Massage Parlor Reports

**Gabby W** · 07-02-11 12:12

http://chicago.backpage.com/Therapeu...cation/8291922

Paris, Bella and Carmen all give AMAZING massages! Great pricing! I haven't tried any of the other girls so YMMV.

It looks like they may have moved but I haven't been to the new place yet.

Every time I've been there I've left very happy. Can't say enough good things about them!

**Elpatron** · 07-02-11 12:02

I've been to this place before by lawrence and christiana, its a basement apartment like two months ago had this fat big tits girl curly hair I think her name was michel, mpaid. 6 massage was very poor no talent at all she was like 5 on sacale from 1 to 10lthen last mponth went to their other place on fullerton ave right off the expressway by I hop at the corner paid. 60 had a latina chick she probalbly weight closed to 200 lbs well I saw her and I toll her if anybody else available she said the other girl was busy I told her thank you ii'l try some other time.

Originally Posted by DaFlyestCubano [View Original Post]

I've been to many providers and although many are are pretty good I'm glad this one has dropped there prices a bit. I asked Mia if they dropped there prices because they've been slow and she responded by saying that they dropped their prices because many customers had thought that too many providers were over priced. This location and the other on Christiana are my 2 favorite spots yet their prices have got cheaper while others keep going up. They are by appointment only but atleast you can choose your provider. If anyone needs info I'd be willing on helping in exchange for info on another location or future lead.

http://chicago.backpage.com/BodyRubs...032-21/6927782

Or.

http://chicago.backpage.com/BodyRubs/and9608-22/7149447

**genuis8** · 07-02-11 11:51

As reported by a prior poster, Halsted Spa is open around the 2600 block of Halsted. The rates are 65/45 (1hr / 30 min). Good massage. Will repeat. Gave me a business card for $5 off on next visit.

Star Spa (1500 block on N Ashland) shows the sign QQSpa at the door. Those who have freqented Chinatown and Archer Ave spas will recognized the 2 current staff. Rates are 65/45. Will not repeat, for personal reasons.

Tao at 2600 block of W Chicago. Rates are 65/45. Massage is acceptable. Will not repeat. Legit. From the conversation with my therapist, it looks like the Tao Spa on 3111 W Lawrence is under a different owner than this one.

The MP at 3334 W Peterson is inside a building and staffed by 2 korean ladies. The older one is the owner. Rate is $70 for a session, no half-hour sessions. Massage is good. Visited several time total. Will not repeat, because I want to check out other places And/Or stay with current regulars, for better value for money spent.

**BeetleJuice001** · 07-02-11 11:26

Originally Posted by Gilibee [View Original Post]

ROTL! This is pretty funny. But some pretty true observations. I mean, when a woman is middle aged, you're not going to get off-the-scale aroused just from looking at her.

When it comes to the economics of "paid for" sex versus "marriage" sex (although nothing is free, but the medium of exchange can vary) , one way to look at it is that with "paid for" sex you encounter relatively low fixed cost (for the first sex act) but relatively high marginal cost. With "marriage" sex you pay a relatively high cost for the first sex act (high fixed cost) but a decreasing cost trend for subsequent sex acts (low marginal cost). LOL. Of course, by the time the woman hits middle age, her ability to extract any kind of "rent", fixed or marginal, decreases considerably.

Awesome economic analysis!

BJ001

**Gabby W** · 07-02-11 10:57

TOFTT and checked out this ad http://chicago.craigslist.org/sox/thp/2470667114.html

Did the incall. It's at an Asian nail / tanning place so I had hopes.

They have a shower but it's a stand up and you're left alone. Massage was draped but not all that well and she didn't seem to have problems with me being nude before I got on the table. She spent time on the butt but didn't get close to any of the fun parts. I even moved the draping off. She didn't replace it, but there was no hint of extras.

Nice lady. Massage was about a 7 or 8. Not the best ever but not bad. A little pricey, $90 for the hour and I gave her an extra $10.

She makes house calls so who knows what might be available there, but I wouldn't bet on it.

**Raoul Duke** · 07-02-11 10:40

Originally Posted by F Blaster [View Original Post]

I've gotten the look in areas where I never imagined making a pickup. If mongering happens and no one notices, does it affect the neighborhood?

No doubt about it. A couple of years ago I was walking on State on a weekday afternoon, between Ohio and Ontario, and made eye contact with a pretty attractive girl. It was innocent enough. She looked nice, I smiled and she smiled back. Then she asked me if I wanted a date. I had no idea she was a working girl, it didn't even enter my mind when I initially saw her. It was pretty funny. I declined the offer, but to F Blaster's point, you just never know.

**Rtr111** · 07-02-11 10:17

For me I like uncomplicated sexual experiences most men do. We all know that regular "free" sex turns in an expectation of a committed relationship. This is complicated no matter your marital status or age. There is one fundamental truth.

We don't pay them to cum we pay them to go.

MTs or apartment girls or girls on the street do not expect a relationship.

**Alterxxx** · 07-02-11 09:26

I was drawn to this ad due to it's close proximity to my place and due to the fact that I heard one of the chicks that use to work at Claudia's opened up an apt in the area and I thought I might run into her here. Anyways. The place is on California right next to the school. AVOID this place unless you like ugly, chubby, fresh off the boat looking Mexican chicks (barrel shaped bodies with flat ass, chicken legs, frizzy hair that don't know how to put on makeup) that try to upsell like crazy. Massage was even worse than her looks, and I actually got the better looking of the 2 that were there. HJ technique was totally lacking and I told her to stop as it just was not going to happen.

http://chicago.backpage.com/BodyRubs...-65-23/7783142

**F Blaster** · 07-02-11 06:49

Originally Posted by Gilibee [View Original Post]

What I reject is the mentality that I see expressed in some of these postings that goes: "I can't believe those unreasonable people." when referring to people who either express opposition to the "trade", attempt to shut down MPs, street walking and so forth. As though they can't understand how "those unreasonable people" could have a different view from their own. For my own part, I can understand why people would be opposed to this kind of stuff; so I don't necessarily consider such people to be unreasonable.

Maybe it's fine with you to have MP and street walking activity near where you live, but I assure you that to many people, your perspective would be considered to be rather "unique". For my own part, unlike you, I would *not* want this kind of trade operating near where I live. In fact, I have always tended to have a preference for places farther away from where I live. So I can understand why a place like Downers Grove would want to shut down MPs that operate on Ogden Avenue; to people who don't share your viewpoint, these MP establishments put the community in an unfavorable light.

I'm not moralizing on mongering; I'm criticizing people who act like they can't understand why some people don't care for mongering.

OK, Professor, get off your high horse.

Regarding the MP, it's been there in some incarnation for at least a decade. If it were causing a disturbance or bringing an unwanted element to the neighborhood, it would have been shut down years ago. There's no gaudy signage and the windows are all covered so you can't see inside. It's just another storefront business. I bet if you asked most residents nearby what was in that spot, most couldn't even tell you.

I'm sure most residents in the neighborhood would be up in arms if they knew SW activity was occuring near them. I understand that. If the SW were dressing outlandishly and drawing attention to themselves, I'd want it stopped as well. As I said before, business is done very discreetly. Most people have no clue as to what's going on. It's all a matter of giving and getting the look. If it's done right, the pickup can be made without anyone noticing.

You'd be surprised where SW activity occurs in the city. I've gotten the look in areas where I never imagined making a pickup. If mongering happens and no one notices, does it affect the neighborhood?

**Gilibee** · 07-02-11 04:27

Originally Posted by Gus Hogan [View Original Post]

It is illegal for two reasons: (1) when you do the math, it is cheaper than marriage (if you count the number of times you have married sex). Rational men would not marry if they could buy sex daily at market prices. Given the choice of paid sex on demand, or marriage, paid sex wins; (2) Absent the scarcity created by making prostitution illegal (and by marriage) , in a pay for sex world, women over 30 would have to give it away to find sex. Men would line up to pay for sex with 20 year olds.

But lets look at the facts guys. When you get 40 or 50 you don't want sex like when you were 25. You have more cash. You really would save up for a great night with a 20 something.

I'd rather have fun twice a week with a 20 something than 5 times a week with a woman my own age.

ROTL! This is pretty funny. But some pretty true observations. I mean, when a woman is middle aged, you're not going to get off-the-scale aroused just from looking at her.

When it comes to the economics of "paid for" sex versus "marriage" sex (although nothing is free, but the medium of exchange can vary) , one way to look at it is that with "paid for" sex you encounter relatively low fixed cost (for the first sex act) but relatively high marginal cost. With "marriage" sex you pay a relatively high cost for the first sex act (high fixed cost) but a decreasing cost trend for subsequent sex acts (low marginal cost). LOL. Of course, by the time the woman hits middle age, her ability to extract any kind of "rent", fixed or marginal, decreases considerably.

**Gilibee** · 07-02-11 04:17

Originally Posted by F Blaster [View Original Post]

I live right by a massage parlor and it doesn't bother me one bit. I doubt if anyone else even notices; they're probably pleased that it isn't ANOTHER empty storefront. There's no gaudy signage or traffic congestion; it's doesn't disrupt the neighborhood at all.

There are some SW who work nearby as well. They are low key for the most part. It's not a known stroll, so there aren't a lot of mongers running around. (Traffic is so bad anyway, I don't think anyone could tell the difference.) As long as they don't walk around in minis and high heels and walk around in traffic and draw attention to themselves, it's not that big of a deal. I admit, it kind of bothered me at first, but now I don't even think about it.

One request. Please stop posting down to us like some condescending schoolteacher and let's all get back to meaningful reporting.

What I reject is the mentality that I see expressed in some of these postings that goes: "I can't believe those unreasonable people." when referring to people who either express opposition to the "trade", attempt to shut down MPs, street walking and so forth. As though they can't understand how "those unreasonable people" could have a different view from their own. For my own part, I can understand why people would be opposed to this kind of stuff; so I don't necessarily consider such people to be unreasonable.

Maybe it's fine with you to have MP and street walking activity near where you live, but I assure you that to many people, your perspective would be considered to be rather "unique". For my own part, unlike you, I would *not* want this kind of trade operating near where I live. In fact, I have always tended to have a preference for places farther away from where I live. So I can understand why a place like Downers Grove would want to shut down MPs that operate on Ogden Avenue; to people who don't share your viewpoint, these MP establishments put the community in an unfavorable light.

I'm not moralizing on mongering; I'm criticizing people who act like they can't understand why some people don't care for mongering.

**DaFlyestCubano** · 07-02-11 01:12

I've been to many providers and although many are are pretty good I'm glad this one has dropped there prices a bit. I asked Mia if they dropped there prices because they've been slow and she responded by saying that they dropped their prices because many customers had thought that too many providers were over priced. This location and the other on Christiana are my 2 favorite spots yet their prices have got cheaper while others keep going up. They are by appointment only but atleast you can choose your provider. If anyone needs info I'd be willing on helping in exchange for info on another location or future lead.

http://chicago.backpage.com/BodyRubs...032-21/6927782

Or.

http://chicago.backpage.com/BodyRubs/and9608-22/7149447

**Gus Hogan** · 07-02-11 00:38

Originally Posted by Ghostface89 [View Original Post]

For the life of me, I cannot understand why there is no tolerance by the thought police who accept all these other sex concepts, but hound and demonize hetero mongers like they were moral terrorists.

Your thoughts, gentlemen?

It is illegal for two reasons: (1) when you do the math, it is cheaper than marriage (if you count the number of times you have married sex). Rational men would not marry if they could buy sex daily at market prices. Given the choice of paid sex on demand, or marriage, paid sex wins; (2) Absent the scarcity created by making prostitution illegal (and by marriage) , in a pay for sex world, women over 30 would have to give it away to find sex. Men would line up to pay for sex with 20 year olds.

But lets look at the facts guys. When you get 40 or 50 you don't want sex like when you were 25. You have more cash. You really would save up for a great night with a 20 something.

I'd rather have fun twice a week with a 20 something than 5 times a week with a woman my own age.

**Northside Jim** · 07-01-11 14:30

Originally Posted by Musei [View Original Post]

It took the likes of Harvey Milk and the Stonewall Riots to shift the tide for the Gays. Seems that all we have is "The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet" in the Monger corner.

Most mongers want to remain in secret. There is no political will to change things because there are no voices calling for change. I'm not about to step out from behind my screen name and I bet most of the people on this board aren't either.

**Grateful One** · 07-01-11 12:59

Another area is if your browse C-list, how many m4m posts are there with depictions and open proposals where if a W4M was to, it is flagged and removed.

Perhaps the key to this is NOT mentioning a donation at all.

Stay safe and prosper.

Originally Posted by Ghostface89 [View Original Post]

In my time on this earth, about three score years, the political climate has changed regarding most sexual mores. Now divorce is commonplace and no longer a stigma. Now living together without a marriage certificate is no longer "living in sin." The biggest change in sexual ethics is that homosexuality is now in your face with "gay pride" parades and openly accepted gay bars, etc.

In other words, there has been a tidal wave of change in many areas of sexual conduct. EXCEPT for heterosexual activity regarding escorts and especially massage parlors.

For the life of me, I cannot understand why there is no tolerance by the thought police who accept all these other sex concepts, but hound and demonize hetero mongers like they were moral terrorists.

Your thoughts, gentlemen?