Bareback Providers

**HelloThar** · 10-02-25 19:10

Originally Posted by Vadger [View Original Post]

Agreed. It seems to be a Seattle area thing. I feel like every other city, providers are open about theu menu, as it leads to less frustration / misunderstanding later on. Much less time wasted. Almost every traveling provider's website is quite clear about their menu.

Now, TNA is great because there are a lot of providers on it, and even if the reviews are BS, we can reach out to the reviewers to discuss. But, this is a lengthy process and only works if you're planning ahead. If you are looking to hookup same day, it's so difficult to understand a provider's menu. TNA is useless for that.

It wouldn't be so bad if reviewers gave more info directly in their posts too instead of PM'ing.

Give some damn alphabet soups or say if she's GFE at the very least. Wish I could block every hobbyist who says she's great and now my atf and nothing else. And agreed, it's a pretty garbage system we have here.

**MSindon23** · 10-02-25 16:46

Hello fellow believers. First time posting here. I am visiting the area soon and have looked at all the providers in the Seattle / Tacoma area. Based on my taste and the reviews I have narrowed it down to Sweet Miranda and ndcaPrincess. Has anyone on here been with both? If so, would you say one would be better than the other and why? Thanks in advance.

**MSindon23** · 10-02-25 01:11

Hi all, first post here. I will be coming to the Seattle / Tacoma area soon and looking to see a provider who has a proven satisfaction record where most guys feel like they got their monies worth. I know that each individual has their own preferences and ratings so each his own. But for the "average guy" not looking for a specific fetish or skill set other than not to feel like I've wasted my money. I've narrowed it down to Sweet Miranda and NDCAPrincess. I've read the reviews and did my own comparisons but I wanted reach out to the local community to see what your thoughts are on either one.

**Vadger** · 10-01-25 12:42

Originally Posted by HelloThar [View Original Post]

Just wish menus could easily be discerned. Providers complain of hobbyists wasting their time asking questions about menu, but that's because they get your money either way while you're trying to figure out if she's worth it.

Agreed. It seems to be a Seattle area thing. I feel like every other city, providers are open about theu menu, as it leads to less frustration / misunderstanding later on. Much less time wasted. Almost every traveling provider's website is quite clear about their menu.

Now, TNA is great because there are a lot of providers on it, and even if the reviews are BS, we can reach out to the reviewers to discuss. But, this is a lengthy process and only works if you're planning ahead. If you are looking to hookup same day, it's so difficult to understand a provider's menu. TNA is useless for that.

**HelloThar** · 10-01-25 12:29

Originally Posted by DrtyHarry [View Original Post]

Yeah the pussy cartel revolted - "How dare you provide services that result in a hobbyist being happy. " LOL.

Jokes aside, a few years ago I posted a review there, where I listed something that related to a service and I remember some mod reaching out requesting me to change wording saying it could be construed as "pay for play" and we would rather you remove that word and I happily did.

I swear I've seen ads that straight up imply BB by mentioning something like 'VIP if you have recent test results' by longtime providers. Something less ambiguous than just VIP, but less explicit than all holes open, LOL. I know most of removing certain wordage is to avoid legality issues.

Just wish menus could easily be discerned. Providers complain of hobbyists wasting their time asking questions about menu, but that's because they get your money either way while you're trying to figure out if she's worth it.

**DrtyHarry** · 10-01-25 10:58

Originally Posted by BackInSea [View Original Post]

I'm sure a WK probably told her to take the pic down. It was basically a pic with a menu and price breakdown. She had $300/ hr "BB all 3 holes" with rough sex.

[QUOTE=Colnago;7404401][QUOTE=BackInSea;7404364]I'm sure a WK probably told her to take the pic down. It was basically a pic with a menu and price breakdown. She had $300/ hr "BB all 3 holes" with rough sex.[/ QUOTE]More likely a moderator. I don't think you post menus anymore.

[QUOTE=Colnago;7404468]Probably a moderator. I don't think girls can post activities anymore.[ / QUOTE].

Yeah the pussy cartel revolted - "How dare you provide services that result in a hobbyist being happy. " LOL.

Jokes aside, a few years ago I posted a review there, where I listed something that related to a service and I remember some mod reaching out requesting me to change wording saying it could be construed as "pay for play" and we would rather you remove that word and I happily did.

**HelloThar** · 10-01-25 01:13

Originally Posted by Colnago [View Original Post]

Probably a moderator. I don't think girls can post activities anymore.

They need to just let some gals have fun. Always women putting down other women, LOL.

**Colnago** · 09-30-25 17:47

Originally Posted by BackInSea [View Original Post]

I'm sure a WK probably told her to take the pic down. It was basically a pic with a menu and price breakdown. She had $300/ hr "BB all 3 holes" with rough sex.

Probably a moderator. I don't think girls can post activities anymore.

**Silver Wraith** · 09-30-25 16:43

Check out the large bold words in her ad: "So Totally Willing" seems pretty clear LOL.

Originally Posted by Wanker23 [View Original Post]

Oh right! I saw her ads and profile. It was pretty blatant. Seems to have been edited as there is no longer anything real obvious. Side note: One of the photos really makes her look old and haggard. Other photos look reasonably doable.

**Colnago** · 09-30-25 16:41

[QUOTE=BackInSea;7404364]I'm sure a WK probably told her to take the pic down. It was basically a pic with a menu and price breakdown. She had $300/ hr "BB all 3 holes" with rough sex. [ / QUOTEy].

More likely a moderator. I don't think you post menus anymore.

**BackInSea** · 09-30-25 15:50

Originally Posted by Wanker23 [View Original Post]

What / who was the link to? Seems to have been deleted.

Originally Posted by ScotchYoke [View Original Post]

Whitebudbabe.

https://www.tnaboard.com/community/m...udbabe.665886/#xfmgMedia.

I'm sure a WK probably told her to take the pic down. It was basically a pic with a menu and price breakdown. She had $300/ hr "BB all 3 holes" with rough sex.

**PoonHound1969** · 09-30-25 15:45

Originally Posted by Wanker23 [View Original Post]

Oh right! I saw her ads and profile. It was pretty blatant. Seems to have been edited as there is no longer anything real obvious. Side note: One of the photos really makes her look old and haggard. Other photos look reasonably doable.

Isn't she just an old STG chick?

**Wanker23** · 09-30-25 15:25

Originally Posted by ScotchYoke [View Original Post]

Whitebudbabe.

https://www.tnaboard.com/community/m...udbabe.665886/#xfmgMedia.

Oh right! I saw her ads and profile. It was pretty blatant. Seems to have been edited as there is no longer anything real obvious. Side note: One of the photos really makes her look old and haggard. Other photos look reasonably doable.