Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 17,881 to 17,895 of 24728
-
01-14-15 21:24 #6848Senior Member

Posts: 690Good Intel, LTB. Thanks.
Originally Posted by Lovethatbob
[View Original Post]
-
01-14-15 00:24 #6847Senior Member

Posts: 485St. Charles Middle Age Gal
Saw her last summer. Real lady, not bad looking, 50-ish. Sets up a table in her large kitchen with very light shades, so it was VERY BRIGHT in there. Yeah, I know. Kitchen? Bright daylight? Maybe the bedroom was being painted or something. Anyway, just a massage, and not a bad one. A solid BE efffort. NOTHING more. I answered her ad again a few weeks ago by email. Led her on about what would make me happiest. (She had no way of knowing I'd already seen her before.) She finally replied that she'd be fine with me taking care of myself at the conclusion, and she'd get me a washcloth when I was done.
Originally Posted by HockeyDood
[View Original Post]
So, why spend $60 on a moderate massage and finish yourself off, when for a bit more, you can have a lovely younger woman do it for you in a MUCH more convivial environment and feel her up a bit all the while. Oh well. There's a lid for every pot, right?
LTB.
-
01-13-15 20:00 #6846Senior Member

Posts: 811Got it. Thanks.
Originally Posted by Roye12
[View Original Post]
-
01-13-15 19:59 #6845Senior Member

Posts: 209Yes, I've seen her a few times. Legit. Great massage and will tease as much as you want but won't touch where it counts. Great personality and very nice location.
Originally Posted by HockeyDood
[View Original Post]
-
01-13-15 19:04 #6844Regular Member

Posts: 13Lillia and Tierney. Mia? Devon?
Hey guys,
Quick report on recent findings.
Went to see both Lillia and Tierney from YGND. Lillia is very attractive, young, and full of energy. Huge bolt ons that she lets you tease. The massage was good, but not as erotic as Lake's other girls. The flip was basic, but her looks and body alone had it next level. Tierney is more of a pro when it comes to the massage. Not much small talk either, which is hard to find and nice. She makes you feel like she really wants you while you are on her table. It's fantastic. She is a little older, but her body is in very good shape. Both were great overall, but very different. Tierney is more dedicated to making it an overall experience from beginning to end. I will repeat both. Angel is still my favorite hands down. What a pro.
Has anyone had any luck with either of these? Mia looks like she could be legit, but you never can tell with out a review. Please let me know! Thanks as always.
http://stlouis.backpage.com/BodyRubs...t-mia/15585504
http://stlouis.backpage.com/BodyRubs...h-kay/15023931
http://stlouis.backpage.com/BodyRubs...y-rub/15585716
-
01-13-15 18:15 #6843Senior Member

Posts: 34KUBoobs
Drop the period at the end.
Originally Posted by LarksTongue
[View Original Post]
-
01-13-15 17:43 #6842Senior Member

Posts: 811KUboobs no longer a valid twitter page / account.
Originally Posted by Jeffc574
[View Original Post]
-
01-13-15 10:57 #6841Senior Member

Posts: 66Any intel on this one?
https://stlouis.craigslist.org/stp/4843372602.html
I see her ad all the time, but I don't think I've seen any reviews. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Dood.
-
01-13-15 10:40 #6840Senior Member

Posts: 304Caty
YEah, I met with her before at Drury Inn, Chesterfield. From west county area. Says she's got a sugar daddy and we wound up having some mutual friends. All Talk and no go. Save your money and Forget about it!!
Originally Posted by Jeffc574
[View Original Post]
-
01-13-15 10:18 #6839Senior Member

Posts: 1744Ms. KU
Ms. "KU" is from https://twitter.com/kuboobs. It is certainly possible she is just a poor college student picking up some cash over the holiday. But not what I would bet on.
Originally Posted by Stlconnoisseur
[View Original Post]
-
01-13-15 09:28 #6838Senior Member

Posts: 152The top link I'm pretty sure was reported as a scam previously on this board. Either way the 347 (New York City) area code pretty much screams that she's a fake IMO.
Originally Posted by Stlconnoisseur
[View Original Post]
On the other hand the lower link for Caty has a local 636 phone number. I image searched several of her pictures and did not find any duplicates so she didn't swipe them from somewhere else online. I tried to contact her after you posted the link initially with no success (no voicemail set up either). One thing I noticed was that she posted that ad on only a couple specific days so she might only answer her phone on the days she posts the ads, I have met a few girls that operated that way. If I learn anything further I will report.
-
01-13-15 07:14 #6837Senior Member

Posts: 59VIP in Centreville
I used to be a regular at VIP in Centreville. I always got the table shower and usually got FS. With a couple of exceptions, things went as I wanted them too. Haven't been there for several months, but I have no reason to think the place has changed. Korean women, mostly in their 30's and 40's. Clean, decent AMP.
Originally Posted by Simplycool
[View Original Post]
DT.
-
01-12-15 23:04 #6836Senior Member

Posts: 225WOW! Both of them are really HoT! Caty has a local number which is a good sign. I would be interested on a review if anyone gets to see either one of them!
Originally Posted by Stlconnoisseur
[View Original Post]
-
01-12-15 20:55 #6835Senior Member

Posts: 203Tgtbt
Both of these young ladies are attractive and I gave not been able to find much information about them. I assume they are too good to be true but would love to be proved wrong. Anyone with information?
Originally Posted by Stlconnoisseur
[View Original Post]
http://stlouis.backpage.com/BodyRubs...y-lmt/15509190
http://stlouis.backpage.com/BodyRubs...t-fun/15452679
-
01-12-15 11:40 #6834Senior Member

Posts: 225I have been looking for a good AMP in the St Louis area for years. I have been to other cities that have great selections. I miss the table showers, etc. Anyone know of any that are true AMPs, with table shower, and HE? I would really like to know.
Originally Posted by DonnyBrasso
[View Original Post]











Reply With Quote





