The Massholes

[SpermSac]

Spermie, This week you will find one of the AMPs being busted.. in Fram. now dont tell me I didnt warn you...jeeze only wished my friend with the mouth problem and pencil dick ss could be there to see it take place... amyway if we dont chat.(peace minus one) and happy new year touch hole. Go play with your dick photos.

Now scuzbag, Douche bag or just plain ole asshole. YOU just don't listen, do you!

If you have anything to say to me, SAY IT HERE. I want everyone to know what words of wisdom come from your booze breath. Don't send me PM's. You know they will only end up here so save some time. You know you read this forum when the booze lets you.

Thanks for the New Years wish, but again you are wrong. It is not one piece it happens to be 2 pieces and no I won't share one with you.

[Smoke Screen]

I actually like to see the ads that state "no black men", not because of race, but instead, it gives me a safer feeling that the ad isn't put up by LE for a sting. I would think if LE put up an ad for a sting, they would want blacks as well as whites and whatever else they could snag. Of course nothing is 100%, but I think this thought is close.

[Deb4512]

Maybe that will be the next big sting, the FBI will go after every girl advertising that she doesn't see black men. Maybe I shouldn't be giving Martha any ideas.

I've had more problems with white men than black men. But I cannot imagine writing "no white men" in my ad.

Happy Holidays everyone!

[Skatar018]

Nobody was being douchey, it was actually a pretty good discussion but it was choking up the CL thread and technically its a violation. It's a violation because it usually drags the assholes out from under their rocks. If it gets ugly I'm gonna shut it down. For ugly there is a recent example in Jacksonville on the Woodshed thread.

A2

Agree the conversation didn't belong on the CLCE forum & thanks for moving the posts, you & the board have my apologies for initiating that topic in that forum.

[Admin2]

Nobody was being douchey, it was actually a pretty good discussion but it was choking up the CL thread and technically its a violation. It's a violation because it usually drags the assholes out from under their rocks. If it gets ugly I'm gonna shut it down. For ugly there is a recent example in Jacksonville on the Woodshed thread.

A2

[Skatar018]

You can believe what you want but unless you hear it from the mouth of the provider herself as to why they will or will not do something then everything else is just speculation & supposition & may not be the facts, but it was her not providing a BBBJ that was the deal breaker for me, not seeing black men was just another reason for to pass. As stated I can not comment on her service being good, bad or indifferent.

Maybe I shouldn't be giving Martha any ideas...

BTW HH Martha is out thank GAWD!.

[OreoCookie]

Is it morally right? Does it violate local and federal laws regarding discrimination? Do they care about breaking laws or morals?

Being older (like way older) I have yet to be denied service because of my age. YAY for me, but you'd think that there would a line drawn somewhere.

[Ho Hunter 328]

On the other hand, after seeing numerous backpage ads with "no black men, please" I asked the provider that I'm friendly with whether she too had issues with black guys and she said no. But she had an issue with some other ethnic group that I would not mention here, and that was based on her personal practical experience with several men from that group.

I've heard from several girls that they don't like Indian men. The reasons I heard were poor hygiene, uncircumcised, and poor attitude. Obviously I'm sure that doesn't apply to all of them, but it may apply to a high enough percentage that they just prefer to deny all of them.

Obviously there are "bad clients" from every ethnic group, but if a high enough percentage of a minority group cause issues, it's easier to just deny service to all of them instead of make the effort to determine if they're one of the "bad" ones or "good" ones. It's important to remember that Massachusetts is over 80% white, so it's easy to see why escorts here can afford to be selective regarding ethnicity. Is it morally right? Does it violate local and federal laws regarding discrimination? Do they care about breaking laws or morals?

Maybe that will be the next big sting, the FBI will go after every girl advertising that she doesn't see black men. Maybe I shouldn't be giving Martha any ideas...

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

[Ho Hunter 328]

Both of you have valid points.

My research about these providers that have this " no blacks" policy shows that many, maybe even most, have black street punk handlers (I hate the word, pimp. Almost makes them sound big). Also, many of them used to see blacks before suddenly adopting that policy. HoHunter is right: they have this (erroneous) belief that they can get more money from white mongers. I say erroneous because if all mongers are disciplined and never overpay, it would not matter if one is white or black. That's like a convenience store owner deciding to sell only to whites because he figures he can raise the price of his soda from $1 to $2.

Joe is right also: in effect, their street punk handlers are concerned about their fellow African Americans who, they worry " know the game". This infact, becomes another good way to identify providers to avoid. Personally, I would never see a provider working with a handler. That should be a deal breaker for every monger.

It is true that many of those posting "No Blacks" are pimped, and it's something their pimps insist on. Others say it for other reasons as I've already stated, and most of those will make exceptions on a case by case basis.

I can say for certain in Brianna's case that she definitely does not have a pimp.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

[Ho Hunter 328]

She's allowed her preferences as is anyone, we do however need to be informed what those preferences are along with options & donation amounts.

As I've never seen her I can't state what her preferences are other than what she posts, & one of those preferences she did post "Sorry no black men" http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...-3174/28148330.

There are always exceptions to the rules, but that along with her don'ts on her service options & donation amounts were deal breakers for me.

Perhaps you can state what & how your experience (if any) was with Brianna & if you'd repeat or have repeated & if you'd recommend others spending their time & money to see her.

It's been a few years since I've engaged her services, and my experiences may not be typical because of how long I've known her. For me her performance and skill was good for a CBJ, she did kiss, she did get into it, she didn't rush in any way. But I just can't do CBJ's anymore, it just doesn't do it for me. Her attitude is good though, and I wish more girls had the right attitude.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

[Member #4675]

I have asked girls why they don't like to see african americans, Alot of the girls I have asked have told me they have been robbed at gun point, can I trust that there telling the truth /? No, I mean have you watched "drugs inc" on the nat geo channel, there is gangs that stick up drug dealers and take there drugs and cash, I'm sure there is black gangs that like to rob working girls of there hard earned money, its not like the girls are going to go to the police so they are easy targets for the stick up kids, I was hanging with a girl from nh last night, 22 year old very pretty, 3 black dudes have tried to pimp her out, so now she is just scared to even book a date with men of color.

[Hotboyzz]

Though not a politically correct viewpoint, some of these girls have a "no black men" policy because they have had bad experiences with them. At the strip clubs, I have met dancers with a similar policy for that reason. At Teddies in Bridgeport several years ago, an Indian dancer marched straight over to me one night as soon as I walked in. Her complaint about the black men was, "All they want is sex and blow-job!

I sure all gals in this industry have had "bad" interaction with varies races. I think they saw "no black men" because they have a black pimp and know that a fellow black is not as an easy target. I could be wrong; just my observation.

[Nrlmus]

Though not a politically correct viewpoint, some of these girls have a "no black men" policy because they have had bad experiences with them. At the strip clubs, I have met dancers with a similar policy for that reason. At Teddies in Bridgeport several years ago, an Indian dancer marched straight over to me one night as soon as I walked in. Her complaint about the black men was, "All they want is sex and blow-job!

I had a nice UTR on the South Shore that cut me off couple of years back after she (erroneously) came to believe that I gave her info to "some creepy sounding black man". I actually never shared her info with anybody but I guess shit happens.

On the other hand, after seeing numerous backpage ads with "no black men, please" I asked the provider that I'm friendly with whether she too had issues with black guys and she said no. But she had an issue with some other ethnic group that I would not mention here, and that was based on her personal practical experience with several men from that group.

[Choir Boy]

Joe is right also: in effect, their street punk handlers are concerned about their fellow African Americans who, they worry " know the game". This in fact, becomes another good way to identify providers to avoid. Personally, I would never see a provider working with a handler. That should be a deal breaker for every monger.

Though not a politically correct viewpoint, some of these girls have a "no black men" policy because they have had bad experiences with them. At the strip clubs, I have met dancers with a similar policy for that reason. At Teddies in Bridgeport several years ago, an Indian dancer marched straight over to me one night as soon as I walked in. Her complaint about the black men was, "All they want is sex and blow-job!

[Steveon]

Stereotypically could also mean they don't want to be pimped.

Both of you have valid points.

My research about these providers that have this " no blacks" policy shows that many, maybe even most, have black street punk handlers (I hate the word, pimp. Almost makes them sound big). Also, many of them used to see blacks before suddenly adopting that policy. HoHunter is right: they have this (erroneous) belief that they can get more money from white mongers. I say erroneous because if all mongers are disciplined and never overpay, it would not matter if one is white or black. That's like a convenience store owner deciding to sell only to whites because he figures he can raise the price of his soda from $1 to $2.

Joe is right also: in effect, their street punk handlers are concerned about their fellow African Americans who, they worry " know the game". This infact, becomes another good way to identify providers to avoid. Personally, I would never see a provider working with a handler. That should be a deal breaker for every monger.