Thread: BackPage Advertiser Reviews
Closed Thread
Results 10,156 to 10,170 of 11707
-
11-10-12 10:35 #1552Senior Member

Posts: 922She has 6 reviews on the oThER board. Looks average out to be 7. 5. Service average out to be 4. 2 (4= " she just laid there")
Originally Posted by Werm2011
[View Original Post]
-
11-09-12 23:29 #1551Senior Member

Posts: 2669Fake Pics
I feel there is no excuse for using fake pics. These days it is not difficult at all to blur a face, or remove tattoos, or other easily recognizable features. Sure someone who knows the girl well enough may suspect it's her pic, but it's all about plausible deniability. Just don't take pics in your own home, and don't wear anything easily recognizable as belonging to you (jewelry is where most girls give themselves away).
Originally Posted by Kevinm1
[View Original Post]
Stay safe, and happy hunting.
-
11-09-12 23:08 #1550Senior Member

Posts: 481Kiley
Yes the info I found was from this past spring. That is when she made the phone / name change from Lexxi. I had a hard time finding her old reviews on That othER site because her name was misspelled and I couldn't find her old phone number.
Originally Posted by Fuhgetaboudit
[View Original Post]
Her old ID is 170339 over there if anyone is interested. Reviews are definitely mixed at best. A downward slope, too. Lots of rules and upsell. I can't read the full reviews, but the non-vip info is fairly clear. The good news is that she does indeed appear 'not' to have a cock like that other one. LOLLast edited by Werm2011; 11-09-12 at 23:43. Reason: typo
-
11-09-12 19:37 #1549Senior Member

Posts: 53Kristalee
Hi,
This lady used to advertise a lot in NH forum. I have met her. She is much older than her pic. She has good attitude but her body is too old (perhaps a reflection of several years in the business).
http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...up-39/19090432
Certainly not worth 200.
-
11-09-12 19:37 #1548Senior Member

Posts: 427Kiley has been advertizing as Kiley since at least early last spring, basically similar ads, same phone number. Have seen her in eroticmugshots and escortphone ads. She had lost some weight though. Last spring 135 lb, summer 130 lb, now 125 lb. Somehow though, almost all the ads have that tiny little belly bump that is in the current ad, so do not know how old that pic is. Looks great, ads are from all different areas. As her weight went down in the ads, her age went up. Used to post as being 19, now 20. If she ever was a sexi lexxi, glad she looks like the real thing, vs. the sexxi lexxi on hungangels.
Originally Posted by Werm2011
[View Original Post]
-
11-09-12 14:10 #1547Senior Member

Posts: 481She most likely only has one review because she apparently used to be Sexi Lexxi according to a post on ThE otheR site. I quote:
Originally Posted by Deb4512
[View Original Post]
"Just to give my fellow hobbyists a chance to save their money for more worthy paramours.
Sexi lexxi, who had a few bad reviews seems to have resurfaced as Kiley. http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...ow-19/19953636
New ph#: 4oh4&9733; 637&9733; 7348 (404-637-7348)
Still the same. Got lousy review on another board. Upsells, rules, bait & switch kind."
Take it FWIW.
-
11-09-12 09:35 #1546Forum Advertiser

Posts: 844Ok. This is another one I found you guys may like
http://massachusetts.backpage.com/Fe...ie-20/19995293
Granted, she only has one excellent review, but I searched the reviewer, he is legite, from the Boston area, has 15 reviews and doesn't give every lady he sees excellent reviews, so he is most likely honest. It is only one review though. She is new, he says that her pics are real. Hope this helps.
-
11-09-12 01:12 #1545Senior Member

Posts: 261Raven
Hi Guys,
Here is my post from the Worcester Forum.
Its hard to know where to put Framingham.
I saw her and would not again.
See link for review.
Stay Safe,
PS
http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...71#post1582471
Originally Posted by Fuhgetaboudit
[View Original Post]
-
11-08-12 22:51 #1544

Posts: 302Lisa.
So after reading all the posts about Lisa I got curious and gave her a call as she seemed legit and could be hot.
Well she said they were her pictures, even after I said if they were not I would walk out. She then said $300 hr, I kinda chuckled and said you look and sound great but not taking a chance on someone I have no idea how they are.
She was kind of taken aback by my response and said she was worth it. I told her maybe in your mind but I am not taking a chance for that price. Told her thank you have a nice night.
So whoever goes to see her good luck paying that price. No f'ing way I am. LOL
-
11-08-12 19:57 #1543Banned Member

Posts: 210Very rare but Harmony who used to work at cheaters and currently works at caddy was doing BP with fake pics but the pics weren't as hot as here IMHO she used fakes because Paul was firing girls who worked otc.
Originally Posted by Werm2011
[View Original Post]
-
11-08-12 19:42 #1542Senior Member

Posts: 310Almost
LOL, almost got tricked by this one.
-
11-08-12 14:22 #1541Senior Member

Posts: 475Proposal: TOFTT Collective
Call me crazy (because I am) but this notion hit me last night when contemplating this girl.
What if a group of like minded individuals such as ourselves were to organize a kind of agreement where we could share TOFTT?
I know it's going to sound impossible, but I think if there were enough of us that trusted each other, we could make it work.
Here's my thought: When a girl such as this comes along, marginal evidence, but no real proof of wrong doing. Say she has a couple reviews, but there's still some doubt, and none of us has actually seen her. (this girl is a perfect example) The following takes place.
All but one member of the group (I think it would need to be at least 5) would each contribute an amount to equal 2/3 thirds of the expected TOFTT cost. In this case that would be 100.
The remaining member would be responsible for the balance.
That member would TOFTT and report back. If the date was bad, no one is out the full expense. If the date was good, it provides a personal recommendation from a trusted member.
The 1/3 member selection rotates, so everyone has a chance to reap the benefit of the pool.
The frequency could be weekly, monthly, or some where in between, depending on the availability of potential providers or an agreed upon schedule.
If a member chooses not to use their opportunity, (Personal taste regarding the provider, bad timing, whatever) the next in line would have a shot, and the one who passed would retain their position for the next time.
The Collective would have to be able to come to agreement as to the potential benefit of the provider to all members. (or at least a strong majority).
Sounds crazy, I know, but think about it. Once in while you kick in 20-25 bucks to get valued feedback on a potential provider. Every so often you get the chance to see a provider for 1/3 the cost.
This wouldn't be the right approach to every girl that comes along, but for the times when you think to your self,"I would totally TOFTT if I had the extra cash" it might just work.
Pay Pal, to answer the obvious question, which is why a high level of trust would have to exist between the members.
OK, let me have it. Tell me how stupid and idealistic that sounds. OR, Join me, and together we will conquer the WORLD! (of hookers)
Originally Posted by Werm2011
[View Original Post]
-
11-08-12 13:04 #1540Senior Member

Posts: 481It's not really important, but I originally thought so too. It's actually an unknown amateur from 4chan. Org.
Here is her set if interested. http://www.poringa.net/posts/imagene...ersabrosa.html
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that 'Lisa' is not going to be nearly as hot as this chick, but maybe someone here will let us know for sure soon. It won't be me as she is not in my mongering district. However, I'd expand out if reports come in that Lisa is anywhere close to this girl @ 1.5 hr haha
Originally Posted by Legend Man
[View Original Post]
-
11-08-12 10:38 #1539Senior Member

Posts: 853Yep Diaz, http://ayishadiaz.com/
Originally Posted by Stressed Out
[View Original Post]
Nice figure
-
11-07-12 21:30 #1538Senior Member

Posts: 475Details
Details from her reviews (abridged)
Early college age. 5' 4"ish slim build, perky B's. While her photos are obviously in question, the review labels them "real and accurate" Neither reviewer mentioned photo comparison, or displeasure with her appearance.
The 8/8 reviewer has 14 reviews, (since mid 2011) most of which are in a similar rating range. Describes her as cute with a warm smile, hour glass, pretty. His experience was GFE.
The 10/10 reviewer has 6 reviews, (Since early 2012) of which a couple are hi-mids, a few are bad dates, and then there's this 10/10 (he REALLY must still be hard from this date)
He describes her as having an "AWESOME ass!" (repeatedly) and his review is the gush of descriptors and details of someone who is truly smitten. His experience reaches PSE levels on ALL fronts.
The rate as stated in her profile is 1. 5 HR (seems low, but she's new so?)
That pretty much sums it up. Hope it helps.
Originally Posted by Longjblues
[View Original Post]











