Escort Reports

[Fuzzyface61]

BP ad is recent, but I gave up on her a while back, very difficult girl to get a hold of.

Yep, she posted an ad message on another board within the last 18 hours, so I can only guess she considers herself to be active.

[Deviousdog]

Which Ivy?

This one I guess:

http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEsco...ond-25/4897693

BP ad is recent, but I gave up on her a while back, very difficult girl to get a hold of.

[Fuzzyface61]

Is Ivy still in business?

Which Ivy?

[Tmans59]

Is Ivy still in business? I tried, last week, and she left me hanging by the tennis courts. Still no answer, not going to press it. Too bad too, she had some good reviews.

[Member #4558]

OW, I completely respect your view on giving up personal info, but the guy I was responding to seemed to imply that the lady in question is fake or a scam. That's a lot different than him just saying her screening is too invasive. Good hunting and and best wishes.

I had my doubts about her as well. Too many gray areas for me but as others have come forth to confirm that she is for real then she must be.

[Longhairngotee]

I for one would never offer any personal information to a provider. There was a thread on another discussion board where an escort basically admitted that she would use the personal information she had on a previous client to black mail him. She had his personal phone number, real name, place of employment and job phone number. She said that she would call his work and tell everyone that he consorted with hookers. Now granted, that is an extreme case but it is all the reason that I need to back away from "intrusive" screening by a provider.

OW, I completely respect your view on giving up personal info, but the guy I was responding to seemed to imply that the lady in question is fake or a scam. That's a lot different than him just saying her screening is too invasive. Good hunting and and best wishes.

[Member #4558]

Why do you make this comment about phishing and age verification? The ad has contact info, an email address. Many providers don't give out phone numbers until after an appointment has been made. Her legitimacy was also established. Below Lokillo says he has seen her. As Deviousdog said in his post, she is reviewed on T*R (numerous times) and has good reports, although I would agree her services don't warrant her fee. As for her appearance the most recent reviewer says "She was very much like her pictures. Pretty face, and a very lean and fit figure, with large breasts and slim, shapely legs that looked great beneath the short nightie she was wearing."

If her screening is too intrusive and her rate too high, one can move on. There's no reason to suggest she's fake.

I for one would never offer any personal information to a provider. There was a thread on another discussion board where an escort basically admitted that she would use the personal information she had on a previous client to black mail him. She had his personal phone number, real name, place of employment and job phone number. She said that she would call his work and tell everyone that he consorted with hookers. Now granted, that is an extreme case but it is all the reason that I need to back away from "intrusive" screening by a provider.

[Ho Consultant]

Why do you make this comment about phishing and age verification? The ad has contact info, an email address. Many providers don't give out phone numbers until after an appointment has been made. Her legitimacy was also established. Below Lokillo says he has seen her. As Deviousdog said in his post, she is reviewed on T*R (numerous times) and has good reports, although I would agree her services don't warrant her fee. As for her appearance the most recent reviewer says "She was very much like her pictures. Pretty face, and a very lean and fit figure, with large breasts and slim, shapely legs that looked great beneath the short nightie she was wearing."

If her screening is too intrusive and her rate too high, one can move on. There's no reason to suggest she's fake.

Seen her before. She is a nice lady, but not worth the donation she asks for. She was reffered to me by another provider named Miranda who has done doubles with her. Again, nice lady but not worth the donation in my opinion. If you are going to spend that kinda money, I would suggest Harley cruise (yes she is still around to regulars) or Taylar Lake. You get more bang for your buck.

[Reaper400]

no BBBJ or multipops. For $$$? Pass.

WTF? No BBBJ / cumdodger for $$$. The enhanced screening is not a big deal but the limts.

[Longhairngotee]

These usually turn out to be an attempt to get you to join a site for 'age verification'. Either info phishing or they'll charge 5$ membership in order to get her contact info.

Simple rule: if the phone number is hard to get, just avoid.

Why do you make this comment about phishing and age verification? The ad has contact info, an email address. Many providers don't give out phone numbers until after an appointment has been made. Her legitimacy was also established. Below Lokillo says he has seen her. As Deviousdog said in his post, she is reviewed on T*R (numerous times) and has good reports, although I would agree her services don't warrant her fee. As for her appearance the most recent reviewer says "She was very much like her pictures. Pretty face, and a very lean and fit figure, with large breasts and slim, shapely legs that looked great beneath the short nightie she was wearing."

If her screening is too intrusive and her rate too high, one can move on. There's no reason to suggest she's fake.

[Sirlixalot]

Pictures look too good for a "soccer mom" and given the fact that she wants too much personal info and a photo I'd upon my arrival makes me hesitant. Now, if she wants to be fair and provide me with her personal info ahead of time and show me her photo I'd as well, then I might reconsider.

Tineye turns up nothing with the pics and no phone number is provided so that is a dead end as well. I smell another Lia Nice so I would pass.

These usually turn out to be an attempt to get you to join a site for 'age verification'. Either info phishing or they'll charge 5$ membership in order to get her contact info.

Simple rule: if the phone number is hard to get, just avoid.

[Member #4558]

Can't seem to dig up much intel on her, which makes me wonder. TGTBT?

http://www.eros-tampa.com/files/134451.htm

Pictures look too good for a "soccer mom" and given the fact that she wants too much personal info and a photo I'd upon my arrival makes me hesitant. Now, if she wants to be fair and provide me with her personal info ahead of time and show me her photo I'd as well, then I might reconsider.

Tineye turns up nothing with the pics and no phone number is provided so that is a dead end as well. I smell another Lia Nice so I would pass.

[Deviousdog]

Can't seem to dig up much intel on her, which makes me wonder. TGTBT?

http://www.eros-tampa.com/files/134451.htm

Haven't seen her but she's well-reviewed on ThE otheR site. Mostly 8s for both appearance and performance. Real pix, DFK, but no BBBJ or multipops. For $$$? Pass.

[Lokillo]

Can't seem to dig up much intel on her, which makes me wonder. TGTBT?

http://www.eros-tampa.com/files/134451.htm

I have dream of her. A bit shy but as advertised. She has reviews on The Other site.

[ArthurTpa]

Can't seem to dig up much intel on her, which makes me wonder. TGTBT?

http://www.eros-tampa.com/files/134451.htm

$$$ an hour? And wants I'd? As we said below. And on other forums. Their high prices and their investigation should be avoided.