Thread: Sugar Daddy Sites
+
Add Report
Results 8,791 to 8,805 of 11284
-
04-13-17 12:41 #2494Senior Member

Posts: 5603I can agree with that.
Originally Posted by Stolper
[View Original Post]
-
04-13-17 00:56 #2493Senior Member

Posts: 77People have to realize that the $100 slam dunks are almost always black (and sometimes latina) girls. Going for cute white / asian girls at the $100 price range is just asking for a waste of time.
Originally Posted by Zman429
[View Original Post]
-
04-12-17 23:19 #2492Senior Member

Posts: 917I noticed he's going after white / asian girls is $100 in there price range? That might be the problem. Also, do same day meetings help with the flaking?
Originally Posted by HollywoodGuy
[View Original Post]
-
04-12-17 21:40 #2491Senior Member

Posts: 836I agree
Any gal on SA who is fooking for $100 is a pro. You might as well cut through the drama and go to backpage.
Originally Posted by WHM69
[View Original Post]
-
04-12-17 21:29 #2490Senior Member

Posts: 5603It definitely takes a long time to find your groove on SA. Lots of trial and error. I would say it took me years to get to where I can slam dunk for a $. And I don't even go for $$. That would be just too easy (and expensive). Looks, personality, etc, do play a part.
Originally Posted by WHM69
[View Original Post]
In the beginning (sounds ominous), I way overpaid. But I was determined to learn this game (and develop some of my own). I had been in one LTR or another from HS to the age of 52. So you could say I had no game when I started in the bowl.
-
04-12-17 20:38 #2489Senior Member

Posts: 1355Yeah its not for everyone and if that's what works for you and its probably the best route to take.
Originally Posted by WHM69
[View Original Post]
-
04-12-17 20:11 #2488Senior Member

Posts: 3353We're fishing in the same pond, and I've seen a couple of those profiles, and also knew those were no-gos. I am contacting a different type, or getting responses from a different type, and am doing OK.
Originally Posted by WHM69
[View Original Post]
-
04-12-17 20:00 #2487Senior Member

Posts: 186I've had decent experiences with SA a few years ago, but it's just not happening for me now. Even fat girls want $300.
Originally Posted by DogRice
[View Original Post]
-
04-12-17 19:37 #2486Senior Member

Posts: 186No thanks, grandma.
How about a woman who looks like she's in her 50's but insists she's in her 30's? $300 just to have dinner but no touching.
And a gigantic attitude problem, you'll get to hear over and over that she's done this before and knows what she's worth.
-
04-12-17 19:33 #2485Senior Member

Posts: 563Bro,
Hear you. I had similar experience in San Diego area, and that's why I am no longer dealing w / SBs. Too much time and effort, and not particular less expensive than high-quality escorts.
Originally Posted by WHM69
[View Original Post]
-
04-12-17 19:33 #2484Senior Member

Posts: 186More GPS
Do you want to spend $1,000 to have dinner and "hang out" at the mall? This is your girl.
-
04-12-17 19:20 #2483Senior Member

Posts: 186Not having luck.
Maybe it's because I'm ugly, or maybe I'm just too impatient. SA has not been good to me. Lots of girls flake at the last minute or develop GPS at the last minute (or right away). I'm also pretty sure there are tons of fake accounts that send messages just to entice you to join.
This is too much like dating. Except more expensive. I need to stick to straight-up professionals.
Had some girls on the hook and struck out with all of them because I don't want to pay $500 to $1000 when I'm used to banging Jenna Besos for $160 or PrincessK for $180. They don't care if I'm ugly.
-
04-12-17 18:56 #2482Senior Member

Posts: 119New SD report
So I set up an account this past Sunday and started shooting off messages to the newer Latina girls on there. Tried to chose wisely and stayed away from the ones who were clearly out of my league. I have had a good number contact me back and went ahead and set up a couple of meet and greets for Thursday and Friday. One already flaked on our meeting for Friday.
I did communicate that the first meeting was sans sugar. Used the tips and suggestions I found on the Richmond thread. Many of these girls I've set up m&g's with gave me their real number and I was quickly able to find out more about them.
But I was shocked with how many wanted to be "pampered", treated like "queens", and the general level of GPS I came across. At this point in my life I should know better but nonetheless it's sobering seeing how many of these SB have unrealistic expectations. But so far I'm learning a lot. And trying to stay ambivalent to the whole thing and not get caught up.
-
04-11-17 09:32 #2481Senior Member

Posts: 3353This thread needs an IV
FC yesterday w / a married baby, InlandMILF. I'm watching out the window of the hotel, she pulls up in a German sports car. She's got horses & wears nice jewelry. Not poor. I think she's in the bowl b / c she's defiant / subversive to her jerk of a controlling husband, who works in 'security' (good enough to fly around the world doing it, leaving her alone to play) and is ex-military. This did give me pause, and I have maintained my usual high level of OpSec; not worrying about her, she's bright but not savvy in many ways of the bowl, but in fear hubby could suspect and try to track her / us down.
-
04-09-17 14:30 #2480Senior Member

Posts: 5603An X from a long time ago txted me today. She is married now, but said she might come visit me. She used to have such nice slender long legs. I went to the mall yesterday to get a few sexy things for my new little girl. First time I have done that in ages. Pics to follow.










Reply With Quote






