Thread: "Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?
+
Add Report
Results 21,301 to 21,315 of 23684
-
11-27-12 08:59 #2384Senior Member

Posts: 1022It's Genocea and it's a preventive vaccine, not a cure.
Originally Posted by Rob Taylor
[View Original Post]
-
11-26-12 21:18 #2383Senior Member

Posts: 43Hello I work in the Biotech industry. There is a cure and preventive vaccine for HSV2 coming in 2014.
Originally Posted by JoesParty
[View Original Post]
Google genecoa.
-
11-25-12 21:43 #2382Senior Member

Posts: 32Doubtful she is an amature
$400 a visit? That sounds more like professional prices. I don't pay per visit, that's what escorts are for, and if she is insisting on that many tests.
Originally Posted by Hercules78
[View Original Post]
I agree with Golfcart, tests are redundant if performed frequently. No medical reason to take that many, that often. If you have an SB the idea is a longer relationship, and not a revolving door for other guys.
-
11-25-12 20:31 #2381Senior Member

Posts: 1774Agree with F Scott
This whole thing screams "pro", or at least,"professional sugar baby."
Originally Posted by Hercules78
[View Original Post]
/z
-
11-25-12 20:29 #2380Senior Member

Posts: 5606Funny
My atf and I wish I had a fireplace in my home. Not a common thing in hollywood
Originally Posted by F Scott
[View Original Post]
-
11-25-12 17:36 #2379Senior Member

Posts: 754Beware of the dangling carott!
Am I the only one who sees trouble here? This girl already knows what buttons to push to get more sugar. What does that say about her amateur status, or lack thereof? At the very least, she has been around the block a few times. If it were me, I'd pass, regardless of the type of bug you might or might not catch.
Originally Posted by Hercules78
[View Original Post]
Happy holidays ahead,
Scott
-
11-25-12 16:49 #2378Senior Member

Posts: 1420I'm sure I read somewhere those tests are not accurate up to the minute like taking one's temperature; that they have a "look-back period" as to which period they are not reliable. To state this as an example, a clean report on a test run today would reflect the medical condition as of the girl (hypothetically) 60 days ago so any bug acquired during the immediately preceding 60 days would not show up on the report as a positive. I don't know what the delay is but I'm sure this is one. And if a girl was clean yesterday and caught a bug today I don't know how quickly she would become contageous. Seems to me there might be a different answer depending on the group of bugs on the test.
Originally Posted by Hercules78
[View Original Post]
-
11-22-12 17:58 #2377Senior Member

Posts: 37Met a SB from SA today. First meeting. She's willing to go bare back and spend all night as long as I do 400 each visit. Very pretty, works in a local university. What was a little surprising was she says she gets "tested" each month, just broke from a relationship of three years and would be willing to go bare back after her results come next week. She advised (not demanded) that I should get tested too. Anyways, why would she need to get tested every month? I am thinking she's probably going bare with many people. I think I'm going to pass. Better to be safe than sorry! Just thought I'd share my story with the team here.
-
11-20-12 13:06 #2376Senior Member

Posts: 754Succinctly stated
I think this is the way I feel about it as well. Even when things were going well with my ATF, I liked to pick the random cherry now and again, especially when out of town for work. My problem at the moment is that I appear to be in far greater demand on the road than in my hometown, so that comforting, settled down feeling is eluding me at present.
Originally Posted by HollywoodGuy
[View Original Post]
Winter's a'comin', though, and I'm trying hard to get something set up for the cold nights ahead.
Wish me luck,
Scott
-
11-20-12 05:50 #2375Senior Member

Posts: 1039Univ
I've got a couple ideas about why experiments fail to validate this theory; the first is that most university coeds today, despite years of safe-sex education & despite the Dr Phil-&-"Pretty Woman movie" hype, aren't sexually open-minded enough to deal with the realities of being any older-guys S'B' unless he is also incredibly handsome & sexy; they'd think nothing of giving B'B'B'J's to their "B'F's" for free, or maybe even to "jocks" or musicians that they find attractive, but they won't want to think of themselves as "whoring" for money! & even if they found a sugar-daddy who is both rich & as handsome + sexy as they'd find attractive: they wouldn't want to be hidden away in discreet rendezvous' but they'd want to be eye-candy at high-class events! The "Dr Phil\Pretty Woman movie" "effect" (a' k' a' "platinum pussy syndrome" in some venues) may well exist, but I think that most of them wouldn't even get to the "maybe-baby" level because of their close-mindedness! Even those that venture to the "Maybe-Baby" stage probably drop-out of the "sugar-bowl" very quickly as soon as they become dis-illusioned with it once they realize that their expected "market" doesn't really exist!
Originally Posted by EasyGoingJ
[View Original Post]
The second is that I've also had anecdotal conversations, with girls who claim to have participated in the "program" even at small & less well-known universities, that athletic-program "boosters" at universities that recruit young male "jocks" (often from inner-cities) for high-value "full-ride" athletic-scholarships will make U'T'R' "arrangements" with coeds willing to join "pep"club-type programs so that these coeds financial + medical (particularly including birth-control) needs will be taken care of in return for keeping these "jocks" (that the athletic-dep't has expensively & publicly recruited) sexually satiated; thereby avoiding the unwelcome publicity that might arise from the family of some naive freshmen or sophomore coed, or some local girl, if it should happen that she'd get "accidentally" pregnant or if she'd freak-out & go on the news if the "jock" got a little too rough with her during sex! Such "arrangements" might "cherry-pick" many of the more likely potential S'B's prior to them ever venturing into the "sugar-bowl" outside the campus!
Originally Posted by EasyGoingJ
[View Original Post]
-
11-20-12 02:19 #2374Senior Member

Posts: 5606I do not disagree with this
Everything you say here is all good and I have been moving in this direction a bit. Now it's just a typical bf gf relationship. The girls seem to fall in love a little more than I can handle sometimes. But my current #1 is as you have described and I am returning the affection. Although I am not "in love". But it is good. She has full knowledge of my random girls. And has not gotten greedy. Financially or emotionally. I guess the bottom line is it's nice to party but it's also nice to have that settled down feeling as well. I just seem to need both
Originally Posted by Hernando
[View Original Post]
-
11-19-12 13:32 #2373Senior Member

Posts: 5606Average Age
My average age girl is 22. There have been a few scientific polls done and the results seem to indicate that the most popular girls for LTR SB's is from 27 to 35.
Originally Posted by HappyKampr75
[View Original Post]
-
11-18-12 23:10 #2372Senior Member

Posts: 272Variety
Hollywood, I hear you man and we are all turned on by different things. If you track my posts back to the beginning you will see that I have been all up and down this road in every vehicle made. After logging many miles I now value a steady girl who has my best interest at heart (as long as the sugar flows) Safe sex is an oxymoron and girls who devalue sex and play it loose are a bigger risk. They can also be more callous when it comes to enjoyment and consider it a job. I want the young girl who has enough money from her job or parents for the necessities and looks to her Daddy for some cream.pun intended. I have experienced the Nando 1s who are whining for money constantly and it is never enough. They do need multiple daddies, and we actually call them escorts. They are also the ones who are more likely to be scammers and blackmailers. Never again for me. So I stick with self sufficient girls who can appreciate a classy guy who cherishes then, treats them to special occasions, and allows then to have enough money to enjoy the extras in life.
-
11-18-12 16:11 #2371Senior Member

Posts: 606For you, that may be true. For others of us, we seek other things. As I and others have said, sometimes our circumstances make an arm-candy SB impractical. And there's value in the dependability and safety of a SB over an escort, regardless of their age.
Originally Posted by HappyKampr75
[View Original Post]
As for looks, I'll just say that there are MILF's out there that are not only just as hot as any 20-something you can find, they're much better in the rack simply because of their experience. And you can actually have a conversation with them afterwards.
But that's the beauty of this. We can each find what works for us.
-
11-18-12 15:01 #2370Senior Member

Posts: 32Whats with older chicks
I've been watching the board this week and over the last few weeks. What's with you guys getting much older ladies for SB. Isn't the point of SB for her to be a PYT? Instead you are paying a woman in her 30's and some of you in her 40's for the time. It seems to me you are getting a MILF at a higher rate than a regular escort. Or some of you are calling your regular a SB when she is just that, a regular escort. An SB should be a younger girl there at your convience, whom you take care of financially. An SB should be more of a dating relationship then a pay per visit. SB you take. To dinner, go to theatre, ext.









Reply With Quote






