The Massholes

[SpermSac]

Took me a few days to get it guys....you too are really married to each other right? This back and forth sounds exactly like what I have at home. Now what I want to know is which one of you knows they are going to lose the argument? Since we all know that when a guy is arguing with his so HE KNOWS he is going to lose! LOL. And don't flame me guys since I'm friends with both of you and not taking any sides! SO.

It has been finally acknowledged that the number of post a person has means absolutely nothing. How many times did I hear that as an arguing point? Is that finally a dead issue? May it rest in peace.

Now the rest lies with what my post contains for information. Sorry IMHO that is an attempt to tell me what I have to put in my posts. I'll take my lumps for my position on being discreet. Admin has slapped my ass and that should be a dead issue. If a provider tells me no reviews or be discreet, I respect that request.

If I made comments to other post you ever think I might have some inside info for the comment? OK so maybe the posting was in the wrong area. So many forums to choose from which is best for your comments is a personal decision. OH damn I posted on the wrong one. Where's the MOVE button?

Name calling has been done, the ass chewing has been done. Only ass kissing I've done was with my provider who likes to be discreet.

We've told each other to fuck off and go fuck ourselves. Is that over? May it rest in peace!

Those who have PM'd me asking about someone or someplace know they have gotten my best, accurate and truthfull info. Sorry I select not to provide intimate details in open forum. That's my choice. No matter how much you try when a provider asks me not to I don't.

IMHO. There is no win loose or draw. We can argue about that until hell freezes over and since we are all going there can we atleast argue over how many seats to save? I hate standing when its's hot!

[Nrlmus]

Funny that Democrats and Republicans both take an anti sex worker's stance. I'm more of a Libertarian, who believe that everyone should have the right to live the way they choose without intervention or interference from the government unless they are hurting someone else. I'm friendly with a few sex workers, mostly older, who believe the same way. I actually went to an ACLU meeting in Worcester to talk to someone about hiring a lawyer to overturn the laws against sex work. I know, what's the chances of that happening LOL. But darn it happened in Canada unless they repeal the new laws making sex work illegal again. I'd rather see sex work decriminalized instead of legalized as the government would be involved with our business and regulating us, probably would need to sign up for escort licenses. But legal is better than illegal. I think it'd be great if the owners / amin of this board competed with backpage. I'd advertise on their site for sure! Xoxo Debbie.

I think it's women mostly. And lawyers of course too who is together with businessmen are two professions in this country that basically divided power between themselves, with two parties representing the interests of each: Democratic (lawyers) and Republicans (businessmen). If you skim through members of Congress and their professions or education before they got there it becomes so apparent it's not funny. And they both really protect their brethren too.

Lawyers need more laws. The more laws there are the more opportunities for people to break them so you'd have more work for lawyers. Businessmen on the other hand are the reverse. They need less laws so they can have an easier time making money at your expense, and not be punished for it. So in my book, they kind of try to balance each other out. With this logic, here in Mass we're the state of lawyers. If they make prostitution legal it's one less thing to be putting through court, I.e. Less work for lawyers and the rest of the legal system so why do it?

And lawyer-politicians can justify it electorally too because there seem to be a great public support to keep prostitution illegal among women. We were discussing on the other site once the reasons why women hate "ladies of the night" so much. There are different reasons of course but they definitely do and illogically so.

I was talking to a female friend who clearly stated that she would rather her husband have an affair with her best friend then to sleep with a prostitute. On my being surprised with: "Come on! Having an affair with you friend is a threat to your relationship, to your lifestyle, while sleeping with hooker is really threat to nothing!" But she just frowned and wouldn't budge and said things in relation to sex workers that I wouldn't repeat here.

I mean, in Japan, even until now, wives would often be the ones choosing geisha (s) for their husbands. That's in my mind is called common sense way of protecting your turf.

There is also a French joke I know that I'd cut and paste here which to me makes perfect sense:

"A French woman returns from two-week business trip and asks her husband: "So, how many women did you have while I was away?

He responds: "Just one, honey", "Only one!" she exclaims disturbed, "Oh, that's a problem!

To me that illustrates a more common sense approach to both relationship and understanding of male psyche.

[Stressed Out]

It's not about the post count, it's about content and substance. Knowing the the mamasons name provides nothing. You are the one who had posts deleted by Admin because you tried to tell other members how to post, not me. I am not trying to tell you how or what to post I am simply pointing out that what you post has no substance and is simply commentary on other members reviews.

Go chew an aspirin while the rest of us await your next meltdown.

Took me a few days to get it guys....you too are really married to each other right? This back and forth sounds exactly like what I have at home. Now what I want to know is which one of you knows they are going to lose the argument? Since we all know that when a guy is arguing with his so HE KNOWS he is going to lose! LOL. And don't flame me guys since I'm friends with both of you and not taking any sides! SO.

[Stressed Out]

Jax and I are kicking around the idea of going up against BP. Us, our servers, CC processing, and the corporate entity would all be outside of the USA.

Of course we condemn all those fucking douchebags that do the kind of crap the OP mentioned. We just think chicks like Deb, you know grown ups, should be able to get a message out without having all the tight assed hand wringers fucking shit up.

Thoughts

A2.

I think it would be a great idea. First of all like you said it would provide a forum for grown-ups to get their message out without all the do-gooders and god save the world idiots forcing their views on us. Secondly I would 'assume' (god I hate that word) that it would be run somewhat as this is and have some way to 'prevent or police' those ads that are run to make it safer for the providers and the gents who use them. Let's face it BP, Tazlist or CL or whatever avenue they use is a crapshoot. It would be nice if more providers used the escort ad forum but that doesn't seem to be the avenue they want. The 'verification' forums are useful but they too are narrow in scope since you need to be verified. Now verification in itself obviously isn't a bad thing for safety but unfortunately is tough for some of us. And unlike what those puritan do-gooders say we do a pretty good job policing ourselves here. You have my vote! SO.

[Deb4512]

Funny that Democrats and Republicans both take an anti sex worker's stance. I'm more of a Libertarian, who believe that everyone should have the right to live the way they choose without intervention or interference from the government unless they are hurting someone else. I'm friendly with a few sex workers, mostly older, who believe the same way. I actually went to an ACLU meeting in Worcester to talk to someone about hiring a lawyer to overturn the laws against sex work. I know, what's the chances of that happening LOL. But darn it happened in Canada unless they repeal the new laws making sex work illegal again. I'd rather see sex work decriminalized instead of legalized as the government would be involved with our business and regulating us, probably would need to sign up for escort licenses. But legal is better than illegal. I think it'd be great if the owners / amin of this board competed with backpage. I'd advertise on their site for sure! Xoxo Debbie.

[Yellowfever023]

If numbers are so important then have Admin create new rules or make it so that only actual review materials count to your overall tally. Issue resolved! The rest can be termed BS items.

They are simply a number which means what? Not a damn thing other than the fact that the person actively uses the board. BIG Deal!

I don't understand your obsession with a number. Is there a hidden meaning to them that I haven't read about? Do you get a discount for every 100 posts? Is there a special club you get inducted to when you hit 1000?

I've read where newbies with 1 or 2 posts get jumped on for asking a question. Why? Because it was their 1st or 2nd post and they dared ask a question. WTF!

Attachment 311919

It's not about the post count, it's about content and substance. Knowing the the mamasons name provides nothing. You are the one who had posts deleted by Admin because you tried to tell other members how to post, not me. I am not trying to tell you how or what to post I am simply pointing out that what you post has no substance and is simply commentary on other members reviews.

Go chew an aspirin while the rest of us await your next meltdown.

[Admin2]

Well, not the USA / International Sexguide. The servers are in Germany where sex for a fee is legal.

Jax and I are kicking around the idea of going up against BP. Us, our servers, CC processing, and the corporate entity would all be outside of the USA.

Of course we condemn all those fucking douchebags that do the kind of crap the OP mentioned. We just think chicks like Deb, you know grown ups, should be able to get a message out without having all the tight assed hand wringers fucking shit up.

Thoughts

A2.

[SpermSac]

It was me that created it..Guilty as charged.

Point was that this was a newly created forum. Sorry for the mixup in creators.

[MeatMan]

you do realize that the Admins just created this forum. How dumb can you be?.

It was me that created it..Guilty as charged.

[MeatMan]

http://articles.chicagotribuneincom/...ge-voice-media

Well, not the USA / International Sexguide. The servers are in Germany where sex for a fee is legal.

[Member #5037]

My point exactly testacle bag. You don't do streetwalkers. So what do you do besides paraphrase an color commentary.

[SpermSac]

Ok. Numbers aside what have you posted relevant to this forum over the past year?

Considering the source of where this question comes from you do realize that the Admins just created this forum. How dumb can you be?

Sorry I have no streetwalker reviews for you. Oh I forgot you just like starting shit too.

Keep it going. I hear the guys in the BAT station enjoy the TV. You really think the cameras don't see you?

I'll beep at you next time I see you on Spring Street.

Another one who needs to get a life.

[Member #5037]

Ok. Numbers aside what have you posted relevant to this forum over the past year?

[Dh1610]

Ouch.

Judging from the pic did Yellow take a bit out of your ass?

If numbers are so important then have Admin create new rules or make it so that only actual review materials count to your overall tally. Issue resolved! The rest can be termed BS items.

They are simply a number which means what? Not a damn thing other than the fact that the person actively uses the board. BIG Deal!

I don't understand your obsession with a number. Is there a hidden meaning to them that I haven't read about? Do you get a discount for every 100 posts? Is there a special club you get inducted to when you hit 1000?

I've read where newbies with 1 or 2 posts get jumped on for asking a question. Why? Because it was their 1st or 2nd post and they dared ask a question. WTF!

Attachment 311919

[Deb4512]

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...ge-voice-media