Massage Parlor Reports

**Joe Fish** · 04-30-15 15:32

Swung by here today. The last time I visited here, there was an older asian woman who although wasn't bad looking, she certainly wasn't a '10. ' Today, I was pleasantly surprised to see a younger (late 20's or early 30's) attractive asian gal there. Very easy on the eyes and friendly. She must be new because she was definitely not the woman I met before. Anyway, I made an appointment for this coming Monday. Hoping for the best but certainly not betting on it. After all, the Hanover Police Department is basically within walking distance of it. Stranger things have happened though.

**WalthamKid** · 04-30-15 10:07

Did a walk in, very cute girl with heavy makeup greeted me. She was wearing miniskirt and fishnets so I was happy / hopeful. Took me in and told me to "get ready". Knock knock? Whose there? Not the chick in the fishnets!! Much plainer girl in jeans and tshirt, think she said Lisa, enters. Not terrible, not fishnet girl. Massage was ok, opted for 1/2 hr, teasing started quickly. Flipped and got UTC access on top while she gave a nice finish. Not bad not great. 40/40 damages. Fishnets was with a monger in closed room when I was leaving. Going back and trying for fishnets. Anyone know her name?

**HowardSprague** · 04-30-15 09:54

Originally Posted by AmpSlave [View Original Post]

Most cases end up being taken care of in court. Not sure if any of these cases ever have a trial. Does anyone know? Do the girls and mama san get deported?

Heard that the places shut down and just open elsewhere.

It depends on whether they want and can afford to fight. Most people can't really afford to go to trial, so they plead out. Even if they're innocent. In these cases it's fines for girls and mamasan. Unless the cops think they can make a trafficking charge. Then it gets ugly and expensive for the mamasan. But they mostly treat the girls as victims. Maybe get a night in jail with the fine, but that's about it. The shops often lose their business licenses. Whether they reopen depends on what charges they've faced and how tenacious they are.

**BostonNorth16** · 04-30-15 08:37

I saw Wendy yesterday and she wasn't at her bestr with me. Actually it was the worst time that I have had with her. She answered her phone and made appointments the entire time. Then she watched the clock and rushed me without giving me the full time. I have had some great sessions with her but after yesterday I will not return. There are too many other options.

**MrHappy1823** · 04-30-15 06:00

Anyway aside from people getting freak out of getting caught and stuff.

I decided to visit my good ole wendy in wakefield, she has a worker name cici english is ok cute lady slim age 35 and her massage skills is awesome.

Please note if you have a weak back you better let her know cause she will put her knees on your back full weight and also she puts a towel on your back and if it wasnt for those
towel those pointing knees of her will probly break me in half. I am now feeling it this morning. I opt for one hour and there was no rush and no tips was ask.

Session ended with a good finish anyone who is a regular of wendy and if you don't like her workers she will note of it and make sure they won't return.

But anyway 6+4 with tip and I was satisfied for the day as of my body was out of sync. Seniors can msg me for more info.

**Hazed79** · 04-29-15 23:09

Originally Posted by AmpExplorer [View Original Post]

Previous locations Yumi worked more was available.

Wonder if she knew you from before you could get "grandfathered" in for extras? Or is she playing it safe in Norwood.

Do not like places in residential areas from what it sounds like.

Which place in norwood? Northern lights or place on RT 1 at gas station?

I noticed it at Northern Lights. I'm still considering checking it out, but as I said seeing LEO parked in back of the place. (that one time) has made me reluctant to pull the trigger. Ill post something if I do. Now that RI is options are drying up and over used, its about time I find something a little closer to home.

**Amp Slave** · 04-29-15 17:55

Originally Posted by SpermSac [View Original Post]

There are those who are so gullible that they think every cop tells the truth. ROFLMAO.

Most cases end up being taken care of in court. Not sure if any of these cases ever have a trial. Does anyone know? Do the girls and mama san get deported?

Heard that the places shut down and just open elsewhere.

**DontFailMeNow** · 04-29-15 16:54

Originally Posted by CMeLater19 [View Original Post]

Anyone know of any FS spas in qtown?

And what's the going rate these days?

Thanks in advance.

Ampfan228 just made a very informative post a few pages back on options in Qtown. You have to do your part by at least putting in some effort to reading this thread. So much info in here. Look and you shall find!

**SpermSac** · 04-29-15 07:15

Originally Posted by Katokay [View Original Post]

The thing that outweighs all of this law conversation is that cops lie. They make things up, plant evidence, etc etc. Many times they justify this because they believe you are guilty and don't care about the law.

There are those who are so gullible that they think every cop tells the truth. ROFLMAO.

**Jolem** · 04-28-15 22:53

Lily is a young, shapely masseuse at Chi Bodyworks. Friendly, no-rush attitude, face 6/10 body 7/10. Good, vigorous bodyrub, HE with UTC roaming on top, OTC below. . 45/. 4 for 1/2 hr. Walk-in, 3 girls working midday, and was even offered a look at them before choosing (I declined, went w Lily right off).

Originally Posted by JohnBoy69 [View Original Post]

HD, when in newton, try Chi Bodyworks in chestnut hill on rt 9 W 6179930317 ask for michelle (boss) and if she works that day. You're in luck, if not there are a few amy, alice. Joy. Always left happy but no FS. Jb.

**Katokay** · 04-28-15 21:25

The thing that outweighs all of this law conversation is that cops lie. They make things up, plant evidence, etc etc. Many times they justify this because they believe you are guilty and don't care about the law.

**Jolem** · 04-28-15 10:24

Originally Posted by HowardSprague [View Original Post]

But my understanding has been that stop and identify does not require a reasonable suspicion as cops can always stop you (and often search) based on reasonable suspicion, hence the statute to give them even more leeway.

Absolutely, HS, when I said 'exception' I also meant to their burden of proof. Thanks for clarifying and for good advice!

**HowardSprague** · 04-28-15 10:00

Originally Posted by Jolem [View Original Post]

Subject to HS' answer, here's Wikipedia: ' "Stop and identify" statutes are statute laws in the United States that authorize police to legally obtain the identification of someone whom they reasonably suspect has committed a crime. If the person is not reasonably suspected of committing a crime, they are not required to provide identification, even in states with stop and identify statutes. '.

Police can 1) arrest you, 2) detain you, 3) have a consensual, voluntary conversation with you, or 4) ignore you. To be detained, they must have "a reasonable suspicion" that you committed, or will commit, a crime. If they detain you, you are NOT obliged to answer questions. An exception: stop and identify laws specifically require you to provide identification to police when detained.

HS' advice is spot on: Offer no information, and politely ask if you are being detained, or are free to leave.

That pretty much says it all. But my understanding has been that stop and identify does not require a reasonable suspicion as cops can always stop you (and often search) based on reasonable suspicion, hence the statute to give them even more leeway.

As with anything in law, there are RARELY cut and dried answers. There are always variables. That certainly applies to stops and searches.

We are enveloped in a shell of legal innocence. Cops look for cracks (anything unlawful) in that shell as a way to legally get to you. Whether it was a crack or just a mark on the shell is determined by the courts and affects the admissibility of the evidence the cops find inside that shell. So, they can't really bust you for walking out of an AMP because they don't have any evidence of a crime (though that's not what they'll tell you if they do stop you), but if you stumble they can say they suspected public intoxication. If your car has a cracked taillight, they can stop you for faulty equipment. Those are valid excuses for a stop allowing them to start probing.

**Jolem** · 04-28-15 08:58

Originally Posted by PwHerman [View Original Post]

HS, could you please shed a little light on this sentence. I think it may be important and get glossed over.

Subject to HS' answer, here's Wikipedia: ' "Stop and identify" statutes are statute laws in the United States that authorize police to legally obtain the identification of someone whom they reasonably suspect has committed a crime. If the person is not reasonably suspected of committing a crime, they are not required to provide identification, even in states with stop and identify statutes. '.

Police can 1) arrest you, 2) detain you, 3) have a consensual, voluntary conversation with you, or 4) ignore you. To be detained, they must have "a reasonable suspicion" that you committed, or will commit, a crime. If they detain you, you are NOT obliged to answer questions. An exception: stop and identify laws specifically require you to provide identification to police when detained.

HS' advice is spot on: Offer no information, and politely ask if you are being detained, or are free to leave.