The Massholes

**BigDog001** · 03-30-14 18:33

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

I actually think it's an awful idea. Chicks will use this for advertising themselves but that would be the least of our concerns. Did we all forget the Deanna-drama so quickly? How Deanna Santana who no doubt was one of the best providers in Boston got an opportunity to post here and before we knew the whole Boston board turned into the board about Deanna. Deanna became nearly only topic and we ourselves were largely divided between pro and anti Deanna camps. Remember how she got kicked out but after a while came back and before too long the whole thing started again until Jackson kicked her out for good? If we allow chicks to post unmoderated, it's only a matter of time before something like this happens again.

Moreover, once they start reviewing us many of us would be afraid to post negative reviews, lest it come back to haunt us. That's exactly what's going on on the other site where providers basically say "I'm not going to see the guy who ever gave rating below such-and-such." So many hobbyists are afraid to post negative reviews or anybody who is thinking on posting one sets up aliases just for those.

Imagine if some disgruntled provider posts something embarrassing about you so every hobbyists (let alone provider) on USG knows some staff about you that you really would rather not be public knowledge? Like you really sucked in the suck and can't perform worth a shit. Or that you have it so short that you can't even push an inch in. Or watch out for that guy, he is so big he'll tear your intestines out. I mean do we really need this? Good luck with convincing people that she's lying. Many of you seniors after one review like this you would have to start over under another alias. Providers have their own websites where they exchange information like this between themselves. Last time I checked this was hobbyists' site, not a gossip site but primarily a hookers-review site.

The Massholes. No holds bared "f-this, f-that" between us is a good idea, allowing chicks to posts there and review us is a bad bad idea!

Originally Posted by BigDog001 [View Original Post]

Are you shitting me! We pussy whip ourselves without mercy in front of these providers. They will never make fun of us on this board. They make too much money by not exposing us for the pussy whipped morons we are.

"I love cutting these guys down to the size of their little dicks. First I tell them how big it is (they all love that shit). Then I talk to my friends and family, and text with one hand and rub a finger over their thigh or back, then I leave for a few minutes, then I come back and tell them to flip, and then squeeze their dicks like bicycle brakes. Then when they scream 'TOO HARD', I release their brain-dead-dicks and pretend I don't understand. And the pussy whipped morons come back for more".

I'll write it for you, and for them. Because they won't. They won't kill the golden geese. They fleece the golden geese.

Stay pussy whipped pony boys.

They will not review us.

**Hags Joe** · 03-30-14 18:21

Why not, it's only fair, should be a 2-way street.

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

I actually think it's an awful idea. Chicks will use this for advertising themselves but that would be the least of our concerns. Did we all forget the Deanna-drama so quickly? How Deanna Santana who no doubt was one of the best providers in Boston got an opportunity to post here and before we knew the whole Boston board turned into the board about Deanna. Deanna became nearly only topic and we ourselves were largely divided between pro and anti Deanna camps. Remember how she got kicked out but after a while came back and before too long the whole thing started again until Jackson kicked her out for good? If we allow chicks to post unmoderated, it's only a matter of time before something like this happens again.

Moreover, once they start reviewing us many of us would be afraid to post negative reviews, lest it come back to haunt us. That's exactly what's going on on the other site where providers basically say "I'm not going to see the guy who ever gave rating below such-and-such." So many hobbyists are afraid to post negative reviews or anybody who is thinking on posting one sets up aliases just for those.

Imagine if some disgruntled provider posts something embarrassing about you so every hobbyists (let alone provider) on USG knows some staff about you that you really would rather not be public knowledge? Like you really sucked in the suck and can't perform worth a shit. Or that you have it so short that you can't even push an inch in. Or watch out for that guy, he is so big he'll tear your intestines out. I mean do we really need this? Good luck with convincing people that she's lying. Many of you seniors after one review like this you would have to start over under another alias. Providers have their own websites where they exchange information like this between themselves. Last time I checked this was hobbyists' site, not a gossip site but primarily a hookers-review site.

The Massholes. No holds bared "f-this, f-that" between us is a good idea, allowing chicks to posts there and review us is a bad bad idea!

**Admin2** · 03-30-14 18:10

Originally Posted by SpermSac [View Original Post]

No problem I have broad shoulders. Do I get brownie points? Now where's that girl that was going to fuck my brains out?

This one is pretty hot, I haven't gotten around to her yet. About 50 bucks an hour, BBBJ but front door only. The guys on the local forum say she's ok.

http://www.bairesgirls.net/escorts/f...2221_11964.htm

If you're not into big titties, this one will suck your balls out through your dick and she loves facials. Seriously, she will change your life. Same price.

http://www.bairesgirls.net/escorts/B...8337_12997.htm

You got to come to Argentina though.

**SpermSac** · 03-30-14 18:05

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

I actually think it's an awful idea. Chicks will use this for advertising themselves but that would be the least of our concerns. Did we all forget the Deanna-drama so quickly? How Deanna Santana who no doubt was one of the best providers in Boston got an opportunity to post here and before we knew the whole Boston board turned into the board about Deanna. Deanna became nearly only topic and we ourselves were largely divided between pro and anti Deanna camps. Remember how she got kicked out but after a while came back and before too long the whole thing started again until Jackson kicked her out for good? If we allow chicks to post unmoderated, it's only a matter of time before something like this happens again.

Moreover, once they start reviewing us many of us would be afraid to post negative reviews, lest it come back to haunt us. That's exactly what's going on on the other site where providers basically say "I'm not going to see the guy who ever gave rating below such-and-such." So many hobbyists are afraid to post negative reviews or anybody who is thinking on posting one sets up aliases just for those.

Imagine if some disgruntled provider posts something embarrassing about you so every hobbyists (let alone provider) on USG knows some staff about you that you really would rather not be public knowledge? Like you really sucked in the suck and can't perform worth a shit. Or that you have it so short that you can't even push an inch in. Or watch out for that guy, he is so big he'll tear your intestines out. I mean do we really need this? Good luck with convincing people that she's lying. Many of you seniors after one review like this you would have to start over under another alias. Providers have their own websites where they exchange information like this between themselves. Last time I checked this was hobbyists' site, not a gossip site but primarily a hookers-review site.

The Massholes. No holds bared "f-this, f-that" between us is a good idea, allowing chicks to posts there and review us is a bad bad idea!

IMHO I think it would be good to have them post. I know there are a few on here now. I see no reason why the same rules shouldn't apply to them as they do to us.

I don't think you'll find many of the decent providers willing to engage in an argument but having their general comments on some subjects in here might make us learn somethings. Then again maybe not. I sincerely doubt many even know that a review section exits on here never mind them even having the time to bother posting.

I don't expect to hear personal info being revealed like real names or phone numbers. However intimate details like "Monger x wanted a BJ and he had damn shit hanging off his balls no wonder why no BJ" or " Monger why was told FS was 200 so why did he cheat me an only pay 160? So I shorted him on time next time I saw him" or maybe Sally Grab Ya Crotch from the spa will pipe in and explain why she couldn't perform the HJ you expected on first visit.

They have a right to confront a bad review or even one that reveals to much information.

The site says US Sex Guide and doesn't not say "FOR MEN ONLY".

If it comes to a vote I say YA Let's hear from them here.

**Rush 2112** · 03-30-14 16:21

Originally Posted by admin2 [View Original Post]

skatar i'll pretty much give any city a fight club. (it's funny how most of them morph into fight/odd musings though) i'm not sure where you were sending them because i don't remember getting those messages but the fights on in the massholes.

i put a post in there explaining how the rules are applied. essentially arguing or calling guys assholes (or pretty much whatever you want to call them) is ok. the majority of what i think of as major infractions; arrest reports, std accusations, revealing personal info of others, threats, posts about anybody ****, that kind of stuff is still a no go, but otherwise we don't edit or delete. of course we still reserve the right to if there is something really fucked up. in those other threads you mentioned i prolly pull down one or two posts a month between them all.

something not mentioned is chicks can post in there as well. free fire zones are free fire zones.

a2

maybe the cities need a "war room" thread.

just a suggestion a2.

there are a couple of manchester nh girls who are members there (i encoraged them to join) but are afraid to post responses in thier respective threads.

**BigDog001** · 03-30-14 16:07

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

I actually think it's an awful idea. Chicks will use this for advertising themselves but that would be the least of our concerns. Did we all forget the Deanna-drama so quickly? How Deanna Santana who no doubt was one of the best providers in Boston got an opportunity to post here and before we knew the whole Boston board turned into the board about Deanna. Deanna became nearly only topic and we ourselves were largely divided between pro and anti Deanna camps. Remember how she got kicked out but after a while came back and before too long the whole thing started again until Jackson kicked her out for good? If we allow chicks to post unmoderated, it's only a matter of time before something like this happens again.

Moreover, once they start reviewing us many of us would be afraid to post negative reviews, lest it come back to haunt us. That's exactly what's going on on the other site where providers basically say "I'm not going to see the guy who ever gave rating below such-and-such." So many hobbyists are afraid to post negative reviews or anybody who is thinking on posting one sets up aliases just for those.

Imagine if some disgruntled provider posts something embarrassing about you so every hobbyists (let alone provider) on USG knows some staff about you that you really would rather not be public knowledge? Like you really sucked in the suck and can't perform worth a shit. Or that you have it so short that you can't even push an inch in. Or watch out for that guy, he is so big he'll tear your intestines. I mean do we really need this? Good luck with convincing people that she's lying. Many of you seniors after one review like this you would have to start over under another alias. Providers have their own websites where they exchange information like this between themselves. Last time I checked this was hobbyists' site, not a gossip site but primarily a hookers-review site.

The Massholes. No holds bared "f-this, f-that" between us is a good idea, allowing chicks to posts there and review us is a bad bad idea!

Are you shitting me! We pussy whip ourselves without mercy in front of these providers. They will never make fun of us on this board. They make too much money by not exposing us for the pussy whipped morons we are.

"I love cutting these guys down to the size of their little dicks. First I tell them how big it is (they all love that shit). Then I talk to my friends and family, and text with one hand and rub a finger over their thigh or back, then I leave for a few minutes, then I come back and tell them to flip, and then squeeze their dicks like bicycle brakes. Then when they scream 'TOO HARD', I release their brain-dead-dicks and pretend I don't understand. And the pussy whipped morons come back for more".

I'll write it for you, and for them. Because they won't. They won't kill the golden geese. They fleece the golden geese.

Stay pussy whipped pony boys.

**Nrlmus** · 03-30-14 15:33

Originally Posted by SpermSac [View Original Post]

The chicks can respond now? That should be interesting to say the least. I look forward to reading their responses!!

Come on girls let's hear from YOU!

I actually think it's an awful idea. Chicks will use this for advertising themselves but that would be the least of our concerns. Did we all forget the Deanna-drama so quickly? How Deanna Santana who no doubt was one of the best providers in Boston got an opportunity to post here and before we knew the whole Boston board turned into the board about Deanna. Deanna became nearly only topic and we ourselves were largely divided between pro and anti Deanna camps. Remember how she got kicked out but after a while came back and before too long the whole thing started again until Jackson kicked her out for good? If we allow chicks to post unmoderated, it's only a matter of time before something like this happens again.

Moreover, once they start reviewing us many of us would be afraid to post negative reviews, lest it come back to haunt us. That's exactly what's going on on the other site where providers basically say "I'm not going to see the guy who ever gave rating below such-and-such." So many hobbyists are afraid to post negative reviews or anybody who is thinking on posting one sets up aliases just for those.

Imagine if some disgruntled provider posts something embarrassing about you so every hobbyists (let alone provider) on USG knows some staff about you that you really would rather not be public knowledge? Like you really sucked in the suck and can't perform worth a shit. Or that you have it so short that you can't even push an inch in. Or watch out for that guy, he is so big he'll tear your intestines out. I mean do we really need this? Good luck with convincing people that she's lying. Many of you seniors after one review like this you would have to start over under another alias. Providers have their own websites where they exchange information like this between themselves. Last time I checked this was hobbyists' site, not a gossip site but primarily a hookers-review site.

The Massholes. No holds bared "f-this, f-that" between us is a good idea, allowing chicks to posts there and review us is a bad bad idea!

**SpermSac** · 03-30-14 15:28

Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]

SS, seems like you're my stand in for examples today. If I quoted a post of yours and said, "Fuck you asshole, I'm gonna find you and fucking kill you." That is a threat. It's also really fucking stupid because it's over the internet posted to a pussy forum, but it is a threat.

What Lmao123 is doing is known as being a keyboard warrior in my business. Just like in real life, seriously dangerous people don't ever talk, they just act. Trust me, I know some some real tough guys, I'm not one myself, but I do know some. They never talk, they pop your eyes out of your head then crush your larynx while you were talking, then step back to watch your body drop and if they are bored they might watch you convulse while you die. But none that I have ever known do much talking about it.

Lmao I'm not punking you, we all do dumb shit from time to time, myself included. Especially when we are young to communities like this. Why once your beloved A2 did this very thing. I told a guy on our local forum I was going to kick his ass. Jax made me write "I was sorry" to the guy 25 times in a post or he would ban me.

It's just fucking stupid because everybody knows it's not going anywhere. Nobody is ever going to give you their address and meet you, unless they are planning on being near and not there so they can shoot you as you walk up.

A2

No problem I have broad shoulders. Do I get brownie points? Now where's that girl that was going to fuck my brains out?

**SpermSac** · 03-30-14 14:56

There comes a time when some may exhibit just to much testosterone and probably need some female hormones to mellow out.

Not pointing fingers. Just saying.

**Admin2** · 03-30-14 14:52

SS, seems like you're my stand in for examples today. If I quoted a post of yours and said, "Fuck you asshole, I'm gonna find you and fucking kill you." That is a threat. It's also really fucking stupid because it's over the internet posted to a pussy forum, but it is a threat.

What Lmao123 is doing is known as being a keyboard warrior in my business. Just like in real life, seriously dangerous people don't ever talk, they just act. Trust me, I know some some real tough guys, I'm not one myself, but I do know some. They never talk, they pop your eyes out of your head then crush your larynx while you were talking, then step back to watch your body drop and if they are bored they might watch you convulse while you die. But none that I have ever known do much talking about it.

Lmao I'm not punking you, we all do dumb shit from time to time, myself included. Especially when we are young to communities like this. Why once your beloved A2 did this very thing. I told a guy on our local forum I was going to kick his ass. Jax made me write "I was sorry" to the guy 25 times in a post or he would ban me.

It's just fucking stupid because everybody knows it's not going anywhere. Nobody is ever going to give you their address and meet you, unless they are planning on being near and not there so they can shoot you as you walk up.

A2

**SpermSac** · 03-30-14 14:44

Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]

They can be very specific if they want. The same rules apply, they can't out you in reality, can't say you have STD's, can't threaten. But they sure as hell can review you.

Again SS I'm not talking about you individually, it's the universal you thingy again. They can respond to their negative reviews, they can lie and make up shit, so long as it's within the relaxed guidelines here, they can post like members. They can have catfights and post shit about other chicks, whatever they want within the rules.

Thanks Admin for the clarity in this NO THREATS! Got ya!

**Lmao123** · 03-30-14 14:38

Originally Posted by Talisker1370 [View Original Post]

So now I am getting PMs to meet up. Man you are unhinged.

What a sad sad person you must be, but I bet you are nice though. I hope I am not mistaking your kindness for weakness.

LOL. I knew that was going to get you. Let that be a lesson to you. You never know who you're messing with.

**Talisker1370** · 03-30-14 14:28

Originally Posted by Lmao123 [View Original Post]

That's what I thought. I'm going to ask again, Put up an address so we could meet up. We'll find out who's an Internet tough guy.

So now I am getting PMs to meet up. Man you are unhinged.

What a sad sad person you must be, but I bet you are nice though. I hope I am not mistaking your kindness for weakness.

**Lmao123** · 03-30-14 13:53

Originally Posted by Talisker1370 [View Original Post]

Oh look, he's one of those internet tough guys he was just railing about.

That's what I thought. I'm going to ask again, Put up an address so we could meet up. We'll find out who's an Internet tough guy.

**Admin2** · 03-30-14 13:50

Originally Posted by SpermSac [View Original Post]

I understand what you are saying and not having it directed at anyone specific.

It would be great to hear their feedback.

They can be very specific if they want. The same rules apply, they can't out you in reality, can't say you have STD's, can't threaten. But they sure as hell can review you.

Again SS I'm not talking about you individually, it's the universal you thingy again. They can respond to their negative reviews, they can lie and make up shit, so long as it's within the relaxed guidelines here, they can post like members. They can have catfights and post shit about other chicks, whatever they want within the rules.