Thread: Backpage Advertiser Reviews
Closed Thread
Results 20,191 to 20,205 of 23051
-
02-10-13 02:16 #2861Awaiting Email Confirmation

Posts: 1287I'm always surprised at how many people I talk to (folks that are not involved in the hobby at all I mean) that believe it should be legalized, but yet there doesn't seem to be much traction on making it so. One thing I wanted to convey that I probably didn't do a good job of. When I was discussing technology backfiring on those seeking to eliminate the worlds oldest profession, I was talking about what happens currently in the sugarbaby online scene (or at least using that as a baseline example). Technically there is nothing illegal at all about SB / SD arrangements, and while I know that's probably not quite on topic in a BP ad discussion, I think the politicians and LEOs who unknowingly have daughters involved in this would be horrified to discover how ineffective their tactics of eliminating prostitution really are. I'm sure the runaway teen streetwalker thing still happens in some areas, and certainly if they are minors then the law IMO has every right to intervene in that situation. But many girls simply wait until they are 18 and start putting out for cash, whether it's officially sugar daddying or not. Prostitution is not going away, it is simply reinventing itself in ways that will make it much harder for LE to truly enforce anything. At least if they legalized it, for example they could pass a law that requires 21 as a minimum age, which would actually give them more legal control than they have now. Right now they can set up stings for BP girls trying to make ends meet but for every one they get there are probably 50 more they don't, and I don't think I've ever heard of any sort of legal intervention into the sugarbaby scene.
Originally Posted by Prurient6
[View Original Post]
-
02-09-13 23:44 #2860Senior Member

Posts: 1066Sir PS,
Originally Posted by PlanetSide
[View Original Post]
(If you read this and realize that you did this, then you should go straight to the mirror and punch yourself in the face repeatedly.) LMAO! Very good info.
Lex
-
02-09-13 23:34 #2859Senior Member

Posts: 1066Sir S. Guy,
Originally Posted by Southern Guy
[View Original Post]
At your best guess, when do you think she would return?
Lex
-
02-09-13 23:31 #2858Senior Member

Posts: 1066Sir Joe Looking,
Originally Posted by Joe Looking
[View Original Post]
Very nice read. I enjoy the detail you put into your work. I try to do the same with the interviews I post. I am planning on doing a little traveling so I am checking out your neck of the woods.
Lex
-
02-09-13 23:26 #2857Senior Member

Posts: 1066Sir Joe Looking,
Originally Posted by Joe Looking
[View Original Post]
You are a very patient man. I think I would have walked once the blah blah blah started. I do prefer GFE at times and I always do the hour interviews as long as multi pops are allowed even if it doesn't happen for me, I still always want the option.
Lex
-
02-09-13 22:46 #2856Senior Member

Posts: 41Devine
Does anyone have any info on Devine? Her pics are quite a turn-on but my instincts say she probably doesn't deliver good service. Thanks in advance.
http://raleigh.backpage.com/FemaleEs...als-24/9992255
-
02-09-13 16:25 #2855Senior Member

Posts: 1291Name: Maya.
Ad: http://raleigh.backpage.com/FemaleEs...at-20/11283701
Number: (336) 687-4803.
After my last experience I was a bit hesitant to hop back on the backpage saddle, but saw the ad for this girl and decided to give it a shot. I knew she would not be GFE, but it looked like her pricing was fair considering she would probably be at best a somewhat interactive pump and dump.
Setting up the appointment was pretty easy. I called she answered and I told her what time I would be there (I was a bit late due to rush hour traffic and she never once mentioned my tardiness). On the phone she did mention and two girl special and said that the other girl would be there. This is usually a red flag, but she was pretty sweet about it so I let it slide. She opened the door dressed pretty close to what she is wearing in her pictures. There was no enthusiastic hello and when I asked for her prices she said. 8 for half hour and $.5 for the hour. I thought the title of the ad indicated the hour was 80, but who knows and I only wanted a half hour anyway. As is my standard I used the bathroom (a quasi cleanliness check) before proceeding and it was very clean.
When I returned from the bathroom she was sitting on the bed fully clothed watching tv so I told her that she could go ahead and get undressed. She is very slim, unshaved (not too bushy) and has a cute face. After I undressed she handed me a condom with the expectation that I would work myself up while she watched a bit more tv. I joked with her a bit about how I don't expect to pay for sex and then have to masturbate (I get the impression that maybe some guys come in ready to go). She indicated that the half hour is usually just straight sex, IMO p4p from an "escort" and not a SW should always be half and half but that's another story. I tried for a while and then got on the bed semi-erect. She then sweetly asked if I still needed some help to which I replied that I would appreciate it and she proceeded to give me a good CBJ until I stopped her.
I spent my entire time with her in missionary and on the overall it was enjoyable. She let out a few moans from time to time and her pussy stayed moist without having to add lube. I know that I ran over time but she never rushed me or even looked at the clock once. The only real awkward part was that the other girl took a customer into the bathroom while we were together, but that's one of the biggest downsides to doing an incall with girls who travel together.
I was considering seeing her again so after I found out how often she comes to Raleigh I inquired about how the hour is different. She told me that for the hour she sucks and fucks and that you can go as many times as your hour allows. She did mention that she does not kiss, but a lot of them have that rule. I've found that for some providers it is pretty easy to get around if you can joke a bit with them to throw them off guard. I think it mainly depends on how far removed they are from primarily having sex only while in a relationship. I did not ask about DATY because that's not my thing but there was a bit of an odor that seemed familiar. I didn't figure it out until I was leaving and remembered a bottle of feminine hygiene product in the bathroom, I can't remember the name but it's the stuff that helps to balance the ph in women's vaginas.
If she comes back next month I will probably repeat. The choice between the hour and half hour will probably hinge on her willingness to do an outcall or her being in the room alone.
-
02-09-13 15:08 #2854Senior Member

Posts: 246LEO or not LEO?
I noticed that the phone number Jumpman2010 referred to in post #2735 from 1/25 in connection with a LEO sting has re-appeared in an ad just this morning:
http://raleigh.backpage.com/FemaleEs...ut-20/11172498
Furthermore, yesterday morning it was in a Fayetteville BP ad:
http://fayettevillenc.backpage.com/F...ed-20/11306085
Here's a photo that even clearly shows the face of the girl in the ad:
http://images.escortads.xxx/cities/2...11172498-1.jpg
I could not find any other hits for this photo.
So what is likely going on here? I see the following possibilities:
(a) formerly legit provider, jumped ship / forced by LEO to play along.
(be) legit provider, there was no sting but Jumpman2010 has some beef with her.
Any other options?
Sorry for the suspicions if unfounded; someone please enlighten me if I'm missing something.
-
02-09-13 13:43 #2853Senior Member

Posts: 246Hi JeezLizard, no, I have no daughters, but I hope that my thinking about this issue would be consequent if I did. Even in a socially advanced country with full legal protection for prostitutes (e. G. Germany) , I would not want them to become call girls, not because there's anything fundamentally wrong with it, but simply because it's not such a great profession, even if all customers were as gentlemanly as I am. I mean, after all, I wouldn't want them to become janitors (no offense) or politicians (indeed, the other kinds of wh*res, as you write) either.
Originally Posted by JeezLizard
[View Original Post]
Regarding the whole hooking up through the internet thing, that is of course another issue. I would hope to teach my kids how to engage in safe behavior regardless of the legal climate. Alas, the legal climate forces us to use this medium as well; you write that the technological advances "backfired" in the faces of fundamentalist politicians (and that seems to be all of them when it comes to this issue, WTF?) , but I don't quite agree here. We are seeing that politicians and their LEO enforcement arm have intruded into this technological territory and have arrogantly given themselves the right to police it-just like they want to police every aspect of our lives and all our money exchanges, whether for nookie, booze, bread or anything else. That compels us to either give up on our amusement, or play with the danger of being caught, fined, embarrassed, or sent to the idiotic "john school"-where they want to brainwash us with the preposterous notion that prostitution, trafficking and child abuse are all one and the same thing.
Even if we know how to stay safe (until LEO comes up with a new trick, that is) , the hobby is still pretty dreary in this climate. Instead of going to a totally safe bar / club-type brothel where I can hang around and enjoy myself, make contact, check for chemistry, and then take out, I have no choice but to surf through crappy ads or escort sites and order sight unseen, hoping for the best or at least not the worst, which is LEO. So in addition to the real danger, the pleasant, exciting aspect of safe live interaction allowing one to choose from a number of girls before the deed is completely missing here, and all that makes the whole thing quite depressing for me. Who's to blame? Historically, the WCTU perhaps, or Calvinism, or Martin Luther (not King). Today, all mainstream politicians and a large (perhaps dominant) part of the general population. What you write sounds utterly sane, and is in fact what Germany does, but I have to wonder whether more than, say. 10% would be willing to sign off on it.
-
02-09-13 02:35 #2852Awaiting Email Confirmation

Posts: 1287Prurient,
I tend to agree with you. Do you mind if I ask if you have any daughters? I don't either. Maybe if I did my perspective would be different, but at this point yes I think the hobby should be legalized, regulated, and taxed like any other profession. I should at least be able to list my barely legal SBs as dependts on my tax returns shouldn't I? The Internet has changed a lot of things including parent's control over their daughter and the types of girls that put out for cash. Even on regular (non-SD, non-Hobby) dating websites (actually those are some of the best hunting ground) , it's relatively easy to find someone who just registered because she's recently entered adulthood and got tired of mom and dad telling her what she could not do while under their thumb. No need to convince her to try the SB / SD thing, she's been ready for a couple of years already. Sorry but its the new way and one reason I don't care to be a parent. The plans the fundie politicians had to protect family values backfired in their face the moment the technology they didn't understand facilitated more efficient hookups. That's the bottom line. So the industry is thriving in ways that neither politics nor law nor parental strategies can possibly intervene. It's for this very reason that the government needs to either learn that they can no longer fight the world's oldest profession, and even trying to is truly moronic. It would be much smarter to legalize and tax it. Not only is the money better (politicians themselves are working girls and that's the bottom line they care about anyway) , but it's much easier to regulate something and to attempt some level of control at the bookkeeping level than to ban it outright. Especially something as natural as pussy for payment.
Originally Posted by Prurient6
[View Original Post]
-
02-08-13 19:18 #2851Awaiting Email Confirmation

Posts: 1287Then I stand corrected then on the stance that "nobody who has lived here for a while would call it that". I've lived here 15+ yrs and never heard the term used, but I fully understand what you're saying when people confusingly refer to anything north of the beltline, like Crabtree or North Hills area for example, as "North Raleigh". I think a lot of folks who have lived here for a while almost forget the North Hills area exists until we have a specific reason to be in the area, even though it's alive and well and seems to attract folks new to the area more than long-timers.
Anyway my prior comment was really to the poster who seemed to feel the use of "midtown" in a BP ad would be a sign of a scam. I actually think the opposite is true especially when the phone area code is non-local. Someone new to that area, even if they landed there somewhat randomly, could look at where they are on their smartphone maps and easily label their location as midtown if they were used to doing same in other cities.
Originally Posted by Rduguy
[View Original Post]
-
02-08-13 16:52 #2850Senior Member

Posts: 246A rant and a semi-recommendation
So sorry you had to experience such aggravation in this "land of the free," Jumpman2010. As a foreigner, I am simply stunned that American men continue to put up with this crap in their own country-and yes, I am affected by it during the time I spend here. It seems that the other half of the population essentially dominates us men completely when it comes to this. Doesn't that make you guys mad at all? I mean, what does it take to vote out of the office all politicians who refuse to fully legalize the hobby? Sorry for the rant but I grew up with John Wayne and all these other larger-than-life American movie heroes-watch John Ford's "Stagecoach" (made in 1939!) to see what I mean specifically about our topic here.
Originally Posted by Jumpman2010
[View Original Post]
Anyway, here is some info on a recent dream: Ms. Passion, advertises on BP almost daily. Pics are real, body is indeed fabulously slender-athletic if you like model-shaped AA girls like I do. Experience good though not great (does not like missionary, not shaved though I realize some of us like that) , but trying to accommodate, fair enough for the HH payment. Downside: pimp hanging around in incall location hallway, and she even mentioned her "homeboy" in conversation. BTW, these guys are of course an almost necessary by-product of the criminalization, as we all know.
Good luck to all, stay safe, and vote these p-whipped politicians the hell out of their offices.
-
02-08-13 10:31 #2849Regular Member

Posts: 12"midtown Raleigh" is a thing
When they tore down the old North Hills Mall and Kane rebuilt the area, his advertising and marketing people started calling the area "Midtown." It actually makes a LOT more sense than calling the area "North Raleigh." It was "North Raleigh" 30 years ago but for people who have come here in the last 15 years, it doesn't make much sense considering you drive another 15 minutes north to get to 540 and the true 2013 "North Raleigh."
Originally Posted by Velasco
[View Original Post]
The N&O has a "Midtown Raleigh News" section, there is a restaurant N. Hills Mall called Midtowne Grill, etc. http://www.midtownraleighnews.com/ People and businesses in the Midtown Area use the term but I can see if it has not spread to the whole county.
It's no Midtown Atlanta, but it is what we got. And it would not surprise me that visiting dream girls would use the term if they were staying at a motel in "Midtown" of which there are many, especially over near DukeRaleigh Hosp.
Now, Midtown is real. That ad- well, that looks way TGTBT!
-
02-08-13 10:07 #2848Senior Member

Posts: 409Kattie or Katie
The real Katie spells her name with one "t".
Originally Posted by Raltime
[View Original Post]
-
02-08-13 09:24 #2847Senior Member

Posts: 433Midtown is Glenwood / Crabtree Area. I've heard the term used a lot.
Originally Posted by Velasco
[View Original Post]












