Escort Reports

[WebSurfer]

If what gets your motor running is a beautiful brunette who is slim, sexy and fun then you will want to see Andrea. She does not put ads on BP but you can find her on P411. She will screen you thoroughly and call your "Okays" to see what kind of client you are. She is very careful and I like that! She is very selective and doesn't see just anyone. I am so glad that I made it through her screening process. She is true GFE. She made me feel like I knew her already and we were reuniting lovers. Very relaxed, not rushed and so erotic was the mood. She took very good care of me. I will be back to visit!

[BFDeal]

I've seen Marie and she's the best in Indy when she's here, but I've heard Jade is top-notch, although I haven't seen her. And I'm texting Marie as I'm typing this.

BFDeal.

How has no one commented on this one yet?

http://www.**************.com/escort...s-white-female

http://indianapolis.backpage.com/Fem...eal-31/5585224

She looks fierce!

[BFDeal]

Kim Marie is simply "Marie" on nr. She's head-to-toe hot and worth every red cent (and then some).

BFDeal.

Is coming to town, and is a really sweet girl!

[JohnBuddy]

Is coming to town, and is a really sweet girl!

[Funluvr]

How has no one commented on this one yet?

http://www.**************.com/escort...s-white-female

http://indianapolis.backpage.com/Fem...eal-31/5585224

She looks fierce!

Googled her phone number and found one "not worth it" review on another board. She does have a couple of good reviews since arriving in Indy, so it would appear as always YMMV.

[Dave30]

How has no one commented on this one yet?

http://www.**************.com/escort...s-white-female

http://indianapolis.backpage.com/Fem...eal-31/5585224

She looks fierce!

[Lovebigass]

Has anyone seen Tori recently? She's a hot blonde that alternated between Indy and Detroit.

[B Beall]

You're welcome.

Let's not have any misunderstandings with you, me, or the board. I said what I said because I think there ought to be a clear distinction between reporting rumor, opinion, and guesswork from reporting fact. I allowed as how you might be right in general sense.

Had I been an interested hobbyist in this case-which I wasn't-your report wouldn't have convinced me either way, because of the way you stated it. One I received later did convince me, because it contained verifiable facts. And I think I relayed it without revealing any sources.

That's all. I think we can all agree that there's a distinction between saying someone "might be a cop" and noting that a newbie provider fell for Uncle Leo's high-pressure sales technique, and at least one hobbyist got busted. Maybe the latter causes the next newbie in line to do her homework. Maybe it'll encourage some of our brethren, who sample BP girls like grandma's candy dish, to pass along some solid information. Like the three most important things if you're faced with arrest are 1) Try to stay calm; 2) Know your rights; and 3) Realize that the cops don't want you to stay calm or know your rights.

And, finally, let's try to find a small amount of compassion for a scared young woman who got taken. The real culprits are the guys who lurk in dingy motels trying to enforce a comic-book version of Bronze Age morality.

[EarlyCuyler]

I've now had three people tell me privately that the events did, in fact, occur as described.

You're welcome.

[B Beall]

Just me playing devil's advocate here. If this happens, perhaps it's a ploy to run a preventative operation and / or one with a big PR media payoff and the corresponding political benefits. Besides, it's potentially easier to keep a first-time offender from becoming a felon than it is to keep a felon from repeating. Once they have the felony, they're branded and their "give-a-damn" is busted too.

There's also the possibility that a) they're hoping some big fish flops into the net, or be) they've got a quota. I've now had three people tell me privately that the events did, in fact, occur as described.

This still doesn't really explain what they were up to. It was, apparently, the young woman's first brush with the law, and she got scammed.

Which is all the more reason for us here to do what we can to make sure that the paranoia and the misinformation are kept in check. This woman was not aware of the legal ramifications of what she was doing. She was unaware that she faced a misdemeanor charge, automatic entry into a diversion program, and a clean record in six months time. She got convinced she needed to do something to help the cops, rather than something to help herself, namely, clam up and demand an attorney. As a result who knows what others' lives may have been ruined.

One thing further: this is why we are all in this together, providers and clients. Anything which increases disinformation and paranoia, discomfort and distrust hurts us all.

[Mikehammerindy]

For the record, what I meant was that reviewers there are limited to one review per provider. Both of the women you mentioned have two reviews.

The point I'm trying to make is that while "someone" might be served by that sort of information, provided it turned out to be true, and reached them just in the nick of time, the board as a whole is not. In case you're not aware of it, that sort of thing has disrupted this forum on a regular basis, always from someone with "inside information" that so-and-so "is working with LE". No one has ever quite explained the devious legal stratagem which swaps a Class A misdemeanor (or C felony) arrest for the opportunity to make some more Class A misdemeanor arrests at no small expense. And, to my knowledge, no one has ever demonstrated that actually happening.

Just me playing devil's advocate here. If this happens, perhaps it's a ploy to run a preventative operation and / or one with a big PR media payoff and the corresponding political benefits. Besides, it's potentially easier to keep a first-time offender from becoming a felon than it is to keep a felon from repeating. Once they have the felony, they're branded and their "give-a-damn" is busted too.

[EarlyCuyler]

For the record, what I meant was that reviewers there are limited to one review per provider. Both of the women you mentioned have two reviews.

The point I'm trying to make is that while "someone" might be served by that sort of information, provided it turned out to be true, and reached them just in the nick of time, the board as a whole is not. In case you're not aware of it, that sort of thing has disrupted this forum on a regular basis, always from someone with "inside information" that so-and-so "is working with LE". No one has ever quite explained the devious legal stratagem which swaps a Class A misdemeanor (or C felony) arrest for the opportunity to make some more Class A misdemeanor arrests at no small expense. And, to my knowledge, no one has ever demonstrated that actually happening.

Stinging unwary hobbyists, yes. Alexis Whatever might be a cop, as might any of us, but it's the combination of New Listing and No Reviews from Established Hobbyists which should give any sensible hobbyist pause. If you have inside information to add to that-inside information defined as "I saw her and the deal was hinky in the usual, get-undressed-and-fan-out-your-money, honey" cop fashion, or your private pipeline to the Vice Squad-try to figure out some way to say it without "outing" yourself. Or swallow it. It's inflammatory, and the rumor mill is less than worthless nine times out of ten. Everybody and his brother can say it about anyone who refused to see him.

I'm all for this sort of thing being exposed. Just report rumors as rumors and facts as facts.

It's a rumor. There's no truth to it. I made it all up, based on the fact that one or both of the ladies in question refused to see me.

Look, I know I'm new around here. In my time here however, I've asked a couple of questions, added a few reports, given a couple of the USASG advertisers some business, and generally played by the rules. I'm not trying to come in here with guns blazing, and I have indeed seen some of the disruptions caused by previous exchanges Those exchanges largely involved providers who had some level of verification on this board. Unlike those reports, I searched and found nothing on either of the providers. Therefore, a comparison to those exchanges I believe, is not a valid comparison. I'm stymied by the fact that you are upset by my raising a red flag. I'll repeat this one more time. If I were to give details in public about my information, it would not create a good situation for me-even if I used my extensive knowledge of the English language, liberally seasoned with innuendo, double entendre, and satire. Whether you grasp that reality or agree with it doesn't alter it. In 1/10th of the time it took you to write your response, you could have sent me a PM. Do you really want to know what I know? It would seem to me that by your choice of berating me as opposed to writing me, that question is answered.

As regards to reporting rumor as rumor, I'm not sure how I could more clearly state it than,"I cannot promise that I'm 100 percent correct in my thoughts" and "I would of course be happy to say I was wrong". I would think even you would appreciate that particular wording. (This is another example of how a comparison to other exchanges on the board doesn't really fit my report.)

I'm not looking for a fight. I like this board for many reasons, and am appreciative of the information I've been able to glean from it. I trust that at least someone benefits from what I've had to say in regards to Vivian and Alexis Nicole.

"I'm Urlee Kiler and I approvify this here messige."

[B Beall]

Actually NR doesn't limit reviews to one per provider. Many advertisers have multiple reviews.

For the record, what I meant was that reviewers there are limited to one review per provider. Both of the women you mentioned have two reviews.

The point I'm trying to make is that while "someone" might be served by that sort of information, provided it turned out to be true, and reached them just in the nick of time, the board as a whole is not. In case you're not aware of it, that sort of thing has disrupted this forum on a regular basis, always from someone with "inside information" that so-and-so "is working with LE". No one has ever quite explained the devious legal stratagem which swaps a Class A misdemeanor (or C felony) arrest for the opportunity to make some more Class A misdemeanor arrests at no small expense. And, to my knowledge, no one has ever demonstrated that actually happening.

Stinging unwary hobbyists, yes. Alexis Whatever might be a cop, as might any of us, but it's the combination of New Listing and No Reviews from Established Hobbyists which should give any sensible hobbyist pause. If you have inside information to add to that-inside information defined as "I saw her and the deal was hinky in the usual, get-undressed-and-fan-out-your-money, honey" cop fashion, or your private pipeline to the Vice Squad-try to figure out some way to say it without "outing" yourself. Or swallow it. It's inflammatory, and the rumor mill is less than worthless nine times out of ten. Everybody and his brother can say it about anyone who refused to see him.

I'm all for this sort of thing being exposed. Just report rumors as rumors and facts as facts.

[EarlyCuyler]

In my post-two reports lower-I originally mentioned Alexis Nicole. Later, I said Alexis Ann. This was a mistake. (I have OTHER issues with Alexis Ann). Too many Alexis (es). One thief, one cop, and one dirty massage therapist.

[Member #6999]

I was going to buy you a new calendar for Christmas, but all the new ones were gone, I hope you like that old out of date one I sent you, all the numbers look the same at least on the months.

I never look at the dates, just the naked pictures. Got to get me a calander with cars and trucks or somthing unapealing.

I used my secret room while in vegas again this trip. Wife playing slots while I'm watching an asian play my flute.