Escort Reports

[Zhuxi]

My man you are more than familiar with the agencies. For the 300, the quality is almost always 8+ looks wise (l hesitate to say always, but I haven't been disappointed by an agency looks wise yet), and the experience is solid. Stick to those Ambidexterious. I have frequented one (and reviewed it without naming) - I'll post a newer review on it a bit, but my experiences have all been close to an A grade. Which for me means worth the cash without all the hassle of BP. I believe we have talked about it before, but PM if you want the agency I speak of, since it sounds like you might be tired of your goto's.

Bunker and Jm always have good takes.

Zhuxi.

[JmSuttr]

I could not find any reviews on Miko but her ad looked OK so I decided to take a chance. In the ad she said she "provides an incredible GFE. " On the phone she quoted me 3 $/ h, a premium price that in this area gets you BBBJCIM. Arrived at her Tyson's Corner hotel, she was ready on time.

Miko said she is Japanese, maybe so but she speaks English like a native. Her ad says she is 27 but I would give her ten years more than that. She has also gained weight since the ad photos were taken (or they were photoshopped). While the ad photos might show a 7 or 8 in attractiveness, in person she is about a 5.

A provider of marginal attractiveness who charges 3 $/ h had better at least give good service. But I quickly ran into problems when she put a condom on me right away and refused DATY, saying it was for health reasons.

She had asked me for payment when I disrobed and I put the envelope containing 3 $ on the dresser. When she declined DATY and seemed intent on following her own agenda I lost the little enthusiasm I had and decided to abort the mission. I told her that her limitations were a turnoff, put my clothes back on, and said I wanted my money back. She said she doesn't give money back, but I picked the envelope up from where I left it, took out $60 and put it on the dresser, and left. I said I felt $60 was more than fair for the ten minutes I had been there. She was angry and said nothing as I left, although I said "Sorry about that. ".

This should have been a wakeup call for her. This kind of provider might be worth $. 5/ h at the most. Buyer beware.

First, I'm assuming this is the (incredible GFE) Miko to whom you're referring:

http://www.eros.com/us/washington_dc/files/520423.htm

I heartily concur with the sage advice posted by BB and in addition I would like to offer the observation that a simple google search of the number would have led you to an ad using the EXACT same wording (except for the name) even including the way the text in the ad is underlined, which should have been a red flag.

http://www.eros.com/us/washington_dc/files/509655.htm

The second ad, even without doing a search on the photos (which come back to porn sites, BTW), would have clued you in to the fact you weren't dealing with an independent and would at least have put you more on your guard.

Also, 646 is a NYC prefix and while there are a number of great, legit providers who visit from NYC there are also plenty of scam agencies and individual scam providers who prey on gullible and horny hobbyists. At a minimum, IMHO, a NYC phone prefix is an indicator that extra homework is warranted.

And the fact the girl who opened the door was a 5 instead of the advertised 8+ should have been the final red flag to make you walk away. Here's why: when a low-to-med priced BP girl doesn't match her pics that's not ideal but not altogether unexpected. But it's much more unusual when a supposedly top-notch, high-end, sophisticated provider (who advertises herself in superlative terms) is so far off the mark. A true high-end provider is generally very concerned about her reputation and is less likely to misrepresent herself or her services. The minute you saw a 5 on the other side of the door it meant there was absolutely nothing about the ad you could trust.

If you're in the mood for a $300 girl, then do a search on the oThER site, or Eros or BP with the price as your search parameter and then do some homework on those search results. Or, if you're in the mood for Asian providers, search specifically for them and let those results guide your homework efforts.

No matter what process you use, a little homework is absolutely a better way to save yourself the time, aggravation and $ you waste when you wing it and hope for the best.

P.S. Extremely lucky for you she didn't have a "manager" nearby when you decided to take back part of the fee. If she had, that situation could have gone sideways in a hurry, and not in a good way.

P. P.S. All the EROS ads look good, including (or maybe, especially) the scam ones.

[Drunker Irish]

She had asked me for payment when I disrobed and I put the envelope containing 3 $ on the dresser. When she declined DATY and seemed intent on following her own agenda I lost the little enthusiasm I had and decided to abort the mission. I told her that her limitations were a turnoff, put my clothes back on, and said I wanted my money back. She said she doesn't give money back, but I picked the envelope up from where I left it, took out $60 and put it on the dresser, and left. I said I felt $60 was more than fair for the ten minutes I had been there. She was angry and said nothing as I left, although I said "Sorry about that. ".

Good on you.

I wouldn't feel bad or apologized either. We need to learn as customers to be more assertive. I think you could have taken back $200 with no problem IMHO.

[Bunker Buster]

I could not find any reviews on Miko but her ad looked OK so I decided to take a chance. In the ad she said she "provides an incredible GFE. " On the phone she quoted me 3 $/ h, a premium price that in this area gets you BBBJCIM. Arrived at her Tyson's Corner hotel, she was ready on time.

Miko said she is Japanese, maybe so but she speaks English like a native. Her ad says she is 27 but I would give her ten years more than that. She has also gained weight since the ad photos were taken (or they were photoshopped). While the ad photos might show a 7 or 8 in attractiveness, in person she is about a 5.

A provider of marginal attractiveness who charges 3 $/ h had better at least give good service. But I quickly ran into problems when she put a condom on me right away and refused DATY, saying it was for health reasons.

She had asked me for payment when I disrobed and I put the envelope containing 3 $ on the dresser. When she declined DATY and seemed intent on following her own agenda I lost the little enthusiasm I had and decided to abort the mission. I told her that her limitations were a turnoff, put my clothes back on, and said I wanted my money back. She said she doesn't give money back, but I picked the envelope up from where I left it, took out $60 and put it on the dresser, and left. I said I felt $60 was more than fair for the ten minutes I had been there. She was angry and said nothing as I left, although I said "Sorry about that. ".

This should have been a wakeup call for her. This kind of provider might be worth $. 5/ h at the most. Buyer beware.

You must be doing well to roll the dice at $300 on a pig in a poke. No reviews, fake pix, and there's a 5 behind Door #1, but you still laid down that coin? If we lived in the 1700's, we'd put you in the stocks and throw fruit at you to shame you into better behavior. At least you had the good sense to abort and walk out with $240, so we'll only keep you in the stocks for a few minutes.

My rule is worth repeating here: for an unknown, unreviewed provider, start with the shortest-available session. Don't pour your life savings into a speculative land deal before even seeing the soil test, LOL. Once you've seen her, and things are going well, you can always suggest extending, and I've rarely heard of a girl who refuses more money.

If things don't go well, you're only out $60-$120, leaving you more than enough for a make-up visit with someone else.

And why are you still messing around with the Asian ads which have been proven over and over and over to be fake pix? The girl in the room is ALWAYS 10+ years older, 3 points lower in appearance, and no better than a 5-6 in performance.

$300 is a lot of money, even in DC. If you're determined to drop $300, there are some well-reviewed, Grade-A girls around town that hit 9-10 on the civilian scale, and you're guaranteed an 8-9 experience. If I were going to spend that kind of $, I'd go see someone like Bedroom Barbie, a well-reviewed Roanoke girl who travels around the state. She's phenomenal looking, and has great reviews.

http://www.bedroombarbie.com/

[Ambidextrous]

I could not find any reviews on Miko but her ad looked OK so I decided to take a chance. In the ad she said she "provides an incredible GFE. " On the phone she quoted me 3 $/ h, a premium price that in this area gets you BBBJCIM. Arrived at her Tyson's Corner hotel, she was ready on time.

Miko said she is Japanese, maybe so but she speaks English like a native. Her ad says she is 27 but I would give her ten years more than that. She has also gained weight since the ad photos were taken (or they were photoshopped). While the ad photos might show a 7 or 8 in attractiveness, in person she is about a 5.

A provider of marginal attractiveness who charges 3 $/ h had better at least give good service. But I quickly ran into problems when she put a condom on me right away and refused DATY, saying it was for health reasons.

She had asked me for payment when I disrobed and I put the envelope containing 3 $ on the dresser. When she declined DATY and seemed intent on following her own agenda I lost the little enthusiasm I had and decided to abort the mission. I told her that her limitations were a turnoff, put my clothes back on, and said I wanted my money back. She said she doesn't give money back, but I picked the envelope up from where I left it, took out $60 and put it on the dresser, and left. I said I felt $60 was more than fair for the ten minutes I had been there. She was angry and said nothing as I left, although I said "Sorry about that. ".

This should have been a wakeup call for her. This kind of provider might be worth $. 5/ h at the most. Buyer beware.

[Member #4932]

In her ad "Angie" looks like a robo-babe. The ad does not list any agency, but I hoped she was a K-girl because that is my preference. I booked a 10 am appointment, arrived on time and texted her. She texted me to wait "5 minutes," which turned into 10, then she texted me the room number. Game face on, I strolled calmly through the hotel lobby and up the elevator I went.

Angie turned out to be a very attractive Thai girl, but by the time I got inside the room it was 15 minutes past the hour and I was afraid of clock-watching. I asked if she had another appointment after me. There was a language barrier but I understood her to say that her next appointment was at ten minutes after 11, leaving me 55 minutes at most. Being shorted on time because she was not ready is a deal-breaker for me, so I explained and politely bailed, which she accepted although I don't know if she understood the reason.

From my car I called my two go-to K-agencies, but no immediate appointment was available. Then I thought of the Chinese condo located on Lincoln Way. I have had their number for several years and I don't even know where (or if) they advertise these days. The rate has been $. 6/ h since I first went there. I knew I was taking a chance on the service I might get, but I was on a mission, so I called and was able to book an immediate appointment. They have changed locations so I had to find the new place, not far away.

Behind the door in the darkened room stood "Coco," about 30, not very pretty but a perfect body, perky be-cups and flat stomach. She smiled thinly but was not warm, seemed a little shy and spoke very little English. She did not seem to like to kiss, but I still gave her all the affection I could. Her pussy was as perfect as it comes and I thoroughly enjoyed giving her a long unhurried DATY which culminated in a climax that I believe was as fully satisfying to her as it was to me.

Slipped on a condom and we went at it in several positions for about ten minutes. She enjoyed it but resisted kissing, disappointing to me. I prefer to finish with BBBJ so I took off the condom and motioned to her mouth. To my surprise she shook her head no. I reminded myself that this was not the K-service I am used to so I straddled her and using her hand and mine, finished on her excellent chest. Though she held her hand up to shield her face I still dumped a major load on her. I enjoyed it immensely, but she made a face like it was distasteful and immediately headed to the bathroom to clean up. It seems that providers who like having come in their mouth or on their body (or at least act as if they do) exist only in porn.

After we cleaned up I figured she was disgusted with me but there was still some time left, so I laid down on the bed and motioned for her to cuddle with me. She did so and to my surprise even seemed affectionate, so we enjoyed a moment of quiet closeness. I guess she had no hard feelings after all.

I can't deny that I got a lot of pleasure and saved over a hundred bucks, but this experience confirmed to me that the premium you pay for a K-girl is worth it.

On the excellent Z-scale: Face 6, Body 9, Attitude 6, Service 5.

You need to find one or two gals that like COF or swallow and stick to them?

[Ambidextrous]

Viki is young and does not have a feel for the job. Fussy, bossy, stopped me many times (don't touch hair or face), faked O, poor BJ technique. I felt she does not like this activity and has no idea what a man wants. I was disappointed big time and because this has happened a couple of times at this agency (Barbara) I am going to try to go elsewhere for a while. My experience FWIW. Face 8 Body 8 Attitude 2 Service 2

[Zhuxi]

"Morgan" is Laotian, 27, fairly pretty, speaks decent English. Always interesting to try a new nationality. All communication before the visit, including screening, was by text. Her Tysons Corner hotel room opens to the street, no need to pass through a common area.

Morgan has a robust body, big breasts and a kind, welcoming manner. Because she knew the drill and seemed comfortable she seemed like a veteran but said she's only done this work for 6 months. Affectionate and cooperative, unlimited kissing and touching, allowed DATO but no finger penetration. After initial obviously fake sound effects, seemed to get off pretty well from extended DATY and a small egg-shaped vibrator I brought along.

Did several positions enthusiastically and agreed to finish with BBBJ w / PM. Nixed CIF for the familiar reason: "makeup. " Although her BJ technique was pretty good I needed to use my hand to finish and when I did she covered me with her hand to avoid getting splattered on the face. Disappointing but understandable.

Damage for 1 hour: 3 x $. On the excellent Z-scale: Face 7, Body 7, Attitude 8, Service 7 1/2.

Thanks for keeping the escort thread hot Amb. You're a good man, and you're right, it is a good scale my friend. Hah!

Zhuxi.

[Ambidextrous]

In her ad "Angie" looks like a robo-babe. The ad does not list any agency, but I hoped she was a K-girl because that is my preference. I booked a 10 am appointment, arrived on time and texted her. She texted me to wait "5 minutes," which turned into 10, then she texted me the room number. Game face on, I strolled calmly through the hotel lobby and up the elevator I went.

Angie turned out to be a very attractive Thai girl, but by the time I got inside the room it was 15 minutes past the hour and I was afraid of clock-watching. I asked if she had another appointment after me. There was a language barrier but I understood her to say that her next appointment was at ten minutes after 11, leaving me 55 minutes at most. Being shorted on time because she was not ready is a deal-breaker for me, so I explained and politely bailed, which she accepted although I don't know if she understood the reason.

From my car I called my two go-to K-agencies, but no immediate appointment was available. Then I thought of the Chinese condo located on Lincoln Way. I have had their number for several years and I don't even know where (or if) they advertise these days. The rate has been $. 6/ h since I first went there. I knew I was taking a chance on the service I might get, but I was on a mission, so I called and was able to book an immediate appointment. They have changed locations so I had to find the new place, not far away.

Behind the door in the darkened room stood "Coco," about 30, not very pretty but a perfect body, perky be-cups and flat stomach. She smiled thinly but was not warm, seemed a little shy and spoke very little English. She did not seem to like to kiss, but I still gave her all the affection I could. Her pussy was as perfect as it comes and I thoroughly enjoyed giving her a long unhurried DATY which culminated in a climax that I believe was as fully satisfying to her as it was to me.

Slipped on a condom and we went at it in several positions for about ten minutes. She enjoyed it but resisted kissing, disappointing to me. I prefer to finish with BBBJ so I took off the condom and motioned to her mouth. To my surprise she shook her head no. I reminded myself that this was not the K-service I am used to so I straddled her and using her hand and mine, finished on her excellent chest. Though she held her hand up to shield her face I still dumped a major load on her. I enjoyed it immensely, but she made a face like it was distasteful and immediately headed to the bathroom to clean up. It seems that providers who like having come in their mouth or on their body (or at least act as if they do) exist only in porn.

After we cleaned up I figured she was disgusted with me but there was still some time left, so I laid down on the bed and motioned for her to cuddle with me. She did so and to my surprise even seemed affectionate, so we enjoyed a moment of quiet closeness. I guess she had no hard feelings after all.

I can't deny that I got a lot of pleasure and saved over a hundred bucks, but this experience confirmed to me that the premium you pay for a K-girl is worth it.

On the excellent Z-scale: Face 6, Body 9, Attitude 6, Service 5.

[Watta]

I don't get your way much anymore so when I do I really was NEEDING to see the girls at the FCCC but when I called 202-XXX-X000 there was a quick dump to VM and then no answer at all!

If you will, PLEASE PM me the numbers for the TCCC (s) that you know of and I will gladly provide some phone numbers of some interesting women around Richmond.

Thanks!

WATTA sad situation to get up to NoVa with no good phone numbers!

[Bunker Buster]

"Morgan" is Laotian, 27, fairly pretty, speaks decent English. Always interesting to try a new nationality. All communication before the visit, including screening, was by text. Her Tysons Corner hotel room opens to the street, no need to pass through a common area.

There are a few Morgans on Backpage, but none that are Laotian.

In my experience, passing through a common area to a hotel room is better than knocking on a door in plain view of the entire parking lot and observation posts across the street. It's much harder to notice frequent visitors to a door on an interior hallway, and you can always walk in the lobby and out the back stairs.

[JmSuttr]

"Morgan" is Laotian, 27, fairly pretty, speaks decent English. Always interesting to try a new nationality. All communication before the visit, including screening, was by text. Her Tysons Corner hotel room opens to the street, no need to pass through a common area.

Morgan has a robust body, big breasts and a kind, welcoming manner. Because she knew the drill and seemed comfortable she seemed like a veteran but said she's only done this work for 6 months. Affectionate and cooperative, unlimited kissing and touching, allowed DATO but no finger penetration. After initial obviously fake sound effects, seemed to get off pretty well from extended DATY and a small egg-shaped vibrator I brought along.

Did several positions enthusiastically and agreed to finish with BBBJ w / PM. Nixed CIF for the familiar reason: "makeup. " Although her BJ technique was pretty good I needed to use my hand to finish and when I did she covered me with her hand to avoid getting splattered on the face. Disappointing but understandable.

Damage for 1 hour: 3 x $. On the excellent Z-scale: Face 7, Body 7, Attitude 8, Service 7 1/2.

There are multiple providers out there using the name Morgan. Not sure which one is the subject of your report.

[Ambidextrous]

"Morgan" is Laotian, 27, fairly pretty, speaks decent English. Always interesting to try a new nationality. All communication before the visit, including screening, was by text. Her Tysons Corner hotel room opens to the street, no need to pass through a common area.

Morgan has a robust body, big breasts and a kind, welcoming manner. Because she knew the drill and seemed comfortable she seemed like a veteran but said she's only done this work for 6 months. Affectionate and cooperative, unlimited kissing and touching, allowed DATO but no finger penetration. After initial obviously fake sound effects, seemed to get off pretty well from extended DATY and a small egg-shaped vibrator I brought along.

Did several positions enthusiastically and agreed to finish with BBBJ w / PM. Nixed CIF for the familiar reason: "makeup. " Although her BJ technique was pretty good I needed to use my hand to finish and when I did she covered me with her hand to avoid getting splattered on the face. Disappointing but understandable.

Damage for 1 hour: 3 x $. On the excellent Z-scale: Face 7, Body 7, Attitude 8, Service 7 1/2.

[Jackman302]

Its been a while since I've been out of town and since I am home in NOVA for a while I haven't gotten action. I was wondering if anyone remembers the fun on Quann in Woodbridge and if anything still goes on over there? Anyone will to help me out would be appreciated!

JM.

[Roamin Roman]

Thanks for the responses. I agree with everything you said. However, my options are very limited due to the fact that I'm unable to provide employment info and therefore get screened. The floodgates will remain locked unless a senior member is feeling generous and get me a reference somehow. Happy hunting guys and stay safe, I will stick to AMPs for now.

Nothing I wrote was intended to steer you toward the higher priced agencies which require employment info for screening purposes. F*ck that! I refuse to provide that kind of personal info and I don't give any of those outfits my business.

But that doesn't mean the gates are locked, quite the opposite. There are a ton of independent providers out there who have no (or minimal) screening requirements.

Agree with JmSuttr's words, although I'd even go a little further. There's just TOO much risk in providing any verifiable information about yourself, even "light screening. " There are enough other providers about whom any of us can obtain sufficient info / details to know whether that provider is worth a visit. If a provider tells me during a phone call (or, worse, after I arrive) that she requires screening, even "light screening," my reply is that I'm willing to give her the same info that she's requesting of me. That usually ends the "screening" nonsense. If not, I leave (or terminate the phone call) without any drama on my part.

JmSuttr is right about avoiding agency girls (and ALL outcalls) and just sticking with independents. However, some girl who appears to be an independent MIGHT occasionally be a sting, and that is why you need to do your research. Nothing substitutes for doing your homework. If the girl is just too good to be true (TGTBT), or if she looks legit but there are no reviews of her in any of the usual sites on the 'Net, it's best to stay clear of her. If she's legit (and a good provider), she'll be around for a while and reviews will start appearing.

Hope this helps. Be smart, be careful, and stay safe.

RR.