Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 211 to 225 of 13425
-
09-12-25 17:07 #13215Senior Member

Posts: 225Put it this way
There's a pretty hot 21 year old with one review from way back that was "meh" at best, I don't think I'd roll the dice personally, but don't let me stop you if she's your jam. That's usually my tell for providers who look like they'd be my type and are on the younger side. If there's crickets as to their performance, that's my tell its not worth it.
Originally Posted by FlTourYear
[View Original Post]
-
09-12-25 15:57 #13214Regular Member

Posts: 16A bland experience. I reviewed her
She's real. Safe Incall. But the experience was boring. She has no personality. Doesn't get into it. Wasted my time. Hopefully you don't waste yours.
Originally Posted by FlTourYear
[View Original Post]
-
09-12-25 09:49 #13213Senior Member

Posts: 167Anyone seen Xaria?
Did a forum search, only saw a post 2. 5 yrs ago but dead link, no pic. Not sure if same provider. If so, less than ideal review.
There's a review in LC that passes the check.
Anyone seen lately?
https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ampa/193091913
https://tryst.link/escort/xariabooks
-
09-12-25 09:31 #13212Senior Member

Posts: 110London
Seen this one post alot lately. Has anyone sampled recently? Rates seem very reasonable and pretty open menu. Reviews are a bit old and mixed so wondering if someone seen her lately.
https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view...986/7275988968
-
09-11-25 18:34 #13211Senior Member

Posts: 155Fantasia
It's been a few months so I decided to reach out to Fantasia, and I'm glad I did. Comms were smooth, and service was top notch. She's hosting in St. Pete currently, in a nice clean place. Hopefully whatever she was dealing with is behind her. For now at least. Looking forward to our next meet.
-
09-11-25 16:42 #13210Senior Member

Posts: 178Different experiences
Work out deals on multi hour visits. Not paying 1 k an hour. For a longer 2/3 hour visit maybe. I've seen some for 4/5 hr.
They're not the chics we talk about on here that's for sure. Other forums for that. Those girls also require more screening. Just so you know.
-
09-11-25 16:30 #13209Senior Member

Posts: 436Some def do. That's way out of my league.
Originally Posted by Pirate6969
[View Original Post]
-
09-11-25 07:59 #13208Senior Member

Posts: 143Tryst question
I occasionally scroll through Tryst and just wonder if anyone actually pays the $600-$1000 most of these ladies are asking? Really, for just an HOUR of fun? Seems pretty outrageous to me. Can't imagine they get many calls. Opinions?
-
09-10-25 16:37 #13207Senior Member

Posts: 310Who are you talking about?
Originally Posted by MarkDean
[View Original Post]
-
09-10-25 14:16 #13206Asshole

Posts: 554Look back at it
Second week in a row. This time she got her boyfriend thrown in jail. She pissed him off and then the police showed up. She is just trouble. Stay away and out of jail.
-
09-08-25 18:07 #13205Senior Member

Posts: 436Should be in the General thread IMHO.
Originally Posted by OldmanWhore727
[View Original Post]
-
09-08-25 16:20 #13204Senior Member

Posts: 658Kristy Kompanion
Any sightings lately of Kristy. She was at The Shoppes, went Indy with an ad on Tryst but now her ad is gone.
-
09-08-25 15:00 #13203Senior Member

Posts: 178Tech issues
There's got to be a different thread for all these tech issues?? I keep tapping into this escort thread looking to see if there's anything new out there and all I see is tech issues. Isn't this what they talk about in general reports.
-
09-08-25 13:16 #13202Senior Member

Posts: 1590Https vs http
It seems for some (myself included) I have to be on any variety of firefox to work. Remove the S from HTTPS and hit enter.
Originally Posted by Zmac1
[View Original Post]
I can't force the other broswers to stop using the S, but at least I can get in now.
-
09-08-25 11:51 #13201Senior Member

Posts: 566Bad gateway
Had a buddy help me get around this. I had to switch to fire Fox and remove the S from https.
Originally Posted by RickJohn
[View Original Post]
Basically it sounds like http lacks some serious security but this website doesn't really operate by 2025 security measures. Here an explanation from the robots.
1. Chrome is pushing HTTPS much harder.
Chrome has been steadily deprecating plain HTTP for years.
When you try to load an http: site, Chrome may attempt an "HTTPS upgrade" in the background (using things like HTTPS-First Mode, HSTS preload lists, or automatic HTTPS rewriting).
If the server doesn't support HTTPS properly, this can result in 502 Bad Gateway or similar errors in Chrome.
2. Firefox is more tolerant by default.
Firefox still allows http: connections in a straightforward way unless you manually enable HTTPS-Only Mode.
That's why it loads sites over HTTP without forcing the upgrade, so you don't get the same error.
3. Why a 502 Bad Gateway specifically?
A 502 usually means the browser's request went through a proxy / gateway (like Cloudflare, Nginx, or even Chrome's own upgrade handler) and failed.
In this case:
Chrome tries HTTPS → the site doesn't respond correctly → the gateway fails → Chrome shows 502.
Firefox just sticks with plain HTTP → the site loads (though insecure).
4. Things that can cause this in Chrome.
HTTPS-First Mode enabled in Chrome flags (sometimes auto-enabled in new builds).
HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) rules cached for that domain.
Extensions that try to force HTTPS.
The site itself misconfigured (proxy / load balancer only answers cleanly on HTTP, not HTTPS).
✅ Fix / Workarounds:
1. In Chrome, check:
Settings → Privacy and Security → Security → toggle Always use secure connections.
2. Try clearing HSTS entries for that domain:
Go to chrome: net-internals /#hsts, search the domain, and delete it.
3. Test with an incognito window or fresh Chrome profile (rules may be cached).
4. If you control the site → add a valid TLS / SSL certificate so it works with HTTPS (the long-term solution).














Reply With Quote










