BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[My Hobby]

I agree with that assessment. The duo was fun for $.80.

Are you saying you had both girls together for $80?

[Rareye]

Paige.

Paige is LEGIT!

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...ll-21/17600240

69,BBBJ, TIGHT cfs and a pretty cool girl. K9? Still thinking about it and will be for a while. Did she smell down there? Yeah, she did, like a dozen roses! A touch more hard than I was thinking, but she is cool. I am repeating, she is a definite STARTER. Spinner body, not much in the tit area, but legs, ass and face are to die for. 80 hh and 130 hr. Trying to think of a negative... Got nothing. Lexi will send you pictures of Paige. Paige is 22.

I agree with that assessment. The duo was fun for $.80.

[Raider1687]

Paige.

Paige is LEGIT!

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...ll-21/17600240

69,BBBJ, TIGHT cfs and a pretty cool girl. K9? Still thinking about it and will be for a while. Did she smell down there? Yeah, she did, like a dozen roses! A touch more hard than I was thinking, but she is cool. I am repeating, she is a definite STARTER. Spinner body, not much in the tit area, but legs, ass and face are to die for. 80 hh and 130 hr. Trying to think of a negative... Got nothing. Lexi will send you pictures of Paige. Paige is 22.

[Cobalt]

Your are correct Josh. I've had a few dates with her. Sometimes she looks pretty good, other times not so good. Noticed lots of marks / scabs on her hands & arms when I saw her a few months ago. When I asked, she said it was nothing. Gives a good BBBJ though.

I am certain I saw this girl walking the Parson's Ave. corridor recently? I got a close look too, and it wasn't pretty. I could be wrong? Let me know.

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...re-26/18166106

[Member #4732]

I am certain I saw this girl walking the Parson's Ave. corridor recently? I got a close look too, and it wasn't pretty. I could be wrong? Let me know.

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...re-26/18166106

You are correct, she is an SW from the parsons stroll. First experience with Her back in Dec was pretty good, great body, decent attitude etc. Real name is Ashley. As with most of these SWs the more you see them the less you want to. I'm not going to get into details but this one WILL rip you off beware.

[MonkeyAss]

Sean6969, what is the question here? You have the ad and her number, give her a call. Mona is Legit, well reviewed and fairly popular. She usually only puts up an ad every other month or so because she has lots of regulars. I saw her a couple of times in the last month.

The original ad was dated May 1st how it got changed to may 22 I have no idea.

[MrMikeCols]

She had an ad about 2 weeks ago and haven't' seen her ad since. Any intel?

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...ed-29/15889288

I saw Mona last weekend. It was our first meeting. Met up at her house. She was very cautious with her LE check. I had texted her a couple weeks back and got no answer. Last Saturday, she got back to me pretty quick. I was going to post a review here but I like to wait a while in case I might need to report that the girl sent me home with a little extra unbargained for.

Got to her place. I was really pleased with the looks of the girl that met me. She did a LE check and we got down to business. BBBJ, CG and Mish. I had a nice time and plan to repeat.

She told me that she posts only occasionally because of the LE attention that it gets. She also has a nice group of regulars.

[Buster Capp]

Not sure what to say...

I would be sure what to say. If you are happy with the service you received for the price you paid, just say you really don't give a fuck what anyone else thinks, unless he comes up with names and contact info. In that case, say "Thank you".

[Member #5083]

I am certain I saw this girl walking the Parson's Ave. corridor recently? I got a close look too, and it wasn't pretty. I could be wrong? Let me know.

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...re-26/18166106

[Member #5083]

She had an ad about 2 weeks ago and haven't' seen her ad since. Any intel?

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...ed-29/15889288

I have to agree with SteveBlack. She shouldn't be too hard to find? There are over 100 reviews of her out there on TER alone. A lot of 4 & 5's in the looks category, but except for a brief period, the performance ratings were consistently positive. BTW, the ad you attached is dated for today.

[Member #4934]

Been off the scene for a bit. Looking for a duo or possibly a good single provider. Under $2 preferred. Any suggestions? Seems to be a lot out there with no reviews. I don't have a lot of time to invest in the search and I've helped several others out, so hoping I can get some help.

Thanks.

Macy and her friend have received a few solid reviews for their Duo performance, lately. They are on my list to see, and hits your price point. This was on TER. There was a report on here about another Macy (Star?) who does not advertise about a friend.

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...ne-21/17808192

[Member #4934]

She had an ad about 2 weeks ago and haven't' seen her ad since. Any intel?

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...ed-29/15889288

Sean6969, what is the question here? You have the ad and her number, give her a call. Mona is Legit, well reviewed and fairly popular. She usually only puts up an ad every other month or so because she has lots of regulars. I saw her a couple of times in the last month.

[Member #5083]

She may be too new for anyone to have seen yet? The pics appear to check out and the other woman at the studio where he works has reviews as a legitimate HJ / HE provider. A little pricey at 1.6/ hr though. Can't see her body in the photos, but she doesn't appear to be a large body like her partner?

http://columbus.backpage.com/BodyRub...ar-21/17962874

[MonkeyAss]

She had an ad about 2 weeks ago and haven't' seen her ad since. Any intel?

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...ed-29/15889288

[Dapon]

I think it's this Nikki who he's referring to?

http://columbus.backpage.com/FemaleE...st-30/16945992

No. The Nikki being dicussed is not on BP.