General Reports

**Member #4868** · 12-05-12 11:14

Thank you Jackson. I apologize for my over reaction and sky is falling attitude.

Originally Posted by Admin [View Original Post]

Greetings Everyone,

1. Calm down.

2. The PM feature is not going away, ever.

3. I remove the registration date from the member's profile because it was being used by some member's significant others to identify them.

4. The Search Index is being rebuilt, a server process that requires several stages over several days to complete.

5. If you want to advise me about some issue with the forum, then use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of every page of the forum to send me a message.

6. I actually have a life outside this forum which on occasion sometimes takes me away from the day-to-day minutia here, and specifically from answering email, the vast majority of which are comprised of one member complaining about another member.

Thanks,

Jackson

**Admin** · 12-05-12 11:09

Greetings Everyone,

1. Calm down.

2. The PM feature is not going away, ever.

3. I remove the registration date from the member's profile because it was being used by some member's significant others to identify them.

4. The Search Index is being rebuilt, a server process that requires several stages over several days to complete.

5. If you want to advise me about some issue with the forum, then use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of every page of the forum to send me a message.

6. I actually have a life outside this forum which on occasion sometimes takes me away from the day-to-day minutia here, and specifically from answering email, the vast majority of which are comprised of one member complaining about another member.

Thanks,

Jackson

**Skatar018** · 12-03-12 22:27

Originally Posted by Rule43 [View Original Post]

True enough, but it isn't fair to assume that all of the women we're seeing are using the income from donations to feed destructive habits.

A: I didn't assume, you assumed that I assumed.
B: I didn't say all, you said all.
While there are always exceptions to the rule, & not having the stats to back this up, I think it would be safe to say that the majority have issues & habits to contend with. Come to think of it I have several issues myself that makes me an enabler, so my shit stinks big time.

Originally Posted by Energizerbunne [View Original Post]

I sent a private message to Skatar08

EB did pm me & from what I can tell he is a gracious standup guy...with some dictatorial issues! just kidding EB.

EB's original topic was about givng, speaking for myself, it makes me feel good about myself & life in general when I give.

As testament to this, I hadn't seen or heard from an ATF so Sunday I stopped in to see whats up. She was all disgruntled & bummed out, being broke as a joke, no food no money, phone issues blah blah blah. Told her I'd be back in 15 mins.

Went to the store got some food, butts, minutes for her phone & when I dropped them off she said she didn't think I was coming back. As it was almost kick-off for the Pats game told her I'd be back after the game. When I looked at her I thought she was going to bust out crying, so I gave her a hug & told her emphatically I'd be back after the game.

Went back to her place & she was all smiles & happy, said thank you very much for coming back & told her no, for what I'm about to receive thank you, which made her laugh & then she got a sly grin on her face & I was very happy for what I received, twice over!

If you are so inclined to give, then by all means please do so in whatever manner you choose.

Have fun stay safe

**Energizerbunne** · 12-03-12 12:13

Originally Posted by Rule43 [View Original Post]

True enough, but it isn't fair to assume that all of the women we're seeing are using the income from donations to feed destructive habits.

For example, I know of one provider who is currently putting a son through college. I won't mention her name, but many of you would recognize it because she has been the subject of a number of reports on this site. Another provider (who retired recently) has a child with a serious medical condition. She didn't offer FS when she started out, but added this later. I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if she went FS in order to help pay for the doctor and hospital bills.

It's difficult to say how many providers are in the business in order to fund a substance abuse problem, since this isn't exactly something that anyone would want to mention in their ads. Many of us try to avoid these women entirely, but I'm sure there are quite a few of them.

Are we enablers? Well, yes. But sometimes we're enabling the providers to care for their families, to pay off large debts, or to fund their own education.

I sent a private message to Skatar08, which essentially said the same thing. I didn't want to clog up this forum, even though this one is not specifically for reports. Thank-you for your post.

**Rule43** · 12-03-12 10:00

Originally Posted by Skatar018 [View Original Post]

EB you may feel you are not an enabler, but just by the very nature of this board, forum & site & the women we see, we all here are enablers. (not that there is anything wrong with that). Just saying don't be so naive to think that the money paid to the women we see is not going to feed their destructive habits whatever those habits maybe. While we are not social service agencies/workers, I am sure they, LE & the lawgivers would agree that yeah we are enablers.

True enough, but it isn't fair to assume that all of the women we're seeing are using the income from donations to feed destructive habits.

For example, I know of one provider who is currently putting a son through college. I won't mention her name, but many of you would recognize it because she has been the subject of a number of reports on this site. Another provider (who retired recently) has a child with a serious medical condition. She didn't offer FS when she started out, but added this later. I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if she went FS in order to help pay for the doctor and hospital bills.

It's difficult to say how many providers are in the business in order to fund a substance abuse problem, since this isn't exactly something that anyone would want to mention in their ads. Many of us try to avoid these women entirely, but I'm sure there are quite a few of them.

Are we enablers? Well, yes. But sometimes we're enabling the providers to care for their families, to pay off large debts, or to fund their own education.

**Energizerbunne** · 12-03-12 08:12

Originally Posted by Skatar018 [View Original Post]

EB you may feel you are not an enabler, but just by the very nature of this board, forum & site & the women we see, we all here are enablers. (not that there is anything wrong with that). Just saying don't be so naive to think that the money paid to the women we see is not going to feed their destructive habits whatever those habits maybe. While we are not social service agencies / workers, I am sure they, LE & the lawgivers would agree that yeah we are enablers.

I didn't think you were trying to dicate to anyone, you stated your opinion, I stated mine. Though we both agree in giving, we just differ in how we choose to give, neither opinion is right or wrong.

I do think you are good people & commend you for giving however you choose too, I will give how I choose too & others will choose how & if they give.

With that said hopefully we can move on.

. You make a valid point that we are all enablers.

**Skatar018** · 12-02-12 23:14

Originally Posted by Energizerbunne [View Original Post]

From a personal standpoint, I would not take any pleasure in knowing that I had been an enabler. I'd rather spend my money on helping someone to their feet as opposed to continuing destructive habits. I think most social service agencies / workers would agree.

EB you may feel you are not an enabler, but just by the very nature of this board, forum & site & the women we see, we all here are enablers. (not that there is anything wrong with that). Just saying don't be so naive to think that the money paid to the women we see is not going to feed their destructive habits whatever those habits maybe. While we are not social service agencies/workers, I am sure they, LE & the lawgivers would agree that yeah we are enablers.

I didn't think you were trying to dicate to anyone, you stated your opinion, I stated mine. Though we both agree in giving, we just differ in how we choose to give, neither opinion is right or wrong.

I do think you are good people & commend you for giving however you choose too, I will give how I choose too & others will choose how & if they give.

With that said hopefully we can move on.

**Energizerbunne** · 12-02-12 17:57

Originally Posted by Skatar018 [View Original Post]

We all have stories, & here's the other side of the coin.

It's not up to you, me or anyone to tell an individual what, when, where, why, or how to give. That is their choice, you give the way you choose & let others do the same, even if it includes cold hard cash. The point being give what & when you can as EB has.

The purpose of my post was not to dictate to another person, but to offer another perspective and perhaps educate. Which is better, giving a wino cash, which they then spend on booze, or buying them a hot meal? From a personal standpoint, I would not take any pleasure in knowing that I had been an enabler. Sure, the wino may even think,"I'd rather have some booze than this food", but is that really helping them? I'd rather spend my money on helping someone to their feet as opposed to continuing destructive habits. That is just my own personal opinion; but I think most social service agencies / workers would agree.

**Ho Hunter 328** · 12-02-12 01:04

Originally Posted by Stressed Out [View Original Post]

This has evidently been around for awhile but I just ran across it and had to post it. It will leave you shaking your head in disbelief. And BTW it has nothing to do with the caller being a lady and this a forum about ladies so don't shoot the messenger. LOL And again if some of you have heard it I apologize! Jim.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFCrJleggrI

Reminds me of a time I was on rt 2 out near Gardner. For those who don't know the area, there are moose crossing signs on rt 2. About ten years ago, I was driving down rt 2, and I saw a moose standing next to one of the signs. This was back in the pre camera phone days, and sadly my camera was in my trunk.

**Newday53** · 12-02-12 00:04

Thanks for the laugh SO, hadn't seen that. ND.

Originally Posted by Stressed Out [View Original Post]

This has evidently been around for awhile but I just ran across it and had to post it. It will leave you shaking your head in disbelief. And BTW it has nothing to do with the caller being a lady and this a forum about ladies so don't shoot the messenger. LOL And again if some of you have heard it I apologize! Jim.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFCrJleggrI

**Stressed Out** · 12-01-12 16:21

This has evidently been around for awhile but I just ran across it and had to post it. It will leave you shaking your head in disbelief. And BTW it has nothing to do with the caller being a lady and this a forum about ladies so don't shoot the messenger. LOL And again if some of you have heard it I apologize! Jim.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFCrJleggrI

**Deb4512** · 11-30-12 21:56

[Unannotated link deleted by Admin]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEEgtOFFlM

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited to remove what appeared to be an unannotated link to another website. Please do not post links to other websites without some explanation as to what may be found at the linked webpage. In other words, if you want to post a link to another website, please include some commentary describing what the link is to.

**Deb4512** · 11-30-12 21:53

Agenda 21, which reportedly means an agenda for the 21st century, is a United Nations program launched in 1992 for the vague purpose of achieving global "sustainable development." Congress never approved Agenda 21, although Presidents Obama, Clinton and George H. W. Bush have all signed Executive Orders implementing it. 178 other world leaders agreed to it in 1992 at the Rio Summit. Since then, the U. N. Has mostly bypassed national governments, using Agenda 21's International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives ('ICLEI') to make agreements directly with local governments. ICLEI's USA presence has grown to include agreements with over 600 cities, towns and counties here, which are now copying the land use plans prescribed in Agenda 21.

**Mfp79** · 11-29-12 20:52

Originally Posted by JReacher [View Original Post]

Earlier, I posed a question about what to expect from a slightly higher end adventure. Interestingly, this women's reviews on the other site are all quite good. I hate to throw her under the bus, being a newbie, but my experience was very far removed from what I had hoped it might be.

This is a perfectly nice woman, making a living, staying safe. Clearly she is appreciated by many. Does one write a negative review when the problem might be my expectations?

Absolutely. I recently wrote a mildly negative review after a so-so time I had with an agency girl. Gorgeous body, so-so service and that's the short version of what I wrote (was for Veronica. Who's now actually not on BI's site anymore. Hrm).

I think as long as you write a balanced review (mention she was nice, for example. If you thought she was attractive, but the service wasn't quite to what you expected, say that too) , you're doing the right thing.

**Smoke Screen** · 11-29-12 05:54

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

Come on man, you know better then that, even at its saddest, in the worse f-in' favelas it still is the happiest place on earth! Dare to tell me I'm wrong?! LOL

It really depends on how much you see & pay attention to. Granted, I had the best few weeks of my life while I was there. After that vacation I needed another to recoup.