Escort Reports

[Member #6822]

That's the Candy I saw. I suspect the agency had a talk with her. I am tempted to see her again.

PSA: here's the new site if you don't have it already. And yes Candy's gone.

http://nicesense.wixsite.com/girls

[TheBarbarian]

http://amberaffection.wixsite.com/home

Amber is a curvy BBW. She is GFE and is enthusiastic. She is really good with giving a BJ and you can CIM. She is also fun in bed. She rotates locations but Tysons is one regular visit. I recommend her. 160/300 for 30/60.

I saw this chick when I was searching for a PAWG. A lot of red flags for me in conversation with her after the session. On the oThER site, her reviews or solid. She puts in a lot of work. She had a substandard appointment with me and reached out for a do over.

I don't do. Do overs when it's their shortcoming.

To add, the bottom of her feet were dirty ass hell.

[Mayhem101]

http://amberaffection.wixsite.com/home

Amber is a curvy BBW. She is GFE and is enthusiastic. She is really good with giving a BJ and you can CIM. She is also fun in bed. She rotates locations but Tysons is one regular visit. I recommend her. 160/300 for 30/60.

[Member #5603]

I'm a regular monger in RVA I'm in Chantilly for work can anyone suggest a good it'd who isn't afaraid of hotels or even a regular no girl who does outcalls? Bonus if they're young blonde spinner. I also prefer BBBJ. Private message me please.

[Brock Sampson]

I'm really interested as well, however the pics are from an Indian porn site so I doubt she would be the woman you would see.

Xquisitely4.

No answer. Not even voicemail. There's enough questions floating around her for me to assume I'm not missing much.

[Xquisitely4]

Anyone have any knowledge of this one? I am really interested, but can't find anything out there. One pic definitely appears fake, so I am hesitant.

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Wom...esire/26460552

I'm really interested as well, however the pics are from an Indian porn site so I doubt she would be the woman you would see.

Xquisitely4.

[Bunker Buster]

I did something wrong I guess. Created a blog instead of a forum.

Whatever.

That's what user-created threads look like. Nothing wrong with it.

[Wiiiiam]

I did something wrong I guess. Created a blog instead of a forum.

Whatever.

Just go to the main Northern Virginia forum page and click on +Post New Thread.

[Bunker Buster]

Any way I do not know how to create a thread. I'm sure someone can help.

Just go to the main Northern Virginia forum page and click on +Post New Thread.

[Wiiiiam]

The thread I had in mind would not show phone numbers, websites, or any contact info. Guys sharing experiences and hook up tips. Pictures without face are welcome.

I have also seen some similar threads from other cities that have some nice reads and hot amateur selfies. You have seen some I have posted.

I have traded UTR info here before with some success. That is done on I'm. I would share with the lady info of the guy, just a short description or pic. Never ever even send any of the ladies personal info without her permission, and then only her email address.

Any way I do not know how to create a thread. I'm sure someone can help.

A UTR thread for those interested in sharing or swapping UTRs doesn't preclude backchannel sharing for those who prefer not to post about them.

An example of one is the Hit or Miss thread in Baltimore. HOM posts that he has a new one, members PM him, and he decides whether to forward the UTR's info. I've also seen UTR threads in the Tidewater / Norfolk area. What I haven't seen is someone posting up direct contact info for UTRs.

Some guys only want to trade their UTRs with others who've done the extensive legwork it usually takes to land one. UTRs fall into a gray area between BP and SBs, so I'm OK with those who have them getting more latitude in deciding how to share their finds.

[Krakatoa]

Thanks for heads up on NA. Is this the girl?

http://candylovely.wixsite.com/candy/

One review elsewhere indicates BBBJ. I guess I'll wait for more intel.

That's the Candy I saw. I suspect the agency had a talk with her. I am tempted to see her again.

[Roamin Roman]

Shame on me. I forgot to do a Google Image search on her pix. They looked "normal" enough, which is what fooled me.

It took a while, but Web search showed that the pics belong to an Indian "amateur" porn model.

http://tanteku-binal.********.com/20...5839d2863de580

Google search on her last pic reveals that it comes up on a lot of blogs and ****** feeds featuring naked Indian girls. Could be swiped.

[JTreehorn14]

I've seen her ads, as well, but am inclined to believe all the pix and the ad itself are on the up-and-up. Should be worth exploring. BTW, which picture "definitely" appeared fake? I don't see anything wrong with any of them, since they all appear to be the same girl (who is not a polished, air-brushed model type). Everything looks to be real.

Google search on her last pic reveals that it comes up on a lot of blogs and ****** feeds featuring naked Indian girls. Could be swiped.

[Brock Sampson]

I've seen her ads, as well, but am inclined to believe all the pix and the ad itself are on the up-and-up. Should be worth exploring. BTW, which picture "definitely" appeared fake? I don't see anything wrong with any of them, since they all appear to be the same girl (who is not a polished, air-brushed model type). Everything looks to be real.

It took a while, but Web search showed that the pics belong to an Indian "amateur" porn model.

http://tanteku-binal.********.com/20...5839d2863de580

[Roamin Roman]

Anyone have any knowledge of this one? I am really interested, but can't find anything out there. One pic definitely appears fake, so I am hesitant.

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Wom...esire/26460552

I've seen her ads, as well, but am inclined to believe all the pix and the ad itself are on the up-and-up. Should be worth exploring. BTW, which picture "definitely" appeared fake? I don't see anything wrong with any of them, since they all appear to be the same girl (who is not a polished, air-brushed model type). Everything looks to be real.