. I certainly would not call them ugly by any stretch. The other girl I saw I did not consider that attractive, but she was enthusiastic.

While they are not models, they are girl next door types mostly (based on my small sampling). I am sure there may be some dogs, but the price and service was good enough for me.

**CoolPatrick** · 05-25-17 17:21

Originally Posted by Rackster [View Original Post]

I don't care for the agency. Their girls are ugly and mediocre service.

I would not have high expectation of appearance given their price range and where they operate. Which is also why I'm not a fan of their verification, If I need to tell everything about me to be able to see a girl, the girl will have to be like the legendary porn stars on my bucket list.

**CoolPatrick** · 05-25-17 17:14

Originally Posted by Rackster [View Original Post]

The discount is deceptively good because it only applies to the appointment after you post the review. If you write reviews for every girl you see. The last review you write with the agency is wasted.

The first one will be at the regular full price, so you can book a girl charging JUST $300. Then the second one you should book the more expensive one like $375. This is the only way you can make more out of your buck with their discount.

In any case, I see that the discount will allow me to see the more expensive girl at the reasonable rate, AFTER I book and activate the discount mode. I wouldn't consider the LAST review as wasted so long as they can keep up the quality and do not put an expiration date to the review discount. Not a bad way to retain client.

City-Girls does literally the same thing, but much easier to understand and more straight forward. The first time full rate is $350/ hr, after that you apply for VIP status, as long as the girl don't talk shit about you, you will get it. Then it's $300/ hr for you moving forward. They don't require review, but did offer additional review discount, to the point where their volumes made TER ban City-Girls.